Dynamiken privater Autorität und die Rolle des Staates: Eine neue Perspektive auf (De-)Privatisierungsprozesse

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover der Ausgabe: PVS Politische Vierteljahresschrift Jahrgang 55 (2014), Heft 4
Vollzugriff

Zeitschrift der Deutschen Vereinigung für Politikwissenschaft

Jahrgang 55 (2014), Heft 4

Autor:innen:
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Erscheinungsjahr
2014
ISSN-Online
0032-3470
ISSN-Print
0032-3470

Kapitelinformationen

Vollzugriff

Jahrgang 55 (2014), Heft 4

Dynamiken privater Autorität und die Rolle des Staates: Eine neue Perspektive auf (De-)Privatisierungsprozesse

Autor:innen:
ISSN-Print
0032-3470
ISSN-Online
0032-3470
Kapitelvorschau:

Der Beitrag identifiziert die Dynamiken privater Autorität über Zeit sowie gegenläufige Deprivatisierungsprozesse als empirisch-analytisch und politik-praktisch zentrale, aber bisher zu wenig erforschte Aspekte von privater Autorität und Privatisierung. Er plädiert für eine staatsfokussierte, aber dynamische theoretische Herangehensweise, die die empirische Möglichkeit ernst nimmt, dass Staaten eine asymmetrische Rolle bei der Autorisierung (Privatisierung) bzw. „Entmachtung“ (Deprivatisierung) von privaten Governance-Akteuren zukommt. Zu diesem Zweck erscheint eine Kombination der oftmals getrennt oder als rivalisierend betrachteten Theorieströmungen der Prinzipal-Agenten-Theorie, politökonomischer Ansätze zu privater Autorität und des historischen Institutionalismus vielversprechend.

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Abbott, Kenneth W., Philipp Genschel, Duncan Snidal, und Bernhard Zangl. 2014. Orchestration: Global Governance Through Intermediaries. In dies.: International Organizations as Orchestrators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (im Erscheinen). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139979696.018
  2. Abbott, Kenneth W., und Duncan Snidal. 1998. Why States Act Trough Formal International Organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42: 3-32. DOI: 10.1177/00220027 98042001001. Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Avant, Deborah. 2005. The Market for Force. The Consequences of Privatizing Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Avant, Deborah, Martha Finnemore, und Susan Sell. 2010. Who Governs the Globe? In dies.: Who Governs the Globe?, 1-33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845369.002
  5. Barnett, Michael. 2002. Historical Sociology and Constructivism. An Estranged Past, a Federated Future? In Historical Sociology of International Relations, Hrsg. Stephen Hobden und John M. Hobson, 99-119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Biersteker, Thomas J., und Rodney B. Hall. 2002. Private Authority as Global Governance. In The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance, Hrsg. Rodney B. Hall und Thomas J. Biersteker, 202-222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491238.011
  7. Brunnermeier, Markus, Andrew Crocket, Charles Goodhart, Avinash D. Persaud, und Hyun Shin. 2009. The Fundamental Principles of Financial Regulation. Geneva: International Center for Monetary and Banking Studies. Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Büthe, Tim. 2010. Private Regulation in the Global Economy. A (P)Review. Business and Politics 12: 1-38. DOI: 10.2202/146935691328. Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Büthe, Tim, und Walter Mattli. 2011. The New Global Rulers. The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/9781400838790
  10. Capoccia, Giovanni, und Daniel R. Kelemen. 2007. The Study of Critical Junctures. Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism. World Politics 59: 341-369. DOI: 10.1017/S0043887100020852. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100020852
  11. Conzelmann, Thomas, und Klaus Dieter Wolf. 2007. Doing Good While Doing Well? -Potenzial und Grenzen grenzüberschreitender politischer Steuerung durch privatwirtschaftliche Selbstregulierung. In Macht und Ohnmacht internationaler Organisationen, Hrsg. Andreas Hasenclever, Klaus Dieter Wolf und Michael Zürn, 145-175. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Cooley, Alexander, und James Ron. 2002. The NGO Scramble. Organizational Insecurity and the Political Economy of Transnational Action. International Security 27: 5-39. DOI:10.1162/016228802320231217. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1162/016228802320231217
  13. Cortell, Andrew P., und Susan Peterson. 1999. Altered States. Explaining Domestic Institutional Change. British Journal of Political Science 29: 177-203. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0007123499000083
  14. Cutler, Anne C. 2010. The Legitimacy of Private Transnational Governance. Experts and the Transnational Market for Force. Socio-Economic Review 8: 157-185. DOI: 10.1093/ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwp027
  15. ser/mwp027. Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Cutler, Anne C. 1999. Locating “Authority” in the Global Political Economy. International Studies Quarterly 43: 59-81. DOI: 10.1111/0020-8833.00111. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00111
  17. Cutler, Anne C., Virginia Haufler und Tony Porter. 1999a. Private Authority and International Affairs. In dies.: Private Authority and International Affairs, 2-38. Albany: State University of New York Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Cutler, Anne C., Virginia Haufler, und Tony Porter. 1999b. The Contours and Significance of Private Authority in International Affairs. In dies.: Private Authority and International Affairs, 333-376. Albany: State University of New York Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Deitelhoff, Nicole, und Andreas Fischer-Lescano. 2013. Politik und Recht der privatisierten Sicherheit. In Recht und Politik globaler Sicherheit. Bestandsaufnahme und Erklärungsansätze, Hrsg. Andreas Fischer-Lescano und Peter Mayer, 43-77. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Dingwerth, Klaus. 2007. The New Transnationalism. Transnational Governance and Democratic Legitimacy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/9780230590144_7
  21. Fischer-Lescano, Andreas, und Peter Mayer (Hrsg.). 2013. Recht und Politik globaler -Sicherheit. Bestandsaufnahme und Erklärungsansätze. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Fuchs, Doris. 2007. Business Power in Global Governance. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Genschel, Philipp, und Bernhard Zangl. 2014. State Transformations in OECD Countries. Towards the State as a Manager of Political Authority. Annual Review of Political -Science 17: 337-354. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-061312-113943. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-061312-113943
  24. Graz, Jean-Christophe, und Andreas Nölke. 2008. Introduction. Beyond the Fragmented Debate on Transnational Private Governance. In dies.: Transnational Private Governance and its Limits, 1-26, London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Green, Jessica F. 2014. Rethinking Private Authority. Agents and Entrepreneurs in Global Environmental Governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Green, Jessica, und Jeff Colgan. 2013. Protecting Sovereignty, Protecting the Planet. State Delegation to International Organizations and Private Actors in Environmental Politics. Governance 26: 473-497. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01607.x. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01607.x
  27. Hall, Rodney B., und Thomas J. Biersteker. 2002. The Emergence of Private Authority in the International System. In dies.: The Emergence of Private Authority in Global -Governance, 3-22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491238.002
  28. Hanrieder, Tine. 2015. International Organization in Time. Fragmentation and the Vicious Circle of Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press (im Erscheinen). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198705833.003.0007
  29. Hawkins, Darren G., David A. Lake, Daniel L. Nielson, und Michael J. Tierney. 2006. -Delegation under Anarchy. States, International Organizations, and Principal-Agent Theory. In dies.: Delegation and Agency in International Organizations, 3-38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491368.002
  30. Héritier, Adrienne, und Christoph Lehmkuhl. 2008. Introduction. The Shadow of Hierarchy and New Modes of Governance. Journal of Public Policy 28: 1-17. DOI: 10.1017/S0143814X08000755. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X08000755
  31. Higgott, Richard A., Geoffrey D. Underhill, und Andreas Bieler (Hrsg.). 2000. Non-State Actors and Authority in the Global System. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4324/9780203279380
  32. Hurrelmann, Achim, Stephan Leibfried, Kerstin Martens, und Peter Mayer (Hrsg.). 2008. Zerfasert der Nationalstaat? Die Internationalisierung politischer Verantwortung. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Hurrelmann, Achim, Stephan Leibfried, Kerstin Martens, und Peter Meyer (Hrsg.). 2007. Transforming the Golden Age Nation State. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/9780230590861_10
  34. Hutter, Bridget M. 2006. The Role of Non-State Actors in Regulation. In Global Governance and the Role of Non-State Actors, Hrsg. Gunnar F. Schuppert, 63-79. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Krahmann, Elke. 2010. States, Citizens and the Privatization of Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Krause-Hansen, Hans, und Dorte Salskov-Iversen (Hrsg.). 2008. Critical Perspectives on Private Authority in Global Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Kruck, Andreas. 2014. Theorising the Use of Private Military and Security Companies. A Synthetic Perspective. Journal of International Relations and Development 14: 112-141. DOI: 10.1057/jird.2013.4. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/jird.2013.4
  38. Kruck, Andreas. 2011. Private Ratings, Public Regulations. Credit Rating Agencies and Global Financial Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Lake, David A. 2010. Rightful Rules. Authority, Order and the Foundations of Global Governance. International Studies Quarterly 54: 587-613. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468- 2478.2010.00601.x. Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Lawson, George. 2006. The Promise of Historical Sociology in International Relations. International Studies Review 8: 397-423. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2006.00600.x. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2006.00600.x
  41. Leibfried, Stephan, Evelyne Huber, Matthew Lange, Jonah Levy, Frank Nullmeier, und John Stephens (Hrsg.). 2014/15. The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press (im Erscheinen). Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Leibfried, Stephan, und Michael Zürn (Hrsg.). 2005. Transformations of the State? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511752193.001
  43. Mahoney, James. 2000. Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and Society 29: 507-548. DOI: 10.1023/A:1007113830879. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1023/A:1007113830879
  44. Mahoney, James, und Kathleen Thelen. 2010. A Gradual Theory of Institutional Change. In dies.: Explaining Institutional Change. Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, 1-37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Mattli, Walter. 2003. Public and Private Governance in Setting International Standards. In Governance in a Global Economy. Political Authority in Transition, Hrsg. Miles Kahler und David A. Lake, 197-229. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Mattli, Walter, und Tim Büthe. 2005a. Accountability in Accounting? The Politics of -Private Rule-Making in the Public Interest. Governance 18: 399-429. DOI: 10.1111/ j.1468-0491.2005.00282.x. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00282.x
  47. Mattli, Walter, und Tim Büthe. 2005b. Global Private Governance. Lessons from a National Model of Setting Standards in Accounting. Law and Contemporary Problems 68: 225-262. Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Nielson, Daniel L., und Michael J. Tierney. 2003. Delegation to International Organizations. Agency Theory and World Bank Environmental Reform. International Organization 57: 241-276. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818303572010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0020818303572010
  49. Nölke, Andreas. 2004. Transnational Private Authority and Corporate Governance. In New Rules for Global Markets. Public and Private Governance in the World Economy, Hrsg. Stefan A. Schirm, 155-175. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/9780230524361_8
  50. Nölke, Andreas, und James Perry. 2007. Coordination Service Firms and the Erosion of Rhenish Capitalism. In The Transnational Politics of Corporate Governance Regulation, Hrsg. Henk Overbeek, Bastian van Apeldoorn und Andreas Nölke, 121-136. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2202/1469-3569.1185
  51. Ougaard, Morten, und Anna Leander (Hrsg.). 2010. Business and Global Governance. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  52. Pattberg, Philipp. 2007. Private Institutions and Global Governance. The New Politics of Environmental Sustainability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Pauly, Louis W. 2002. Global Markets, National Authority and the Problem of Legitimation. The Case of Finance. In The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance, Hrsg. Rodney B. Hall und Thomas J. Biersteker, 76-90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491238.005
  54. Pauly, Louis W., und Edgar Grande. 2005. Reconstituting Political Authority. Sovereignty, Effectiveness, and Legitimacy in a Transnational Order. In Complex Sovereignty. Reconstituting Political Authority in the Twenty-first Century, Hrsg. Edgar Grande und Louis W. Pauly, 3-21. Toronto, ON: Toronto University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3138/9781442684201-003
  55. Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time. History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Pierson, Paul. 2000. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. The American Political Science Review 94: 251-267. Google Scholar öffnen
  57. Pollack, Mark A. 2003. The Engines of European Integration. Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/0199251177.003.0002
  58. Pollack, Mark A. 1997. Delegation, Agency, and Agenda-setting in the European Community. International Organization 51: 99-134. DOI: 10.1162/002081897550311. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1162/002081897550311
  59. Rittberger, Berthold, und Arndt Wonka (Hrsg.). 2012. Agency Governance in the EU. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Strange, Susan. 1996. The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World -Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Streeck, Wolfgang, und Kathleen Thelen. 2005. Introduction. Institutional Change in -Advanced Political Economies. In dies.: Beyond Continuity. Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, 1-39. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Tallberg, Jonas. 2002. Delegation to Supranational Institutions: Why, How, and with What Consequences? West European Politics 25: 23-46. DOI: 10.1080/713601584. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/713601584
  63. Thatcher, Mark. 2002. Delegation to Independent Regulatory Agencies. Pressures, Functions and Contextual Mediation. West European Politics 25: 125-147. Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Thatcher, Mark, und Alec Stone Sweet. 2002. Theory and Practice of Delegation to Non-Majoritarian Institutions. West European Politics 25:1-22. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/713601583
  65. Zürn, Michael, Martin Binder, und Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt. 2012. International -Authority and Its Politicization. International Theory 4: 69-106. DOI: 10.1017/S1752971912000012. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S1752971912000012

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF)

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien