Characterizing Value Co-Creation With AI-Enabled Non-Human Agents From The Perspective of Well-Being

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover der Ausgabe: SMR - Journal of Service Management Research Jahrgang 8 (2024), Heft 3-4
Kein Zugriff

SMR - Journal of Service Management Research

Jahrgang 8 (2024), Heft 3-4

Autor:innen:
, , , , , , ,
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Erscheinungsjahr
2024
ISSN-Online
2942-3392
ISSN-Print
2511-8676

Kapitelinformationen

Kein Zugriff

Jahrgang 8 (2024), Heft 3-4

Characterizing Value Co-Creation With AI-Enabled Non-Human Agents From The Perspective of Well-Being

Im Shop erwerben
Autor:innen:
, , ,
ISSN-Print
2511-8676
ISSN-Online
2942-3392
Kapitelvorschau:

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Akaka, M., & Chandler, J. D. (2011). Roles as resources: A social perspective of change in value networks. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 243–260. Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Akaka, M. A., & Vargo, S. L. (2014). Technology as an operant resource in service (eco)systems. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 12(3), 367–384. Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Almirall, E., Lee, M., & Wareham, J. (2012). Mapping Living Labs in the Landscape of Innovation Methodologies. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2, 12–18. Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Ågerfalk, P. (2020). Artificial intelligence as digital agency. European Journal of Information Systems, 29 (1), 1–8. Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Bansal, G., Nushi, B., Kamar, E., Weld, D. S., Lasecki, W. S., & Horvitz, E. (2020). Updates in human-AI teams: Understanding and addressing the performance/compatibility tradeoff. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 33(01). Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Barile, S., Bassano, C., Piciocchi, P., Saviano, M., & Spohrer, J. (2021). Empowering value co-creation in the digital age. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing. Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Beck, R., Dibbern, J., & Wiener, M. (2022). A Multi-Perspective Framework for Research on (Sustainable) Autonomous Systems. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 64, 265–273. Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Benbya, H., Pachidi, S., & Jarvenpaa, S. (2021). Special Issue Editorial: Artificial Intelligence in Organizations: Implications for Information Systems Research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22(2). Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Berente, N., Gu, B., Recker, J., & Santhanam, R. (2021). Managing artificial intelligence. MIS Quarterly, 45(3), 1433–1450. Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Beutel, T., Jonas, J., & Möslein, K. (2017). Co-Creation and User Involvement in a Living Lab: An Evaluation of Applied Methods. International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik. Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Beverungen, D., Müller, O., Matzner, M., Mendling, J., & vom Brocke, J. (2019). Conceptualizing smart service systems. Electronic Markets, 29(1), 7–18. Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Bittner, E., Oeste-Reiss, S., & Leimeister, J. M. (2019). Where is the Bot in our Team? Toward a Taxonomy of Design Option Combinations for Conversational Agents in Collaborative Work. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Bock, D., Wolter, J., & Ferrell, O. (2020). Artificial intelligence: Disrupting what we know about services. Journal of Services Marketing, 34(3), 317–334. Google Scholar öffnen
  14. Böhmann, T., Leimeister, J. M., & Möslein, K. (2014). Service Systems Engineering. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 6(2), 73–79. Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Brown, J., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information, Brighton, Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods, Oxford, Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  17. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). The Business of Artificial Intelligence. Harvard Business Review, 7, 3–11. Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. (2023). Generative AI at Work. NBER Working Paper 31161. Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Čaić, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Mahr, D. (2018). Service robots: value co-creation and co-destruction in elderly care networks. Journal of Service Management, 29(2), 178–205. Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555–568. Google Scholar öffnen
  21. Castillo, D., Canhoto, A. I., & Said, E. (2021). The dark side of AI-powered service interactions: exploring the process of co-destruction from the customer perspective. The Service Industries Journal, 41(13-14), 900–925. Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation (CDEI). (2024). Public attitudes to data and AI: Tracker survey (Wave 3). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-attitudes-to-data-and-ai-tracker-survey-wave-3/public-attitudes-to-data-and-ai-tracker-survey-wave-3 (Last accessed: 20th February 2025) Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis, New York, SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Chandra, B., & Rahman, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence and value co-creation: a review, conceptual framework, and directions for future research. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 34(1), 7–32. Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Dell'Acqua, F., McFowland, E., Mollick, E., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., Kellogg, K., Rajendran, S., Krayer, L., Candelon, F., & Lakhani, K. (2023). Navigating the Jagged Technological Frontier: Field Experimental Evidence of the Effects of AI on Knowledge Worker Productivity and Quality. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 24-013. Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Dellermann, D., Ebel, P., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2019). Hybrid Intelligence. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61(6), 637–643. Google Scholar öffnen
  27. European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L_202401689 (Last accessed: 9th February 2025) Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Finsterwalder, J., & Kuppelwieser, V. (2020). Equilibrating resources and challenges during crises: a framework for service ecosystem well-being. Journal of Service Management, 31(6), 1107–1129. Google Scholar öffnen
  29. Flavián, C., Pérez-Rueda, A., Belanche, D., & Casaló, L. V. (2022). Intention to use analytical artificial intelligence (AI) in services – the effect of technology readiness and awareness. Journal of Service Management, 33(2), 293–320. Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Frow, P., McColl-Kennedy, J. R., & Payne, A. (2016). Co-creation practices: Their role in shaping a health care ecosystem. Industrial Marketing Management, 56, 24–39. Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Frow, P., McColl-Kennedy, J., Payne, A., & Govind, R. (2019). Service ecosystem well-being: conceptualization and implications for theory and practice. European Journal of Marketing, 53(12), 2657–2691. Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal, 204(5), 291–295. Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Guggenberger, T., Lämmermann, L., Urbach, N., Walter, A., & Hofmann, P. (2023). Task delegation from AI to humans: A principal-agent perspective. International Conference on Information Systems. Google Scholar öffnen
  34. Gursoy, D., Chi, O. H., Lu, L., & Nunkoo, R. (2019). Consumers' acceptance of artificially intelligent (AI) device use in service delivery. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 157–169. Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Hadfield-Menell, D., & Hadfield, G. K. (2019). Incomplete contracting and AI alignment. AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 417–422. Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Hemmer, P., Schemmer, M., Vössing, M., & Kühl, N. (2021). Human-AI complementarity in hybrid intelligence systems: A structured literature review. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Hofstede, G. (2001), Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations, New York, SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen
  38. Holthöwer, J., & van Doorn, J. (2023). Robots do not judge: service robots can alleviate embarrassment in service encounters. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 51(6), 767–784. Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Huang, M.-H., & Rust, R. T. (2021). Engaged to a Robot? The Role of AI in Service. Journal of Service Research, 24(1), 30–41. Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Jonker, C., van Riemsdijk, B., & Vermeulen, B. (2011). “Shared mental model”, in De Vos, M., Fornara, N., Pitt, J. V. & Vouros G. (Eds.). Coordination, organizations, institutions, and norms in agent systems VI (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 654), Berlin, Springer, 132–151. Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Kaartemo, V., & Helkkula, A. (2018). A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence and Robots in Value Co-creation: Current Status and Future Research Avenues. Journal of Creating Value, 4(2), 211–228. Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Kaartemo, V., & Helkkula, A. (2024). Human–AI resource relations in value cocreation in service ecosystems. Journal of Service Management. Advance online publication. Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Kaltenpoth, S., & Müller, O. (2024). Getting in contract with large language models: An agency theory perspective on large language model alignment. International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik. Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Kijima, K., Toivonen, M., & Ruutu, S. (2016). „Service ecosystems innovation in systemic perspective: Transitions and coevolutions”, in Toivonen, M. (Ed.), Service innovation, Berlin, Springer, 51–67. Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Kim, T., Jiang, L., Duhachek, A., Lee, H., & Garvey, A. (2022). Do You Mind if I Ask You a Personal Question? How AI Service Agents Alter Consumer Self-Disclosure. Journal of Service Research, 25(4), 649–666. Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health & Illness, 16(1), 103–121. Google Scholar öffnen
  47. Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research: Introducing focus groups. BMJ, 311, 299–302. Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Knote, R., Janson, A., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2021). Value Co-Creation in Smart Services: A Functional Affordances Perspective on Smart Personal Assistants. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22(2). Google Scholar öffnen
  49. Kühl, N., Schemmer, M., Goutier, M., & Satzger, G. (2022). Artificial intelligence and machine learning. Electronic Markets, 32(4), 2235–2244. Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing, New York, SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen
  51. Laud, G., Chou, C., & Leo, W. (2023). Service system well-being: scale development and validation. Journal of Service Management, 34(3), 368–402. Google Scholar öffnen
  52. Lawton, M. (1983). The varieties of well-being. Experimental Aging Research, 9(2), 65–72. Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Lehmann, V., Frangioni, M., & Dubé, P. (2015). Living Lab as knowledge system: An actual approach for managing urban service projects?, Journal of Knowledge Management, 19, 1087–1107. Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding Customer Experience Throughout the Customer Journey. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 69–96. Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Leo, W., Laud, G., & Yunhsin Chou, C. (2019). Service system well-being: conceptualising a holistic concept. Journal of Service Management, 30(6), 766–792. Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Locke, K., & Golden-Biddle, K. (1997). Constructing opportunities for contribution: Structuring intertextual coherence and "problematizing" in organizational studies. The Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1023–1062. Google Scholar öffnen
  57. Lu, L., Cai, R., & Gursoy, D. (2019). Developing and validating a service robot integration willingness scale. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 80, 36–51. Google Scholar öffnen
  58. Lu, V., Wirtz, J., Kunz, W., Paluch, S., Gruber, T., Martins, A., & Patterson, P. (2020), Service robots, customers and service employees: what can we learn from the academic literature and where are the gaps?, Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 30(3), 361–391. Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Luger, E., & Sellen, A. (2016). "Like having a really bad PA": The gulf between user expectation and experience of conversational agents. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Maglio, P. P., Vargo, S. L., Caswell, N., & Spohrer, J. (2009). The service system is the basic abstraction of service science. Information Science and e-Business Management, 7, 395–406. Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Maglio, P. P., & Spohrer, J. (2013). A service science perspective on business model innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(5), 665–670. Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Maglio, P. P. (2017). Editorial Column—New Directions in Service Science: Value Cocreation in the Age of Autonomous Service Systems. Service Science, 9(1), 1–2. Google Scholar öffnen
  63. Mariani, M., Hashemi, N., & Wirtz, J. (2023). Artificial intelligence empowered conversational agents: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 161, 113838. Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Mars, M., Bronstein, J., & Lusch, R. F. (2012). The value of a metaphor: Organizations and ecosystems. Organizational Dynamics, 41(4), 271–280. Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Marx, E., Daudrich, R., Pauli, T., Matzner, M., & Beverungen, D. (2023). Standardization as a catalyst for extending resources and capabilities in service systems engineering: Findings from the omlox case. Journal of Service Management Research, 7(4), 213–231. Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Mayer, H., Yee, L., Chui, M., & Roberts, R. (2025). Superagency in the workplace: Empowering people to unlock AI’s full potential. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/superagency-in-the-workplace-empowering-people-to-unlock-ais-full-potential-at-work (Last accessed: 20th February 2025) Google Scholar öffnen
  67. McColl-Kennedy, J., Breidbach, C., Green, T., Zaki, M., Gain, A., & van Driel, M. (2023). Cultivating resilience for sustainable service ecosystems in turbulent times: Evidence from primary health care. Journal of Services Marketing, 37(9), 1167–1185. Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Medina-Borja, A. (2015). Editorial Column—Smart Things as Service Providers: A Call for Convergence of Disciplines to Build a Research Agenda for the Service Systems of the Future. Service Science, 7(1), ii–v. Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Mele, C., Russo Spena, T., Kaartemo, V., & Marzullo, M. (2021). Smart nudging: How cognitive technologies enable choice architectures for value co-creation. Journal of Business Research, 129, 949–960. Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Meske, C., Abedin, B., Klier, M., & Rabhi, F. (2022). Explainable and responsible artificial intelligence. Electronic Markets, 32(4), 2103–2106. Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Meyer, A. D., Tsui, A. S., & Hinings, C. R. (1993). Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1175–1195. Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Microsoft. (2016, March 25). Learning from Tay’s introduction. Microsoft Blog. https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2016/03/25/learning-tays-introduction/ (Last accessed: 10th February 2025) Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Möhlmann, M., Zalmanson, L., Henfridsson, O., & Gregory, R. (2021). Algorithmic Management of Work on Online Labor Platforms: When Matching Meets Control. MIS Quarterly, 45(4), 1999–2022. Google Scholar öffnen
  74. Murray, A., Rhymer, J. & Sirmon, D. (2021). Humans and Technology: Forms of Conjoined Agency in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 46(3), 552–571. Google Scholar öffnen
  75. Nenonen, S., & Storbacka, K. (2018). Actors, actor engagement and value creation. Journal of Creating Value, 4(2), 196–198. Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Normann R. (2001). Reframing business: When the map changes the landscape. Chichester, Wiley. Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Orlikowski, W. J. (1996). Improvising organizational transformation over time: The case of a large-scale information technology implementation. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 63–92. Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Orsingher, C., McColl-Kennedy, J., Zaki, M., Green, T., Varnfield, M., Li, J., Butten, K., Titman, J., & Hansen, D. (2024). Mobile applications (apps) as service provider actors. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 48(2), e13016. Google Scholar öffnen
  79. Ostrom, A., Field, J., Fotheringham, D., Subramony, M., Gustafsson, A., Lemon, K., Huang, M.-H., & McColl-Kennedy, J. (2021). Service Research Priorities: Managing and Delivering Service in Turbulent Times. Journal of Service Research, 24(3), 329–353. Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Pakkala, D., & Spohrer, J. (2019). Digital Service: Technological Agency in Service Systems. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Google Scholar öffnen
  81. Palinkas, L., Horwitz, S., Green, C., Wisdom, J., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Paluch, S., & Wirtz, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence and robots in the service encounter. Journal of Service Management Research, 4(1), 3–8. Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Pitardi, V., Wirtz, J., Paluch, S., & Kunz, W. (2022). Service robots, agency and embarrassing service encounters. Journal of Service Management, 33(2), 389–414. Google Scholar öffnen
  84. Polese, F., Carrubbo, L., Caputo, F., & Sarno, D. (2018). Managing healthcare service ecosystems: Abstracting a sustainability-based view from hospitalization at home (HaH) practices. Sustainability, 10(11), 1–15. Google Scholar öffnen
  85. Roth, A., Benz, C., Wilga, M., Hottum, P., Langes, B., Lewandowski, T., Nägele, R., Peters, C., & Satzger, G. (2024). Value creation in the information economy: The triad of AI, service, and human work. Journal of Service Management Research, 8(1), 2–12. Google Scholar öffnen
  86. Rubin, H., & Rubin, I. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data, New York, SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen
  87. Rzepka, C., & Berger, B. (2018). User interaction with AI-enabled systems: A systematic review of IS research. International Conference on Information Systems. Google Scholar öffnen
  88. Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. New York, SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen
  89. Schmidt, R., Alt, R., & Zimmermann, A. (2023). Assistant platforms. Electronic Markets, 33(59). Google Scholar öffnen
  90. Seeber, I., Waizenegger, L., Seidel, S., Morana, S., Benbasat, I., & Lowry, P. (2020). Collaborating with technology-based autonomous agents: Issues and research opportunities. Internet Research, 30(1), 1–18. Google Scholar öffnen
  91. Siemon, D. (2022). Elaborating team roles for artificial intelligence-based teammates in human-AI collaboration. Group Decision and Negotiation, 31, 871–912. Google Scholar öffnen
  92. Spohrer, J., & Maglio, P.P. (2010). “Toward a science of service systems”, in Maglio, P.P., Spohrer, J., & Kieliszewski, C. (Eds.). Handbook of service science, Boston, Springer, 157–194. Google Scholar öffnen
  93. Streim, A., & Hecker, J. (2023, 31st May). Ein Fünftel der Deutschen hat ChatGPT schon einmal ausprobiert [Press release]. Bitkom. https://www.bitkom.org/Presse/Presseinformation/Ein-Fuenftel-der-Deutschen-hat-ChatGPT-schon-einmal-ausprobiert (Last accessed: 6th February 2025) Google Scholar öffnen
  94. Tronvoll, B. (2017). The actor: The key determinator in service ecosystems. Systems, 5(2), 38. Google Scholar öffnen
  95. Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. A. (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal, 26(3), 145–152. Google Scholar öffnen
  96. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10. Google Scholar öffnen
  97. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2017). Service-dominant logic 2025. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(1), 46–67. Google Scholar öffnen
  98. Vargo, S. L. (2018). Situating humans, technology, and materiality in value cocreation. Journal of Creating Value, 4(2), 202–204. Google Scholar öffnen
  99. Wilga, M., Hajjam, L., Lugmair, N., Schymanietz, M., & Roth, A. (2024). Characterizing the Roles of AI-Enabled Non-Human Agents in Service Systems. International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik. Google Scholar öffnen
  100. Wirtz, J., Patterson, P., Kunz, W., Gruber, T., Lu, V., Paluch, S., & Martins, A. (2018). Brave new world: Service robots in the frontline. Journal of Service Management, 29(5), 907–931. Google Scholar öffnen
  101. Yin, R. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications. Design and Methods, New York, SAGE.break-after Google Scholar öffnen

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex
Kein Zugriff
Sie haben keinen Zugriff auf diesen Inhalt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien