Voting for the Populist Radical-Right in Austria and Germany: A Comparative Analysis

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover des Buchs: Informationsflüsse, Wahlen und Demokratie
Open Access Vollzugriff

Informationsflüsse, Wahlen und Demokratie

Festschrift für Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck

Autor:innen:
Reihe
Studien zur Wahl- und Einstellungsforschung
Band
35
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2023
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0800-1
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-1555-3

Kapitelinformationen

Open Access Vollzugriff

Voting for the Populist Radical-Right in Austria and Germany: A Comparative Analysis

Autor:innen:
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0800-1
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-1555-3
Kapitelvorschau:

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Aichholzer, J., Kritzinger, S., Wagner, M., Berk, N., Boomgaarden, H., & Müller, W. C. (2019). AUTNES Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Post-Election Survey 2017 (SUF Edition). AUSSDA Dataverse. https://doi.org/doi/10.11587/W193UZ. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  2. Akkerman, A., Mudde, C., & Zaslove, A. (2014). How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters. Comparative Political Studies, 47(9), 1324–1353. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  3. Art, D. (2007). Reacting to the Radical Right: Lessons from Germany and Austria. Party Politics, 13(3), 331–349. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  4. Art, D. (2018). The AfD and the end of containment in Germany? German Politics and Society, 36(2), 76–86. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  5. Arzheimer, K. (2009). Contextual Factors and the Extreme Right Vote in Western Europe, 1980 – 2002. American Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 259–275. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  6. Arzheimer, K. (2015). The AfD: Finally a successful right-wing populist Eurosceptic party for Germany? West European Politics, 38(3), 535-556. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  7. Arzheimer, K., & Berning, C. C. (2019). How the Alternative for Germany (AfD) and their voters veered to the radical right, 2013–2017. Electoral Studies, 60(4), 102040. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  8. Arzheimer, K., & Carter, E. (2009). Christian Religiosity and Voting for West European Radical Right Parties. West European Politics, 32(5), 985–1011. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  9. Arzheimer, K. (2019). Don’t Mention the War: How Populist Right-Wing Radicalism Became (Almost) Normal in Germany. Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(Annual Review), 90-102. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  10. Bale, T. (2003). Cinderella and her ugly sisters: the mainstream and extreme right in Europe’s bipolarising party systems. West European Politics, 26(3), 67–90. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  11. Bernhard, T. (1988). Heldenplatz. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  12. Bischof, D., & Wagner, M. (2019). Do voters polarize when radical parties enter parliament?. American Journal of Political Science, 63(4), 888-904. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  13. Bodlos, A., & Plescia, C. (2018). The 2017 Austrian snap election: a shift rightward. West European Politics, 41(6), 1354–1363. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  14. Boomgaarden, H. G., & Vliegenthart, R. (2007). Explaining the rise of anti-immigrant parties: The role of news media content. Electoral Studies, 26(2), 404–417. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  15. Burscher, B., van Spanje, J., & de Vreese, C. H. (2015). Owning the issues of crime and immigration: The relation between immigration and crime news and anti-immigrant voting in 11 countries. Electoral Studies, 38(2), 59–69. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  16. Castanho Silva, B., Jungkunz, S., Helbling, M., & Littvay, L. (2020). An empirical comparison of seven populist attitudes scales. Political Research Quarterly, 73(2), 409–424. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  17. Chua, J., Valentim, V., Dinas, E., & Ziblatt, D. (2023). How Mainstream Politicians Erode Norms: Evidence from two survey experiments. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/mjbnf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  18. CSES. (2019). The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems: Module 5 [dataset and documentation], May 21, 2019 version. https://doi.org/doi:10.7804/cses.module5.2019-05-21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  19. Damstra, A., & Vliegenthart, R. (2018). (Un) covering the economic crisis? Over-time and inter-media differences in salience and framing. Journalism Studies, 19(7), 983–1003. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  20. Dinas, E., Martínez, S., & Valentim, V. (2023). Social Norm Change, Political Symbols, and Expression of Stigmatized Preferences. Journal of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1086/726951. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  21. Döring, H., Huber, C., & Manow, P. (2022). ParlGov 2022 Release. Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/doi:10.7910/DVN/UKILBE. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  22. Down, I., & Han, K. J. (2020). Marginalisation or legitimation? Mainstream party positioning on immigration and support for radical right parties. West European Politics, 43(7), 1388-1414. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  23. Ennser, L. (2012). The homogeneity of West European party families: The radical right in comparative perspective. Party Politics, 18(2), 151–171. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  24. Faas, T., & Klingelhöfer, T. (2019). The more things change, the more they stay the same? The German federal election of 2017 and its consequences. West European Politics, 42(4), 914–926. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  25. Falter, J. W. (1991). Hitlers Wähler. München: Beck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  26. Geurkink, B., Zaslove, A., Sluiter, R., & Jacobs, K. (2019). Populist Attitudes, Political Trust, and External Political Efficacy: Old Wine in New Bottles? Political Studies, 68(1), 247–267. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  27. Hameleers, M., & de Vreese, C. H. (2020). To whom are “the people” opposed? Conceptualizing and measuring citizens’ populist attitudes as a multidimensional construct. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 30(2), 255–274. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  28. Han, K. J. (2015). The impact of radical right-wing parties on the positions of mainstream parties regarding multiculturalism. West European Politics, 38(3), 557–576. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  29. Hanmer, M. J., & Kalkan, O. K. (2013). Behind the Curve: Clarifying the Best Approach to Calculating Predicted Probabilities and Marginal Effects from Limited Dependent Variable Models. American Journal of Political Science, 57(1), 263–277. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  30. Heinisch, R. K., & Werner, A. (2021). Austria: Tracing the Austrian Christian Democrats’ Adaptation to the Silent Counter-Revolution. In T. Bale & C. R. Kaltwasser (Eds.). Riding the Populist Wave: Europe’s Mainstream Right in Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 91-112. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  31. Hjorth, F., & Larsen, M. V. (2022). When does accommodation work? Electoral effects of mainstream left position taking on immigration. British Journal of Political Science, 52(2), 949-957. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  32. Hobolt, S. B., Anduiza, E., Carkoglu, A., Lutz, G., & Sauger, N. (2016). Democracy Divided? People, Politicians and the Politics of Populism (CSES Planning Committee Module 5 Final Report). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  33. Ivarsflaten, E. (2008). What unites right-wing populists in Western Europe? Re-examining grievance mobilization models in seven successful cases. Comparative Political Studies, 41(1), 3–23. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  34. Jenny, M. (2018). Austria: Political development and data for 2017. European Journal of Political Research Political Data Yearbook, 57(1), 23–30. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  35. Jungkunz, S., Fahey, R. A., & Hino, A. (2021). How populist attitudes scales fail to capture support for populists in power. Plos One, 16(12), e0261658. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  36. Krause, W., Cohen, D., & Abou-Chadi, T. (2023). Does accommodation work? Mainstream party strategies and the success of radical right parties. Political Science Research and Methods, 11(1), 172-179. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  37. Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2006). Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared. European Journal of Political Research, 45(6), 921–956. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  38. Krzyżanowski, M. (2013). From anti-immigration and nationalist revisionism to Islamophobia: Continuities and shifts in recent discourses and patterns of political communication of the Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ). In Wodak, R., KhosraviNik, M., & Mral, B. (Eds.). Right-wing populism in Europe: Politics and discourse. London: Bloomsbury, 135-148. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  39. Lehmann, P., Franzmann, S., Burst, T., Regel, S., Riethmüller, F., Volkens, A., Weßels, B., Zehnter, L. (2023). The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  40. Lewandowsky, M., & Wagner, A. (2022). Fighting for a lost cause? Availability of populist radical right voters for established parties. The case of Germany. Representation, 1-28. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  41. Luther, K. R. (2007). Wahlstrategien und Wahlergebnisse des österreichischen Rechtspopulismus, 1986–2006. In F. A. Plasser & P. Ulram (Eds.). Wechselwahlen. Analysen zur Nationalratswahl 2006. Wien: Facultas, 231–254. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  42. Marcinkiewicz, K., & Dassonneville, R. (2022). Do religious voters support populist radical right parties? Opposite effects in Western and East-Central Europe. Party Politics, 28(3), 444–456. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  43. Meguid, B. M. (2005). Competition Between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success. American Political Science Review, 99, 347–359. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  44. Meguid, B. M. (2008). Party competition between unequals: Strategies and electoral fortunes in Western Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  45. Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  46. Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  47. Müller, W. C. (2000). The Austrian election of October 1999: A shift to the right. West European Politics, 23(3), 191–200. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  48. OENB. (2017). Wirtschaftswachstum beschleunigt sich 2017 – Arbeitslosigkeit sinkt. Retrieved from https://www.oenb.at/Presse/Pressearchiv/2017/20170609.html. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  49. Oesch, D. (2013). The class basis of the cleavage between the New Left and the Radical Right: An analysis for Austria, Denmark, Norway and Switzerland. In J. Rydgren (Ed.). Class Politics and the Radical Right. London: Routledge, 31-51. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  50. Poguntke, T., & Kinski, L. (2018). Germany: Political development and data for 2017. European Journal of Political Research Political Data Yearbook, 57(1), 108–120. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  51. Rooduijn, M. (2018). What unites the voter bases of populist parties? Comparing the electorates of 15 populist parties. European Political Science Review, 10(3), 351–368. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  52. Rooduijn, M., van Kessel, S., Froio, C., Pirro, A., De Lange, S., Halikiopoulou, D., … Taggart, P. (2019). The PopuList: An overview of populist, far right, far left and Eurosceptic parties in Europe. Retrieved from www.popu-list.org. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  53. Roßteutscher, S., Schmitt-Beck, R., Schoen, H., Weßels, B., Wolf, C. (2019). Post-election Cross-section (GLES 2017). GESIS Datenarchiv, Köln. ZA6801 Datenfile Version 4.0.1. https://doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.13235. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  54. Schmitt-Beck, R. (2014). Euro-Kritik, Wirtschaftspessimismus und Einwanderungsskepsis: Hintergründe des Beinah-Wahlerfolges der Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) bei der Bundestagswahl 2013. Zeitschrift Für Parlamentsfragen, 45, 94–112. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  55. Schmitt-Beck, R. (2017). The ‘Alternative für Deutschland in the electorate’: between single-issue and right-wing populist party. German Politics, 26(1), 124–148. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  56. Schmitt-Beck, R., van Deth, J. W., & Staudt, A. (2017). Die AfD nach der rechtspopulistischen Wende. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 27(3), 273–303. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  57. Sipma, T., & Berning, C. C. (2021). Economic conditions and populist radical right voting: The role of issue salience. Electoral Studies, 74, 102416. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  58. Sipma, T., & Lubbers, M. (2020). Contextual-level unemployment and support for radical-right parties: A meta-analysis. Acta Politica, 55, 351–387.Spoon, J. J., & Klüver, H. (2020). Responding to far right challengers: does accommodation pay off? Journal of European Public Policy, 27(2), 273-291. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  59. Statistisches Bundesamt. (2018). German economy continued to grow strongly in 2017. https://www.destatis.de/EN/Press/2018/01/PE18_011_811.html. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  60. Steenvoorden, E., & Harteveld, E. (2018). The appeal of nostalgia: The influence of societal pessimism on support for populist radical right parties. West European Politics, 41(1), 28–52. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  61. Taggart, P. (2004). Populism and representative politics in contemporary Europe. Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(3), 269–288. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  62. ’t Hart, P., & Tindall, K. (2009). From “market correction” to “global catastrophe”: Framing the economic downturn. In P. ’t Hart, K. Tindall, & R. A. W. Rhodes (Eds.). Framing the global economic downturn: Crisis rhetoric and the politics of recessions. Canberra: ANU E Press, 3-19. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  63. Valentim, V. (2021). Parliamentary representation and the normalization of radical right support. Comparative Political Studies, 54(14), 2475-2511. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  64. van der Brug, W., Fennema, M., & Tillie, J. (2000). Anti‐immigrant parties in Europe: Ideological or protest vote? European Journal of Political Research, 37(1), 77–102. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  65. van Spanje, J. (2010). Contagious parties: Anti-immigration parties and their impact on other parties’ immigration stances in contemporary Western Europe. Party Politics, 16(5), 563–586. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  66. van Spanje, J., & de Graaf, N. D. (2018). How established parties reduce other parties’ electoral support: the strategy of parroting the pariah. West European Politics, 41(1), 1–27. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  67. Wagner, S., Wurthmann, L. C., & Thomeczek, J. P. (2023). Bridging left and right? How Sahra Wagenknecht could change the German party landscape. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 1–16. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  68. Williams, C. J., & Hunger, S. (2022). How challenger party issue entrepreneurship and mainstream party strategies drive public issue salience: evidence from radical-right parties and the issue of immigration. European Political Science Review, 14(4), 544-565. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  69. Wodak, R., & Pelinka, A. (2002). The Haider Phenomenon in Austria. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  70. Wuttke, A., Schimpf, C., & Schoen, H. (2020). When the Whole is Greater Than the Sum of its Parts: On the Conceptualization and Measurement of Populist Attitudes and Other Multi-dimensional Constructs. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 356–374. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  71. References Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  72. Acock, A. C. 2013. Discovering Structural Equation Modeling Using Stata. Revised edition, College Station: Stata Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  73. Adorno, T. W., E. Frenkel-Brunswik, D. Levinson, R. Nevitt Sanford, and Betty Aron. 1950. The Authoritarian personality: Studies in prejudice. New York: Harper. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  74. Akkerman, A., A. Zaslove, and B. Spruyt. 2017. “‘We the People’or ‘We the Peoples’? A Comparison of Support for the Populist Radical Right and Populist Radical Left in the Netherlands.” Swiss Political Science Review 23: 377-403. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12275. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  75. Akkerman, A., C. Mudde, and A. Zaslove. 2014. “How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters.” Comparative Political Studies 47: 1324-1353. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  76. American Jewish Congress. 2022. Antisemitismus in Deutschland: Eine Representativebefragung. Berlin: American Jewish Congress Berlin Ramer Institute. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  77. Arzheimer, K., and C. C. Berning. 2019. “How the Alternative for Germany (AfD) and their voters veered to the radical right, 2013-2017.” Electoral Studies 60: 102040. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2019.04.004. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  78. Becker, S.O., and L. Pascali. 2019. “Religion, division of labor, and conflict: Anti-semitism in germany over 600 years.” American Economic Review 109: 1764-1804. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  79. Bergmann, W. 1988. “Public beliefs about Anti‐Jewish attitudes in West Germany: A case of ‘pluralistic ignorance’.” Patterns of prejudice 22: 15-21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  80. Canovan, Margaret. 1999. “Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy.“ Political studies 47: 2-16. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  81. Caramani, D., and L. Manucci. 2019. “National past and populism: the re-elaboration of fascism and its impact on right-wing populism in Western Europe.“ West European Politics 42: 1159-1187. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2019.1596690. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  82. Citrin, Jack, and Matthew Wright. 2009. “Defining the circle of we: American identity and immigration policy.” The forum 7. doi: https://doi.org/10.2202/1540-8884.1319. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  83. Cohen, J. E. 2018. “Left, right, and antisemitism in European public opinion.“ Politics and Religion Journal 12: 341-371. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  84. Dalton, R. 2018. Political Realignment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  85. Decker, Oliver, E. Brähler, and D. Baier. 2018. Flucht ins Autoritäre: Rechtsextreme Dynamiken in der Mitte der Gesellschaft. Die Leipziger Autoritarismus-Studie 2018. Giessen: Psychosozial-Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  86. Decker, O., Johannes K., and Elma B. 2022. “Anti-semitic Attitudes in Germany: Their Prevalence and Causes“. In: The Dynamics of Right-Wing Extremism Within German Society, edited by Oliver Decker, Johannes Kiess and Elma Brähler, 127-154. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  87. Downes, J. F., and M. Loveless. 2018. “Centre right and radical right party competition in Europe: Strategic emphasis on immigration, anti-incumbency, and economic crisis.“ Electoral studies 54: 148-158. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2018.05.008. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  88. Evans, G., and J. Mellon. 2019. “Immigration, Euroscepticism, and the rise and fall of UKIP.“ Party Politics 25: 76-87. doi: 10.1177/1354068818816969. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  89. Federico, C. M., and A. Malka. 2018. “The Contingent, Contextual Nature of the Relationship Between Needs for Security and Certainty and Political Preferences: Evidence and Implications.“ Political Psychology 39: 3-48. doi: 10.1111/pops.12477. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  90. Georgiadou, V., L. Rori, and C. Roumanias. 2018. “Mapping the European far right in the 21st century: A meso-level analysis.“ Electoral Studies 54: 103-115. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2018.05.004. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  91. Heiss, R., and J. Matthes. 2019. “Stuck in a Nativist Spiral: Content, Selection, and Effects of Right-Wing Populists? Communication on Facebook.“ Political Communication. 37: 303-328. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2019.1661890. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  92. Hetherington, M.J., and J.D. Weiler. 2009. Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  93. Hetherington, M. J., and J. Weiler. 2018. Prius or Pickup? How the Answers to Four Simple Questions Explain America's Great Divide. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  94. Hobolt, S. B., and C. E. de Vries. 2016. “Public Support for European Integration.“ Annual Review of Political Science 19: 413-432. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  95. Ivarsflaten, E. 2008. “What Unites Right-Wing Populists in Western Europe?“ Comparative Political Studies 41: 3-23. doi: 10.1177/0010414006294168. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  96. Kline, R. B. 2016. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Methodology in the social sciences, 4th ed., New York: The Guilford Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  97. Kriesi, H. 2014. “The populist challenge.“ West European Politics 37: 361-378. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2014.887879. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  98. Kurthen, H., W. Bergmann, and R. Erb. 1997. Antisemitism and xenophobia in Germany after unification. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  99. Lavine, H., C. D. Johnston and M. R. Steenbergen. 2012. The ambivalent partisan: How critical loyalty promotes democracy. New York, NY, Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  100. Lindstam, E., M. Mader, and H. Schoen. 2019. “Conceptions of National Identity and Ambivalence towards Immigration.“ British Journal of Political Science: 1-22. doi: 10.1017/S0007123418000522. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  101. Lubbers, M., and M. Coenders. 2017. “Nationalistic attitudes and voting for the radical right in Europe.“ European Union Politics 18: 98-118. doi: 10.1177/1465116516678932. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  102. Malka, A., Y. Lelkes, Y., Bakker, B., and E. Spivack. 2022. “Who Is Open to Authoritarian Governance within Western Democracies? Perspectives on Politics.“, 20: 808-827. doi:10.1017/S1537592720002091. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  103. Mayer, N. 2018. “The Radical Right in France.“ In: The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right, edited by Jens Rydgren, 433-451. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  104. Mudde, C. 2004. “The populist Zeitgeist.“ Government and Opposition 39: 541-563. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  105. Mudde, C. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  106. Müller, J.-W. 2016. What is populism? Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  107. Mutz, D. C. 2018a. “Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote.“ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115: E4330-E4339. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1718155115. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  108. Mutz, D. 2018b. “Response to Morgan: On the role of status threat and material interests in the 2016 election.“ Socius 4: 2378023118808619. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  109. Norris, P., and R. Inglehart. 2019. Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and the rise of authoritarian populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  110. Pardos-Prado, S. 2015. “How Can Mainstream Parties Prevent Niche Party Success? Center-Right Parties and the Immigration Issue.“ The Journal of Politics 77: 352-367. doi: 10.1086/680040. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  111. Pehrson, S., R. Brown, and H. Zagefka. 2009. “When does national identification lead to the rejection of immigrants? Cross‐sectional and longitudinal evidence for the role of essentialist in‐group definitions.” British journal of social psychology 48: 61-76. doi: 10.1348/014466608X288827. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  112. Rooduijn, M. 2018. “What unites the voter bases of populist parties? Comparing the electorates of 15 populist parties.“ European Political Science Review 10: 351-368. doi: 10.1017/s1755773917000145. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  113. Schedler, A. 1996. “Anti-Political-Establishment Parties.“ Party Politics 2: 291-312. doi: 10.1177/1354068896002003001. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  114. Schmitt-Beck, R. 2017. “The ‘Alternative fur Deutschland in the Electorate’: Between Single-Issue and Right-Wing Populist Party.“ German Politics 26: 124-148. doi: 10.1080/09644008.2016.1184650. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  115. Semyonov, Moshe, Rebeca Raijman, and Anastasia Gorodzeisky. 2006. “The rise of anti-foreigner sentiment in European societies, 1988-2000.” American Sociological Review 71: 426-449. doi: 10.1177/000312240607100304. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  116. Silbermann, A., and H. A. Sallen. 1976. “Latent anti-semitism in west-germany.“ Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 28: 706-723. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  117. Sniderman, M., and T. L. Piazza. 1993. The scar of race. Cambridge, Massachusets: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  118. Stenner, K., and J. Haidt. 2018. ”Authoritarianism is not a momentary madness, but an eternal dynamic within liberal democracies”. In: Can It Happen Here? Authoritarianism in America, edited by C. R. Sunstein, 175-195. New York: Dey Street Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  119. Talshir, G. 2005. “Knowing right from left: The politics of identity between the radical left and far right.” Journal of Political Ideologies 10: 311-335. doi: 10.1080/13569310500244339. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  120. Urbinati, N. 2019. “Political Theory of Populism.” Annual Review of Political Science, 22: 111-127. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  121. Waxman, D., D. Schraub, and A. Hosein. 2022. “Arguing about antisemitism: why we disagree about antisemitism, and what we can do about it.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 45: 1803-1824. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2021.1960407. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  122. Welzel, C. 2020. “The Cultural Pre-Requisites of Democracy.“ In: The Oxford Handbook of Political Representation in Liberal Democracies, edited by Robert Rohrschneider and Jacques Thomassen, 77-94. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  123. Online Appendix Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  124. https://www.nomos-shop.de/shopfiles/anhang_978-3-7560-0800-1_mat_online_anhang.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-559
  125. Literatur Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-583
  126. Babka von Gostomski, C. 2021. Facetten antisemitischer Einstellungen bei ausgewählten Migrantengruppen in Deutschland. In: S. Schulz, P. Siegers, B. Westle, O. Hochman (Hg.), (In)Toleranz in der Einwanderungsgesellschaft? Einstellungen zu Migranten in Deutschland und Europa (Reihe Blickpunkt Gesellschaft), Wiesbaden: Springer, S. 199-240. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-583
  127. Baumann, H. (ed.), (2021). GESIS-Variable Reports No. 2021|08. German General Social Survey (ALLBUS): Cumulation 1980-2018. Study No. 5276. GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-583
  128. Baumann, H., Schulz, S., Thiesen, S. (2022). GESIS-Variable Reports No. 2022|10. ALLBUS 2021, Studien-Nr. 5280. GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-583
  129. Bergmann, W., Erb, R. (1986). Kommunikationslatenz, Moral und öffentliche Meinung. Theoretische Überlegungen zum Antisemitismus in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 38: 223–246. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-583
  130. Bergmann, W., Erb, R. (1991a). „Mir ist das Thema Juden irgendwie unangenehm.“ Kommunikationslatenz und die Wahrnehmung des Meinungsklimas im Fall des Antisemitismus. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 43: 502–519. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-583
  131. Bergmann, W., Erb, R. (1991b). Latenter Antisemitismus, in: dies., Antisemitismus in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, S. 275-298. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-583
  132. Bergmann, W., Erb, R. (2000). Antisemitismus in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1996, in: Schmidt, P., Wasmer, P., Alba, R. (Hg.), Deutsche und Ausländer: Freunde, Fremde oder Feinde. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, S. 401-438. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-583
  133. Beyer, H., & Krumpal, I. (2010). „Aber es gibt keine Antisemiten mehr“: Eine experimentelle Studie zur Kommunikationslatenz antisemitischer Einstellungen. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 62: 681-705. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-583
  134. BMI (2017). Antisemitismus in Deutschland – aktuelle Entwicklungen. Bericht des unabhängigen Expertenkreis Antisemitismus. https://www.bmi.bund.de/SharedDocs/downloads/DE/publikationen/themen/heimat-integration/expertenkreis-antisemitismus/antisemitismus-in-deutschland-bericht.html . Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-583
  135. Cohen, J. E. (2021). Survey Mode, Social Desirability Effects, and Antisemitic Attitudes: A Survey Experiment. Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism, 4: 27-36. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-583
  136. Decker, O., Kiess, J., Heller, A., Schuler, J., Brähler, E. (2022). Die Leipziger Autoritarismus Studie 2022: Methode, Ergebnisse und Langzeitverlauf, in: Decker, O., J. Kiess, A. Heller, E. Brähler (Hg.), Autoritäre Dynamiken in unsicheren Zeiten. Neue Herausforderungen – alte Reaktionen? Leipziger Autoritarismus Studie 2022. Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag, S. 31-90. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-583
  137. Dondera, C. (2019) Was gesagt werden muss: Günther Grass und der inszenierte Tabubruch, in: S. Salzborn (Hg.) Antisemitismus seit 9/11. Ereignisse, Debatten, Kontroversen. Baden-Baden: Nomos, S. 65-88. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-583
  138. Enstad, J. D. (2021). An Integrated Perspective on Contemporary Antisemitism: Reviewing Cross-National Data on Attitudes, Incidents, and Exposure. https://files.de-1.osf.io/v1/resources/adqkn/providers/osfstorage/6087b70ef16160018d9cc6e6?action=download&direct&version=3 . Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-583
  139. Hirndorf, D. (2023). Antisemitische Einstellungen in Deutschland. Repräsentative Umfrage zur Verbreitung von antisemitischen Einstellungen in der deutschen Bevölkerung. Monitor Wahl und Sozialforschung hrsg. v. Konrad Adenauer Stiftung e.V. Berlin. (https://www.kas.de/documents/252038/22161843/Antisemitische+Einstellungen+in+Deutschland.pdf/cead70cb-a767-65f8-82a1-5f3537c409d1?version=1.0&t=1689837878953). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-583
  140. Institut für Demoskopie Allensbach, (2018). Wie antisemitisch ist Deutschland? Eine Dokumentation des Beitrags von Dr. Thomas Petersen in der Frankfurter Allgemeinen Zeitung Nr. 140 vom 20. Juni 2018 https://www.ifd-allensbach.de/fileadmin/kurzberichte_dokumentationen/FAZ_Juni2018_Antisemitismus.pdf . Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-583
  141. Klein, M., & Ohr, D. (2004). Ändert der Wertewandel seine Richtung? Die Entwicklung gesellschaftlicher Wertorientierungen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland zwischen 1980 und 2000. In: R. Schmitt-Beck, M. Wasmer, A. Koch (Hg.), Sozialer und politischer Wandel in Deutschland: Analysen mit ALLBUS-Daten aus zwei Jahrzehnten (Reihe Blickpunkt Gesellschaft), Wiesbaden: Springer, S. 153-178. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-583
  142. Krumpal, I. (2013). Determinants of Social Desirability Bias in Sensitive Surveys: A Literature Review. Quality & Quantity 47: 2025–47. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-583
  143. Öztürk, C., & Pickel, G. (2022). Der Antisemitismus der Anderen: Für eine differenzierte Betrachtung antisemitischer Einstellungen unter Muslim:innen in Deutschland. Zeitschrift für Religion, Gesellschaft und Politik 6: 189-231. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-583
  144. Poensgen, D., Steinitz, B. (2019). Alltagsprägende Erfahrung, in: S. Salzborn (Hrsg.) Antisemitismus seit 9/11. Ereignisse, Debatten, Kontroversen. Baden-Baden: Nomos, S. 11-28. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-583
  145. Salzborn, S. (2019). Antisemitismus in der „Alternative für Deutschland“, in: S. Salzborn (Hrsg.) Antisemitismus seit 9/11. Ereignisse, Debatten, Kontroversen. Baden-Baden: Nomos, S. 197-216. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-583
  146. Schmitt-Beck, R., M. Wasmer, A. Koch (Hg.) (2004). Sozialer und politischer Wandel in Deutschland: Analysen mit ALLBUS-Daten aus zwei Jahrzehnten (Reihe Blickpunkt Gesellschaft), Wiesbaden: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-583
  147. Voigtländer, N., & Voth, H. J. (2015). Nazi indoctrination and anti-Semitic beliefs in Germany. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112: 7931-7936. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-583
  148. Wittenberg, R. (2000). Antisemitische Einstellungen in Deutschland zwischen 1994 und 1998. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 52: 118. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-583
  149. Zick, A., Jensen, S., Marth, J., Krause, D., & Döring, G. (2017). Verbreitung von Antisemitismus in der deutschen Bevölkerung. Ergebnisse ausgewählter repräsentativer Umfragen. Expertise für den unabhängigen Expertenkreis Antisemitismus. Institut für Konflikt- und Gewaltforschung (IKG) Bielefeld. (zuletzt abgefragt 08.08.2023: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/211847472.pdf) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-583
  150. Ziemer, C. T., Decker, O., & Brähler, E. (2021). Antisemitismus in Sachsen, in: Sachsen zwischen Integration und Desintegration: Politisch-kulturelle Heimaten. Wiesbaden: Springer, S. 185-215. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-583
  151. Literatur- und Quellenverzeichnis Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  152. Bennett, Lance W., Segerberg, Alexandra (2013): The Logic of Connective Action, New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  153. Bieber, Christoph, Borucki, Isabelle, Ruttloff, Daniel, Weissenbach, Kristina, Ziegler, Stine (2022): Digital, divers, dynamisch. Perspektiven der Parteiendemokratie, in: Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte (APuZ), 72:10-11, 35-41. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  154. Butzlaff, Felix, Messinger-Zimmer, Sören (2019): Undermining or defending democracy? The consequences of distrust for democratic attitudes and participation, Critical Policy Studies, 14:3, 249-266, DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2019.1584120. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  155. Cairney, Paul (2011): Understanding public policy, London: MacMillan Education. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  156. Delhees, Stefanie, Korte, Karl-Rudolf, Switek, Niko, Schartau, Florian, Weissenbach, Kristina (2008): Wohlfahrtsstaatliche Reformkommunikation, Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  157. Derrig, Ríán (2020): Was Menschen dazu bringt, auch strenge Regeln zu befolgen. Die Pandemie zeigt Grenzen der Nudging-Theorie auf, WZB-Mitteilungen, H. 168, 66-72. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  158. Druyen, Thomas (Hrsg.) (2018): Die ultimative Herausforderung – über die Veränderungsfähigkeit der Deutschen, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  159. Easton, David (1965): A Systems Analysis of Political Life, New York/London/Sydney: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  160. ECSA (European Citizen Science Association) (2015): Ten Principles of Citizen Science. Berlin. http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XPR2N Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  161. Endreß, Martin, Maurer, Andrea (Hrsg.) (2015): Resilienz im Sozialen, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  162. Florack, Martin, Korte, Karl-Rudolf, Schwanholz, Julia (Hrsg.) (2021): Coronakratie. Demokratisches Regieren in Ausnahmezeiten. Frankfurt/M.: Campus. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  163. Heigl, Florian, Kieslinger, Barbara, Paul, Katharina T., Uhlik, Julia, Dörler, Daniel (2023): Toward an international definition of citizen science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 116:17, 8089-8092. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  164. Hirschman, Albert O. (1970): Exit, Voice, Loyalty. Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  165. Hutter, Swen, Kriesi, Hanspeter, Lorenzini, Jasmine (2019): Soziale Bewegungen im Zusammenspiel mit politischen Parteien. Eine aktuelle Bestandsaufnahme, Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen, 32:2, 163-177, DOI: 10.1515/fjsb-2019-0023. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  166. Kielmansegg, Peter Graf (2013), Die Grammatik der Freiheit, Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  167. Kimhi, Shaul, Eshel, Yohanan (2022): Politische Psychologie und Resilienz, in: Zmerli, Sonja, Feldmann, Ofer (Hrsg.): Politische Psychologie, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 453-462. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  168. Klandermans, Bert (2006): The Demand and Supply of Participation: Social‐Psychological Correlates of Participation in Social Movements, in: Snow, David A., Soule, Sarah A., Kriesi, Hanspeter (Hrsg.): The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 360-379. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  169. Heidar, Knut (1994): The Polymorphic Nature of Party Membership, European Journal of Political Research, 25:1, 61–86, DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1994.tb01201.x. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  170. Kollmorgen, Raj, Merkel, Wolfgang, Wagener, Hans-Jürgen (Hrsg.) (2015): Handbuch Transformationsforschung, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  171. Korte, Karl-Rudolf (2022): Politische Mechanik. Über Entscheidungsheuristiken in der Politik, in: Korte, Karl-Rudolf, Scobel, Gert, Yildiz, Taylan (Hrsg.): Heuristiken des politischen Entscheidens, Berlin: Suhrkamp, 289-321. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  172. Korte, Karl-Rudolf (2024): Wählermärkte. Wahlverhalten und Regierungspolitik in der Berliner Republik, Frankfurt/M./ New York: Campus (i.E.). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  173. Korte, Karl-Rudolf, Florack, Martin (Hrsg.) (2022): Handbuch Regierungsforschung, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  174. Korte, Karl-Rudolf, Fröhlich, Manuel (2009): Politik und Regieren in Deutschland, Paderborn: UTB. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  175. Korte, Karl-Rudolf, Schiffers, Maximilian, Schuckmann, Arno von, Plümer, Sandra (Hrsg.) (2023a): Die Bundestagswahl 2021, Wiesbaden: Springer VS (i.E.). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  176. Korte, Karl-Rudolf, Richter, Philipp, Schuckmann, Arno von (Hrsg.) (2023b): Regieren in der Transformationsgesellschaft. Impulse aus Sicht der Regierungsforschung, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  177. Kristof, Kora (2020): Wie Transformation gelingt, München: oekom. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  178. Lefkofridi, Zoe, Weissenbach, Kristina (2019): The institutionalisation of new parties in Greece. (How) does it matter for success?, in: Harmel, Robert, Svåsand, Lars G. (Hrsg.): Institutionalisation of political parties: Comparative cases, London/ New York: ECPR Press Rowman & Littlefield International. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  179. Leggewie, Claus, Welzer, Harald (2009): Das Ende der Welt, wie wir sie kannten, Frankfurt/M: Fischer-Taschenbuch. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  180. Lowi, Theodore J. (1972): Four Systems of Policy, Politics and Choice, Public Administration Review, 32:4, 298-310. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  181. Merkel, Wolfgang, Puhle, Hans-Jürgen (1999): Die Konsolidierung der Demokratie, in: Merkel, Wolfgang, Puhle, Hans-Jürgen (Hrsg.): Von der Diktatur zur Demokratie, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 135-183, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-322-83336-5_5. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  182. Plümer, Sandra, Schiffers, Maximilian (2022): Dynamics of Policy Change. Conceptualizing policy change and stability in a transforming society, der modern staat (dms), 15:2, 275-292. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  183. Polanyi, Karl (2021): The Great Transformation, Berlin: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  184. Richardson, Liz (2014): Engaging the public in policy research: Are Community Researchers the Answer? Politics and Governance, 2:1, 32–44, DOI: 10.17645/pag.v2i1.19. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  185. Rosa, Hartmut (2021): Unverfügbarkeit, Berlin: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  186. Rüb, Friedbert W. (Hrsg.) (2014): Rapide Politikwechsel in der Bundesrepublik, Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  187. Scarrow, Susan (2013): New Challenges of Intra-Party Democracy: Grassroots Activists, Instant Members, and Cyber-Militants, in: Avril, Emmanuelle, Zumello, Christine (Hrsg.): New Technology, Organizational Change and Governance, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 85–101. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  188. Schleicher, Katharina (2021): Von alternativen Paradigmen zur umfassenden Transformation, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  189. Schmidt, Vivian (2010): Taking ideas and discourse Seriously: explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth 'new institutionalism', European Political Science Review, 2:1, 1-25. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  190. Tauginienė, Loreta, Butkevičienė, Egle, Vohland, Katrin, Heinisch, Barbara, Daskolia, Maria, Suškevičs, Monika, Portela, Manuel, Balázs, Bálint, Prūse, Baiba (2020): Citizen science in the social sciences and humanities: the power of interdisciplinarity, Palgrave Communications 6:89, DOI: 10.1057/s41599-020-0471-y. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  191. Vicens, Julián, Perelló, Josep, Duch, Jordi (2018): Citizen Social Lab: A digital platform for human behavior experimentation within a citizen science framework, PLoS one, 13:12, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207219. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  192. Weissenbach, Kristina (2016): Parteienförderung im Transitionsprozess, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  193. Weissenbach, Kristina, Beyer, Jessica (2022): Party institutionalization via platform? A comparative analysis of highly populated online communities on their route to institutionalized parties, Konferenzpapier, Jahrestagung AK Digitalisierung und Politik der DVPW, September 2022. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-617
  194. Mair, P., Müller, W. C., & Plasser, F. (2004). Conclusion: Political parties in changing electoral markets. In P. Mair, W. C. Müller, & F. Plasser (Eds.), Political parties and electoral change (pp. 264-274). London: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  195. Mair, P., & van Biezen, I. (2001). Party Membership in Twenty European Democracies, 1980-2000. Party Politics, 7, 5-21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  196. McClurg, S. D., & Holbrook, T. M. (2009). Living in a Battleground. Political Research Quarterly, 62(3), 495-506. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  197. McNulty, J. E. (2005). Phone-Based GOTV: What's on the Line? Field Experiments with Varied Partisan Components, 2002-2003. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601, 41-65. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  198. Michelson, M. R., & Nickerson, D. W. (2011). Voter mobilization. In J. N. Druckman, D. P. Green, J. H. Kuklinksi, & A. Lupia (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  199. Moore, R. T. (November 2010). blockTools: Blocking, Assignment, and Diagnosing Interference in Randomized Experiments. (0.5-2 ed.). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  200. Morales, L. (2010). Getting a single message? The impact of homogeneous political communication contexts in Spain in a comparative perspective. In M. W. Wolf, L. Morales, & K. I. Ikeda (Eds.), Political Discussion in Modern Democracies in a Comparative Perspective (pp. 201-222). London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  201. Nickerson, D. W. (2005). Partisan Mobilization Using Volunteer Phone Banks and Door Hangers. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601, 10-27. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  202. Nickerson, D. W. (2006). Volunteer Phone Calls Can Increase Turnout. American Politics Research, 34(3), 271-292, doi:10.1177/1532673x05275923. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  203. Nickerson, D. W. (2007). Quality Is Job One: Professional and Volunteer Voter Mobilization Calls. American Journal of Political Science, 51(2), 269-282, doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00250.x. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  204. Nickerson, D. W., Friedrichs, R. D., & King, D. C. (2006). Partisan Mobilization Campaigns in the Field: Results from a Statewide Turnout Experiment in Michigan. Political Research Quarterly, 59(1), 85-97. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  205. Norris, P. (2000). A Virtuous Circle? Political Communications in Post-Industrial Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  206. Nyman, P. (2017). Door-to-Door Canvassing in the European Elections: Evidence from a Swedish Field Experiment. Electoral Studies, 45, 110-118. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  207. Panagopoulos, C. (2009a). Partisan and Nonpartisan Message Content and Voter Mobilization. Political Research Quarterly, 62(1), 70-76. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  208. Panagopoulos, C. (2009b). Street fight: The impact of a street sign campaign on voter turnout. Electoral Studies, 28(2), 309-313, doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2009.03.001. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  209. Panagopoulos, C. (2011). Timing Is Everything? Primacy and Recency Effects in Voter Mobilization Campaigns. Political Behavior, 33(1), 79-93, doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9125-x. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  210. Pasquino, G. (2001). The New Campaign Politics in Southern Europe. In N. Diamandouros, & R. Gunther (Eds.), Parties, Politics and Democracy in the New Southern Europe. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  211. Pattie, C., Whiteley, P., Johnston, R., & Seyd, P. (1994). Measuring Local Campaign Effects: Labour Party Constituency Campaigning at the 1987 General Election. Political Studies, 42(3), 469-479, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1994.tb01689.x. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  212. Pattie, C. J., Johnston, R. J., & Fieldhouse, E. A. (1995). Winning the Local Vote: The Effectiveness of Constituency Campaign Spending in Great Britain, 1983-1992. The American Political Science Review, 89(4), 969-983. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  213. Pons, V. (2018). Will a Five-Minute Discussion Change Your Mind? A Countrywide Experiment on Voter Choice in France. American Economic Review, 108(6), 1322-1363. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  214. Ramiro, L., & Morales, L. (2004). Latecomers but 'Early-Adapters'. The Adaptation and Response of Spanish Parties to Social Changes. In K. Lawson, & T. Poguntke (Eds.), How Political Parties Respond to Voters. Interest Aggregation Revisited (pp. 198-226). London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  215. Rico, G. (2009). Líderes políticos, opinión pública y comportamiento electoral en España. Madrid: CIS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  216. Scarrow, S. E. (2000). Parties without members? Party organization in a changing electoral environment. In R. J. Dalton, & M. P. Wattenberg (Eds.), Parties without partisans. Political change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  217. Schmitt-Beck, R. (2007). New modes of campaigning. In R. Dalton, & H.-D. Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior (pp. 744-764). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  218. Schmitt-Beck, R., & Farrell, D. M. (2002). Studying political campaigns and their effects. In D. M. Farrell, & R. Schmitt-Beck (Eds.), Do political campaigns matter? : campaign effects in elections and referendums (pp. 1-21). London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  219. Seyd, P., & Whiteley, P. F. (1992). Labour's grass-roots. The politics of party membership. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  220. Swanson, D., & Mancini, P. (1996). Politics, media, and modern democracy. Westport: Praeger. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  221. Torcal, M., Montero, J. R., & Gunther, R. (2002). Anti-party sentiments in Southern Europe. In J. R. Montero, R. Gunther, & J. J. Linz (Eds.), Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  222. Townsley, J. (2018). Is it Worth Door-Knocking? Evidence from a United Kingdom-based Get Out The Vote (GOTV) Field Experiment on the Effect of Party Leaflets and Canvass Visits on Voter Turnout. Political Science Research and Methods, Online First, 1-15. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  223. van Biezen, I. (2000). Party financing in new democracies. Party Politics, 6, 329-342. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  224. Van Biezen, I., & Hopkin, J. (2005). The Presidentialization of Spanish democracy: sources of Prime Ministerial power in Post-Franco Spain. In T. Poguntke, & P. Webb (Eds.), The presidentialization of politics in democratic societies? (pp. 107-127). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  225. Van Biezen, I., Mair, P., & Poguntke, T. (2012). Going, Going, .... Gone? Party Membership in the 21st Century. European Journal of Political Research, 51(1), 24-56, doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.01995.x. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  226. Wattenberg, M. P. (2002). Where have all the voters gone? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  227. Wolfinger, R. E. (1963). The influence of precinct work on voting behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly, 27(3), 387-398, doi:10.1086/267183. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  228. References Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  229. Alvarez, R. Michael. 1997. Information and Elections. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  230. Baker, Andy, and Lucio Renno. 2019. Nonpartisans as False Negatives: The Mismeasurement of Party Identification in Public Opinion Surveys. Journal of Politics 81(3): 906-922. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  231. Bargsted, Matias A., and Orit Kedar. 2009. Coalition-Targeted Duvergerian Voting: How Expectations Affect Voter Choice under Proportional Representation. American Journal of Political Science 53(2): 307–23. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  232. Bartolini, Stefano, and Peter Mair. 1990. Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability: The Stabilisation of European Electorates, 1885-1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  233. Blais, André. 2002. Why is there so Little Strategic Voting in Canadian Plurality Rule Elections? Political Studies 50(3): 445–454. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  234. Breton, Charles, Fred Cutler, Sarah Lachance, and Alex Mierke-Zatwarnicki. 2017. Telephone versus Online Survey Modes for Election Studies: Comparing Canadian Public Opinion and Vote Choice in the 2015 Federal Election. Canadian Journal of Political Science 50(4): 1005-1036. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  235. Brody, Richard A., and Lawrence S. Rothenberg. 1988. The Instability of Partisanship: An Analysis of the 1980 Presidential Election. British Journal of Political Science 18(4): 445-465. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  236. Campbell, James E. 2008. The American Campaign: U.S. Presidential Campaigns and the National Vote. College Station: Texas A&M University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  237. Campbell, James E, Lynna Cherry, and Kenneth Wink. 1992. The Convention Bump. American Politics Quarterly 20(3): 287-307. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  238. Cohen, Marty, David Karol, Hans Noel, and John Zaller. 2008. The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  239. Cox, Gary W. 2018. Portfolio-maximizing strategic voting in parliamentary elections, in Erik S. Herron, Robert J. Pekkanen, Matthew S. Shugart, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  240. Duch, Ray, Jeff May, and David A. Armstrong II. 2010. Coalition-directed Voting in Multiparty Democracies. American Political Science Review 104(4): 698-719. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  241. Erikson, Robert S., and Christopher Wlezien. 2012. The Timeline of Presidential Elections: How Campaigns Do (and Do Not) Matter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  242. Hagen, Michael G., and Richard Johnston. 2007. Conventions and campaign dynamics. In Costas Panagopoulos, ed., Rewiring Politics: Presidential Nominating Conventions in the Media Age Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press. pp. 29-52. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  243. Henderson, Michael, D. Sunshine Hillygus. 2016. Changing the Clock: The Role of Campaigns in the Timing of Vote Decision. Public Opinion Quarterly 80(3): 761–70. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  244. Huber, Sascha, and Robert Welz. 2022. Dynamics of Coalition Preferences and Vote Choices, in Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Sigrid Roßteutscher, Harald Schoen, Bernhard Weßels, and Christof Wolf, eds. 2022. The Changing German Voter. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 183-206. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  245. Iyengar, Shanto, Gaurav Sood, and Yphtach Lelkes. 2012. Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly 76(3): 405–431.  Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  246. Jennings, Will, and Christopher Wlezien. 2015. The Timeline of Elections: A Comparative Perspective. American Journal of Political Science 60(1): 219-33. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  247. Johnston, Richard. 2023. Affective Polarization in the Canadian Party System, 1988–2021. Canadian Journal of Political Science. 56(2): 372-95. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  248. Johnston, Richard, and Henry E. Brady. 2002. The Rolling Cross-Section Design. Electoral Studies 21(2): 283-295. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  249. Johnston, Richard, and Sarah Lachance. 2022. The Predictable Campaign: Theory and Evidence. Electoral Studies 75(1): 1-12. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  250. Kaplan, Noah, David K Park, and Andrew Gelman. 2012. Polls and Elections: Understanding Persuasion and Activation in Presidential Campaigns: The Random Walk and Mean Reversion Models. Presidential Studies Quarterly 42(4): 843–866. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  251. Kedar, Orit. 2005. When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme Parties: Policy Balancing in Parliamentary Elections. American Political Science Review 99(2): 185-199. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  252. Lee, Francis. 2016. Insecure Majorities: Congress and the Perpetual Campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  253. Lenz, Gabriel. 2009. Learning and Opinion Change, Not Priming: Reconsidering the Priming Hypothesis. American Journal of Political Science 53(4): 821–37. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  254. Lenz, Gabriel. 2012. Follow the Leader? How Voters Respond to Politicians Policies and Performance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  255. Le Pennec, Caroline, and Vincent Pons. 2023. How do Campaigns Shape Vote Choice? Multicountry Evidence from 62 Elections and 56 TV Debates. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 138(2): 637–701. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  256. Matthews, J. Scott. 2017. Issue Priming Revisited: Susceptible Voters and Detectable Effects. British journal of Political Science 49(2): 513-531. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  257. McCarty, Nolan, Keith T. Poole, and Howard Rosenthal. 2007. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  258. Meffert, Michael F., and Thomas Gschwend. 2010. Strategic coalition voting: Evidence from Austria. Electoral Studies 29(3): 339-49. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  259. Partheymüller, Julia, and Richard Johnston. 2022. Plus ça Change? Stability and Volatility in German Campaigns, in Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Sigrid Roßteutscher, Harald Schoen, Bernhard Weßels, and Christof Wolf, eds. 2022. The Changing German Voter. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 282-310. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  260. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, and Thorsten Faas. 2006. The Campaign and its Dynamics at the 2005 German Election. German Politics 15(4): 303-419. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  261. Shively, W. Phillips. 1972. Party Identification, Party Choice, and Voting Stability: The Weimar Case. American Political Science Review 66(4): 1203-1225. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  262. Sides, John, Chris Tausanovitch, and Lynn Vavreck. 2022. The Bitter End: The 2020 Presidential Campaign and the Challenge to American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  263. Taagepera, Rein, and Bernard Grofman. 1985. Rethinking Duverger's Law: Predicting the Effective Number of Parties in Plurality and PR Systems – Parties Minus Issues Equals One. European Journal of Political Research 13(4): 341-352. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  264. Wlezien, Christopher, and Robert S. Erikson. 2002. The Timeline of Presidential Election Campaigns. Journal of Politics 64(4): 969-93. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-247
  265. References Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  266. Abney, R., Adams, J.F., Clark, M., Easton, M., Ezrow, L., Kosmidis, S., Neundorf, A., 2013. When does valence matter? Heightened valence effects for governing parties during election campaigns. Party Politics 19 (1), 61–82. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  267. Adams, J.F., Merrill, S.III, Grofman, B., 2005. A unified theory of party competition: A cross-national analysis integrating spatial and behavioral factors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  268. Baumann, M., Gross, M., 2016. Where Is My Party? Introducing New Data Sets on Ideological Cohesion and Ambiguity of Party Positions in Media Coverage. MZES Working Paper 167. Mannheim: Mannheim Centre for European Social Research. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  269. Benoit, K., Laver, M., 2006. Party policy in modern democracies. London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  270. Box-Steffensmeier, J., Dillard, M., Kimball, D., Massengill, W., 2015. The long and short of it: the unpredictability of late deciding voters. Electoral Studies 39 (1), 181–194. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  271. Brader, T.A., Tucker, J.A., 2009. What’s Left behind When the Party’s Over: Survey Experiments on the Effects of Partisan Cues in Putin’s Russia. Politics & Policy 37 (4), 843–868. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  272. Brambor, T., Clark, W.R., Golder, M., 2006. Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis 14 (1), 63–82. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  273. Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller, W.E., Stokes, D.E., 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  274. Converse, P., 1964. The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. In: Apter, D. (Ed.), Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press, pp. 206–261. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  275. Costello, R., Thomassen, J., Rosema, M., 2012. European Parliament elections and political representation: Policy congruence between voters and parties. West European Politics 35 (6), 1226–1248. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  276. Cox, G.W., McCubbins, M.D., 1991. On the decline of party voting in Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 16 (4), 547–570. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  277. Dassonneville, R., Baudewyns, P., Debus, M., Schmitt-Beck, R., 2017. The time of the vote choice: Causes and consequences of late-deciding. In: Deschouwer, K. (Ed.), Mind the Gap: Political Participation and Representation in Belgium. Colchester: Rowman & Littlefield International/ECPR Press, pp. 201–227. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  278. Dassonneville, R., Lewis-Beck, M.S., 2013. Economic policy voting and incumbency: Unemployment in Western Europe. Political Science Research and Methods 1 (1), 53–66. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  279. Dassonneville, R., Lewis-Beck, M.S., 2014. Macroeconomics, economic crisis and electoral outcomes: A national European pool. Acta Politica 49 (4), 372–394. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  280. Debus, M., Müller, J., 2014. Expected utility or learned familiarity? The formation of voters’ coalition preferences. Electoral Studies 34 (1), 54–67. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  281. Debus, M., Somer-Topcu, Z., Tavits, M., 2016. Comparative Campaign Dynamics Dataset. Mannheim Centre for European Social Research, University of Mannheim. http://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de/d7/en/datasets/comparative-campaign-dynamics-dataset. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  282. Downs, A., 1957. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  283. Eberl, J.M., Plescia, C., 2018. Coalitions in the news: How saliency and tone in news coverage influence voters' preferences and expectations about coalitions. Electoral Studies 55 (1), 30–39. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  284. Elff, M., Roßteutscher, S., 2011. Stability or decline? Class, religion and the vote in Germany. German Politics 20 (1), 107–127. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  285. Evans, G., 1999. Class voting: From premature obituary to reasoned appraisal. In: Evans, G. (Ed.), The end of class politics? Class voting in comparative context. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–20. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  286. Fernandez-Vazquez, P., Somer-Topcu, Z., 2019. The informational role of party leader changes on voter perceptions of party positions. British Journal of Political Science 49 (3), 977–996. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  287. Fortunato, D., 2021. The cycle of coalition: How parties and voters interact under coalition governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  288. Gomez, B.T., Wilson, J.M., 2001. Political sophistication and economic voting in the American electorate: A theory of heterogeneous attribution. American Journal of Political Science 45 (4), 899–914. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  289. Grofman, B., 2004. Downs and two-party convergence. Annual Review of Political Science 7 (1), 25–46. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  290. Joesten, D.A., Stone, W.J., 2014. Reassessing proximity voting: Expertise, party, and choice in congressional elections. Journal of Politics 76 (3), 740–753. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  291. Johann, D., Kleinen-von Königslöw, K., Kritzinger, S., Thomas, K., 2018. Intra-campaign changes in voting preferences: the impact of media and party communication. Political Communication 35 (2), 261–286. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  292. Lachat, R., 2008. The impact of party polarization on ideological voting. Electoral Studies 27 (4), 687–698. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  293. Lefkofridi, Z., Giger, N., Gallego, A., 2014. Electoral participation in pursuit of policy representation: ideological congruence and voter turnout. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 24 (3), 291–311. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  294. Lewis-Beck, M.S., 1986. Comparative Economic Voting: Britain, France, Germany, Italy. American Journal of Political Science 30 (2), 315–346. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  295. Lewis-Beck, M.S., Jacoby, W.G., Norpoth, H., Weisberg, H.F., 2008. The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  296. Lewis-Beck, M.S., Stegmaier, M., 2000. Economic determinants of electoral outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science 3 (1), 183–219. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  297. Lipset, S.M., Rokkan, S., 1967. Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments: an introduction. In: Lipset, S.M., Rokkan, S. (Eds.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: The Free Press, pp. 1–64. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  298. Lupia, A., McCubbins, M.D., 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  299. Lupia, A., McCubbins, M.D., Popkin, S.L., 2000. Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  300. Macdonald, S.E., Rabinowitz, G., Listhaug, O., 1995. Political sophistication and models of issue voting. British Journal of Political Science 25 (4), 453–483. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  301. MacKuen, M.B., Erikson, R.S., Stimson, J.A., 1992. Peasants or bankers? The American electorate and the US economy. American Political Science Review 86 (3), 597–611. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  302. Mauerer, I., Thurner, P., Debus, M., 2015. Under Which Conditions Do Parties Attract Voters’ Reactions to Issues? Party-Varying Issue Voting in German Elections 1987–2009. West European Politics 38 (6), 1251–1273. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  303. Merolla, J.L., Stephenson, L.B., Zechmeister, E.J., 2008. Can Canadians Take a Hint? The (In)Effectiveness of Party Labels as Information Shortcuts in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science 41 (3), 673–696. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  304. Mitchell, M.N., 2012. Interpreting and visualizing regression models using Stata. College Station: Stata Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  305. Müller, W. C., (2000). “Political parties in parliamentary democracies: Making delegation and accountability work”. European Journal of Political Research 37 (3), 309-33. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  306. Morgenstern, S., 2004. Patterns of Legislative Politics: Roll Call Voting in Latin America and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  307. Nadeau, R., Lewis-Beck, M.S., Foucault, M., 2019. Wealth and voter turnout: investigating twenty-eight democracies. Polity 51 (2), 261–287. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  308. Nadeau, R., Pétry, F., Bélanger, É., 2010. Issue-based strategies in election campaigns: The case of health care in the 2000 Canadian federal election. Political Communication 27 (4), 367–388. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  309. Nyhuis, D., Plescia, C., 2018. The nonideological component of coalition preferences. Party Politics 24 (6), 686–697. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  310. Popkin, S., 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  311. Powell Jr, G. Bingham. 2004. The quality of democracy: The chain of responsiveness. Journal of Democracy 15 (4), 91–105. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  312. Rabinowitz, G., Macdonald, S.E., 1989. A Directional Theory of Issue Voting. American Political Science Review 83 (1), 93–121. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  313. Rahn, W.M., 1993. The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates. American Journal of Political Science 37 (2), 472–496. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  314. Rattinger, H., Roßteutscher, S., Schmitt-Beck, R., Weßels, B., et al., 2011. Zwischen Langeweile und Extremen: Die Bundestagswahl 2009. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  315. Schmitt-Beck, R., Partheymüller, J., 2012. Why voters decide late: A simultaneous test of old and new hypotheses at the 2005 and 2009 German federal elections. German Politics 21 (3), 299–316. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  316. Schmitt-Beck, R., Rattinger, H., Roßteutscher, S., Weßels, B., Wolf, C., et al., 2014. Zwischen Fragmentierung und Konzentration: Die Bundestagswahl 2013. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  317. Schmitt-Beck, R., Weick, S., Christoph, B., 2006. Shaky attachments: Individual‐level stability and change of partisanship among West German voters, 1984–2001. European Journal of Political Research 45 (4), 581–608. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  318. Singh, S.P., 2010. Contextual influences on the decision calculus: A cross-national examination of proximity voting. Electoral Studies 29 (3), 425–434. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  319. Singh, S.P., Roy, J., 2014. Political knowledge, the decision calculus, and proximity voting. Electoral Studies 34 (1), 89–99. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  320. Slothuus, R., 2009. The Political Logic of Party Cues in Opinion Formation. Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  321. Somer‐Topcu, Z. 2015. Everything to everyone: The electoral consequences of the broad‐appeal strategy in Europe. American Journal of Political Science 59 (4), 841–854. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  322. Stinchcombe, A.L., 1975. Social structure and politics. In: Greenstein, F.I., Polsby, N.W. (Eds.), Macropolitical theory. Reading: Addison-Wesley, pp. 557–622. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  323. Stokes, D., 1963. Spatial Models and Party Competition. American Political Science Review 57 (2), 368–377. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  324. Suzuki, M., 1991. The rationality of economic voting and the macroeconomic regime. American Journal of Political Science 35 (3), 624–642. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  325. Thomassen, J., 2016. An ever closer and more democratic Union? Electoral Studies 44 (1), 544–551. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  326. Zaller, J., 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  327. Online Appendix Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  328. https://www.nomos-shop.de/shopfiles/anhang_978-3-7560-0800-1_mat_online_anhang.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  329. References Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  330. Aldrich, John H., Rachel K. Gibson, Marta Cantijoch, and Tobias Konitzer. 2012. “Getting Out the Vote in the Social Media Era: Are Digital Tools Changing the Extent, Nature, and Impact of Party Contacting in Elections?” Party Politics 22: 165-178. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  331. Anderson, Christopher J., and Pablo Beramendi. 2012. “Left Parties, Poor Voters, and Electoral Participation in Advanced Industrial Societies.” Comparative Political Studies 45: 714-746. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  332. Barnes, Samuel H. 1977. Representation in Italy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  333. Beck, Paul A. 2022. “The Ground Game in 2020: Party Contacts as Reported by Voters,” in John C. Green. David B. Cohen, and Kenneth M. Miller (eds.), State of the Parties 2022. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp.179-195. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  334. Beck, Paul A. 1975. “Environment and Party: The Impact of Political and Demo­graphic County Characteris­tics on Party Behav­ior.” American Political Science Review, 68: 1229‑1244. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  335. Beck, Paul A., Richard Gunther, and Erik Nisbet. 2018. “What Happened to the Ground Game in 2016?” in John C. Green, Daniel J. Coffey, and David B. Cohen (eds.), The State of The Parties: The Changing Role of Contemporary American Parties. Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 263-277. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  336. Bhatti, Yosef, Jens Olav Dahlgaard, Jonas Hedegaard Hansen, and Kasper M. Hanson. 2016. “Is Door-to-Door Canvassing Effective in Europe? Evidence from a Meta-study across Six European Countries.” British Journal of Political Science 49: 279-290. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  337. Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, and Jan Teorell, 2022. Dataset v10. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  338. Cutright, Phillips. 1963. “Measuring the Impact of Local Party Activity on the General Election Vote.” Public Opinion Quarterly 27: 372-386. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  339. Cutright, Phillips, and Peter Rossi. 1958. “Grass Roots Politicians and the Vote.” American Sociology Review 23: 171-179. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  340. Green, Donald P., and Alan S. Gerber. 2015. Get Out the Vote: How to Increase Voter Turnout. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  341. Green, Donald P., and Alan S. Gerber. 2016. “Voter Mobilization, Experimentation, and Translational Social Science.” Perspectives on Politics 14: 738-749. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  342. Hill, Kim Quaile, and Jan E. Leighley. 1996. “Political Parties and Class Mobilization in Contemporary United States Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 4: 787-804. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  343. Hooghe, Marc, Sara Vissers, Dietlind Stolle, and Valérie-Anne Maheo. 2010. “The Potential of Internet Mobilization: An Experimental Study on the Effects of Internet and Face-to-Face Mobilization Efforts.” Political Communication 27: 404-431. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  344. Huckfeldt, Robert, and John Sprague. 1992. “Political Parties and Electoral Mobilization: Political Structure, Social Structure, and the Party Canvass.” American Political Science Review 86: 70-86. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  345. Johnston, Ron, David Cutts, Charles Pattie, and Justin Fisher. 2012. “We’ve Got Them on the List: Contacting, Canvassing and Voting in a British General Election Campaign.” Electoral Studies 31: 317-329. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  346. Karp, Jeffrey. 2012. “Electoral Systems, Party Mobilisation and Political Engagement.” Australian Journal of Political Science 47: 71-89. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  347. Karp, Jeffrey, and Susan A. Banducci. 2007. “Party Mobilization and Political Participation in New and Old Democracies.” Party Politics 13: 217-234. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  348. Karp, Jeffrey, Susan A. Banducci, and Shaun Bowler. 2007. “Getting Out the Vote: Party Mobilization in Comparative Perspective.” British Journal of Political Science 38: 91-112. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  349. Klingelhöfer, Tristan, and Daniel Schlozman. 2018. “Between Mass Party Legacy and Catch-All Efficiency: Party Contacting in Old and New Democracies”. Paper delivered at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  350. Krönke, Matthias, Sarah J. Lockwood, and Robert Mattes. 2022. “Who is Canvassing Whom? Party Electoral Strategies in Africa.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Montreal, Canada. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  351. Magalhães, Pedro C., John H. Aldrich, and Rachel K. Gibson. 2020. “New Forms of Mobilization, New People Mobilized? Evidence from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems.” Party Politics 26: 605-618. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  352. McClurg, Scott. 2004. “Indirect Mobilization: The Social Consequences of Party Contacts in an Election Campaign.” American Politics Research 32: 406-443. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  353. Mujami, Saiful, R. William Liddle, and Kuskridho Ambardi. 2018. Voting Behavior in Indonesia Since Democratization. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  354. Nuñes, Lucas. 2021. “The Effects of Local Campaigning in Great Britain.” Electoral Studies 73: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102384. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  355. Panagopoulos, Costas. 2016. “All About That Base: Changing Campaign Strategies in U.S. Presidential Elections.” Party Politics 22: 179-190. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  356. Riccardo, Ladini. 2021. “The Differentiated Effects of Direct Mobilization on Turnout: Evidence from the 2013 Austrian Parliamentary Elections.” German Politics 30: 267-296. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  357. Rohrschneider, Robert. 2002. “Mobilizing versus Changing: How Do Parties Target Voters in Election Campaigns.” Electoral Studies 21: 367-382. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  358. Rosenstone, Steven J., and John Mark Hansen. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  359. Sudulich, Laura, and Siim Trumm. 2019. “A Comparative Study of the Effects of Electoral Institutions on Campaigns.” British Journal of Political Science 49-381-399. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  360. Vaccari, Cristian. 2017. “Online Mobilization in Comparative Perspective: Digital Appeals and Political Engagement in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom.” Political Communication 34: 69-88. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  361. Literatur Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  362. Braml, Martin T./Clemens Fuest. 2019. Wahlrecht mit Kinderbonus für Eltern: Konsequenzen für Deutschland. ifo Institut – Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München 72 (11): 23-28. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  363. Buchstein, Hubertus. 2016. Zwei Reformvarianten zur Absenkung des Wahlalters: das Jugendwahlrecht und das (stellvertretend ausgeübte) Wahlrecht von Geburt an. In: Tobias Mörschel (Hrsg.): Wahlen und Demokratie. Reformoptionen des deutschen Wahlrechts: Baden-Baden: Nomos, 225-241. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  364. Deutscher Familienverband. 2017. Wahlrecht ab Geburt: Nur wer wählt, zählt. https://wahlrecht.jetzt/. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  365. Faas, Thorsten/Arndt Leininger. 2020. Wählen mit 16. Ein empirischer Beitrag zur Debatte um die Absenkung des Wahlalters. Otto-Brenner-Stiftung Arbeitspapier 41. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  366. Faas, Thorsten/Arndt Leininger. 2023. Mehr Wählen wagen? Ungleichheiten beim „Wählen ab 16“ und ihre Folgen. Otto-Brenner-Stiftung Arbeitspapier 56. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  367. Faas, Thorsten/Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck. 2010. Voters’ political conversations during the 2005 German parliamentary election campaign. In: Michael R. Wolf/Laura Morales/Ken’ichi Ikeda (Hrsg.): Political discussion in modern democracies: A comparative perspective. London: Routledge, 99-116. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  368. Faas, Thorsten/Sigrid Roßteutscher. 2022. Alive and Kicking: Electoral Reform in Germany. Introduction to the Special Issue, German Politics 31 (4): 477-482. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  369. Franklin, Mark N. 2004. Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  370. Gallego, Aina. 2015. Unequal Political Participation Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  371. GLES (2022a). GLES Tracking September 2021, T50. GESIS, Köln. ZA7708 Datenfile Version 3.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14000. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  372. GLES (2022b). GLES Tracking Februar 2022, T51. GESIS, Köln. ZA7709 Datenfile Version 2.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14001. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  373. GLES (2022c). GLES Tracking Juni 2022, T52. GESIS, Köln. ZA7710 Datenfile Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13941. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  374. Görres, Achim/Guido Tiemann. 2009. Kinder an die Macht? Die politischen Konsequenzen des stellvertretenden Elternwahlrechts. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 50 (1): 50-74. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  375. Gründinger, Wolfgang. 2016. Scheinargumente gegen das Kinderwahlrecht. In: Tobias Mörschel (Hrsg.): Wahlen und Demokratie. Reformoptionen des deutschen Wahlrechts. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 243-254. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  376. Hinrichs, Karl. 2002. Do the old exploit the young? Is enfranchising children a good idea? Archives of European Sociology 43 (1): 35-58. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  377. Jennings, M. Kent/Laura Stoker/Jake Bowers. 2009. Politics across Generations: Family Transmission Reexamined. The Journal of Politics 71 (3): 782-799. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  378. Kamijo, Yoshio/Yoichi Hizen/Tatsuyoshi Saijo/Teruyuki Tamura. 2019. Voting on Behalf of a Future generation: A Laboratory Experiment. Sustainability 11: 1-21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  379. Knödler, Christoph. 1996. Wahlrecht für Minderjährige – eine gute Wahl? Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 27 (4): 553-571. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  380. Kroh, Martin. 2012. Die abnehmende Bedeutung des Elternhauses: Intergenerationale Übertragung von Parteibindungen in Deutschland 1984 bis 2010. Politische Vierteljahresschrift (PVS), Special Issue 45: 203–226. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  381. Merk, Kurt-Peter. 2009. Das Wahlrecht von Geburt an und seine politische Bedeutung. Diskurs Kindheits- und Jugendforschung 4 (4): 525-538. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  382. Merk, Kurt-Peter. 2014. Warum das heutige Wahlrecht möglicherweise verfassungswidrig ist. In: Klaus Hurrelmann/Tanjev Schultz (Hrsg.): Wahlrecht für Kinder? Politische Bildung und die Mobilisierung der Jugend. Weinheim/Basel: Beltz Juventa, 102-113. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  383. Partheymüller, Julia/Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck/Christian Hoops. 2013. Kampagnendynamik bei der Bundestagswahl 2013: die Rolling Cross-Section-Studie im Rahmen der „German Longitudinal Election Study“ 2013. MZES-Working paper 154. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  384. Peschel-Gutzeit, Lore Maria. 1999. Das Wahlrecht von Geburt an: Ein Plädoyer für den Erhalt unserer Demokratie. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 30 (2): 556-563. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  385. Peschel-Gutzeit/Lore Maria. 2014. Plädoyer für eine Mischform: Elternvertretung solange wie nötig, eigene Zuständigkeit so bald wie möglich. In: Klaus Hurrelmann/Tanjev Schultz (Hrsg.): Wahlrecht für Kinder? Politische Bildung und die Mobilisierung der Jugend. Weinheim/Basel: Beltz Juventa, 124-137. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  386. Roßteutscher, Sigrid/Thorsten Faas/Arndt Leininger/Armin Schäfer. 2022. Lowering the Quality of Democracy by Lowering the Voting Age? Comparing the Impact of School, Classmates, and Parents on 15- to 18-Year-Olds’ Political Interest and Turnout. German Politics 31 (4): 483-510. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  387. Schäfer, Armin/Sigrid Roßteutscher/Simone Abendschön. 2019. Rising start-up costs of voting: Political inequality among first-time voters. West European Politics 43 (4): 819-844. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  388. Schickhardt, Christoph. 2015. Kinder im Wahlrecht und in Demokratien. Für eine elterliche Stellvertreterwahlpflicht. Zeitschrift für Praktische Philosophie 2 (1): 191–248. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  389. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger. 1993. Denn sie wissen nicht, was sie tun... Zum Verständnis des Verfahrens der Bundestagswahl bei westdeutschen und ostdeutschen Wählern. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 24 (3): 393-415. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  390. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger/Thorsten Faas/Christian Holst. 2006. Der Rolling Cross-Section Survey – ein Instrument zur Analyse dynamischer Prozesse der Einstellungsentwicklung. ZUMA-Nachrichten 58: 13-49. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  391. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger/Thorsten Faas/Ansgar Wolsing. 2010a. Kampagnendynamik bei der Bundestagswahl 2009: die Rolling Cross-Section-Studie im Rahmen der „German Longitudinal Election Study“ 2009, MZES-Working paper 134. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  392. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger/Hans Rattinger/Sigrid Roßteutscher/Bernhard Weßels. 2010b. Die deutsche Wahlforschung und die German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES). In: Frank Faulbaum/Christof Wolf (Hrsg.): Gesellschaftliche Entwicklungen im Spiegel der empirischen Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag, 141-172. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  393. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger/Julia Partheymüller/Thorsten Faas. 2012. Einflüsse politischer Gesprächspartner auf Parteipräferenzen: Zur ‚sozialen Logik’ des politischen Verhaltens bei der Bundestagswahl 2009. In: Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck (Hrsg.): Wählen in Deutschland. Politische Vierteljahresschrift (PVS) Special Issue 45, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 465-488. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  394. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger/Oana Lup. 2013. Seeking the Soul of Democracy: A Review of Recent Research into Citizens’ Political Talk Culture. Swiss Political Science Review 19 (4): 513–538. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  395. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger. 2016. Die German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES): Die deutsche nationale Wahlstudie zu den Bundestagswahlen 2009, 2013 und 2017. Stadtforschung und Statistik (2): 2-7. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  396. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger/Julia Partheymüller. 2016. A Two-Stage Theory of Discussant Influence on Vote Choice in Multi-Party Systems. British Journal of Political Science 46 (2): 321-348. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  397. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger/Christiane Grill. 2020. From the Living Room to the Meeting Hall: Citizens’ Political Talk in the Deliberative System. Political Communication 37 (6): 832-851. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  398. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger/Christian Schnaudt. 2023. Political Talk and the Triad of Democratic Citizenship. Journal of Deliberative Democracy 19 (1): 1–17. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  399. Staudt, Alexander/Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck, Kampagnendynamik bei der Bundestagswahl 2017: die Rolling Cross- Section-Studie im Rahmen der „German Longitudinal Election Study“ 2017, MZES-Working paper 172. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  400. Stiers, Dieter/Marc Hooghe/Silke Goubin. 2020. Are 16-years-old able to cast a congruent vote? Evidence from a „voting at 16” initiative in the city of Ghent (Belgium). Electoral Studies 63: 102107. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  401. Stiftung für die Rechte zukünftiger Generationen. 2017. Wahlrecht für Jugendliche und ältere Kinder: Demokratietheoretische, jugendsoziologische, und politische Hintergründe einer überfälligen Reform (https://generationengerechtigkeit.info/wahlrecht-ohne-altersgrenze/). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  402. Strohmeier, Gerd. 2016. Familienwahlrecht reloaded: Ein nicht mehr ganz neuer Vorschlag erneut auf der Agenda – und dem Prüfstand. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 26: 3-23. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  403. Torney-Purta, Judith/Wendy Kandl Richardson/Carolyn Henry Barber. 2004. Trust in Government-related Institutions and Political Engagement among Adolescents in Six Countries. Acta Politica 39 (4): 380-406. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  404. Van Parijs, Philippe. 1999. The Disfranchisement of the Elderly, and Other Attempts to Secure Intergenerational Justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs 27 (4): 292-333. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  405. Wagner, Markus/David Johann/Sylvia Kritzinger. 2012. Voting at 16: Turnout and the quality of vote choice. Electoral Studies 31: 372-383. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  406. Westle, Bettina. 2005. „Wahlrecht von Geburt an“ – Rettung der Demokratie oder Irrweg? Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 37 (1): 96- 114. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  407. Wolf, Stephan/Nils Goldschmidt/Thomas Peterson. 2015. Votes on behalf of children: a legitimate way of giving them a voice in politics? Constitutional Political Economy 26: 356-374. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  408. Zeglovits, Eva, und Martina Zandonella. 2013. Political interest of adolescents before and after lowering the voting age: the case of Austria. Journal of Youth Studies 16 (8): 1084-1104. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-319
  409. Literatur Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  410. Alber, Jens, 1982: Vom Armenhaus zum Wohlfahrtsstaat: Analysen zur Entwicklung der Sozialversicherung in Westeuropa. Frankfurt: Campus. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  411. Allbus 1980-2018: Die Allgemeine Bevölkerungs-Umfrage der Sozialwissenschaften (ALLBUS) Kumulation 1980-2018. Köln: GESIS (ZA 5274), https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13748. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  412. Allbus 2021: Die Allgemeine Bevölkerungs-Umfrage der Sozialwissenschaften (ALLBUS) 2021. Köln: GESIS (ZA 5280), https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14002. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  413. Armingeon, Klaus, 1988: Die Entwicklung der westdeutschen Gewerkschaften: 1950-1985. Frankfurt: Campus. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  414. Bell, Daniel, 1976: The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  415. Dahrendorf, Ralf, 1958. Toward a theory of social conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution 2(2): 170–183. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  416. Ebbinghaus, Bernhard, 1995. The Siamese Twins: Citizenship Rights, Cleavage Formation, and Party-Union Relations. In Citizenship, Identity and Social History (International Review of Social History, Supplement 3) Hrsg. Tilly, Charles, 51-89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  417. Ebbinghaus, Bernhard, 2023. Machtressourcentheorie und Korporatismusansatz In Handbuch Policy-Forschung (2. aktualisierte Auflage) Hrsg. Wenzelburger, Georg und Reimut Zohlnhöfer. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  418. Ebbinghaus, Bernhard und Jelle Visser, 1999. When Institutions Matter: Union Growth and Decline in Western Europe, 1950-1995. European Sociological Review 15(2): 1-24. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  419. Ebbinghaus, Bernhard und Claudia Göbel, 2014. Mitgliederrückgang und Organisationsstrategien deutscher Gewerkschaften. In Handbuch Gewerkschaften in Deutschland Hrsg. Schroeder, Wolfgang, 207-237. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  420. Ebbinghaus, Bernhard und Elias Naumann, 2018a. The Popularity of Pension and Unemployment Policies Revisited: The Erosion of Public Support in Britain and Germany. In Welfare State Reforms Seen from Below: Comparing Public Attitudes and Organized Interests in Britain and Germany Hrsg. Ebbinghaus, Bernhard und Elias Naumann, 155-186. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  421. Ebbinghaus, Bernhard und Elias Naumann, 2018b. Introduction: Analysing Organized Interests and Public Opinion Towards Welfare Reforms. In Welfare State Reforms Seen from Below: Comparing Public Attitudes and Organized Interests in Britain and Germany Hrsg. Ebbinghaus, Bernhard und Elias Naumann, 1-23. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  422. Esping-Andersen, Gøsta, 1990: Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  423. Farrell, David und Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck, Hrsg. 2008. Non-Party Actors in Electoral Politics: The Role of Interest Groups and Independent Citizens in Contemporary Election Campaigns. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  424. ICTWSS: Database on Institutional Characteristics of Trade Unions, Wage Setting, State Intervention and Social Pacts in 55 countries between 1960 and 2018; Hrsg. AIAS/OECD; Paris: OECD. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  425. Korpi, Walter, 1983: The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  426. Lehnert, Detlef, 1983: Sozialdemokratie zwischen Protestbewegung und Regierungspartei 1848-1983. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  427. Lepsius, M. Rainer, 1963. Kulturelle Dimensionen der sozialen Schichtung. In Interessen, Ideen und Institutionen Hrsg. Lepsius, M. Rainer, 96-116. Opladen: Westdeutscher 1990. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  428. Lindvall, Johannes und David Rueda, 2014. The Insider–Outsider Dilemma. British Journal of Political Science 44(2): 460-475. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  429. Lipset, Seymour Martin, 1960: Political Man. The Social Bases of Politics (Expanded and Updated Version). Baltimore, Ml.: John Hopkins 1981. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  430. Lipset, Seymour Martin und Stein Rokkan, 1967. Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. In Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives Hrsg. Lipset, Seymour Martin und Stein Rokkan, 1-64. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  431. Merkel, Wolfgang, 1993: Ende der Sozialdemokratie? Machtressourcen und Regierungspolitik im westeuropäischen Vergleich. Frankfurt: Campus. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  432. Naumann, Elias, 2018. Does Population Ageing Change Pension Reform Attitudes? A Survey Experiment on Political Knowledge, Ideology, and Preferences. In Welfare State Reforms Seen from Below: Comparing Public Attitudes and Organized Interests in Britain and Germany Hrsg. Ebbinghaus, Bernhard und Elias Naumann, 211-243. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  433. Olson, Mancur, 1965: The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (second edition). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  434. Poguntke, Thomas und Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck, 1994. Still the Same with a New Name? Bündnis 90/Die Grünen after the Fusion. German Politics 3: 91-113. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  435. Przeworski, Adam und John Sprague, 1986: Paper Stones. A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  436. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, 2020. Wie „AfD-bewegt“ sind die Gewerkschafter?. In The European Social Model under Pressure: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Klaus Armingeon Hrsg. Careja, Romana, Patrick Emmenegger und Nathalie Giger, 401-423. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  437. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger und Cornelia Weins, 1997. Gone with the wind (of change). In Politische Orientierungen und Verhaltensweisen im vereinigten Deutschland Hrsg. Gabriel, Oscar W., 321–351. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  438. Schmitt, Rüdiger, 1990: Die Friedensbewegung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Ursachen und Bedingungen der Mobilisierung einer neuen sozialen Bewegung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  439. Schönhoven, Klaus, 2003. Geschichte der deutschen Gewerkschaften: Phasen und Probleme. In Die Gewerkschaften in Politik und Gesellschaft der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Ein Handbuch Hrsg. Schroeder, Wolfgang und Bernhard Weßels, 40- 64. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  440. Streeck, Wolfgang, 1981: Gewerkschaftliche Organisationsprobleme in der sozialstaatlichen Demokratie. Königstein: Athenäum. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  441. Streeck, Wolfgang und Anke Hassel, 2003. Trade Unions as Political Actors. In International Handbook of Trade Unions Hrsg. Addison, John T. und Claus Schnabel, 335-365. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  442. Visser, Jelle, 1989: European Trade Unions in Figures. Deventer: Kluwer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-355
  443. Referenzen Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  444. Alvarez, R. M., und J. Nagler (2004). Party system compactness: Measurement and consequences. Political Analysis 12(1), 46–62. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  445. Ansolabehere, S., und J. M. Snyder (2000). Valence politics and equilibrium in spatial election models. Public Choice 103(3/4), 327–336. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  446. Bawn, K. (1993). The logic of institutional preferences: German electoral law as a social choice outcome. American Journal of Political Science 37(4), 965–989. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  447. Bawn, K., und Z. Somer-Topcu (2012). Government versus opposition at the polls: how governing status affects the impact of policy positions. American Journal of Political Science 56(2), 433–446. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  448. Brady, H. E. (1990). Traits versus issues: Factor versus ideal-point analysis of candidate thermometer ratings. Political Analysis 2(1), 97–129. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  449. Brennan, G., und L. E. Lomasky (2008). Democracy and decision: the pure theory of electoral preference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  450. Brennan, G. H., und A. P. Hamlin (1998). Expressive voting and electoral equilibrium. Public Choice 95(1), 149–175. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  451. Campbell, A., P. E. Converse, W. E. Miller und D. E. Stokes (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  452. Campbell, A., G. Gurin und W. E. Miller (1954). The voter decides. Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  453. Coombs, C. H. (1964). A theory of data. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  454. Cox, G. W. (1997). Making votes count: strategic coordination in the world’s electoral systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  455. Cox, K. E., und L. J. Schoppa (2002). Interaction effects in mixed-member electoral systems: theory and evidence from Germany, Japan, and Italy. Comparative Political Studies 35(9): 1027-1053. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  456. Debreu, G. (1959). Theory of value: An axiomatic analysis of economic equilibrium. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  457. Duch, R. M., J. May und D. Armstrong (2010). Coalition-directed voting in multi-party democracies. American Political Science Review 104(4), 698–719. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  458. Duverger, M. (1954). Political parties: their organization and activity in the modern state. London: Methuen. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  459. Enelow, J. M., und M. J. Hinich (1984). The spatial theory of voting: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  460. Ferrara, F., und E. S. Herron (2005). Going it alone? Strategic entry under mixed electoral rules. American Journal of Political Science 49(1), 16–31. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  461. Ferrara, F., E. S. Herron und M. Nishikawa (2005). Mixed electoral systems: Contamination and its consequences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  462. Gelman, A., und D. B. Rubin (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Sciences 7, 457–511. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  463. Groseclose, T. (2001). A model of candidate location when one candidate has a valence advantage. American Journal of Political Science 45(4), 862–886. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  464. Gschwend, T. (2007). Ticket-splitting and strategic voting under mixed electoral rules: Evidence from Germany. European Journal of Political Research 46(1), 1–23. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  465. Gschwend, T., und T. Zittel (2012). Machen Wahlkreiskandidaten einen Unterschied? Die Persönlichkeitswahl als interaktiver Prozess. In R. Schmitt-Beck (Hrsg.), Wählen in Deutschland, S. 371–392. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  466. Hainmueller, J., H. Kern und M. Bechtel (2006). Wahlkreisarbeit zahlt sich doppelt aus. Zur Wirkung des Amtsinhaberstatus einer Partei auf ihren Zweitstimmenanteil bei den Bundestagswahlen 1949 bis 1998. In T. Bräuninger und J. Behnke (Hrsg.), Jahrbuch für Handlungs- und Entscheidungstheorie, S. 11–45. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  467. Hamlin, A., und C. Jennings (2011). Expressive political behaviour: Foundations, scope and implications. British Journal of Political Science 41, 645–670. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  468. Herrmann, M. (2012). Voter uncertainty and failure of Duverger’s law: An empirical analysis. Public Choice 151(1), 63–90. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  469. Herrmann, M., und F. U. Pappi (2008). Strategic voting in German constituencies. Electoral Studies 27(2), 228–244. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  470. Herron, E. S., und M. Nishikawa (2001). Contamination effects and the number of parties in mixed superposition electoral systems. Electoral Studies 20(1), 63–86. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  471. Huber, Sascha (2012). Strukturen des politischen Kontexts und die demokratische Kompetenz der Wähler. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  472. King, G. (1990). Electoral responsiveness and partisan bias in multiparty democracies. Legislative Studies Quarterly 15(2), 159–181. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  473. Kreps, D. M. (2013). Microeconomic foundations. 1. Choice and competitive markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  474. Kurella, A.-S. (2016). Hätten Direktkandidaten der AfD über die 5%-Hürde verholfen? Eine Untersuchung des Kontaminationseffekts im Mischwahlsystem. In H. Schoen und B. Weßels (Hrsg.), Wahlen und Wähler: Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2013, S. 202–222. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  475. Käppner, K., und S. Shikano (2015). A polytomous IRT unfolding model for the extraction of ideological space and valence factors from feeling thermometer ratings. Paper prepared for the MPSA conference, Chicago 2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  476. Luce, R. D., und J. W. Tuckey (1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1(1), 1–27. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  477. Manow, P. (2010). Dimensionen der Disproportionalität – Erststimmen und Direktmandate in den Bundestagswahlen von 1953 bis 2009. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 51(3), 433–455. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  478. Markus, G. B., und P. E. Converse (1979). A dynamic simultaneous equation model of electoral choice. The American Political Science Review 73(4), 1055–1070. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  479. Moser, R. G., und E. Scheiner (2004). Mixed electoral systems and electoral system effects: controlled comparison and cross-national analysis. Electoral Studies 23(4), 575–599. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  480. Pappi, F. U. (2011). Party identification. In B. Badie, D. Berg-Schlosser und L. Morlino (Hrsg.), International encyclopedia of political science, Bd. 6, S. 1806–1811. Los Angeles: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  481. Pappi, F. U., und P. W. Thurner (2002). Electoral behaviour in a two-vote system: Incentives for ticket splitting in German Bundestag elections. European Journal of Political Research 41(2), 207–232. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  482. Plummer, M. (2003). Jags: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. http://mcmc-jags.sourceforge.net/. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  483. Rheault, L, A. Blais, J. Aldrich und T. Gschwend (2020). Understanding people’s choice when they have two votes. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 30(4), 466–483. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  484. Riker, W. H., und P. C. Ordeshook (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. The American Political Science Review 62(1), 25–42. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  485. Schoen, H. (1999). Split-ticket voting in German federal elections, 1953-90: An example of sophisticated balloting? Electoral Studies 18(4), 473–496. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  486. Schofield, N., und I. Sened (2006). Multiparty democracy: Elections and legislative politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  487. Schuessler, A. A. (2000). A logic of expressive choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  488. Schüttemeyer, S. S., und R. Sturm (2005). Der Kandidat – das (fast) unbekannte Wesen: Befunde und Überlegungen zur Aufstellung der Bewerber zum Deutschen Bundestag. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 36(3), 539–553. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  489. Shikano, S. (2009). Simulating party competition and vote decision under mixed member electoral systems. Czech Economic Review 3(3), 270–291. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  490. Stokes, D. E. (1992). Valence politics. In D. Kavanagh (Hrsg.), Electoral Politics, S. 161–164. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  491. Stratmann, T., und M. Baur (2002). Plurality rule, proportional representation, and the German Bundestag: How incentives to pork-barrel differ across electoral systems. American Journal of Political Science 46(3), 506–514. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  492. Theil, H. (1969). The desired political entropy. American Political Science Review 63(2), 521–525. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  493. pagebreak Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-379
  494. Literatur Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-413
  495. Achen, Christopher H. und Larry M. Bartels. 2016. Democracy for Realists. Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton und Oxford: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-413
  496. Baccaro, Lucio und Chris Howell. 2017. Trajectories of Neoliberal Transformation. European Industrial Relations Since the 1970s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-413
  497. Dalton, Russell. 2021. „The Representation Gap and Political Sophistication: A Contrarian Perspective.“ Comparative Political Studies 54 (5):889-917. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-413
  498. De Boef, Suzanna und Luke Keele. 2008. „Taking Time Seriously.“ American Journal of Political Science 52 (1):184-200. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-413
  499. Merkel, Wolfgang, Raj Kollmorgen und Hans-Jürgen Wagener, eds. 2019. The Handbook of Political, Social, and Economic Transformation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-413
  500. Schmidt, Manfred G. 1996. „When Parties Matter: A Review of the Possibilities and Limits of Partisan Influence on Public Policy.“ European Journal of Political Research 30 (2):155-83. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-413
  501. Schmidt, Manfred G. 2021. „Parties.“ In Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State, 2nd edition, ed. D. Béland, K. Morgan, H. Obinger und C. Pierson. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-413
  502. Schmitt, Rüdiger und Klaus Armingeon (1986): Wie „friedensbewegt“ sind die Gewerkschafter? Einstellungen von Gewerkschaftsmitgliedern zu Sicherheitspolitik und Friedensbewegung, in: Politische Vierteljahresschrift 27: 423-433. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-413
  503. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger. 2014. „Euro-Kritik, Wirtschaftspessimismus und Einwanderungsskepsis: Hintergründe des Beinah-Wahlerfolges der Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) bei der Bundestagswahl 2013.“ Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 45 (1):94-112. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-413
  504. Literatur Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  505. Adam, Frane. 2008. ‘Mapping Social Capital across Europe: Findings, Trends and Methodological Shortcomings of Cross-National Surveys.’ Social Science Information 47 (2): 159-86. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  506. Anheier, Helmut K. 2007. ‘Reflections on the Concept and Measurement of Global Civil Society.’ VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 18 (1): 1-15. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  507. Badescu, Gabrielund Katja Neller. 2007. ‘Explaining Associational Involvement.’ In Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis, Herausgegeben von Jan W. van Deth, José Ramón Montero und Anders Westholm, 158-87. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  508. Bailer, Stefanie, Thilo Bodenstein und V. Finn Heinrich. 2013. ‘Explaining the Strength of Civil Society: Evidence from Cross-Sectional Data.’ International Political Science Review 34 (3): 289-30. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  509. Banfield, Edward C. 1958. The Moral Basis of a Backward Society. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  510. Barber, Benjamin R. 1995. Jihad vs McWorld. New York: Times Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  511. Bielasiak, Jack. 2000. ‘Participation and Democracy, East and West: Comparisons and Interpretations.’ American Political Science Review 94 (04): 975-76. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  512. Castiglione, Dario, Jan W. van Deth und Guglielmo Wolleb. 2008. ‘The Handbook of Social Capital.’ Oxfor, New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  513. Charron, Nicholas. 2013. 'From Åland to Ankara: European Quality of Government Index. 2013 Data, Sensitivity Analysis and Final Results.' QoG Working Paper Series 2013:11. Göteborg. https://www.gu.se/sites/default/files/2020-05/2013_11_Charron.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  514. Curtis, James E., Douglas Baer und Edward G. Grabb. 2001. ‘Nations of Joiners: Explaining Voluntary Association Membership in Democratic Societies.’ American Sociological Review 66: 783-805. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  515. Dekker, Paul und Andries van den Broek. 1998. ‘Civil Society in Comparative Perspective: Involvement in Voluntary Associations in North America and Western Europe.’ Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 9 (1): 11-38. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  516. Ferragina, Emanuele. 2012. Social Capital in Europe. A Comparative Regional Analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  517. Ferragina, Emanuele. 2013. ‘The Socio-Economic Determinants of Social Capital and the Mediating Effect of History: Making Democracy Work Revisited.’ International Journal of Comparative Sociology 54 (1): 48-73. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  518. Ferragina, Emanuele. 2016. ‘The Social Capital of European Regions.’ In Handbook of Social Capital and Regional Development, Herausgegeben von Hans Westl und and Johan P. Larsson, 257-95. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  519. Gesthuizen, Maurice, Peer Scheepers, William Veld und Beate Völker. 2013. ‘Structural Aspects of Social Capital: Tests for Cross-National Equivalence in Europe.’ Quality & Quantity 47 (2): 909-22. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  520. Guigni, Marco. 2016. ‘LIVEWHAT: Synthesis of Project Findings.’ Geneva. http://www.livewhat.unige.ch/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Synthesis-of-Findings.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  521. Heinrich, Volkhart F. 2005. ‘Studying Civil Society across the World: Exploring the Thorny Issues of Conceptualization and Measurement.’ Journal of Civil Society 1 (3): 211-28. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  522. Hooghe, Marc und Sonja Zmerli. 2011. ‘Introduction: The Context of Political Trust.’ In Political Trust. Why Context Matters, Herausgegeben von Sonja Zmerli and Marc Hooghe, 1-11. Colchester: ECPR Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  523. Howard, Marc Morjé. 2005. ‘Conceptual and Methodological Suggestions for Improving Cross-National Measures of Civil Society: Commentary on Heinrich.’ Journal of Civil Society 1 (3): 229-33. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  524. ICNL. 2014. ‘Assessment Tools for Measuring Civil Society’s Enabling Environment.’ Washington DC. http://www.icnl.org/. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  525. Keane, John. 1998. Civil Society: Old Images, New Visions. Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  526. Magone, José M. 2003. The Politics of Southern Europe: Integration Into the European Union. Westport: Praeger. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  527. Malena, Carmen und Volkhart Finn Heinrich. 2007. ‘Can We Measure Civil Society? A Proposed Methodology for International Comparative Research.’ Development in Practice 17 (3): 338-52. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  528. Mascherini, Massimiliano, Daniele Vidoni und Anna Rita Manca. 2011. ‘Exploring the Determinants of Civil Participation in 14 European Countries: One-Size-Fits None.’ European Sociological Review 27 (6): 790-807. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  529. Monforte, Pierre. 2019. ‘From Compassion to Critical Resilience: Volunteering in the Context of Austerity.’ The Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026119858220. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  530. Morales, Laura. 2009. Joining Political Organizations: Institutions, Mobilization, and Participation in Western Democracies. Colchester: ECPR Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  531. Morales, Laura und Peter Geurts. 2007. ‘Associational Involvement.’ In Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis, Herausgegeben von Jan W. van Deth, José Ramón Montero und Anders Westholm, 135-57. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  532. Moro, Giovanni und Ilaria Vannini. 2006. ‘Italian Civil Society Facing New Challenges.’ Rome. www.civicus.org/media/CSI_Italy_Executive_Summary.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  533. Nash, Robert, Alan Hudson und Cecilia Luttrell. 2006. ‘Mapping Political Context: A Toolkit for Civil Society Organizations.’ London. https://www.odi.org/publications/152-mapping-political-context-toolkit-civil-society-organisations. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  534. OECD. 2017. How’s Life? Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/how_life-2017-en. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  535. Oorschot, Wim van und Wil Arts. 2005. ‘The Social Capital of European Welfare States: The Crowding out Hypothesis Revisited.’ Journal of European Social Policy 15 (1): 5-26. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  536. Pichler, Florian und Claire Wallace. 2007. ‘Patterns of Formal and Informal Social Capital in Europe.’ European Sociological Review 23 (4): 423-35. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  537. Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  538. Quality of Government Institute. 2010. ‘Measuring the Quality of Government and Subnational Variation.’ Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General Regional and Urban Policy, Nr: 2016.СЕ.16.ВАТ.066. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  539. Reimer, Sabine. 2005. ‘Civicus Civil Society Index Report for Germany.’ http://www.civicus.org/media/CSI_Germany_Executive_Summary.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  540. Rothstein, Bo und Dietlind Stolle. 2008. ‘Political Institutions and Generalized Trust.’ In The Handbook of Social Capital, Herausgegeben von Dario Castiglione, Jan W. van Dethund Guglielmo Wolleb, 273-302. Oxford: Oxford Universtiy Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  541. Sarracino, Francesco. 2012. ‘Money, Sociability and Happiness: Are Developed Countries Doomed to Social Erosion and Unhappiness?’ Social Indicators Research 109 (2): 135-88. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  542. Schnaudt, Christian, Michael Weinhardt, Rory Fitzgerald und Stefan Liebig. 2014. ‘The European Social Survey: Contents, Design, and Research Potential.’ Schmollers Jahrbuch 134 (4): 487–506. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  543. Shahin, Jamal, Alison Woodward und Georgios Terzis. 2013. ‘Study on the Impact of the Crisis on Civil Society Organizations in the EU - Risks and Opportunities.’ Brussels: submitted to The European Economic and Social Committee Communication Unit. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  544. Simiti, Marilena. 2017. ‘Civil Society and the Economy: Greek Civil Society During the Economic Crisis.’ Journal of Civil Society 13 (4): 357-73. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  545. Sotiropoulos, Dimitri A. und Evika Karamagioli. 2006. ‘Greek Civil Society: The Long Road to Maturity.’ Athens. www.civicus.org/media/CSI_Greece_Executive_Summary.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  546. Theocharis, Yannis und Jan W. van Deth. 2015. ‘A Modern Tragedy? Institutional Causes and Democratic Consequences of the Greek Crisis.’ Representation 51 (1): 63-7. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  547. van der Meer, Tom. 2009. ‘States of Freely Associating Citizens: Cross-National Studies into the Impact of State Institutions On Social, Civic und Political Participation.’ Nijmegen: Radboud University. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  548. van der Meer, Tom. 2016. ‘Neither Bridging nor Bonding: A Test of Socialization Effects by Ethnically Diverse Voluntary Associations on Participants’ Inter-Ethnic Tolerance, Inter-Ethnic Trust and Intra-Ethnic Belonging.’ Social Science Research 55: 63-74. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  549. van Deth, Jan W. und William A. Maloney. 2015. ‘Associations and Associational Involvement in Europe.’ In Routledge Handbook of European Politics, Herausgegeben von José M. Magone, 826-42. Abingdon/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  550. Wallace, Claire und Florian Pichler. 2009. ‘More Participation, Happier Society? A Comparative Study of Civil Society and the Quality of Life.’ Social Indicators Research 93 (2): 255-74. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  551. Danksagung Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  552. Für hilfreiche Kommentare zu früheren Versionen dieses Kapitels danke ich Paolo Segatti, José Ramón Montero und Christian Schnaudt. Zudem danke ich Christian Schnaudt für die sprachliche Überarbeitung der deutschen Fassung. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-427
  553. References Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  554. Alexander, Peter. 2013. ‘Marikana, Turning Point in South African History’. Review of African Political Economy 40(138): 605–19. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  555. Anderson, Elizabeth. 2018. ‘Freedom and Equality’. In The Oxford Handbook of Freedom, eds. David Schmidtz and Carmen E. Pavel. New York: Oxford University Press, 90–105. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  556. Arblaster, Anthony. 2002. Democracy. 3rd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  557. Arksey, Hilary, and Peter T. Knight. 1999. Interviewing for Social Scientists: An Introductory Resource with Examples. Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  558. Beetham, David. 2004. ‘The Quality of Democracy: Freedom as the Foundation’. Journal of Democracy 15(4): 61–75. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  559. Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. 1990. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  560. Berlin, Isaiah. 1966. Two Concepts of Liberty. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  561. Blokker, Paul. 2010. Multiple Democracies in Europe: Political Culture in New Member States. London & New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  562. Bratton, Michael, and Robert Mattes. 2001. ‘Support for Democracy in Africa: Intrinsic or Instrumental?’ British Journal of Political Science 31(3): 447–74. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  563. Brooks, Heidi, Trevor Ngwane, and Carin Runciman. 2020. ‘Decolonising and Re-Theorising the Meaning of Democracy: A South African Perspective’. The Sociological Review 68(1): 17–32. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  564. Browne, Craig, and Paula Diehl. 2019. ‘Conceptualising the Political Imaginary: An Introduction to the Special Issue’. Social Epistemology 33(5): 393–97. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  565. Bühlmann, Marc, Wolfgang Merkel, Lisa Müller, and Bernhard Weßels. 2012. ‘The Democracy Barometer: A New Instrument to Measure the Quality of Democracy and Its Potential for Comparative Research’. European Political Science 11(4): 519–36. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  566. Chuma, Wallace, Tanja Bosch, and Herman Wasserman. 2017. ‘The Media, Civil Society and Democracy in South Africa: State of the Nation Address 2015’. Communicatio 43(2): 93–108. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  567. Collier, David, and Stephen Levitsky. 1997. ‘Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research’. World Politics 49(3): 430–51. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  568. Dahl, Robert Alan. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  569. Diamond, Larry, and Leonardo Morlino. 2005. Assessing the Quality of Democracy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  570. Diamond, Larry, and Marc F. Plattner. 2001. The Global Divergence of Democracies. Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  571. Doorenspleet, Renske. 2015. ‘Where Are the People? A Call for People-Centred Concepts and Measurements of Democracy’. Government and Opposition 50(3): 469–94. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  572. Dovi, Suzanne. 2014. ‘Political Representation’. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/political-representation/ (August 18, 2015). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  573. Duncan, Jane. 2016. Protest Nation: The Right to Protest in South Africa. University of KwaZulu-Natal Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  574. Dunn, John. 1993. Democracy: The Unfinished Journey, 508 BC to AD 1993. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  575. Dworkin, Ronald. 1996. ‘Do Liberty and Equality Conflict?’ In Living as Equals, ed. Paul Barker. New York: Oxford University Press, 39–57. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  576. Encyclopedia Britannica. 2023. ‘Democracy | Definition, History, Meaning, Types, Examples, & Facts’. https://www.britannica.com/topic/democracy (June 19, 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  577. Ezrahi, Yaron. 2012. Imagined Democracies: Necessary Political Fictions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  578. Gready, Paul. 2010. The Era of Transitional Justice: The Aftermath of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa and Beyond. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  579. Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  580. Hayek, Friedrich August. 1944. The Road to Serfdom. Abingdon & New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  581. Held, David. 2006. Models of Democracy. 3rd ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  582. von Holdt, Karl. 2013. ‘South Africa: The Transition to Violent Democracy’. Review of African Political Economy 40(138): 589–604. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  583. Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late 20th Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  584. Isakhan, Benjamin, and Stephen Stockwell. 2012. Edinburgh Companion to the History of Democracy. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  585. Johnson-Cartee, Karen S. 2005. News Narratives and News Framing: Constructing Political Reality. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  586. Krastev, Ivan, and Stephen Holmes. 2019. The Light That Failed: A Reckoning. London: Penguin UK. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  587. Kruse, Stefan, Maria Ravlik, and Christian Welzel. 2019. ‘Democracy Confused: When People Mistake the Absence of Democracy for Its Presence’. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 50(3): 315–35. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  588. Leeds-Hurwitz, Wendy. 2016. ‘Social Construction’. In Oxford Bibliographies in Communication, ed. Patricia Moy. DOI: 10.1093/OBO/9780199756841-0106. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780199756841/obo-9780199756841-0106.xml (June 8, 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  589. Lieberman, Evan. 2022. Until We Have Won Our Liberty: South Africa after Apartheid. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  590. Mandela, Nelson. 2013. Long Walk To Freedom. London: Little, Brown. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  591. Mkhize, Mbekezeli C. 2015. ‘Is South Africa’s 20 Years of Democracy in Crisis? Examining the Impact of Unrest Incidents in Local Protests in the Post-Apartheid South Africa’. African Security Review 24(2): 190–206. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  592. Moosa, Mikhail, and Jan Hofmeyr. 2021. ‘South Africans’ Trust in Institutions and Representatives Reaches New Low’. Africa Portal. https://www.africaportal.org/publications/south-africans-trust-institutions-and-representatives-reaches-new-low/ (May 5, 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  593. Munck, Gerardo L. 2016. ‘What Is Democracy? A Reconceptualization of the Quality of Democracy’. Democratization 23(1): 1–26. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  594. Nussbaum, Martha, and Amartya Sen. 1993. The Quality of Life. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  595. Project, Borgen. 2020. ‘Poverty on the Rise in South Africa’. The Borgen Project. https://borgenproject.org/poverty-in-south-africa/ (April 14, 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  596. Robeyns, Ingrid, and Morten Fibieger Byskov. 2023. ‘The Capability Approach’. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, eds. Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/capability-approach/ (May 5, 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  597. Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. 2004. ‘The Quality of Democracy: Addressing Inequality’. Journal of Democracy 15(4): 76–90. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  598. Saward, Michael. 2003. Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Polity. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  599. Saward, Michael. 2006. ‘The Representative Claim’. Contemporary Political Theory 5(3): 297–318. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  600. Schaffer, Frederic Charles. 2000. Democracy in Translation: Understanding Politics in an Unfamiliar Culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  601. Schaffer, Frederic Charles. 2014. ‘Thin Descriptions: The Limits of Survey Research on the Meaning of Democracy’. Polity 46(3): 303–30. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  602. Schedler, Andreas, and Rodolfo Sarsfield. 2007. ‘Democrats with Adjectives: Linking Direct and Indirect Measures of Democratic Support’. European Journal of Political Research 46(5): 637–59. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  603. Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Henry E. Brady, and Sidney Verba. 2020. Unequal and Unrepresented: Political Inequality and the People’s Voice in the New Gilded Age. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  604. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, and Christiane Grill. 2020. ‘From the Living Room to the Meeting Hall? Citizens’ Political Talk in the Deliberative System’. Political Communication 37(6): 832–51. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  605. Searle, John R. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. London: Penguin. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  606. Sen, Amartya. 1995. Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  607. Shapiro, Ian, and Casiano Hacker-Cordón. 1999. Democracy’s Edges. London, UK & New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  608. Snyder, Jack L. 2000. From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict. New York: Norton. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  609. Sorensen, Lone, Heather Ford, Walid Al-Saqaf, and Tanja Bosch. 2019. ‘Dialogue of the Deaf: Listening on Twitter and Democratic Responsiveness during the 2015 South African State of the Nation Address’. In ed. Katrin Voltmer et al. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 229–54. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  610. South African Government. 2023. ‘The Constitution’. https://www.gov.za/constitution/ (August 11, 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  611. Southall, Roger. 2016. The New Black Middle Class in South Africa. Suffolk (UK): James Currey. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  612. Steiner, Hillel. 2018. ‘On the Conflict between Liberty and Equality’. In The Oxford Handbook of Freedom, eds. David Schmidtz and Carmen E. Pavel. New York: Oxford University Press, 76–89. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  613. Twala, Chitja. 2014. ‘The Causes and Socio-Political Impact of the Service Delivery Protests to the South African Citizenry: A Real Public Discourse’. Journal of Social Sciences 39(2): 159–67. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  614. Voltmer, Katrin. 2019. ‘Democratization Conflicts as Communicative Contestations’. In Media, Communication and the Struggle for Democratic Change. Case Studies on Contested Transitions, ed. Katrin Voltmer et al. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–31. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  615. van Wessel, Margit. 2010. ‘Political Disaffection: What We Can Learn from Asking the People’. Parliamentary Affairs 63(3): 504–23. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  616. van Wessel, Margit. 2017. ‘Citizens as Sense-Makers: Towards a Deeper Appreciation of Citizens’ Understandings of Democratic Politics’. Political Studies 65(1): 127–45. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  617. Whitehead, Laurence. 2002. Democratization: Theory and Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-457
  618. References Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  619. Alvarez, R.M., Hall, T.E., Llewellyn, M.H., 2008. Are Americans Confident Their Ballots Are Counted? The Journal of Politics 70, 754–766. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608080730 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  620. Arzheimer, K., Evans, J., Lewis-Beck, M.S. (Eds.), 2017. The Sage Handbook of Electoral Behaviour. Sage, Los Angeles. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  621. Berlinski, N., Doyle, M., Guess, A.M., Levy, G., Lyons, B., Montgomery, J.M., Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., 2023. The Effects of Unsubstantiated Claims of Voter Fraud on Confidence in Elections. Journal of Experimental Political Science 10, 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2021.18 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  622. Birch, S., 2008. Electoral Institutions and Popular Confidence in Electoral Processes: A Cross-national Analysis. Electoral Studies 27, 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.005 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  623. Birch, S., 2010. Perceptions of Electoral Fairness and Voter Turnout. Comparative Political Studies 43, 1601–1622. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010374021 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  624. Birch, S., 2011. Electoral Malpractice. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  625. Bowler, S., Brunell, T., Donovan, T., Gronke, P., 2015. Election Administration and Perceptions of Fair Elections. Electoral Studies 38, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2015.01.004 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  626. Bratton, M., 2008. Vote Buying and Violence in Nigerian Election Campaigns. Electoral Studies 27, 621–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.04.013 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  627. Carreras, M., İrepoğlu, Y., 2013. Trust in Elections, Vote Buying, and Turnout in Latin America. Electoral Studies, Special Symposium: The New Research Agenda on Electoral Integrity 32, 609–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.07.012 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  628. Clark, A., 2017. Identifying the Determinants of Electoral Integrity and Administration in Advanced Democracies: the Case of Britain. European Political Science Review 9, 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773916000060 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  629. Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Knutsen, C.H., Lindberg, S.I., Teorell, J., Alizada, N., Altman, D., Bernhard, M., Cornell, A., Fish, M.S., Gastaldi, L., Gjerløw, H., Glynn, A., Grahn, S., Hicken, A., Hindle, G., Ilchenko, N., Kinzelbach, K., Krusell, J., Marquardt, K.L., McMann, K., Mechkova, V., Medzihorsky, J., Paxton, P., Pemstein, D., Pernes, J., Ryd´en, O., von Römer, J., Seim, B., Sigman, R., Skaaning, S.-E., Staton, J., Sundström, A., Tzelgov, E., Wang, Y., Wig, T., Wilson, S., Ziblatt, D., 2022. V-Dem Country-Year Dataset v12. https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemds22 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  630. EVS/WVS, 2022. Joint EVS/WVS 2017-2022 Dataset. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14023. ZA7505 Data file version 3.0.0. GESIS, Cologne. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  631. Fisher, J., Sällberg, Y., 2020. Electoral Integrity – The Winner Takes it All? Evidence from Three British General Elections. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 22, 404–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120912668 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  632. Flesken, A., Hartl, J., 2018. Party Support, Values, and Perceptions of Electoral Integrity. Political Psychology 39, 707–724. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12431 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  633. Fortin-Rittberger, J., Harfst, P., Dingler, S.C., 2017. The Costs of Electoral Fraud: Establishing the Link between Electoral Integrity, Winning an Election, and Satisfaction with Democracy. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 27, 350–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2017.1310111 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  634. Garnett, H.A., 2019. On the Front Lines of Democracy: Perceptions of Electoral Officials and Democratic Elections. Democratization 26, 1399–1418. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1641797 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  635. Garnett, H.A., James, T.S., 2021. Measuring Electoral Integrity: Using Practitioner Knowledge to Assess Elections. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 31, 348–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2020.1824186 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  636. Garnett, H.A., James, T.S., MacGregor, M., 2022. Year in Elections Global Report: 2019-2021. The Electoral Integrity Project. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  637. Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., Lagos, M., Norris, P., Ponarin, E., Puranen, B., 2022. World Values Survey Trend File (1981-2022) Cross-National Data-Set. https://doi.org/10.14281/18241.23. Data File Version 2.0.0. Madrid & Vienna: JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  638. Heisig, J.P., Schaeffer, M., 2019. Why You Should Always Include a Random Slope for the Lower-Level Variable Involved in a Cross-Level Interaction. European Sociological Review 35, 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy053 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  639. Jost, J.T., 2019. A Quarter Century of System Justification Theory: Questions, Answers, Criticisms, and Societal Applications. British Journal of Social Psychology 58, 263–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12297 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  640. Karp, J.A., Nai, A., Norris, P., 2018. Dial ‘F’ for Fraud: Explaining Citizens’ Suspicions about Elections. Electoral Studies 53, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.01.010 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  641. Martínez i Coma, F., van Ham, C., 2015. Can Experts Judge Elections? Testing the Validity of Expert Judgments for Measuring Election Integrity. European Journal of Political Research 54, 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12084 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  642. McCann, J.A., Domı́nguez, J.I., 1998. Mexicans React to Electoral Fraud and Political Corruption: An Assessment of Public Opinion and Voting Behavior. Electoral Studies 17, 483–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(98)00026-2 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  643. Nohlen, D., 2014. Wahlrecht und Parteiensystem, 7th ed. Budrich, Opladen. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  644. Norris, P., 2019. Do Perceptions of Electoral Malpractice Undermine Democratic Satisfaction? The US in Comparative Perspective. International Political Science Review 40, 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512118806783 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  645. Norris, P., 2018. Electoral integrity, in: Fisher, J., Fieldhouse, E., Franklin, M.N., Gibson, R., Cantijoch, M., Wlezien, C. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behavior and Public Opinion. Routledge, Abingdon, 220–231. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315712390.ch18 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  646. Norris, P., 2014. Why Electoral Integrity Matters. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  647. Norris, P., 2013. The New Research Agenda Studying Electoral Integrity. Electoral Studies, Special Symposium: The New Research Agenda on Electoral Integrity 32, 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.07.015 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  648. Norris, P., Frank, R.W., Martínez i Coma, F., 2014. Measuring Electoral Integrity around the World: A New Dataset. PS: Political Science & Politics 47, 789–798. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096514001061 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  649. Norris, P., Grömping, M., 2019a. Electoral Integrity Worldwide. University of Sydney, Sydney. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  650. Norris, P., Grömping, M., 2019b. Perceptions of Electoral Integrity Data, version PEI-7.0. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/PDYRWL Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  651. Norris, P., Martinez i Coma, F., Grömping, M., 2015. Perceptions of Electoral Integrity Data, version PEI-3.0. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/29114 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  652. Schmitt-Beck, R., Faas, T., 2021. Wie frei und fair war die Bundestagswahl 2017? Elektorale Integrität aus Sicht der Bürgerinnen und Bürger, in: Weßels, B., Schoen, H. (Eds.), Wahlen und Wähler: Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2017. Springer, Wiesbaden, 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33582-3_8 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  653. Schnaudt, C., 2023a. Exit or Voice? Behavioral Implications of Electoral-Integrity Beliefs in Germany. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 64, 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-022-00403-9 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  654. Schnaudt, C., 2023b. Sowing the Seeds of Skepticism? Electoral-integrity Beliefs among Political Elites. Electoral Studies 84, 102654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102654 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  655. Schnaudt, C., 2023c. Mind the Gap(s): Winning, Losing, and Perceptions of Electoral Integrity in Mixed-member Proportional Systems. Electoral Studies 83, 102611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102611 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  656. Schnaudt, C., Hahn, C., Heppner, E., 2021. Distributive and Procedural Justice and Political Trust in Europe. Frontiers in Political Science 3, 24. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.642232 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  657. Segatti, P., Schmitt, H., van der Eijk, C., 2021. Comparing Individual Behaviour across Contexts: The Core Research Question, in: Schmitt, H., Segatti, P., Eijk, C. van der (Eds.), Consequences of Context: How the Social, Political, and Economic Environment Affects Voting. ECPR Press, London; Lanham, 1–20. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  658. Simpser, A., 2012. Does Electoral Manipulation Discourage Voter Turnout? Evidence from Mexico. The Journal of Politics 74, 782–795. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000333 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  659. Smets, K., van Ham, C., 2013. The Embarrassment of Riches? A Meta-analysis of Individual-level Research on Voter Turnout. Electoral Studies 32, 344–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2012.12.006 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  660. van Deth, J.W., 2018. Voting and the Expanding Repertoire of Participation, in: Fisher, J., Fieldhouse, E., Franklin, M.N., Gibson, R., Cantijoch, M., Wlezien, C. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behavior and Public Opinion. Routledge, Abingdon, 96–107. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  661. van Ham, C., 2015. Getting Elections right? Measuring Electoral Integrity. Democratization 22, 714–737. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.877447 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  662. Literatur Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-513
  663. Arzheimer, Kai, und Jürgen W. Falter. 2002. „Die Pathologie des Normalen. Eine Anwendung des Scheuch-Klingemann-Modells zur Erklärung rechtsextremen Denkens und Verhaltens“. In Bürger und Demokratie in Ost und West, herausgegeben von Dieter Fuchs, Edeltraud Roller, und Bernhard Weßels, 85–107. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-513
  664. Easton, David. 1965. A System Analysis of Political Life. New York, London, Sydney: John Wiley and Sons. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-513
  665. Fisher, Stephen L. 1973. „The Wasted Vote Thesis: West German Evidence“. Comparative Politics 5 (2): 293–99. https://doi.org/10.2307/421245. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-513
  666. Fuchs, Dieter, und Hans-Dieter Klingemann. 1989. „The Left-Right Schema“. In Continuities in Political Action, herausgegeben von M. Kent Jennings und Jan W. Deth, 203–34. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-513
  667. Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. 2020. „Was macht Menschen zu Extremisten?“ Lagemaß. Infas - Institut für angewandte Sozialforschung 12: 11–13. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-513
  668. Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, und Ebru Canan-Sokullu. 2022. „Democracy under pressure? Support of democracy in Germany and Italy“. In Democracy Under Pressure. Resilience or Retreat?, herausgegeben von Ursula van Beek, 271–311. Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-513
  669. Mielke, Gerd. 2018. „Die repräsentative Demokratie und ihre Herausforderungen. Anmerkungen und Interpretationsversuche“. Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen 31 (1–2): 22–31. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-513
  670. Ruhose, Fedor. 2023. Rechtspopulismus in der Opposition. Die AfD-Fraktion im Bundestag (2017-2021). Frankfurt a.M.: Campus. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-513
  671. Scheuch, Erwin K., und Hans-Dieter Klingemann. 1967. „Theorie des Rechtsradikalismus in westlichen Industriegesellschaften“. In Hamburger Jahrbuch für Wirtschafts- und Sozialpolitik 12, 11–19. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-513
  672. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger. 2014. „Euro-Kritik, Wirtschaftspessimismus und Einwanderungsskepsis: Hintergründe des Beinah-Wahlerfolges der Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) bei der Bundestagswahl 201“. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 45 (1): 94–112. https://doi.org/10.5771/0340-1758-2014-1-94. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-513
  673. – 2021. „Wahlpolitische Achterbahnfahrt. Wer wählte wen bei der Bundestagswahl 2021?“ Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, Beilage zur Wochenzeitung Das Parlament 71 ((47-49)): 10–16. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-513
  674. Schroeder, Wolfgang, und Bernhard Weßels. 2019. „Rechtspopulistische Landnahme in der Öffentlichkeit, im Elektorat und in den Parlamenten“. In Smarte Spalter. Die AfD zwischen Bewegung und Parlament, herausgegeben von Wolfgang Schroeder und Bernhard Weßels, 9–43. Bonn: Dietz Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-513
  675. – 2023. Radikalisiert und etabliert. Die AfD vor dem Superwahljahr 2024. OBS-Arbeitspapier 59. Frankfurt a. M.: Otto-Brenner-Stiftung. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-513
  676. Schroeder, Wolfgang, Bernhard Weßels, Alexander Berzel, und Christian Neusser. 2017. „Parlamentarische Praxis der AfD in deutschen Landesparlamenten“. WZB Discussion Paper SP V 2017-102. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-513
  677. Weßels, Bernhard. 2001. „Vermittlungsinstitutionen und Interessenvertretung: Zur Performanz von Mitgliederorganisationen in Deutschland“. In Politische Partizipation in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Reihe Blickpunkt Gesellschaft 6, herausgegeben von Achim Koch, Martina Wasmer, und Peter Schmidt, 221–46. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-513
  678. Datenquellen Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-513
  679. GLES (2009), Nachwahl-Querschnitt. Rattinger, Hans; Roßteutscher, Sigrid; Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger; Weßels, Bernhard; Wolf, Christof. GESIS Datenarchiv, Köln. ZA5301 Datenfile Version 4.0.2, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13229. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-513
  680. GLES (2013), Nachwahl-Querschnitt. Rattinger, Hans; Roßteutscher, Sigrid; Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger; Weßels, Bernhard; Wolf, Christof. Erhebungszeitraum: 23.09.2013 - 23.12.2013. GESIS Datenarchiv, Köln. ZA5701 Datenfile Version 3.0.1, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13232. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-513
  681. GLES (2017), Nachwahl-Querschnitt. Roßteutscher, Sigrid; Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger; Schoen, Harald; Weßels, Bernhard; Wolf, Christof. Erhebungszeitraum: 25.09.2017 - 30.11.2017. GESIS Datenarchiv, Köln. ZA6801 Datenfile Version 4.0.1, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13235. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-513
  682. GLES (2021), Nachwahl-Querschnitt. Roßteutscher, Sigrid; Debus, Marc; Faas, Thorsten; Schoen, Harald. Erhebungszeitraum: 27.09.2021 - 21.11.2021. GESIS, Köln. ZA7701 Datenfile Version 2.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14074. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-513
  683. References Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  684. Abou-Chadi, T. (2016). Niche party success and mainstream party policy shifts–how green and radical right parties differ in their impact. British Journal of Political Science, 46(2), 417-436. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  685. Abou-Chadi, T., & Krause, W. (2018). The causal effect of radical right success on mainstream parties’ policy positions: A regression discontinuity approach. British Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 1–19. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-533
  686. References Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  687. Allcott, Hunt, Matthew Gentzkow and Chuan Yu. (2019) Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media, in: Research & Politics 6(2). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  688. Alvarez, Richard M. (1997). Information and elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  689. Ansolabehere, Stephen and Shanto Iyengar (1995). Going Negative: How Attack Ads Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  690. Arceneaux, Kevin (2005). Do Campaigns Help Voters Learn? A Cross-National Analysis, in: British Journal of Political Science 36(1): 159-173. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  691. Baptista, Joao Pedro and Anabela Gradim (2022). Who Believes in Fake News? Identification of Political (A)Symmetries, in: Social Sciences, 11(460). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  692. Barabas, Jason and Jennifer Jerit (2009). Estimating the Causal Effects of Media Coverage on Policy-Specific Knowledge, in: American Journal of Political Science 53(1): 73-89. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  693. Bartels, Larry M. (1993). Messages Received: The Political Impact of Media Exposure, in: American Political Science Review 87(2): 267–85. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  694. Bartels, Larry. M. (1988). Presidential primaries and the dynamics of public choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  695. Berelson, Bernard R. (1952). Democratic Theory and Public Opinion, in: Public Opinion Quarterly 16(3): 313-330. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  696. Berelson, Bernard R., Paul F. Lazarsfeld and William N. McPhee (1954). Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  697. Bizer, George Y., Jon A. Krosnick, Allyson L. Holbrook, Christian Wheeler, Derek D. Rucker and Richard E Petty (2004). The Impact of Personality on Cognitive, Behavioral, and Affective Political Processes: The Effect of Need to Evaluate, in: Journal of Personality 72(5): 995-1028. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  698. Bode, Leticia (2016) Political news in the news feed: Learning politics from social media, in: Mass communication and society 19(1): 24-48. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  699. Brians, Craig L. and Martin P. Wattenberg (1996). Campaign Issue Knowledge and Salience: Comparing Reception from TV Commercials, TV News, and Newspapers, in: American Journal of Political Science 40(1): 172–93. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  700. Cacciatore, M. A., S.K. Yeo, D. Scheufele, M. A. Xenos, D. Brossard and E.A. Corley (2018). Is Facebook making us dumber? Exploring social media use as a predictor of political knowledge, in: Journalism & mass communication quarterly 95(2): 404-424. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  701. Cacioppo, John T. and Richard E. Petty (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition, in: Journal of Personality Assessment 48(3): 306-307. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  702. Cacioppo, John T., Richard E. Petty, Jeffrey A. Feinstein and W. Blair Jarvis (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition, in: Psychological Bulletin 119(2): 197–253. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  703. Campbell, James E. and James C. Garand (1999). Before the Vote: Forecasting American National Elections. California, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  704. Castanho Silva, Bruno, Federico Vegetti and Levente Littvay (2017) The elite is up to something: Exploring the between populism and belief in conspiracy theories, in: Swiss political science review 23(4): 423-443. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  705. Chaffee, Steven and Stacey F. Kanihan (1997). Learning about politics from the mass media, in: Political Communication 14(4): 421-430. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  706. Dahl, Robert A. (1971). Polyarchy. Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  707. De Vreese, Claes and Hajo G. Boomgaarden (2006). Media message flows and interpersonal communication – The conditional nature of effects on public opinion, in: Communication Research 33(1): 19-37. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  708. Delli Carpini, Michael X. and Scott Keeter (1996). What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  709. Dolan, Kathleen (2011). Do Women and Men Know Different Things? Measuring Gender Differences in Political Knowledge, in: The Journal of Politics 73(1): 97-107. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  710. Druckman James N. (2003). Media Matter: How Newspapers and Television News Cover Campaigns and Influence Voters, in: Political Communication 22(4): 463–481. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  711. Eveland, William, Andrew F. Hayes, Dhavan V. Shah and Nojin Kwak (2005). Understanding the Relationship Between Communication and Political Knowledge: A Model Comparison Approach Using Panel Data, in: Political Communication 22(4): 423-446. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  712. Farrell, David M and Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck (2002). Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  713. Finkel, Steven E. (1993). Re-examining the “Minimal Effects” Model in Recent Presidential Campaigns, in: Journal of Politics 55(1): 1–21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  714. Fording, Richard C. and Sanford F. Schram (2017) The cognitive and emotional sources of Trump support: The case of low-information voters, in: New Political Science 39(4): 670-686. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  715. Fraile, Marta (2011). Widening or reducing the knowledge gap? Testing the media effects on political knowledge in Spain (2004-2006), in: International Journal of Press/Politics 16(2): 163-184. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  716. Fraile, Marta (2014). Do information-rich contexts reduce knowledge inequalities? The contextual determinants of political knowledge in Europe, in: Acta Politica 48: 119-143. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  717. Frazer, Elizabeth and Kenneth Macdonald (2003). Sex Difference in Political Knowledge in Britain, in: Political Studies 51(1): 67–83. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  718. Gallina, Marta, Pierre Baudewyns and Jonas Lefevere (2020) Political Sophistication and Populist Party Support: The Case of PTB-PVDA and VB in the 2019 Belgian Elections, in: Politics of the Low Countries 2(2): 266-289. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  719. Gelman, Andrew and Gary King (1993). Why are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable?, in: British Journal of Political Science 23(4): 409–51. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  720. Graber, Doris A. (2004). Mediated Politics and Citizenship in the Twenty-First Century, in: Annual Review of Psychology 55(1): 545–71. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  721. Holbrook, Thomas M. (2006). Cognitive Style and Political Learning in the 2000 U.S. Presidential Campaign, in: Political Research Quarterly 59: 343-352. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  722. Huber, Sascha. (2013). Politisches Lernen im Wahlkampf bei der Bundestagswahl 2009, in: Faas, Thorsten, Kai Arzheimer, Sigrid Roßteutscher and Bernhard Weßels (eds.). Koalitionen, Kandidaten, Kommunikation. Analysen zur Bundestagswahl 2009. Wiesbaden: Springer VS: 173-198. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  723. Jarvis, Blair and Richard Petty (1996). The need to evaluate, in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70(1): 172-194. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  724. Jolly, Seth, et al. (2022) Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2019, in: Electoral Studies 75(1): 102420. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  725. Jordan, Jason (2022). The strategic ambiguity of the radical right: A study of the Danish People´s party, in: Party Politics, Online First, https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688221136819. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  726. Kruglanski, Arie, Donna M. Webster and Adena Klem (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information, in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65(5): 861-876. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  727. Lachat, Richard and Pascal Sciarini (2002). When do election campaigns matter, and to whom? Results from the 1999 Swiss election panel study, in: Farrell, David M and Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck (eds.). Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums. London: Routledge: 41–57. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  728. Lazarsfeld, Paul, Bernard Berelson and Hazel Gaudet (1944). The People's Choice. How the Voter Makes Up his Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  729. Lee, Sangwon and Michael Xenos (2019). Social distraction? Social media use and political knowledge in two US Presidential elections, in: Computers in human behavior 90(1): 18-25. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  730. McAllister, Ian (2007). The Personalization of Politics, in: Dalton, Russell J. and Hans-Dieter Klingemann (eds.). Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 571-584. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  731. Miller, William L. (1990). How Voters Change: The 1987 British Election Campaign in Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  732. Milner, Henry (2020). Populism and Political Knowledge: The United States in Comparative Perspective, in: Politics and Governance 8(1): 226-238. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  733. Mondak, Jeffrey and Mary R. Anderson (2004). The Knowledge Gap: A Reexamination of Gender-Based Differences in Political Knowledge, in: Journal of Politics 66(2): 492-512. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  734. Norris, Pippa and David Sanders (2003). Message or Medium? Campaign Learning During the 2001 British General Election, in: Political Communication 20(3): 233–62. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  735. Patterson, Thomas E. and Robert D. McClure (1976). The Unseeing Eye: The Myth of Television Power in National Politics. New York: Putnam. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  736. Perloff, Richard M. (1999). The Third-Person Effect: A Critical Review and Synthesis, in: Media Psychology 1(4): 353-378. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  737. Poguntke, Thomas and Paul Webb (2005). The Presidentialization of Politics. A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  738. Prior, Markus (2005). News vs. Entertainment: How Increasing Media Choice widens Gaps in Political Knowledge and Turnout, in: American Journal of Political Science 49(3): 557-592. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  739. Rhodes, Samuel C. (2022). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and fake news: how social media conditions individuals to be less critical of political misinformation, in: Political Communication 39(1): 1-22. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  740. Riker, William H. (1986). The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  741. Sabato, L. J., Mark Stencel and S. Robert Lichter (2000). Peep show: Media and politics in an age of scandal. Lanham. MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  742. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger (1993) Denn sie wissen nicht, was sie tun... Zum Verständnis des Verfahrens der Bundestagswahl bei westdeutschen und ostdeutschen Wählern, in: Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 24(3): 393-415. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  743. Schmitt-Beck Rüdiger (2002). Politische Kommunikation und Wählerverhalten: Ein internationaler Vergleich. Wiesbaden: Westdt. Verl. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  744. Shepsle, Kenneth A. (1972). The Strategy of Ambiguity: Uncertainty and Electoral Competition, in: American Political Science Review 66(2): 555-568. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  745. Sigelman, L. and David Bullock (1991). Candidates, issues, horse races, and hoopla: Presidential campaign coverage, 1888–1988, in: American Politics Quarterly 19(1): 5-32. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  746. Stanley, Ben and Mikolaj Cześnik (2021). Uninformed or informed populists? The relationship between political knowledge, socio-economic status and populist attitudes in Poland, in: East European Politics 38(1): 43-60. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  747. Stevenson, Randolph and Lynn Vavreck (2000). Does Campaign Length Matter? Testing for Cross-National Effects, in: British Journal of Political Science 30(2): 217-235. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  748. Tichenor, Philip, George A. Donuhue and Calice A. Olien (1970). Mass Flow and Differential Growth in Knowledge, in: Public Opinion Quarterly 34(2): 149-170. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  749. Tomz, Michael and Robert P. van Houweling (2009). The Electoral Implications of Candidate Ambiguity, in: American Political Science Review 103(1): 83-98. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  750. van Deth, Jan W. 2013. Comparative Politics: The Problem of Equivalence. Colchester: ECPR Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  751. van Kessel, Stijn, Javier Sajuria and Steven M. van Hauwaert (2021). Informed, uninformed or misinformed? A cross-national analysis of populist party supporters across European democracies, in: West European Politics, 44(3): 585-610. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  752. Verba, Sidney, Nancy Burns and Kay Lehman Schlozman (1997). Knowing and Caring About Politics: Gender and Political Engagement, in: Journal of Politics 59(4): 1051–57. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  753. Viswanath, Kasisomayajula and John R. Finnegan (1996). The Knowledge Gap Hypothesis: Twenty-Five Years later, in: Brant Burleson (ed.). Communication Yearbook. Thousand Oaks: Sage: 187-227. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  754. Weaver, David. and Dan Drew (1993). Voter learning in the 1990 off-year election: Did the media matter?, in: Journalism Quarterly 70(2): 356–368. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  755. Westle, Bettina (2020) Schützt politisches Wissen vor Populismus?, in: Tausendpfund, Markus and Bettina Westle (eds.) Politisches Wissen in Deutschland: Empirische Analysen mit dem ALLBUS 2018. Springer VS: 199-244. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  756. Zaller, John R. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  757. Zhuravskaya, Ekaterina, Maria Petrova and Ruben Enikolopov (2020). Political effects of the internet and social media, in: Annual review of economics 12(1): 415-438. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-25
  758. Literatur Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  759. Bieber, Christoph (2000): Millenium-Campaigning. Der US-Präsidentschaftswahlkampf 2000 im Internet. In: Kamps, Klaus (Hrsg.): Trans-Atlantik – Trans-Portabel? Die Amerikanisierungsthese in der politischen Kommunikation, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, 93-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91627-3_5. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  760. Clemens, Detlev (1998): Wahlkampf im Internet. In: Gellner, Winand/Korff, Fritz von (Hrsg.): Demokratie und Internet, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 143-156. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  761. Eberl, Jackob Moritz (2020): Medienbias. In: Borucki, Isabelle, Kleinen-von Königslöw, Katherina, Marschall, Stefan, Zerback, Thomas (Hrsg.): Handbuch Politische Kommunikation. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26242-6_32-1. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  762. Galtung, Johan, Ruge, Marie Holmboe (1965): The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. In: Journal of Peace Research, (2), 64–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336500200104. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  763. Geisler, Alexander/Sarcinelli, Ulrich (2002): Modernisierung von Wahlkämpfen und Modernisierung von Demokratie?. In: Dörner, Andreas/Vogt, Ludgera (Hrsg.): Wahl-Kämpfe. Betrachtungen über ein demokratisches Ritual, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 43-68. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  764. Hagen, Lutz M., Zeh, Reimar, Berens, Harald (1998): Kanzler und Kontrahent. In: Kamps, Klaus, Meckel, Miriam (Hrsg.): Fernsehnachrichten. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-07643-8_15. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  765. Holtz-Bacha, Christina (2000): Wahlkampf in Deutschland. Ein Fall bedingter Ameri- kanisierung. In: Kamps, Klaus (Hrsg.): Trans-Atlantik – Trans-Portabel? Die Ameri- kanisierungsthese in der politischen Kommunikation, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91627-3_3. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  766. Holtz-Bacha, Christina, 2001: Negative Campaigning in Deutschland negativ aufgenommen, in: Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 32, 669-677. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24232334. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  767. Holtz-Bacha, Christina (2002): Parteien und Massenmedien im Wahlkampf, in: Alemann, Ulrich Von/Marschall, Stefan (Hrsg.): Parteien in der Mediendemokratie, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, 42-56. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  768. Kamps, Klaus (2000): America ante Portas? Grundzüge der Amerikanisierungsthese, in: Kamps, Klaus (Hrsg.): Trans-Atlantik – Trans-Portabel? Die Amerikanisierungsthese in der politischen Kommunikation, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91627-3_1. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  769. Krewel, Mona (2017): Modernisierung deutscher Wahlkämpfe? Kampagnenkommunikation zwischen 1957 und 1965. Baden-Baden: Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845260785. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  770. Krewel, Mona (2020): Wahlkampf. In: Borucki, Isabelle, Kleinen-von Königslöw, Katherina, Marschall, Stefan, Zerback, Thomas (Hrsg.): Handbuch Politische Kommunikation. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26242-6_21-1. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  771. Leidecker, Melanie, Wilke, Jürgen (2015): Langweilig? Wieso langweilig?: Die Presseberichterstattung zur Bundestagswahl 2013 im Langzeitvergleich. In: Holtz-Bacha, C. (Hrsg.): Die Massenmedien im Wahlkampf. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06151-7_7. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  772. Leidecker-Sandmann, Melanie, Wilke, Jürgen (2016): Auf dem Weg zur Konvergenz?. In: Tenscher, Jens, Rußmann, Uta (Hrsg.): Vergleichende Wahlkampfforschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12977-4_7. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  773. Leidecker-Sandmann, Melanie, Wilke, Jürgen (2019): Aus dem Rahmen fallend oder eher „middle of the road“?. In: Holtz-Bacha, Christina (Hrsg.): Die (Massen-)Medien im Wahlkampf. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24824-6_9. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  774. Leidecker-Sandmann, Melanie, Schäfer-Hock, Christian, Wilke, Jürgen (2023): Ein Wahlkampf wie kein anderer?. In: Holtz-Bacha, Christina (Hrsg.): Die (Massen-)Medien im Wahlkampf. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-38967-3_7. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  775. Marcinkowski, Frank (1996): Politikvermittlung durch das Fernsehen. Politiktheoretische und konzeptionelle Grundlagen der empirischen Forschung. In: Jarren, Otfried/ Schatz, Heribert/Weßler, Hartmut (Hrsg.): Medien und politischer Prozeß. Politische Öffentlichkeit und massenmediale Politikvermittlung im Wandel, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 201-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91675-4_12. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  776. Marschall, Stefan (2000): Amerikanisierung parlamentarischer Öffentlichkeit? Kommunikative Modernisierungsprozesse zwischen Anpassung und Authentizität. In: Kamps, Klaus (Hrsg.): Trans-Atlantik – Trans-Portabel? Die Amerikanisierungsthese in der politischen Kommunikation, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, 247-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91627-3_12. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  777. Meckel, Miriam/Scholl, Armin (2000): „Amerika, Du hast es besser.“ Politik und Journalismus in den USA und in Deutschland. In: Kamps, Klaus (Hrsg.): Trans-Atlantik – Trans-Portabel? Die Amerikanisierungsthese in der politischen Kommunikation, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91627-3_6. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  778. Müller, Albrecht (1999): Von der Parteiendemokratie zur Mediendemokratie. Beobachtungen zum Bundestagswahlkampf 1998 im Spiegel früherer Erfahrungen, Opladen: Leske + Budrich. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  779. Plasser, Fritz (2000): 'Amerikanisierung' der Wahlkampfkommunikation in Westeuropa: Diskussions- und Forschungsstand. In: Bohrmann, Hans/Jarren, Otfried/Melischek, Gabriele/Seethaler, Josef (Hrsg.): Wahlen und Politikvermittlung durch Massenmedien, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 49-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-89002-3_3. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  780. Radunski, Peter (1980): Wahlkämpfe. Moderne Wahlkampfführung als politische Kom- munikation, München: Olzog. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  781. Radunski, Peter (1996): Politisches Kommunikationsmanagement. Die Amerikanisierung der Wahlkämpfe. In: Bertelsmann Stiftung (Hrsg.): Politik überzeugend vermitteln. Wahlkampfstrategien in Deutschland und den USA. Analysen und Bewertungen von Politikern, Journalisten und Experten, Gütersloh: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung, 33-52. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  782. Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Weßels, Bernhard, Krewel, Mona (2015): Campaign Media Content Analysis, TV. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5306 Data file Version 1.2.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.12211. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  783. Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Schoen, Harald, Weßels, Bernhard, Wolf, Christof, Schäfer, Anne, Krewel, Mona, Schmidt, Sebastian (2018): Campaign Media Content Analysis: TV (GLES 2013). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5705 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.12173. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  784. Reinemann, Carsten, Wilke, Jürgen (2000): Kanzlerkandidaten in der Wahlkampfberichterstattung. Eine vergleichende Studie zu den Bundestagswahlen 1949-1998. Köln u.a.: Böhlau. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  785. Reinemann, Carsten, Wilke, Jürgen (2007): It’s the Debates, Stupid! How the Introduction of Televised Debates Changed the Portrayal of Chancellor Candidates in the German Press, 1949—2005. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 12(4), 92–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X07307185. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  786. Rössler, Patrick, Meinzolt, Artur (2000): Persönlichkeit erwünscht! Anmerkungen zur eigentümlichen Öffentlichkeit der deutschen Präsidentenwahl. In: Kamps, Klaus (Hrsg.): Trans-Atlantik – Trans-Portabel? Die Amerikanisierungsthese in der politischen Kommunikation, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, 263-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91627-3_13. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  787. Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Schoen, Harald, Weßels, Bernhard, Wolf, Christof, Schackmann, Lena Marie, Krewel, Mona, Schäfer, Anne (2018): Campaign Media Content Analysis, TV (GLES 2017). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA6808 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13186. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  788. Schäfer, Anne, Schmidt, Sebastian (2016): Dynamiken der Wahlkampfberichterstattung. Eine longitudinale Analyse der deutschen TV-Berichterstattung. Publizistik, 61, 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-016-0259-7. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  789. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Faas, Thorsten (2006): The Campaign and its Dynamics at the 2005 German General Election. German Politics, 15 (4), 393-419, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644000601062535. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  790. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Krewel, Mona, Wolsing, Ansgar (2010): Bundestagswahl 2005 Kampagnendynamik – Fernsehnachrichtenanalyse. GESIS Datenarchiv, Köln. ZA4997 Datenfile Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.4997. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  791. Schoen, Harald (2005): Wahlkampfforschung. In: Falter, Jürgen W., Schoen, Harald (Hrsg.): Handbuch Wahlforschung, Hrsg., 661–728. Wiesbaden: VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05164-8_16. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  792. Schulz, Winfried (1997): Politische Kommunikation. Theoretische Ansätze und Ergebnisse empirischer Forschung zur Rolle der Massenmedien in der Politik. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93094-7. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  793. Schulz, Winfried (2015): Das Medienbild der Kampagne. In: Medien und Wahlen. Medienwissen kompakt. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00857-4_4. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  794. Schulz, Winfried, Zeh, Reimar (2003): Kanzler und Kandidat in den Fernsehnachrichten. In: Christina Holtz-Bacha (Hrsg.): Die Massenmedien im Wahlkampf. Die Bundestagswahl 2002. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, 2003, S. 57-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80461-7_4. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  795. Schulz, Winfried, Zeh, Reimar (2004): Die Fernsehpräsenz der Kanzlerkandidaten im Wandel. Analyse der Wahlkampfberichterstattung 1990–2002. In: Brettschneider, Frank, van Deth, Jan, Roller, Edeltraud (Hrsg.): Die Bundestagswahl 2002. Schriftenreihe des Arbeitskreises „Wahlen und politische Einstellungen“ der Deutschen Vereinigung für Politische Wissenschaft (DVPW), vol 10. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80998-8_5. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  796. Schulz, Winfried, Zeh, Reimar (2006): Die Kampagne im Fernsehen — Agens und Indikator des Wandels. Ein Vergleich der Kandidatendarstellung. In: Holtz-Bacha, Christina (Hrsg.): Die Massenmedien im Wahlkampf. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90383-5_10. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  797. Schulz, Winfried, Zeh, Reimar (2010): Die Protagonisten in der Fernseharena. Merkel und Steinmeier in der Berichterstattung über den Wahlkampf 2009. In: Holtz-Bacha, Christina (Hrsg.): Die Massenmedien im Wahlkampf. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92509-7_12. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  798. Schulz, Winfried, Berens, Harald, Zeh, Reimar (1998): Das Fernsehen als Instrument und Akteur im Wahlkampf. Analyse der Berichterstattung von ARD, ZDF, RTL und SAT. 1 über die Spitzenkandidaten bei der Bundestagswahl 1994. Rundfunk und Fernsehen 46, 58-79. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  799. Strünck, Christoph (2000): Agenten oder Agenturen? Amerikanische und deutsche Parteien in vergleichender Perspektive. In: Kamps, Klaus (Hrsg.): Trans-Atlantik – Trans-Portabel? Die Amerikanisierungsthese in der politischen Kommunikation, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, 199-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91627-3_10. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  800. Walter, Annemarie S, Vliegenthart, Rens (2010): Negative Campaigning across Different Communication Channels: Different Ball Games?. In: International Journal of Press-Politics 15, 441-461. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161210374122. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  801. Wilke, Jürgen, Leidecker, Melanie (2010): Ein Wahlkampf, der keiner war? Die Presseberichterstattung zur Bundestagswahl 2009 im Langzeitvergleich. In: Holtz-Bacha, Christina (Hrsg.) Die Massenmedien im Wahlkampf. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92509-7_13. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  802. Wagner, Jochen W. (2005): Deutsche Wahlwerbekampagnen made in USA?: Amerikanisierung oder Modernisierung bundesrepublikanischer Wahlkampagnen. Wiesbaden: VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-05625-6. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  803. Weischenberg, Siegfried (1998): In Szene gesetzt. Amerikanisierung der Politik, in: Journalist 5, 12-16. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  804. Wilke, Jürgen, Reinemann, Carsten (2001): Do the Candidates Matter?: Long-Term Trends of Campaign Coverage – A Study of the German Press Since 1949. European Journal of Communication, 16(3), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323101016003001. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  805. Wilke, Jürgen, Reinemann, Carsten (2003): Die Bundestagswahl 2002: Ein Sonderfall?. In: Holtz-Bacha, Christina (Hrsg.): Die Massenmedien im Wahlkampf. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80461-7_3. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  806. Zeh, Reimar (2005): Kanzlerkandidaten im Fernsehen. Eine Analyse der Berichterstattung der Hauptabendnachrichten in der heißen Phase der Bundestagswahlkämpfe 1994 und 1998. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Reinhard Fischer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  807. Zeh, Reimar, Schulz, Winfried (2005): The changing election coverage of German television. A content analysis: 1990–2002. Communications, 30 (4), 385-407. https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2005.30.4.385. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  808. Zeh, Reimar, Schulz, Winfried (2015): Fernsehnachrichten über Kanzlerkandidaten. Die Trends seit 1990. In: Holtz-Bacha, Christina (Hrsg.): Die Massenmedien im Wahlkampf. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06151-7_8. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  809. Zeh, Reimar, Schulz, Winfried (2019): Merkel und Schulz im Fernsehen und ein Blick zurück auf acht Wahlkämpfe. In: Holtz-Bacha, Christina (Hrsg.): Die (Massen-)Medien im Wahlkampf. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24824-6_10. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  810. Zeh, Reimar, Hopmann, David Nicholas (2013): Indicating mediatization? Two decades of election campaign television coverage. European Journal of Communication, 28(3), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113475409. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  811. Zeh, Reimar, Adrian, Christoph, Schulz, Winfried. (2023): Alles bleibt anders. Die Fernsehberichterstattung über Baerbock, Scholz und Laschet. In: Holtz-Bacha, Christina (Hrsg.): Die (Massen-)Medien im Wahlkampf. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-38967-3_8. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-53
  812. References Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  813. Allport, Floyd H. (1924): The Group Fallacy in Relation to Social Science. In: American Journal of Sociology 29(6), 688–706. https://doi.org/10.1086/213647 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  814. Barnidge, Matthew/Sayre, Ben/Rojas, Hernando (2015): Perceptions of the Media and the Public and their Effects on Political Participation in Colombia. In: Mass Communication and Society 18(3), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2014.923463 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  815. Becker, Charlotte C. (2019): The influence of a migration background on attitudes towards immigration. In: Social Inclusion 7(4), 279–292. https://doi.org/0.17645/si.v7i4.2317 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  816. Bello, Jason (2012): The dark side of disagreement? Revisiting the effect of disagreement on political participation. In: Electoral Studies 31(4), 782–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2012.06.004 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  817. Brown, Gordon D.A./Lewandowsky, Stephan/Huang, Zhihong (2022): Social sampling and expressed attitudes: Authenticity preference and social extremeness aversion lead to social norm effects and polarization. In: Psychological Review 129(1), 18–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000342 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  818. Burghartswieser, Dominic/Rothmund, Tobias (2021): Conservative bias, selective political exposure and truly false consensus beliefs in political communication about the ‘refugee crisis’ in Germany. In: PLOS ONE 16(11), e0259445. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259445 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  819. Cavaille, Charlotte/Marshall, John (2019): Education and Anti-Immigration Attitudes: Evidence from Compulsory Schooling Reforms across Western Europe. In: American Political Science Review 113(1), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000588 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  820. Christen, Cindy T./Gunther, Albert C. (2003): The Influence of Mass Media and Other Culprits on the Projection of Personal Opinion. In: Communication Research 30(4), 414–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203253366 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  821. Daschmann, G. (2000): Vox Pop & Polls: The Impact of Poll Results and Voter Statements in the Media on the Perception of a Climate of Opinion. In: International Journal of Public Opinion Research 12(2), 160–181. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/12.2.160 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  822. Dawtry, Rael J./Sutton, Robbie M./Sibley, Chris G. (2015): Why Wealthier People Think People Are Wealthier, and Why It Matters: From Social Sampling to Attitudes to Redistribution. In: Psychological Science 26(9), 1389–1400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615586560 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  823. Dostal, Jörg Michael (2017): The German Federal Election of 2017: How the wedge issue of refugees and migration took the shine off Chancellor Merkel and transformed the party system. In: The Political Quarterly 88(4), 589–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12445 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  824. Ellerbrock, Simon (2022): Contextual Constraints and Partisan Selectivity in a Changing Electorate. In: Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger/Roßteutscher, Sigrid/Schoen, Harald/Weßels, Bernhard/Wolf, Christof (Eds.): The Changing German Voter. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 143–165 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  825. Esses, Victoria M. (2021): Prejudice and discrimination toward immigrants. In: Annual Review of Psychology 72(1), 503–531. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-080520-102803 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  826. Eveland, William P./Appiah, Osei/Beck, Paul A. (2018): Americans Are More Exposed to Difference Than We Think: Capturing Hidden Exposure to Political and Racial Difference. In: Social Networks 52(1), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.08.002 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  827. Fiedler, Klaus (1996): Explaining and Simulating Judgment Biases as an Aggregation Phenomenon in Probabilistic, Multiple-Cue Environments. In: Psychological Review 103, 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.1.193 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  828. Fields, James M./Schuman, Howard (1976): Public Beliefs About the Beliefs of the Public. In: Public Opinion Quarterly 40(4), 427–448. https://doi.org/10.1086/268330 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  829. Galesic, Mirta/Olsson, Henrik/Rieskamp, Jörg (2018): A sampling model of social judgment. In: Psychological Review 125(3), 363–390. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000096 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  830. Galesic, Mirta/Olsson, Henrik/Rieskamp, Jörg (2012): Social Sampling Explains Apparent Biases in Judgments of Social Environments. In: Psychological Science 23(12), 1515–1523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612445313 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  831. GLES (2019). Pre-election Cross Section (GLES 2017). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA6800 Data file Version 5.0.1, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13234 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  832. Glynn, Carroll J. (1989): Perceptions of others’ opinions as a component of public opinion. In: Social Science Research 18(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0049-089X(89)90003-3 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  833. Granovetter, Mark S. (1973): The Strength of Weak Ties. In: American Journal of Sociology 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  834. Grill, Christiane/Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger/Metz, Manon (2018): Studying the ‘Conversations of Democracy.’ In: MZES Working Paper 173, 68 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  835. Gunther, Albert C. (1998): The Persuasive Press Inference: Effects of Mass Media on Perceived Public Opinion. In: Communication Research 25(5), 486–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365098025005002 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  836. Gunther, Albert C./Christen, Cindy T. (2002): Projection or Persuasive Press? Contrary Effects of Personal Opinion and Perceived News Coverage on Estimates of Public Opinion. In: Journal of Communication 25(1), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02538.x Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  837. Gvirsman, Shira Dvir (2015): Testing Our Quasi-Statistical Sense: News Use, Political Knowledge, and False Projection: Testing Our Quasi-Statistical Sense. In: Political Psychology 36(6), 729–747. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12203 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  838. Hainmüller, Jens/Hiscox, Michael J. (2007): Educated Preferences: Explaining Attitudes Toward Immigration in Europe. In: International Organization 61(2), 399–442 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  839. Hoffman, Lindsay H. (2013): When the World Outside Gets Inside Your Head: The Effects of Media Context on Perceptions of Public Opinion. In: Communication Research 40(4), 463–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211435938 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  840. Huckfeldt, Robert (1983): Social Contexts, Social Networks, and Urban Neighborhoods: Environmental Constraints on Friendship Choice. In: American journal of Sociology 89(3), 651–669 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  841. Huckfeldt, Robert/Ikeda, Ken’ichi/Pappi, Franz Urban (2005): Patterns of Disagreement in Democratic Politics: Comparing Germany, Japan, and the United States. In: American Journal of Political Science 49(3), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.2307/3647728 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  842. Huckfeldt, Robert/Johnson, Paul E./Sprague, John (2004): Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  843. Huckfeldt, Robert/Sprague, John D. (1995): Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. Cambridge studies in political psychology and public opinion. Cambridg, New York: Cambridge University Press Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  844. Kim, Yonghwan (2015): Does Disagreement Mitigate Polarization? How Selective Exposure and Disagreement Affect Political Polarization. In: Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 92(4), 915–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015596328 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  845. Krueger, Joachim I. (2007): From social projection to social behaviour. In: European Review of Social Psychology 18(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280701284645 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  846. Krueger, Joachim I. (1998): On the Perception of Social Consensus. In: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 30(1), 163–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60384-6 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  847. Krueger, Joachim I./Clement, Russell W. (1994): The Truly False Consensus Effect: An Ineradicable and Egocentric Bias in Social Perception. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67(4), 596–610. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.596 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  848. Lee, Eun/Karimi, Fariba/Wagner, Claudia/Jo, Hang-Hyun/Strohmaier, Markus/Galesic, Mirta (2019): Homophily and minority-group size explain perception biases in social networks. In: Nature Human Behaviour 3(10), 1078–1087. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0677-4 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  849. Leviston, Zoe/Walker, Iain/Morwinski, Sarah (2013): Your opinion on climate change might not be as common as you think. In: Nature Climate Change 3(4), 334–337. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1743 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  850. Marks, Gary/Miller, Norman (1987): Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: an empirical and theoretical review. In: Psychological Bulletin 102(1), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.102.1.72 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  851. Matthes, Jörg/Knoll, Johannes/von Sikorski, Christian (2018): The “Spiral of Silence” Revisited: A Meta-Analysis on the Relationship Between Perceptions of Opinion Support and Political Opinion Expression. In: Communication Research 45(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217745429 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  852. McPherson, Miller/Smith-Lovin, Lynn/Cook, James M. (2001): Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. In: Annual Review of Sociology 27(1), 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  853. Min, Seong Jae/Wohn, Donghee Yvette (2020): Underneath the filter bubble: The role of weak ties and network cultural diversity in cross-cutting exposure to disagreements on social media. In: The Journal of Social Media in Society 9(1), 22–38 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  854. Minozzi, William/Song, Hyunjin/Lazer, David M.J./Neblo, Michael A./Ognyanova, Katherine (2020): The Incidental Pundit: Who Talks Politics with Whom, and Why? In: American Journal of Political Science 64(1), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12469 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  855. Morey, Alyssa C./Eveland Jr, William P./Hutchens, Myiah J. (2012): The “who” matters: Types of interpersonal relationships and avoidance of political disagreement. In: Political Communication 29(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2011.641070 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  856. Mutz, Diana C. (2006): Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  857. Mutz, Diana C./Soss, Joe (1997): Reading Public Opinion: The Influence of News Coverage on Perceptions of Public Sentiment. In: Public Opinion Quarterly 61(3), 431. https://doi.org/10.1086/297807 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  858. Neubaum, German/Krämer, Nicole C. (2017): Monitoring the Opinion of the Crowd: Psychological Mechanisms Underlying Public Opinion Perceptions on Social Media. In: Media Psychology 20(3), 502–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2016.1211539 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  859. Nir, Lilach (2011): Motivated Reasoning and Public Opinion Perception. In: Public Opinion Quarterly 75(3), 504–532. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq076 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  860. Nir, Lilach (2005): Ambivalent Social Networks and Their Consequences for Participation. In: International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17(4), 422–442. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh069 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  861. Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth (1974): The Spiral of Silence a Theory of Public Opinion. In: Journal of Communication 24(2), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  862. Pattie, C.J./Johnston, R.J. (2008): It’s Good To Talk: Talk, Disagreement and Tolerance. In: British Journal of Political Science 38(4), 677–698. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000331 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  863. Peter, Christina (2021): The Will of the People? Effects of Politicians’ Subjective Claims about Public Opinion on Perceived Public Opinion and Evaluative Judgments. In: Mass Communication and Society 24(3), 345–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2020.1850797 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  864. Peter, Christina/Beckers, Kathleen (2022): Vox pops vs. poll results—effects of consonant and dissonant displays of public opinion in news coverage. In: International Journal of Public Opinion Research 34(3), edac017. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edac017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  865. Price, Vincent/Oshagan, Hayg (1995): Social-Psychological Perspectives on Public Opinion. In: Glasser, Theodore Lewis/Salmon, Charles T. (Eds.): Public Opinion and the Communication of Consent. New York: Guilford, 178–216 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  866. Robbins, Jordan M./Krueger, Joachim I. (2005): Social Projection to Ingroups and Outgroups: A Review and Meta-Analysis. In: Personality and Social Psychology Review 9(1), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_3 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  867. Ross, Lee/Greene, David/House, Pamela (1977): The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13(3), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-X Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  868. Scheufele, Dietram A. (2001): Perceptions of “Public Opinion” and “Public” Opinion Expression. In: International Journal of Public Opinion Research 13(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/13.1.25 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  869. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger (2015): Bandwagon Effect. In: Mazzoleni, Gianpietro (Ed.): The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1–5 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  870. Sonck, N./Loosveldt, G. (2010): Impact of Poll Results on Personal Opinions and Perceptions of Collective Opinion. In: International Journal of Public Opinion Research 22(2), 230–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edp045 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  871. Stadt Mannheim, Fachbereich Arbeit und Soziales (2017): Mannheimer Sozialatlas 2017. Bevölkerung und soziale Lebenslagen Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  872. Stoeckel, Florian/A. Lyons, Benjamin/Reifler, Jason (2021): Public misperceptions of European integration in the UK. In: Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2021.1945612 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  873. Sumaktoyo, Nathanael Gratias/Breunig, Christian/Gaissmaier, Wolfgang (2022): Social sampling shapes preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a national survey experiment. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 101(4), 104341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104341 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  874. Van Boven, Leaf/Judd, Charles M./Sherman, David K. (2012): Political polarization projection: Social projection of partisan attitude extremity and attitudinal processes. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 103(1), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028145 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  875. Wojcieszak, Magdalena/Price, Vincent (2009): What Underlies the False Consensus Effect? How Personal Opinion and Disagreement Affect Perception of Public Opinion. In: International Journal of Public Opinion Research 21(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edp001 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  876. Wojcieszak, Magdalena/Rojas, Hernando (2011): Hostile Public Effect: Communication Diversity and the Projection of Personal Opinions Onto Others. In: Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 55(4), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2011.620665 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-85
  877. References Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  878. Al-Amer, R., Maneze, D., Everett, B., Montayre, J., Villarosa, A. R., Dwekat, E., & Salamonson, Y. (2022). COVID-19 vaccination intention in the first year of the pandemic: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 31(1–2), 62–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15951. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  879. Arpino, B., Bordone, V., & Di Gessa, G. (2023). COVID-19 precautionary behaviors and vaccine acceptance among older individuals: The role of close kin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(13), e2214382120 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  880. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2214382120. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  881. Berezin, M., & Eads, A. (2016). Risk is for the rich? Childhood vaccination resistance and a Culture of Health. Social Science & Medicine, 165(18), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.009. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  882. Bernados, S., & Ocampo, L. (2022). How Do People Decide on Getting Vaccinated? Evaluating the COVID-19 Vaccination Program through the Lens of Social Capital Theory. Social Sciences, 11(4), https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11040145. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  883. Bertin, P., Nera, K., & Delouvée, S. (2020). Conspiracy Beliefs, Rejection of Vaccination, and Support for hydroxychloroquine: A Conceptual Replication-Extension in the COVID-19 Pandemic Context. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.565128. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  884. Barouch, D. H. (2022). Covid-19 Vaccines—Immunity, Variants, Boosters. New England Journal of Medicine, 387(11), 1011–1020. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra2206573. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  885. Burke, P. F., Masters, D., & Massey, G. (2021). Enablers and barriers to COVID-19 vaccine uptake: An international study of perceptions and intentions. Vaccine, 39(36), 5116–5128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.07.056. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  886. Brenner, P. S. (2020). Advancing Theories of Socially Desirable Responding: How Identity Processes Influence Answers to “Sensitive Questions.” In P. S. Brenner (Ed.), Understanding Survey Methodology: Sociological Theory and Applications (pp. 45–65). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47256-6_3. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  887. Callaghan, T., Moghtaderi, A., Lueck, J. A., Hotez, P., Strych, U., Dor, A., Fowler, E. F., & Motta, M. (2021). Correlates and disparities of intention to vaccinate against COVID-19. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 272, 113638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113638. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  888. Coffie, I. S., Nkukpornu, A., Kankam, W. A., & Ocloo, C. E. (2022). Using Social Marketing to Demystify the Myths Surrounding Covid-19 Vaccination: The Mediating Role of Important Others. Social Marketing Quarterly, 28(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/15245004221097802. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  889. DeBell, M., Krosnick, J. A., Gera, K., Yeager, D. S., & McDonald, M. P. (2020). The Turnout Gap in Surveys: Explanations and Solutions. Sociological Methods & Research, 49(4), 1133–1162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118769085. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  890. Dubé, E., Gagnon, D., Nickels, E., Jeram, S., & Schuster, M. (2014). Mapping vaccine hesitancy—Country-specific characteristics of a global phenomenon. Vaccine, 32(49), 6649–6654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.09.039. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  891. Dubé, E., Laberge, C., Guay, M., Bramadat, P., Roy, R., & Bettinger, J. (2013). Vaccine hesitancy: An overview. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 9(8), 1763–1773. https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.24657. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  892. Eberhardt, J., & Ling, J. (2021). Predicting COVID-19 vaccination intention using protection motivation theory and conspiracy beliefs. Vaccine, 39(42), 6269–6275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.09.010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  893. Eberl, J.-M., Huber, R. A., & Greussing, E. (2021). From populism to the “plandemic”: Why populists believe in COVID-19 conspiracies. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 31(sup1), 272–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2021.1924730. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  894. Facciani, M., Lazić, A., Viggiano, G., & McKay, T. (2023). Political network composition predicts vaccination attitudes. Social Science & Medicine, 328, 116004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116004. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  895. Galanis, P., Moisoglou, I., Vraka, I., Siskou, O., Konstantakopoulou, O., Katsiroumpa, A., & Kaitelidou, D. (2022). Predictors of COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake in Healthcare Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study in Greece. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 64(4), e191–e196. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002463. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  896. Galasso, V., Profeta, P., Foucault, M., & Pons, V. (2021). COVID-19 Vaccine’s Gender Paradox (p. 2021.03.26.21254380). medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.26.21254380. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  897. Gerretsen, P., Kim, J., Caravaggio, F., Quilty, L., Sanches, M., Wells, S., Brown, E. E., Agic, B., Pollock, B. G., & Graff-Guerrero, A. (2021). Individual determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. PLOS ONE, 16(11), e0258462. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258462. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  898. Guidry, J. P. D., Laestadius, L. I., Vraga, E. K., Miller, C. A., Perrin, P. B., Burton, C. W., Ryan, M., Fuemmeler, B. F., & Carlyle, K. E. (2021). Willingness to get the COVID-19 vaccine with and without emergency use authorization. American Journal of Infection Control, 49(2), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.11.018. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  899. Haakonsen, J. M. F., & Furnham, A. (2023). COVID-19 vaccination: Conspiracy theories, demography, ideology, and personality disorders. Health Psychology, 42(3), 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001222. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  900. Hao, F., & Shao, W. (2022). Understanding the influence of political orientation, social network, and economic recovery on COVID-19 vaccine uptake among Americans. Vaccine, 40(14), 2191–2201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.02.066. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  901. Jaspal, R., & Breakwell, G. M. (2022). Social support, perceived risk and the likelihood of COVID-19 testing and vaccination: Cross-sectional data from the United Kingdom. Current Psychology, 41(1), 492–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01681-z. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  902. Jennings, W., Stoker, G., Bunting, H., Valgarðsson, V. O., Gaskell, J., Devine, D., McKay, L., & Mills, M. C. (2021). Lack of Trust, Conspiracy Beliefs, and Social Media Use Predict COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy. Vaccines, 9(6), 593. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060593. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  903. Jiang, X., Su, M.-H., Hwang, J., Lian, R., Brauer, M., Kim, S., & Shah, D. (2021). Polarization Over Vaccination: Ideological Differences in Twitter Expression About COVID-19 Vaccine Favorability and Specific Hesitancy Concerns. Social Media + Society, 7(3), https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211048413. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  904. Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014). The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions. PLOS ONE, 9(2), e89177. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089177. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  905. Kennedy, J. (2019). Populist politics and vaccine hesitancy in Western Europe: An analysis of national-level data. European Journal of Public Health, 29(3), 512–516. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckz004. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  906. Kerr, J. R., Schneider, C. R., Recchia, G., Dryhurst, S., Sahlin, U., Dufouil, C., Arwidson, P., Freeman, A. L. J., & Linden, S. van der. (2020). Predictors of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance across time and countries. MedRxiv, 2020.12.09.20246439. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.09.20246439. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  907. Kokubun, K., & Yamakawa, Y. (2021). Social Capital Mediates the Relationship between Social Distancing and COVID-19 Prevalence in Japan. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 58(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580211005189. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  908. Konstantinou, P., Georgiou, K., Kumar, N., Kyprianidou, M., Nicolaides, C., Karekla, M., & Kassianos, A. P. (2021). Transmission of Vaccination Attitudes and Uptake Based on Social Contagion Theory: A Scoping Review. Vaccines, 9(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060607. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  909. Larson, H. J., Jarrett, C., Eckersberger, E., Smith, D. M. D., & Paterson, P. (2014). Understanding vaccine hesitancy around vaccines and vaccination from a global perspective: A systematic review of published literature, 2007–2012. Vaccine, 32(19), 2150–2159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.01.081. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  910. Lazarus, J. V., Ratzan, S. C., Palayew, A., Gostin, L. O., Larson, H. J., Rabin, K., Kimball, S., & El-Mohandes, A. (2021). A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine. Nature Medicine, 27(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-1124-9. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  911. Loomba, S., de Figueiredo, A., Piatek, S. J., de Graaf, K., & Larson, H. J. (2021). Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  912. Makarovs, K., & Achterberg, P. (2017). Contextualizing educational differences in “vaccination uptake”: A thirty nation survey. Social Science & Medicine, 188(17), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.06.039. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  913. Matute, J., Palau-Saumell, R., Meyer, J., Derqui, B., & Jiménez-Asenjo, N. (2022). Are you getting it? Integrating theories to explain intentions to get vaccinated against COVID-19 in Spain. Journal of Risk Research, 25(9), 1055–1074. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2021.1958044. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  914. Merrick, E., Weissman, J. P., & Patel, S. J. (2022). Utilizing Google trends to monitor coronavirus vaccine interest and hesitancies. Vaccine, 40(30), 4057–4063 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.05.070. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  915. Milani, E., Weitkamp, E., & Webb, P. (2020). The Visual Vaccine Debate on Twitter: A Social Network Analysis. Media and Communication, 8(2), 364–375. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2847. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  916. Paul, K. T., Eberl, J.-M., & Partheymüller, J. (2021). Policy-Relevant Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccination: Associations with Demography, Health Risk, and Social and Political Factors. Frontiers in Public Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.671896. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  917. Poland, G. A., & Jacobson, R. M. (2011). The Age-Old Struggle against the Antivaccinationists. New England Journal of Medicine, 364(2), 97–99. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1010594. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  918. Rémy, V., Zöllner, Y., & Heckmann, U. (2015). Vaccination: The cornerstone of an efficient healthcare system. Journal of Market Access & Health Policy, 3(1), 27041. https://doi.org/10.3402/jmahp.v3.27041. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  919. Roberts, H. A., Clark, D. A., Kalina, C., Sherman, C., Brislin, S., Heitzeg, M. M., & Hicks, B. M. (2022). To vax or not to vax: Predictors of anti-vax attitudes and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy prior to widespread vaccine availability. PLOS ONE, 17(2), e0264019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264019. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  920. Romer, D., Winneg, K. M., Jamieson, P. E., Brensinger, C., & Jamieson, K. H. (2022). Misinformation about vaccine safety and uptake of COVID-19 vaccines among adults and 5–11-year-olds in the United States. Vaccine, 40(45), 6463–6470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.09.046. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  921. Ruiz, J. B., & Bell, R. A. (2021). Predictors of intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: Results of a nationwide survey. Vaccine, 39(7), 1080–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.01.010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  922. Schmitt-Beck, R., & Lup, O. (2013). Seeking the Soul of Democracy: A Review of Recent Research into Citizens’ Political Talk Culture. Swiss Political Science Review, 19(4), 513–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12051. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  923. Seddig, D., Maskileyson, D., Davidov, E., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2022). Correlates of COVID-19 vaccination intentions: Attitudes, institutional trust, fear, conspiracy beliefs, and vaccine skepticism. Social Science & Medicine, 302, 114981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114981. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  924. Toshkov, D. (2023). What accounts for the variation in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Eastern, Southern and Western Europe? Vaccine, 41(20), 3178–3188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.03.030. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  925. Troiano, G., & Nardi, A. (2021). Vaccine hesitancy in the era of COVID-19. Public Health, 194, 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.02.025. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  926. Uscinski, J. E., Enders, A. M., Klofstad, C., Seelig, M., Funchion, J., Everett, C., Wuchty, S., Premaratne, K., & Murthi, M. (2020). Why do people believe COVID-19 conspiracy theories? Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  927. Viskupič, F., Wiltse, D. L., & Meyer, B. A. (2022). Trust in physicians and trust in government predict COVID‐19 vaccine uptake. Social Science Quarterly, 103(3), 509-520. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13147. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  928. Wagner, A., & Reifegerste, D. (2023). “The Part Played by People” in Times of COVID-19: Interpersonal Communication about Media Coverage in a Pandemic Crisis. Health Communication, 38(5), 1014–1021. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1989786. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  929. Wang, Q., Yang, L., Jin, H., & Lin, L. (2021). Vaccination against COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of acceptability and its predictors. Preventive Medicine, 150(9), 106694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106694. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  930. Watson, O. J., Barnsley, G., Toor, J., Hogan, A. B., Winskill, P., & Ghani, A. C. (2022). Global impact of the first year of COVID-19 vaccination: A mathematical modelling study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 22(9), 1293–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S14733099(22)00320-6. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  931. Winter, K., Pummerer, L., Hornsey, M. J., & Sassenberg, K. (2022). Pro-vaccination subjective norms moderate the relationship between conspiracy mentality and vaccination intentions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 27(2), 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12550. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  932. Wolter, F., Mayerl, J., Andersen, H. K., Wieland, T., & Junkermann, J. (2022). Overestimation of COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage in Population Surveys Due to Social Desirability Bias: Results of an Experimental Methods Study in Germany. Socius, 8(1), 23780231221094748. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231221094749. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  933. Xiao, X., & Wong, R. M. (2020). Vaccine hesitancy and perceived behavioral control: A meta-analysis. Vaccine, 38(33), 5131–5138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.04.076. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  934. Zheng, C., Shao, W., Chen, X., Zhang, B., Wang, G., & Zhang, W. (2022). Real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines: A literature review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 114(1), 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.11.009. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-117
  935. References Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  936. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  937. Amsalem, E., Merkley, E., and Loewen, P. J. (2022). Does talking to the other side reduce inter-party hostility? Evidence from three studies. Political Communication, 39, 61-78. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  938. Appiah, O. (2018). Cultural voyeurism: A new framework for understanding race, ethnicity, and mediated intergroup interaction. Journal of Communication, 68, 233-242. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  939. Appiah, O., Eveland, W., Jr., Bullock, O. M., and Coduto, K. D. (2022). Why we can’t talk openly about race: The impact of race and partisanship on respondents’ perceptions of intergroup conversations. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 25, 434-452. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  940. Appiah, O., Knobloch-Westerwick, S., and Alter, S. (2013). Ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation: Effects of news valence, character race, and recipient race on selective news reading. Journal of Communication, 63, 517-534. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  941. Blau, P. M. (1977). A macrosocial theory of social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 26-54. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  942. Brundidge, J. (2010). Encountering “difference” in the contemporary public sphere: The contribution of the Internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks. Journal of Communication, 60, 680-700. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  943. Carlson, T. N., Abrajano, M., and Bedolla, L. G. (2020). Talking politics: Political discussion networks & the new American electorate. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  944. Charles, C. Z. (2003). The dynamics of racial residential segregation. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 167-207. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  945. Cohn, N., and Quealy, K. (2020, June 10). How public opinion has moved on Black Lives Matter. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/06/10/upshot/black-lives-matter-attitudes.html Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  946. Comas-Díaz, L., and Jacobsen, F. M. (2001). Ethnocultural allodynia. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 10, 246-252. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  947. Dys-Steenbergen, O., Wright, S. C., and Aron, A. (2016). Self-expansion motivation improves cross-group interactions and enhances self-growth. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19, 60-71. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  948. Echols, L., and Graham, S. (2013). Birds of a different feather: How do cross-ethnic friends flock together? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 59, 461-488. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  949. Eddo-Lodge, R. (2020). Why I’m no longer talking to white people about race. Bloomsbury Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  950. Enos, R. D. (2017). The space between us: Social geography and politics. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  951. Eveland, W. P., Jr., and Appiah, O. (2021). A national conversation about race? Political discussion across lines of racial and partisan difference. Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics, 6, 187-213. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  952. Eveland, W. P., Jr., Appiah, O., and Beck, P. A. (2018). Americans are more exposed to difference than we think: Capturing hidden exposure to political and racial difference. Social Networks, 52, 192-200. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  953. Eveland, W. P., Jr., Coduto, K. D., Appiah, O., and Bullock, O. M. (2020). Listening during political conversations: Traits and situations. Political Communication, 37, 656-677. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  954. Eveland, W. P., Jr., and Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and “heterogeneity” of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59, 205-224. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  955. Eveland, W. P., Jr., Song, H., Hutchens, M. J., and Levitan, L. C. (2019). Not being accurate is not quite the same as being inaccurate: Variations in reported (in)accuracy of perceptions of political views of network members due to uncertainty. Communication Methods and Measures, 13, 305-311. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  956. Gil de Zúñiga, H., and Valenzuela, S. (2011). The mediating path to a stronger citizenship: Online and offline networks, weak ties, and civic engagement. Communication Research, 38, 397-421. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  957. Gilberstadt, H. (2020, June 5). A month before George Floyd’s death, black and white Americans differed sharply in confidence in the police. Pew Research Center. Available online: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/06/05/a-month-before-george-floyds-death-black-and-white-americans-differed-sharply-in-confidence-in-the-police/ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  958. Goodreau, S. M., Kitts, J. A., and Morris, M. (2009). Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? Using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks. Demography, 46, 103-125. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  959. Heatherly, K. A., Lu, Y., and Lee, J. K. (2017). Filtering out the other side? Cross-cutting and like-minded discussions on social networking sites. New Media & Society, 19, 1271-1289. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  960. Hofstra, B., Corten, R., van Tubergan, F., and Ellison, N. (2017). Sources of segregation in social networks: A novel approach using Facebook. American Sociological Review, 82, 625-656. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  961. Hutchens, M. J., Hmielowski, J. D., and Beam, M. A. (2019). Reinforcing spirals of political discussion and affective polarization. Communication Monographs, 86, 357-376. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  962. Huber, G. A., and Malhotra, N. (2017). Political homophily in social relationships: Evidence from online dating behavior. The Journal of Politics, 79, 269-283. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  963. Huckfeldt, R., and Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  964. Huckfeldt, R. R., Johnson, P. E., and Sprague, J. D. (2004). Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  965. Hutchens, M. J., Eveland, W. P., Jr., Morey, A. C., and Sokhey, A. (2018). Evaluating summary measures of heterogeneous political discussion: The critical roles of excluded cases and discussion with people holding extreme views. Communication Methods and Measures, 12, 276-294. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  966. Iyengar, S., and Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19-39. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  967. Kim, Y., Hsu, S-H., and Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2013). Influence of social media use on discussion network heterogeneity and civic engagement: The moderating role of personality traits. Journal of Communication, 63, 498-516. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  968. Kleinman, S. B., and Eveland, W. P., Jr. (2015, November). Communicating politics without talking: How people infer political preferences using limited visual information. Presented to the Communication and Social Cognition division of the National Communication Association, Las Vegas. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  969. Klofstad, C. A., Sokhey, E. A., and McClurg, S. D. (2013). Disagreeing about disagreement: How conflict in social networks affects political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 57, 120-134. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  970. Kossinets, G., and Watts, D. J. (2009). Origins of homophily in an evolving social network. American Journal of Sociology, 115, 405-450. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  971. Kreuter, F., Presser, S., and Tourangeau, R. (2008). Social desirability bias in CATI, IVR, and Web surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 847-865. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  972. Kubin, E., and von Sikorski, C. (2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: A systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45, 188-206. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  973. McGuire, W. J., McGuire, C. V., Child, P., and Fujioka, T. (1978). Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one’s ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 511-520. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  974. Mendelberg, T., and Oleske, J. (2000). Race and public deliberation. Political Communication, 17, 169-191. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  975. Merolla, J. L., Sellers, A. H., and Fowler, D. J. (2013). Descriptive representation, political efficacy, and African Americans in the 2008 presidential election. Political Psychology, 34, 863-875. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  976. Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  977. Pew Research Center. (2016). On views of race and inequality, Blacks and Whites are worlds apart. http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2016/06/ST_2016.06.27_Race-Inequality-Final.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  978. Pew Research Center. (2018, March). Wide gender gap, growing educational divide in voters’ party identification. Available online: https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2018/03/03-20-18-Party-Identification-CORRECTED.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  979. Pew Research Center. (2019, April). Race in America 2019. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2019/04/09/race-in-america-2019/ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  980. Phinney, J. S. (1992). The multigroup ethnic identity measure: A new scale for use with diverse groups. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7, 156-176. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  981. Quillian, L., and Campbell, M. E. (2003). Beyond black and white: The present and future of multiracial friendship segregation. American Sociological Review, 68, 540-566. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  982. Rogers, E. M., and Bhowmik, D. K. (1970). Homophily-heterophily: Relational concepts for communication research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 523-538. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  983. Rojas, H. (2008). Strategy vs. understanding: How orientations toward political conversation influence political engagement. Communication Research, 35, 452-480. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  984. Rule, N. O., and Ambady, N. (2010). Democrats and Republicans can be differentiated from their faces. PLoS ONE, 5, e8733. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  985. Scheufele, D. A., Nisbet, M. C., Brossard, D., and Nisbet, E. C. (2004). Social structure and citizenship: Examining the impacts of social setting, network heterogeneity, and informational variables on political participation. Political Communication, 21, 315-338. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  986. Schmitt-Beck, R., and Lup, O. (2013). Seeking the soul of democracy: A review of recent research into citizens’ political talk culture. Swiss Political Science Review, 19, 513-538. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  987. Schmitt-Beck, R., and Schnaudt, C. (2023, online first). Everyday political talk with strangers: Evidence on a neglected arena of the deliberative system. Politische Vierteljahresschrift. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  988. Scott, E. (2020, June 10). What’s different about this moment? Primarily the number of Americans supporting protests over racial justice. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/06/10/whats-different-about-this-moment-primarily-number-americans-supporting-protests-over-racial-injustice/ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  989. Shafranek, R. M. (2021). Political considerations in nonpolitical decisions: A conjoint analysis of roommate choice. Political Behavior, 43, 271-300. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  990. Smith, J. A., McPherson, M., and Smith-Lovin, L. (2014). Social distance in the United States: Sex, race, religion, age, and education homophily among confidants, 1985-2004. American Sociological Review, 79, 432-456. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  991. Song, H., and Boomgaarden, H. (2017). Dynamic spirals put to test: An agent-based model of reinforcing spirals between selective exposure, interpersonal networks, and attitude polarization. Journal of Communication, 67, 256-281. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  992. Trawalter, S., and Richeson, J. A. (2008). Let’s talk about race, Baby! When Whites’ and Blacks’ interracial contact experiences diverge. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1214-1217. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  993. Walsh, K. C. (2007). Talking about race: Community dialogues and the politics of difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  994. Wimmer, A., and Lewis, K. (2010). Beyond and below racial homophily: ERG models of a friendship network documented on Facebook. American Journal of Sociology, 116, 583-642. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  995. Online Appendix Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  996. https://www.nomos-shop.de/shopfiles/anhang_978-3-7560-0800-1_mat_online_anhang.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  997. hit Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  998. References Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  999. Abramowitz, Alan I, and Kyle L Saunders. 2008. “Is Polarization a Myth?” The Journal of Politics 70 (02): 542–55. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1000. Ahn, Toh-Kyeong, Robert Huckfeldt, and John Barry Ryan. 2010. “Communication, Influence, and Informational Asymmetries Among Voters.” Political Psychology 31 (5): 763–87. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1001. Barabas, Jason. 2004. “How Deliberation Affects Policy Opinions.” American Political Science Review 98 (04): 687–701. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1002. Blei, David M, Andrew Y Ng, and Michael I Jordan. 2003. “Latent Dirichlet Allocation.” The Journal of Machine Learning Research 3: 993–1022. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1003. Boxell, Levi, Matthew Gentzkow, and Jesse M Shapiro. 2022. “Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization.” NBER Working Paper Series No. 26669, 1–60. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1004. Chaiken, S., and A. H. Eagly. 1989. “Heuristic and Systematic Information Processing Within and Beyond the Persuasion Context.” In Unintended Thought, edited by J. S. Uleman and J. A. Bargh, 212–52. New York: Guilford Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1005. Clifford, Scott, and Jennifer Jerit. 2013. “How Words Do the Work of Politics: Moral Foundations Theory and the Debate over Stem Cell Research.” Journal of Politics 75 (3): 659–71. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1006. Clifford, Scott, Jennifer Jerit, Carlisle Rainey, and Matt Motyl. 2015. “Moral Concerns and Policy Attitudes: Investigating the Influence of Elite Rhetoric.” Political Communication 32 (2): 229–48. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1007. Clifford, Scott, Thomas J Leeper, and Carlisle Rainey. 2023. “Generalizing Survey Experiments Using Topic Sampling: An Application to Party Cues.” Political Behavior, 1–24. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1008. Cobb, Michael D, and James H Kuklinski. 1997. “Changing Minds: Political Arguments and Political Persuasion.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 88–121. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1009. Day, Martin V., Susan T. Fiske, Emily L. Downing, and Thomas E. Trail. 2014. “Shifting Liberal and Conservative Attitudes Using Moral Foundations Theory.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 40 (12): 1559–73. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1010. Druckman, James N, and Kjersten R Nelson. 2003. “Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens’ Conversations Limit Elite Influence.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (4): 729–45. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1011. Federico, Christopher M., Christopher R. Weber, Damla Ergun, and Corrie Hunt. 2013. “Mapping the Connections Between Politics and Morality: The Multiple Sociopolitical Orientations Involved in Moral Intuition.” Political Psychology 34 (4): 589–610. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1012. Feinberg, Matthew, and Robb Willer. 2013. “The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes.” Psychological Science 24 (1): 56–62. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1013. Feinberg, Matthew, and Robb Willer. 2015. “From Gulf to Bridge When Do Moral Arguments Facilitate Political Influence?” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 41 (12): 1665–81. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1014. Franks, Andrew S., and Kyle C. Scherr. 2015. “Using Moral Foundations to Predict Voting Behavior: Regression Models from the 2012 Us Presidential Election.” Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 15 (1): 213–31. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1015. Garrett, Kristin N, and Alexa Bankert. 2018. “The Moral Roots of Partisan Division: How Moral Conviction Heightens Affective Polarization.” British Journal of Political Science, 1–20. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1016. Garzia, Diego, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, and Simon Maye. 2023. “Affective Polarization in Comparative and Longitudinal Perspective.” Public Opinion Quarterly 87 (1): 219–31. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1017. Gidron, Noam, James Adams, and Will Horne. 2020. American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1018. Graham, Jesse, Jonathan Haidt, Sena Koleva, Matt Motyl, Ravi Iyer, S. Wojcik, and Peter H. Ditto. 2013. “Moral Foundations Theory: The Pragmatic Validity of Moral Pluralism.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 47: 55–130. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1019. Graham, Jesse, Jonathan Haidt, and Brian A. Nosek. 2009. “Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96 (5): 1029–46. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1020. Haidt, Jonathan. 2007. “The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology.” Science 316 (5827): 998–1002. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1021. Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Random House. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1022. Haidt, Jonathan, and Jesse Graham. 2007. “When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions That Liberals May Not Recognize.” Social Justice Research 20 (1): 98–116. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1023. Hetherington, Marc J. 2001. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.” American Political Science Review 95 (03): 619–31. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1024. Hidey, Christopher, Elena Musi, Alyssa Hwang, Smaranda Muresan, and Kathy McKeown. 2017. “Analyzing the Semantic Types of Claims and Premises in an Online Persuasive Forum.” In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Argument Mining, 11–21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1025. Huckfeldt, Robert, Paul Allen Beck, Russell J Dalton, and Jeffrey Levine. 1995. “Political Environments, Cohesive Social Groups, and the Communication of Public Opinion.” American Journal of Political Science 39: 1025–54. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1026. Huddy, Leonie, Lilliana Mason, and Lene Aarøe. 2015. “Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity.” American Political Science Review 109 (01): 1–17. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1027. Iyengar, Shanto, Gaurav Sood, and Yphtach Lelkes. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology. A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (3): 405–31. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1028. Iyengar, Shanto, and Sean J Westwood. 2015. “Fear and Loathing Across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (3): 690–707. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1029. Jhaver, Shagun, Pranil Vora, and Amy Bruckman. 2017. “Designing for Civil Conversations: Lessons Learned from Changemyview.” Georgia Institute of Technology. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1030. Karpowitz, Christopher F, Tali Mendelberg, and Lee Shaker. 2012. “Gender Inequality in Deliberative Participation.” American Political Science Review 106 (03): 533–47. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1031. Kertzer, Joshua D., Kathleen E. Powers, Brian C. Rathbun, and Ravi Iyer. 2014. “Moral Support: How Moral Values Shape Foreign Policy Attitudes.” Journal of Politics 76 (3): 825–40. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1032. Kidwell, Blair, Adam Farmer, and David M Hardesty. 2013. “Getting Liberals and Conservatives to Go Green: Political Ideology and Congruent Appeals.” Journal of Consumer Research 40 (2): 350–67. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1033. Klar, Samara. 2014. “Partisanship in a Social Setting.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (3): 687–704. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1034. Koleva, Spassena P., Jesse Graham, Ravi Iyer, Peter H. Ditto, and Jonathan Haidt. 2012. “Tracing the Threads: How Five Moral Concerns (Especially Purity) Help Explain Culture War Attitudes.” Journal of Research in Personality 46 (2): 184–94. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1035. Kraft, Patrick, and Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck. 2013. “Helfen Politische Gespräche,„korrekt “Zu Wählen? Eine Analyse Zur Bundestagswahl 2009.” In Zivile Bürgergesellschaft und Demokratie: Aktuelle Ergebnisse der Empirischen Politikforschung, edited by Silke I Keil, Oscar W Gabriel, and S Isabell Thaidigsmann, 117–38. Springer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1036. Kraft, Patrick W. 2018. “Measuring Morality in Political Attitude Expression.” The Journal of Politics 80 (3): 1028–33.https://doi.org/10.1086/696862 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1037. Kraft, Patrick W, and Robert Klemmensen. 2023. “Lexical Ambiguity in Political Rhetoric: Why Morality Doesn’t Fit in a Bag of Words.” British Journal of Political Science, 1–19. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1038. Lazer, David, Brian Rubineau, Carol Chetkovich, Nancy Katz, and Michael Neblo. 2010. “The Coevolution of Networks and Political Attitudes.” Political Communication 27 (3): 248–74. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1039. Lipsitz, Keena. 2018. “Playing with Emotions: The Effect of Moral Appeals in Elite Rhetoric.” Political Behavior 40 (1): 57–78. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1040. Low, Michelle, and Ma Glenda Lopez Wui. 2015. “Moral Foundations and Attitudes Towards the Poor.” Current Psychology 35: 650–56. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1041. Manning, Christopher D., Prabhakar Raghavan, Hinrich Schütze, and others. 2008. Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1042. Mason, Lilliana. 2015. “I Disrespectfully Agree: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Behavioral and Issue Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (1): 128–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12089.X Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1043. Mendelberg, Tali, Christopher F Karpowitz, and J Baxter Oliphant. 2014. “Gender Inequality in Deliberation: Unpacking the Black Box of Interaction.” Perspectives on Politics 12 (01): 18–44. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1044. Mutz, Diana C. 2002. “Cross-Cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice.” American Political Science Review 96 (01): 111–26. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1045. Nelson, Thomas E, and Jennifer Garst. 2005. “Values-Based Political Messages and Persuasion: Relationships Among Speaker, Recipient, and Evoked Values.” Political Psychology 26 (4): 489–516. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1046. Petty, Richard E., and John T. Cacioppo. 1986a. Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1047. Petty, Richard E., and John T. Cacioppo. 1986b. “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 19: 123–205. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1048. Reiljan, Andres. 2020. “‘Fear and Loathing Across Party Lines’(also) in Europe: Affective Polarisation in European Party Systems.” European Journal of Political Research 59 (2): 376–96. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1049. Ryan, Timothy J. 2014. “Reconsidering Moral Issues in Politics.” Journal of Politics 76 (2): 380–97. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1050. Ryan, Timothy J. 2017. “No Compromise: Political Consequences of Moralized Attitudes.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (2): 409–23. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1051. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger. 2022. “Prerequisites of Deliberative Democracy: Inclusivity, Publicity, and Heterogeneity of German Citizens’ Everyday Political Talk.” SCM Studies in Communication and Media 11 (1): 7–72. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1052. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, and Christiane Grill. 2020. “From the Living Room to the Meeting Hall? Citizens’ Political Talk in the Deliberative System.” Political Communication 37 (6): 832–51. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1053. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, and Patrick Kraft. 2014. “Political Information Flows and Consistent Voting: Personal Conversations, Mass Media, Party Campaigns, and the Quality of Voting Decisions at the 2009 German Federal Election.” In Voters on the Move or on the Run?, edited by Bernhard Wessels, Hans Rattinger, Sigrid Rossteutscher, and Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck, 193–216. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1054. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, and Manuel Neumann. 2023. “Do People Like to Discuss Politics? A Study of Citizens’ Political Talk Culture.” European Political Science Review, 1–20. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1055. Shatz, Itamar. 2017. “Fast, Free, and Targeted: Reddit as a Source for Recruiting Participants Online.” Social Science Computer Review 35 (4): 537–49. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1056. Skitka, Linda J. 2010. “The Psychology of Moral Conviction.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 4 (4): 267–81. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1057. Skitka, Linda J., Christopher W. Bauman, and Edward G. Sargis. 2005. “Moral Conviction: Another Contributor to Attitude Strength or Something More?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88 (6): 895–917. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1058. Skitka, Linda J, and G Scott Morgan. 2014. “The Social and Political Implications of Moral Conviction.” Political Psychology 35 (S1): 95–110. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1059. Tan, Chenhao, Vlad Niculae, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, and Lillian Lee. 2016. “Winning Arguments: Interaction Dynamics and Persuasion Strategies in Good-Faith Online Discussions.” In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web, 613–24. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1060. Wagner, Markus. 2021. “Affective Polarization in Multiparty Systems.” Electoral Studies 69: 102199. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1061. Wei, Zhongyu, Yang Liu, and Yi Li. 2016. “Is This Post Persuasive? Ranking Argumentative Comments in Online Forum.” In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), 2: 195–200. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-169
  1062. Literatur Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1063. Bai, Hui, Voelkel, Jan G., Eichstaedt, Johannes C., Willer, Robb (2023): Artificial Intelligence Can Persuade Humans on Political Issues. OSF Preprints, https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/stakv. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1064. Baranowski, Paweł, Kruschinski, Simon, Russmann, Uta, Haßler, Jörg, Magin, Melanie, Márton, Bene, Ceron, Andrea, Jackson, Daniel, Lilleker, Darren (2022): Patterns of Negative Campaigning during the 2019 European Election: Political Parties’ Facebook Posts and Users’ Sharing Behaviour across Twelve Countries. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, Online-Vorveröffentlichung, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2022.2115598. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1065. Bode, Leticia, Hanna, Alexander, Yang, Junghwan, Shah, Dhavan V. (2015): Candidate Networks, Citizen Clusters, and Political Expression: Strategic Hashtag Use in the 2010 Midterms. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 659(1), 149–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214563923. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1066. Bommasani, Rishi, et al. (2022): On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models. arXiv:2108.07258v3 [cs.LG]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2108.07258. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1067. Bossetta, Michael (2018): The Digital Architectures of Social Media: Comparing Political Campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 US Election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 95(2), 471–96. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1068. Darius, Philipp (2022): Who Polarizes Twitter? Ideological Polarization, Partisan Groups and Strategic Networked Campaigning on Twitter during the 2017 and 2021 German Federal Elections ‘Bundestagswahlen.’. Social Network Analysis and Mining 12(1), 151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-022-00958-w. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1069. Darius, Philipp, Stephany, Fabian. (2019): ‘Hashjacking’ the Debate: Polarisation Strategies of Germany’s Political Far-Right on Twitter. In: Weber, Ingmar, Darwish, Kareem M., Wagner, Claudia, Zagheni, Emilio Nelson, Laura, Aref, Samin, Flöck, Fabian (Hrsg.): Social Informatics. SocInfo 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11864, Cham: Springer VS. 298–308. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34971-4_21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1071. Darius, Philipp, Urquhart, Michael. (2021): Disinformed Social Movements: A Large-Scale Mapping of Conspiracy Narratives as Online Harms during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Online Social Networks and Media 26, 100174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2021.100174. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1072. Farrell, David M., Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger (2002): Do Political Campaigns Matter?. In: Farrell, David M., Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger (Hrsg): Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums. London: Routledge. 215. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1073. Gibson, Rachel K. (2015): Party Change, Social Media and the Rise of ‘Citizen-Initiated’ Campaigning. Party Politics 21(2), 183–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812472575. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1074. Gibson, Rachel K. (2020): When the nerds go marching in. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1075. Goldstein, Josh A., et al. (2023): Generative Language Models and Automated Influence Operations: Emerging Threats and Potential Mitigations. arXiv:2301.04246v1 [cs.CY]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.04246. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1076. Gorwa, Robert, Binns, Reuben, Katzenbach, Christian (2020): Algorithmic Content Moderation: Technical and Political Challenges in the Automation of Platform Governance. Big Data & Society 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719897945. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1077. Haller, André, Kruschinski, Simon, Günther, Jay, Michelberger, Sven, Uhlich, Maik, Thoß, Lena (2023): Willst du uns im Wahlkampf unterstützen? Bitte bestätige deine E-Mail-Adresse. Fuchs, Martin, Motzkau, Martin (Hrsg.): Digitale Wahlkämpfe: Politische Kommunikation im Bundestagswahlkampf 2021, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 101–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39008-2_7. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1078. Keller, Franziska B., Schoch, David, Stier, Sebastian, Yang, Jung Hwan (2019): Political Astroturfing on Twitter: How to Coordinate a Disinformation Campaign. Political Communication 37(2), 256–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1661888. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1079. Kim, Young Mie, Hsu, Jordan, Neiman, David, Kou Colin, Bankston, Levi, Kim, Soo Yun, Heinrich, Richard, Baragwanath, Robyn, Raskutti, Garvesh. (2018): The Stealth Media? Groups and Targets behind Divisive Issue Campaigns on Facebook. Political Communication 35(4), 515–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1476425. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1080. Klinger, Ulrike, Koc-Michalska, Karolina, Russmann, Uta (2022): Are Campaigns Getting Uglier, and Who Is to Blame? Negativity, Dramatization and Populism on Facebook in the 2014 and 2019 EP Election Campaigns.” Political Communication 40(3), 263-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2133198. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1081. Korte, Karl-Rudolf (2023): Die neue Unübersichtlichkeit in der Mitte. In: Korte, Karl-Rudolf, Schiffers, Maximilian, von Schuckmann, Arno, Plümer, Sandra (Hrsg.): Die Bundestagswahl 2021: Analysen der Wahl-, Parteien-, Kommunikations- und Regierungsforschung, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35758-0_2-1. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1082. Maier, Jürgen, Nai, Alessandro (2021): Mapping the Drivers of Negative Campaigning: Insights from a Candidate Survey. International Political Science Review 44(2), 195-211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512121994512. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1083. Römmele, Andrea, Gibson, Rachel (2020): Scientific and Subversive: The Two Faces of the Fourth Era of Political Campaigning. New Media & Society 22(4), 595–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893979. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1084. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger (2000): Politische Kommunikation und Wählerverhalten. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1085. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger (Hrsg.) (2012): Wählen in Deutschland: Sonderheft der Politischen Vierteljahresschrift 45/2011. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1086. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Wolsing, Ansgar (2010): Der Wähler begegnet den Parteien. Direkte Kontakte mit der Kampagnenkommunikation der Parteien und ihr Einfluss auf das Wahlverhalten bei der Bundestagswahl 2009. In: Korte, Karl-Rudolf (Hrsg.): Die Bundestagswahl 2009. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92494-6_3. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1087. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schoen, Harald, Weßels, Bernhard, Wolf, Christof (Hrsg.) (2022): The Changing German Voter. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1088. Schoch, David, Keller, Franziska B., Stier, Sebastian, Yang, Jung Hwan (2022): Coordination Patterns Reveal Online Political Astroturfing across the World. Scientific Reports 12(1), 4572. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08404-9. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1089. Theocharis, Yannis, Boulianne, Shelley, Koc-Michalska, Karolina, Bimber, Bruce (2022): Platform Affordances and Political Participation: How Social Media Reshape Political Engagement. West European Politics 46(4), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2087410. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1090. Wei, Jason, Tay, et al. (2022): Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models. arXiv:2206.07682v2 [cs.CL]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.07682. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1091. Weßels, Bernhard, Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger (Hrsg) (2014): Voters on the Move or on the Run?. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-199
  1092. References Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1093. Addonizio, E. M., Green, D. P., & Glaser, J. M. (2007). Putting the Party Back into Politics: An Experiment Testing Whether Election Day Festivals Increase Voter Turnout. PS: Political Science & Politics, 40(04), 721-727, doi:10.1017/S1049096507071168. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1094. Alvarez, R. M., Hopkins, A., & Sinclair, B. (2010). Mobilizing Pasadena Democrats: Measuring The Effects of Partisan Campaign Contacts. The Journal of Politics, 72(1), 31-44, doi:10.1017/S0022381609990454. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1095. Arceneaux, K. (2005). Using Cluster Randomized Field Experiments to Study Voting Behavior. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601, 169-179. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1096. Arceneaux, K. (2007). I'm Asking for Your Support: The Effects of Personally Delivered Campaign Messages on Voting Decisions and Opinion Formation Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2(1), 43-65. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1097. Arceneaux, K., & Kolodny, R. (2009). Educating the Least Informed: Group Endorsements in a Grassroots Campaign. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 755-770. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1098. Barton, J., Castillo, M., & Petrie, R. (2013). What Persuades Voters? A Field Experiment on Political Campaigning. The Economic Journal, 124, 293-326. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1099. Bayley, M.A., Hopkins, D.J., & Rogers, T. (2016). Unresponsive and Unpersuaded: The Unintended Consequences of Voter Persuasion Efforts. Political Behavior, 38, 713-746. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1100. Beck, P. A., & Heidemann, E. (2010). Changing Strategies in Grassroots Canvassing: 1956-2008. Paper presented at the APSA Annual Conference, Washington, DC, August 26, 2010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1101. Bennion, E. A. (2005). Caught in the Ground Wars: Mobilizing Voters during a Competitive Congressional Campaign. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601, 123-141. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1102. Berelson, B., Lazarsfeld, P., & McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting: a study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1103. Bhatti, Y., Dahlgaard, J.O., Hansen, J.H., Hansen, K.M. (2019). Is Door-to-Door Canvassing Effective in Europe? Evidence from a Meta-Study across Six European Countries. British Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 279-290. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1104. Bochel, J. M., & Denver, D. T. (1970). Canvassing, Turnout and Party Support: an Experiment. British Journal of Political Science, 1, 257-269. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1105. Cantoni, E., & Pons, V. (2021). Do Interactions with Candidates Increase Voter Support and Participation? Experimental Evidence from Italy. Economics & Politics, 33(2), 379-402. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1106. Cardy, E. A. (2005). An Experimental Field Study of the GOTV and Persuasion Effects of Partisan Direct Mail and Phone Calls. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601, 28-40. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1107. Carty, R. K., & Eagles, M. (1999). Do local campaigns matter? Campaign spending, the local canvass and party support in Canada. Electoral Studies, 18(1), 69-87. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1108. Dale, A., & Strauss, A. (2009). Don't Forget to Vote: Text Message Reminders as a Mobilization Tool. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 787-804, doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00401.x. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1109. Dalton, R., McAllister, I., & Wattenberg, M. P. (2002). Political parties and their publics. In K. R. Luther, & F. Müller-Rommel (Eds.), Political parties in the new Europe. Political and analytical challenges (pp. 19-42). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1110. Denver, D., & Hands, G. (1997). Modern constituency electioneering. London: Frank Cass. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1111. Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Bros. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1112. Eldersveld, S. J. (1956). Experimental Propaganda Techniques and Voting Behavior. The American Political Science Review, 50(1), 154-165. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1113. Farrell, D. M. (1996). Campaign strategies and tactics. In L. LeDuc, R. Niemi, & P. Norris (Eds.), Comparing Democracies (pp. 160-183). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1114. Farrell, D. M. (2002). Campaign modernization and the west European party. In K. R. Luther, & F. Müller-Rommel (Eds.), Political parties in the new Europe. Political and analytical challenges (pp. 63-83). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1115. Farrell, D. M. (2006). Political parties in a changing campaign environment. In R. Katz, & W. Crotty (Eds.), Handbook of Party Politics (pp. 122-133). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1116. Farrell, D. M., & Webb, P. (2000). Political parties as campaign organizations. In R. J. Dalton, & M. P. Wattenberg (Eds.), Parties without partisans. Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies (pp. 102-128). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1117. Farrell, D.M., & Schmitt-Beck, R. (Eds.) (2002). Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums. London & New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1118. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A Flexible Statistical Power Analysis Program for the Social, Behavioral, and Biomedical Sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1119. Fieldhouse, E., & Cutts, D. (2008). The Effectiveness of Local Party Campaigns in 2005: Combining Evidence from Campaign Spending and Agent Survey Data. British Journal of Political Science, 39, 367-388. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1120. Fieldhouse, E., Cutts, D., Widdop, P. &, John, P. (2013). Do Impersonal Mobilisation Methods Work? Evidence from a Get-Out-The-Vote Experiment in England. Electoral Studies, 32(1), 113-123. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1121. Foos, F. & John, P. (2018). Parties are No Civic Charities: Voter Contact and the Changing Partisan Composition of the Electorate. Political Science Research and Methods, 6(2), 283-298. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1122. Foos, F., John, P., Mueller, C., & Cunningham, K. (2021). Social Mobilization in Partisan Spaces. The Journal of Politics, 83(3), 1190-1197. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1123. Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (1999). Does canvassing increase voter turnout? A field experiment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(19), 10939-10942, doi:10.1073/pnas.96.19.10939. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1124. Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2000). The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment. American Political Science Review, 94, 653-663. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1125. Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2005). Do Phone Calls Increase Voter Turnout? An Update. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601, 142-154. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1126. Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Green, M. (2003). Partisan mail and voter turnout: Results from randomized field experiments. Electoral Studies, 22(4), 563-579. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1127. Gerber, A. S., & Rogers, T. (2009). Descriptive Social Norms and Motivation to Vote: Everybody's Voting and so Should You. The Journal of Politics, 71(1), 178-191. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1128. Górecki, M. A., & Marsh, M. (2012). Not just ‘friends and neighbours’: Canvassing, geographic proximity and voter choice. European Journal of Political Research, 51(5), 563-582, doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02008.x. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1129. Gosnell, H. F. (1927). Getting out the vote. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1130. Green, D. P., & Gerber, A. S. (2008). Get out the vote. How to increase voter turnout. Washington, DC: The Brookins Institution. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1131. Green, D. P., Gerber, A. S., & Nickerson, D. W. (2003). Getting Out the Vote in Local Elections: Results from Six Door to Door Canvassing Experiments. Journal of Politics, 65(4), 1083-1096. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1132. Green, D.P., McGrath, M.C. and Aronow, P.M., (2013). Field experiments and the study of voter turnout. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 23(1), 27-48. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1133. Holbrook, T. M. (1996). Do campaigns matter? London: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1134. Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication: information and influence in an election campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1135. Imai, K. (2005). Do Get-Out-the-Vote Calls Reduce Turnout? The Importance of Statistical Methods for Field Experiments. American Political Science Review, 99(02), 283-300, doi:10.1017/S0003055405051658. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1136. Imai, K., King, G., & Nall, C. (2009). The Essential Role of Pair Matching in Cluster-Randomized Experiments, with Application to the Mexican Universal Health Insurance Evaluation. Statistical Science, 24(1), 29-53, doi:10.1214/08-STS274. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1137. John, P., & Brannan, T. G. (2006). How to mobilise the electorate: lessons from the University of Manchester ‘Get Out the Vote’experiment. Representation, 42(3), 209-221. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1138. John, P., & Brannan, T. G. (2008). How Different Are Telephoning and Canvassing? Results from a ‘Get Out the Vote’Field Experiment in the British 2005 General Election. British Journal of Political Science, 38(03), 565-574. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1139. Johnston, R., & Pattie, C. (1997). Where is the difference? Decomposing the impact of local election campaigns in Great Britain. Electoral Studies, 16, 165-174. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1140. Johnston, R., & Pattie, C. (2003). Do Canvassing and Campaigning Work? Evidence from the 2001 General Election in England. British Elections and Parties Review, 13, 248-273. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1141. Karp, J. A., Banducci, S. A., & Bowler, S. (2008). Getting Out the Vote: Party Mobilization in a Comparative Perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 38(01), 91-112, doi:10.1017/S0007123408000057. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1142. Kavanagh, D. (1995). Election Campaigning. The New Marketing of Politics. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1143. Kendall, C., Nannicini, T., & Trebbi, F. (2014). How do Voters Respond to Information? Evidence from a Randomized Campaign. The American Economic Review, 105(1), 322-353. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1144. Kling, D.T., & Stratmann, T. (2022). Large-Scale Evidence for the Effectiveness of Partisan GOTV Robo Calls. Journal of Experimental Political Science, Online First, 1-13. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1145. Kramer, G. (1970). The effects of precinct-level canvassing on voter behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 560-572. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1146. Krassa, M. A. (1988). Context and the canvass: the mechanisms of interaction. Political Behavior, 10(2), 233-246. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1147. Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The People's Choice. How the Voter Makes up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  1148. Levine, P., & Lopez, M. H. (2005). What We Should Know about the Effectiveness of Campaigns but Don't. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601, 180-191. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF) Download kompl. Werk (PDF)

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien