Assessing the Electoral Payoffs of Partisan Mobilization in Adverse Contexts: A Field Experimental Study of the 2011 Spanish Local Elections

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover des Buchs: Informationsflüsse, Wahlen und Demokratie
Open Access Vollzugriff

Informationsflüsse, Wahlen und Demokratie

Festschrift für Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck

Autor:innen:
Reihe
Studien zur Wahl- und Einstellungsforschung
Band
35
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2023
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0800-1
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-1555-3

Kapitelinformationen

Open Access Vollzugriff

Assessing the Electoral Payoffs of Partisan Mobilization in Adverse Contexts: A Field Experimental Study of the 2011 Spanish Local Elections

Autor:innen:
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0800-1
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-1555-3
Kapitelvorschau:

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Mair, P., Müller, W. C., & Plasser, F. (2004). Conclusion: Political parties in changing electoral markets. In P. Mair, W. C. Müller, & F. Plasser (Eds.), Political parties and electoral change (pp. 264-274). London: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  2. Mair, P., & van Biezen, I. (2001). Party Membership in Twenty European Democracies, 1980-2000. Party Politics, 7, 5-21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  3. McClurg, S. D., & Holbrook, T. M. (2009). Living in a Battleground. Political Research Quarterly, 62(3), 495-506. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  4. McNulty, J. E. (2005). Phone-Based GOTV: What's on the Line? Field Experiments with Varied Partisan Components, 2002-2003. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601, 41-65. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  5. Michelson, M. R., & Nickerson, D. W. (2011). Voter mobilization. In J. N. Druckman, D. P. Green, J. H. Kuklinksi, & A. Lupia (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  6. Moore, R. T. (November 2010). blockTools: Blocking, Assignment, and Diagnosing Interference in Randomized Experiments. (0.5-2 ed.). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  7. Morales, L. (2010). Getting a single message? The impact of homogeneous political communication contexts in Spain in a comparative perspective. In M. W. Wolf, L. Morales, & K. I. Ikeda (Eds.), Political Discussion in Modern Democracies in a Comparative Perspective (pp. 201-222). London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  8. Nickerson, D. W. (2005). Partisan Mobilization Using Volunteer Phone Banks and Door Hangers. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601, 10-27. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  9. Nickerson, D. W. (2006). Volunteer Phone Calls Can Increase Turnout. American Politics Research, 34(3), 271-292, doi:10.1177/1532673x05275923. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  10. Nickerson, D. W. (2007). Quality Is Job One: Professional and Volunteer Voter Mobilization Calls. American Journal of Political Science, 51(2), 269-282, doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00250.x. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  11. Nickerson, D. W., Friedrichs, R. D., & King, D. C. (2006). Partisan Mobilization Campaigns in the Field: Results from a Statewide Turnout Experiment in Michigan. Political Research Quarterly, 59(1), 85-97. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  12. Norris, P. (2000). A Virtuous Circle? Political Communications in Post-Industrial Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  13. Nyman, P. (2017). Door-to-Door Canvassing in the European Elections: Evidence from a Swedish Field Experiment. Electoral Studies, 45, 110-118. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  14. Panagopoulos, C. (2009a). Partisan and Nonpartisan Message Content and Voter Mobilization. Political Research Quarterly, 62(1), 70-76. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  15. Panagopoulos, C. (2009b). Street fight: The impact of a street sign campaign on voter turnout. Electoral Studies, 28(2), 309-313, doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2009.03.001. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  16. Panagopoulos, C. (2011). Timing Is Everything? Primacy and Recency Effects in Voter Mobilization Campaigns. Political Behavior, 33(1), 79-93, doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9125-x. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  17. Pasquino, G. (2001). The New Campaign Politics in Southern Europe. In N. Diamandouros, & R. Gunther (Eds.), Parties, Politics and Democracy in the New Southern Europe. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  18. Pattie, C., Whiteley, P., Johnston, R., & Seyd, P. (1994). Measuring Local Campaign Effects: Labour Party Constituency Campaigning at the 1987 General Election. Political Studies, 42(3), 469-479, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1994.tb01689.x. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  19. Pattie, C. J., Johnston, R. J., & Fieldhouse, E. A. (1995). Winning the Local Vote: The Effectiveness of Constituency Campaign Spending in Great Britain, 1983-1992. The American Political Science Review, 89(4), 969-983. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  20. Pons, V. (2018). Will a Five-Minute Discussion Change Your Mind? A Countrywide Experiment on Voter Choice in France. American Economic Review, 108(6), 1322-1363. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  21. Ramiro, L., & Morales, L. (2004). Latecomers but 'Early-Adapters'. The Adaptation and Response of Spanish Parties to Social Changes. In K. Lawson, & T. Poguntke (Eds.), How Political Parties Respond to Voters. Interest Aggregation Revisited (pp. 198-226). London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  22. Rico, G. (2009). Líderes políticos, opinión pública y comportamiento electoral en España. Madrid: CIS. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  23. Scarrow, S. E. (2000). Parties without members? Party organization in a changing electoral environment. In R. J. Dalton, & M. P. Wattenberg (Eds.), Parties without partisans. Political change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  24. Schmitt-Beck, R. (2007). New modes of campaigning. In R. Dalton, & H.-D. Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior (pp. 744-764). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  25. Schmitt-Beck, R., & Farrell, D. M. (2002). Studying political campaigns and their effects. In D. M. Farrell, & R. Schmitt-Beck (Eds.), Do political campaigns matter? : campaign effects in elections and referendums (pp. 1-21). London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  26. Seyd, P., & Whiteley, P. F. (1992). Labour's grass-roots. The politics of party membership. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  27. Swanson, D., & Mancini, P. (1996). Politics, media, and modern democracy. Westport: Praeger. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  28. Torcal, M., Montero, J. R., & Gunther, R. (2002). Anti-party sentiments in Southern Europe. In J. R. Montero, R. Gunther, & J. J. Linz (Eds.), Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  29. Townsley, J. (2018). Is it Worth Door-Knocking? Evidence from a United Kingdom-based Get Out The Vote (GOTV) Field Experiment on the Effect of Party Leaflets and Canvass Visits on Voter Turnout. Political Science Research and Methods, Online First, 1-15. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  30. van Biezen, I. (2000). Party financing in new democracies. Party Politics, 6, 329-342. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  31. Van Biezen, I., & Hopkin, J. (2005). The Presidentialization of Spanish democracy: sources of Prime Ministerial power in Post-Franco Spain. In T. Poguntke, & P. Webb (Eds.), The presidentialization of politics in democratic societies? (pp. 107-127). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  32. Van Biezen, I., Mair, P., & Poguntke, T. (2012). Going, Going, .... Gone? Party Membership in the 21st Century. European Journal of Political Research, 51(1), 24-56, doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.01995.x. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  33. Wattenberg, M. P. (2002). Where have all the voters gone? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  34. Wolfinger, R. E. (1963). The influence of precinct work on voting behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly, 27(3), 387-398, doi:10.1086/267183. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  35. References Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  36. Addonizio, E. M., Green, D. P., & Glaser, J. M. (2007). Putting the Party Back into Politics: An Experiment Testing Whether Election Day Festivals Increase Voter Turnout. PS: Political Science & Politics, 40(04), 721-727, doi:10.1017/S1049096507071168. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  37. Alvarez, R. M., Hopkins, A., & Sinclair, B. (2010). Mobilizing Pasadena Democrats: Measuring The Effects of Partisan Campaign Contacts. The Journal of Politics, 72(1), 31-44, doi:10.1017/S0022381609990454. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  38. Arceneaux, K. (2005). Using Cluster Randomized Field Experiments to Study Voting Behavior. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601, 169-179. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  39. Arceneaux, K. (2007). I'm Asking for Your Support: The Effects of Personally Delivered Campaign Messages on Voting Decisions and Opinion Formation Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2(1), 43-65. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  40. Arceneaux, K., & Kolodny, R. (2009). Educating the Least Informed: Group Endorsements in a Grassroots Campaign. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 755-770. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  41. Barton, J., Castillo, M., & Petrie, R. (2013). What Persuades Voters? A Field Experiment on Political Campaigning. The Economic Journal, 124, 293-326. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  42. Bayley, M.A., Hopkins, D.J., & Rogers, T. (2016). Unresponsive and Unpersuaded: The Unintended Consequences of Voter Persuasion Efforts. Political Behavior, 38, 713-746. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  43. Beck, P. A., & Heidemann, E. (2010). Changing Strategies in Grassroots Canvassing: 1956-2008. Paper presented at the APSA Annual Conference, Washington, DC, August 26, 2010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  44. Bennion, E. A. (2005). Caught in the Ground Wars: Mobilizing Voters during a Competitive Congressional Campaign. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601, 123-141. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  45. Berelson, B., Lazarsfeld, P., & McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting: a study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  46. Bhatti, Y., Dahlgaard, J.O., Hansen, J.H., Hansen, K.M. (2019). Is Door-to-Door Canvassing Effective in Europe? Evidence from a Meta-Study across Six European Countries. British Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 279-290. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  47. Bochel, J. M., & Denver, D. T. (1970). Canvassing, Turnout and Party Support: an Experiment. British Journal of Political Science, 1, 257-269. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  48. Cantoni, E., & Pons, V. (2021). Do Interactions with Candidates Increase Voter Support and Participation? Experimental Evidence from Italy. Economics & Politics, 33(2), 379-402. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  49. Cardy, E. A. (2005). An Experimental Field Study of the GOTV and Persuasion Effects of Partisan Direct Mail and Phone Calls. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601, 28-40. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  50. Carty, R. K., & Eagles, M. (1999). Do local campaigns matter? Campaign spending, the local canvass and party support in Canada. Electoral Studies, 18(1), 69-87. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  51. Dale, A., & Strauss, A. (2009). Don't Forget to Vote: Text Message Reminders as a Mobilization Tool. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 787-804, doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00401.x. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  52. Dalton, R., McAllister, I., & Wattenberg, M. P. (2002). Political parties and their publics. In K. R. Luther, & F. Müller-Rommel (Eds.), Political parties in the new Europe. Political and analytical challenges (pp. 19-42). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  53. Denver, D., & Hands, G. (1997). Modern constituency electioneering. London: Frank Cass. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  54. Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Bros. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  55. Eldersveld, S. J. (1956). Experimental Propaganda Techniques and Voting Behavior. The American Political Science Review, 50(1), 154-165. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  56. Farrell, D. M. (1996). Campaign strategies and tactics. In L. LeDuc, R. Niemi, & P. Norris (Eds.), Comparing Democracies (pp. 160-183). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  57. Farrell, D. M. (2002). Campaign modernization and the west European party. In K. R. Luther, & F. Müller-Rommel (Eds.), Political parties in the new Europe. Political and analytical challenges (pp. 63-83). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  58. Farrell, D. M. (2006). Political parties in a changing campaign environment. In R. Katz, & W. Crotty (Eds.), Handbook of Party Politics (pp. 122-133). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  59. Farrell, D. M., & Webb, P. (2000). Political parties as campaign organizations. In R. J. Dalton, & M. P. Wattenberg (Eds.), Parties without partisans. Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies (pp. 102-128). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  60. Farrell, D.M., & Schmitt-Beck, R. (Eds.) (2002). Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums. London & New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  61. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A Flexible Statistical Power Analysis Program for the Social, Behavioral, and Biomedical Sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  62. Fieldhouse, E., & Cutts, D. (2008). The Effectiveness of Local Party Campaigns in 2005: Combining Evidence from Campaign Spending and Agent Survey Data. British Journal of Political Science, 39, 367-388. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  63. Fieldhouse, E., Cutts, D., Widdop, P. &, John, P. (2013). Do Impersonal Mobilisation Methods Work? Evidence from a Get-Out-The-Vote Experiment in England. Electoral Studies, 32(1), 113-123. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  64. Foos, F. & John, P. (2018). Parties are No Civic Charities: Voter Contact and the Changing Partisan Composition of the Electorate. Political Science Research and Methods, 6(2), 283-298. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  65. Foos, F., John, P., Mueller, C., & Cunningham, K. (2021). Social Mobilization in Partisan Spaces. The Journal of Politics, 83(3), 1190-1197. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  66. Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (1999). Does canvassing increase voter turnout? A field experiment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(19), 10939-10942, doi:10.1073/pnas.96.19.10939. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  67. Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2000). The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment. American Political Science Review, 94, 653-663. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  68. Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2005). Do Phone Calls Increase Voter Turnout? An Update. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601, 142-154. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  69. Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Green, M. (2003). Partisan mail and voter turnout: Results from randomized field experiments. Electoral Studies, 22(4), 563-579. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  70. Gerber, A. S., & Rogers, T. (2009). Descriptive Social Norms and Motivation to Vote: Everybody's Voting and so Should You. The Journal of Politics, 71(1), 178-191. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  71. Górecki, M. A., & Marsh, M. (2012). Not just ‘friends and neighbours’: Canvassing, geographic proximity and voter choice. European Journal of Political Research, 51(5), 563-582, doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02008.x. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  72. Gosnell, H. F. (1927). Getting out the vote. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  73. Green, D. P., & Gerber, A. S. (2008). Get out the vote. How to increase voter turnout. Washington, DC: The Brookins Institution. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  74. Green, D. P., Gerber, A. S., & Nickerson, D. W. (2003). Getting Out the Vote in Local Elections: Results from Six Door to Door Canvassing Experiments. Journal of Politics, 65(4), 1083-1096. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  75. Green, D.P., McGrath, M.C. and Aronow, P.M., (2013). Field experiments and the study of voter turnout. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 23(1), 27-48. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  76. Holbrook, T. M. (1996). Do campaigns matter? London: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  77. Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication: information and influence in an election campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  78. Imai, K. (2005). Do Get-Out-the-Vote Calls Reduce Turnout? The Importance of Statistical Methods for Field Experiments. American Political Science Review, 99(02), 283-300, doi:10.1017/S0003055405051658. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  79. Imai, K., King, G., & Nall, C. (2009). The Essential Role of Pair Matching in Cluster-Randomized Experiments, with Application to the Mexican Universal Health Insurance Evaluation. Statistical Science, 24(1), 29-53, doi:10.1214/08-STS274. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  80. John, P., & Brannan, T. G. (2006). How to mobilise the electorate: lessons from the University of Manchester ‘Get Out the Vote’experiment. Representation, 42(3), 209-221. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  81. John, P., & Brannan, T. G. (2008). How Different Are Telephoning and Canvassing? Results from a ‘Get Out the Vote’Field Experiment in the British 2005 General Election. British Journal of Political Science, 38(03), 565-574. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  82. Johnston, R., & Pattie, C. (1997). Where is the difference? Decomposing the impact of local election campaigns in Great Britain. Electoral Studies, 16, 165-174. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  83. Johnston, R., & Pattie, C. (2003). Do Canvassing and Campaigning Work? Evidence from the 2001 General Election in England. British Elections and Parties Review, 13, 248-273. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  84. Karp, J. A., Banducci, S. A., & Bowler, S. (2008). Getting Out the Vote: Party Mobilization in a Comparative Perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 38(01), 91-112, doi:10.1017/S0007123408000057. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  85. Kavanagh, D. (1995). Election Campaigning. The New Marketing of Politics. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  86. Kendall, C., Nannicini, T., & Trebbi, F. (2014). How do Voters Respond to Information? Evidence from a Randomized Campaign. The American Economic Review, 105(1), 322-353. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  87. Kling, D.T., & Stratmann, T. (2022). Large-Scale Evidence for the Effectiveness of Partisan GOTV Robo Calls. Journal of Experimental Political Science, Online First, 1-13. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  88. Kramer, G. (1970). The effects of precinct-level canvassing on voter behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 560-572. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  89. Krassa, M. A. (1988). Context and the canvass: the mechanisms of interaction. Political Behavior, 10(2), 233-246. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  90. Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The People's Choice. How the Voter Makes up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213
  91. Levine, P., & Lopez, M. H. (2005). What We Should Know about the Effectiveness of Campaigns but Don't. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601, 180-191. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-213

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF) Download kompl. Werk (PDF)

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien