Gender equality between rights and resentment: Social media engagement and gender attitudes across Europe

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover der Ausgabe: Culture, Practice & Europeanization Jahrgang 11 (2026), Heft 1
Open Access Vollzugriff

Culture, Practice & Europeanization

Jahrgang 11 (2026), Heft 1

Autor:innen:
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2026
ISSN-Online
2566-7742
ISSN-Print
2566-7742

Kapitelinformationen

Open Access Vollzugriff

Jahrgang 11 (2026), Heft 1

Gender equality between rights and resentment: Social media engagement and gender attitudes across Europe

Autor:innen:
ISSN-Print
2566-7742
ISSN-Online
2566-7742
Kapitelvorschau:

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Abou-Chadi, T., Breyer, M., & Gessler, T. (2021). The (re)politicisation of gender in Western Europe. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 4(2), 311–314. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510821X16177312096679 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  2. Alexander, A. C., & Off, G. (2025). Attitudes toward Political Authoritarianism in Economically Advanced Democracies: The Role of Gender Values and Norms. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009374309 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  3. Anderson, C. J., Bol, D., & Ananda, A. (2022). Humanity’s Attitudes about Democracy and Political Leaders. Public Opinion Quarterly, 85(4), 957–986. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfab056 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  4. Anduiza, E., & Off, G. (2026). Perceptions of Feminism as a Threat. Politics & Gender, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X26100592 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  5. Auspurg, K., Hinz, T., & Sauer, C. (2017). Why Should Women Get Less? Evidence on the Gender Pay Gap from Multifactorial Survey Experiments. American Sociological Review, 82(1), 179–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122416683393 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  6. Bail, C. A. (2021). Breaking the social media prism: How to make our platforms less polarizing. Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  7. Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M. B. F., Lee, J., Mann, M., Merhout, F., & Volfovsky, A. (2018). Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(37), 9216–9221. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804840115 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  8. Barberá, P. (2020). Social Media, Echo Chambers, and Political Polarization. In N. Persily & J. A. Tucker (Eds), Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field, Prospects for Reform (pp. 34–55). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108890960 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  9. Baym, N. K., & Boyd, D. (2012). Socially Mediated Publicness: An Introduction. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(3), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.705200 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  10. Bernhard, R., Shames, S., & Teele, D. L. (2021). To Emerge? Breadwinning, Motherhood, and Women’s Decisions to Run for Office. American Political Science Review, 115(2), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000970 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  11. Blais, M., & Dupuis-Déri, F. (2012). Masculinism and the Antifeminist Countermovement. Social Movement Studies, 11(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2012.640532 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  12. Bolzendahl, C. I., & Myers, D. J. (2004). Feminist Attitudes and Support for Gender Equality: Opinion Change in Women and Men, 1974–1998. Social Forces, 83(2), 759–789. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2005.0005 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  13. Bornschier, S., Häusermann, S., Zollinger, D., & Colombo, C. (2021). How “Us” and “Them” Relates to Voting Behavior—Social Structure, Social Identities, and Electoral Choice. Comparative Political Studies, 54(12), 2087–2122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414021997504 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  14. Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2017). Greater Internet use is not associated with faster growth in political polarization among US demographic groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(40), 10612–10617. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706588114 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  15. boyd, D. M. (2010). Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A Networked Self Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites (pp. 39–58). Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  16. Chafetz, J. S., & Dworkin, A. G. (1987). IN THE FACE OF THREAT: Organized Antifeminism in Comparative Perspective. Gender & Society, 1(1), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124387001001003 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  17. Chen, A. Y., Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., Robertson, R. E., & Wilson, C. (2023). Subscriptions and external links help drive resentful users to alternative and extremist YouTube channels. Science Advances, 9(35), eadd8080. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.add8080 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  18. Chen, G. M., Pain, P., Chen, V. Y., Mekelburg, M., Springer, N., & Troger, F. (2020). ‘You really have to have a thick skin’: A cross-cultural perspective on how online harassment influences female journalists. Journalism, 21(7), 877–895. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918768500 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  19. Conlin, S. E., & Heesacker, M. (2018). The Association between Feminist Self-Labeling and Gender Equality Activism: Exploring the Effects of Scale Language and Identity Priming. Current Psychology, 37(1), 334–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9517-0 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  20. Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing Mediatization: Contexts, Traditions, Arguments: Editorial. Communication Theory, 23(3), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12019 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  21. Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2020). Media and the Social Construction of Reality. In D. A. Rohlinger & S. Sobieraj (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Digital Media Sociology (pp. 27–39). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197510636.013.2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  22. Dahlum, S., Hanson, T., Johnsen, Å., Kotsadam, A., & Wuttke, A. (2024). Is Support for Authoritarian Rule Contagious? Evidence from Field and Survey Experiments. https://www.ifo.de/en/cesifo/publications/2024/working-paper/support-authoritarian-rule-contagious-evidence-field-and-survey Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  23. de Wilde, P., Koopmans, R., Merkel, W., Strijbs, O., & Zürn, M. (Eds). (2019). The struggle over borders: Cosmopolitanism and communitarianism. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  24. Díaz Fernández, S., García Mingo, E., & Fuentes, A. (2023). #TeamAlienadas: Anti-feminist ideologic work in the Spanish manosphere. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 30(4), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068231173261 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  25. Dietz, M. M., & Roßteutscher, S. (2024). Different Colors of the Same Rainbow? The Polarization of Gender Issues and its Campaign Potential. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/27qyt Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  26. Díez-Medrano, J., Sojka, A., Kaushik, K., Trenz, H.-J., Eigmüller, M., Verbalyte, M., & Wallaschek, S. (2024). Value Conflicts in a Differentiated Europe: The Impact of Digital Media on Value Polarisation in Europe (ValCon) (Version 1.0.0) [Data set]. GESIS. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14286 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  27. Dubois, E., & Blank, G. (2018). The echo chamber is overstated: The moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, Communication & Society, 21(5), 729–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  28. Duncan, L. E., Peterson, B. E., & Winter, D. G. (1997). Authoritarianism and Gender Roles: Toward a Psychological Analysis of Hegemonic Relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297231005 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  29. Eady, G., Nagler, J., Guess, A., Zilinsky, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2019). How many people live in political bubbles on social media? Evidence from linked survey and Twitter data. SAGE Open, 9(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019832705 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  30. Eigmüller, M., & Trenz, H.-J. (2020). Werte und Wertekonflikte in einer differenzierten EU. In A. Grimmel (Ed.), Die neue Europäische Union: Zwischen Integration und Desintegration (pp. 33–56). Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  31. Elder, L., Greene, S., & Lizotte, M.-K. (2021). Feminist and Anti-Feminist Identification in the 21 st Century United States. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 42(3), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2021.1929607 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  32. Esposito, E., & Breeze, R. (2022). Gender and politics in a digitalised world: Investigating online hostility against UK female MPs. Discourse & Society, 33(3), 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221076608 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  33. Eurostat. (2024, March 19). 59 % of EU individuals using social networks in 2023. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/de/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20240319-1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  34. Evans, J. H. (2003). Have Americans’ Attitudes Become More Polarized? An Update. Social Science Quarterly, 84(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8401005 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  35. Feezell, J. T., Wagner, J. K., & Conroy, M. (2021). Exploring the effects of algorithm-driven news sources on political behavior and polarization. Computers in Human Behavior, 116, 106626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106626 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  36. Feldman, S. (2003). Enforcing Social Conformity: A Theory of Authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24(1), 41–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00316 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  37. Frischlich, L., Schatto-Eckrodt, T., Boberg, S., & Wintterlin, F. (2021). Roots of Incivility: How Personality, Media Use, and Online Experiences Shape Uncivil Participation. Media and Communication, 9(1), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3360 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  38. Gattig, A., & Minkus, L. (2021). Does Marriage Increase Couples’ Life Satisfaction?: Evidence Using Panel Data and Fixed-effects Individual Slopes. Comparative Population Studies, 46. https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2021-05 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  39. Graff, A., & Korolczuk, E. (2022). Anti-gender politics in the populist moment. Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  40. Gwiazda, A. (2023). Gender Ideologies and Polish Political Parties. Government and Opposition, 58(4), 641–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.57 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  41. Hepp, A., Hjarvard, S., & Lundby, K. (2015). Mediatization: Theorizing the interplay between media, culture and society. Media, Culture & Society, 37(2), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715573835 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  42. Inglehart, R. F., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  43. IPSOS. (n.d.). Www.ipsos.com. Retrieved 16 June 2025, from https://www.ipsos.com/en Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  44. Jackson, S. J., Bailey, M., & Foucault Welles, B. (2020). #HashtagActivism: Networks of Race and Gender Justice. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10858.001.0001 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  45. Jakob, J., Dobbrick, T., Freudenthaler, R., Haffner, P., & Wessler, H. (2023). Is Constructive Engagement Online a Lost Cause? Toxic Outrage in Online User Comments Across Democratic Political Systems and Discussion Arenas. Communication Research, 50(4), 508–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502211062773 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  46. Jungherr, A., Rivero Rodríguez, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020). Retooling politics: How digital media are shaping democracy. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  47. Kim, J. W., Guess, A., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2021). The Distorting Prism of Social Media: How Self-Selection and Exposure to Incivility Fuel Online Comment Toxicity. Journal of Communication, 71(6), 922–946. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab034 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  48. Kittilson, M. C. (2013). Party Politics (Online Publication). In G. Waylen, K. Celis, J. Kantola, & S. L. Weldon (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199751457.013.0021 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  49. Kligler-Vilenchik, N., Baden, C., & Yarchi, M. (2020). Interpretative Polarization across Platforms: How Political Disagreement Develops Over Time on Facebook, Twitter, and WhatsApp. Social Media + Society, 6(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120944393 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  50. Knight, C. R., & Brinton, M. C. (2017). One Egalitarianism or Several? Two Decades of Gender-Role Attitude Change in Europe. American Journal of Sociology, 122(5), 1485–1532. https://doi.org/10.1086/689814 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  51. Knüpfer, C., Hoffmann, M., & Voskresenskii, V. (2022). Hijacking MeToo: Transnational dynamics and networked frame contestation on the far right in the case of the ‘120 decibels’ campaign. Information, Communication & Society, 25(7), 1010–1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1822904 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  52. Korolczuk, E., & Graff, A. (2018). Gender as “Ebola from Brussels”: The Anticolonial Frame and the Rise of Illiberal Populism. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 43(4), 797–821. https://doi.org/10.1086/696691 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  53. Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Dolezal, M., Helbling, M., Höglinger, D., Hutter, S., & Wüest, B. (Eds). (2012). Political conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  54. Kuhar, R., & Paternotte, D. (Eds). (2018). Anti-gender campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against equality. Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  55. Lombardo, E., Caravantes, P., & Díaz Fernández, S. (2025). ‘Stop torpedoing women’s rights!’: Feminist institutional responses to anti-gender politics in Spain and Catalonia parliaments. European Journal of Political Research, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.70005 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  56. Lorenz-Spreen, P., Oswald, L., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2022). A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(1), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01460-1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  57. Malka, A., Lelkes, Y., Bakker, B. N., & Spivack, E. (2022). Who Is Open to Authoritarian Governance within Western Democracies? Perspectives on Politics, 20(3), 808–827. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592720002091 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  58. Minkus, L., Groepler, N., & Drobnič, S. (2022). The significance of occupations, family responsibilities, and gender for working from home: Lessons from COVID-19. PLOS ONE, 17(6), e0266393. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266393 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  59. Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. F. (2019). Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  60. Off, G. (2023). Gender equality salience, backlash and radical right voting in the gender-equal context of Sweden. West European Politics, 46(3), 451–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2084986 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  61. Off, G. (2024). Multidimensional and intersectional cultural grievances over gender, sexuality and immigration. European Journal of Political Research, 63(4), 1351–1373. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12665 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  62. Ogletree, S. M., Diaz, P., & Padilla, V. (2019). What is Feminism? College Students’ Definitions and Correlates. Current Psychology, 38(6), 1576–1589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9718-1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  63. Osmundsen, M., Bor, A., Vahlstrup, P. B., Bechmann, A., & Petersen, M. B. (2021). Partisan Polarization Is the Primary Psychological Motivation behind Political Fake News Sharing on Twitter. American Political Science Review, 115(3), 999–1015. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000290 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  64. Otteni, C. (2025). Polarized Equality? Ideological and Affective Divides Over Gender Equality in Europe. Social Science Quarterly, 106(7), e70120. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70120 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  65. Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199999736.001.0001 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  66. Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of Internet Use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  67. Peterson, B. E., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2010). Gender, Sexuality, and the Authoritarian Personality. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1801–1826. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00670.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  68. Pew Research Center. (2021). Social Media Use in 2021. https://pewresearch-org-preprod.go-vip.co/internet/2021/04/07/social-media-use-in-2021/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  69. Praet, S., Guess, A. M., Tucker, J. A., Bonneau, R., & Nagler, J. (2022). What’s Not to Like? Facebook Page Likes Reveal Limited Polarization in Lifestyle Preferences. Political Communication, 39(3), 311–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2021.1994066 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  70. Righetti, N., Kulichkina, A., Almeida Paroni, B., Cseri, Z. F., Aguirre, S. I., & Maikovska, K. (2025). Mainstreaming and transnationalization of anti-gender ideas through social media: The case of CitizenGO. Information, Communication & Society, 28(15), 2658–2681. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2025.2470229 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  71. Sauer, B. (2024). Women, gender and right-wing authoritarian populism. In G. Frankenberg & W. Heitmeyer (Eds), Drivers of Authoritarianism (pp. 288–307). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035324705.00022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  72. Schäfer, I., Khoudja, Y., & Grunow, D. (2024). Gender attitudes and the new cultural divide in Europe. Social Science Research, 122, 103042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2024.103042 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  73. Schöne, J. P., Parkinson, B., & Goldenberg, A. (2021). Negativity Spreads More than Positivity on Twitter After Both Positive and Negative Political Situations. Affective Science, 2(4), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-021-00057-7 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  74. Settle, J. E. (2018). Frenemies: How social media polarizes America. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  75. Sobieraj, S. (2022). Gender, Digital Toxicity, and Political Voice Online. In D. A. Rohlinger & S. Sobieraj (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Digital Media Sociology (pp. 614–643). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197510636.013.29 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  76. Sprong, S., Jetten, J., Wang, Z., Peters, K., Mols, F., Verkuyten, M., Bastian, B., Ariyanto, A., Autin, F., Ayub, N., Badea, C., Besta, T., Butera, F., Costa-Lopes, R., Cui, L., Fantini, C., Finchilescu, G., Gaertner, L., Gollwitzer, M., … Wohl, M. J. A. (2019). “Our Country Needs a Strong Leader Right Now”: Economic Inequality Enhances the Wish for a Strong Leader. Psychological Science, 30(11), 1625–1637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619875472 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  77. Swirsky, J. M., & Angelone, D. J. (2014). Femi-Nazis and Bra Burning Crazies: A Qualitative Evaluation of Contemporary Beliefs about Feminism. Current Psychology, 33(3), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9208-7 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  78. Van Bavel, J. J., Rathje, S., Harris, E., Robertson, C., & Sternisko, A. (2021). How social media shapes polarization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(11), 913–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.07.013 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  79. Verbalyte, M., & Eigmüller, M. (2022). COVID-19 related social media use and attitudes towards pandemic control measures in Europe. Culture, Practice & Europeanization, 7(1), 37–67. https://doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2022-1-37 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  80. Verloo, M. (Ed.). (2018). Varieties of opposition to gender equality in Europe. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315625744 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  81. Vida, B. (Ed.). (2022). The gendered politics of crises and de-democratization: Opposition to gender equality. ECPR Press/Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  82. Waitkus, N., & Minkus, L. (2021). Investigating the Gender Wealth Gap Across Occupational Classes. Feminist Economics, 27(4), 114–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2021.1973059 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  83. Wallaschek, S., Kaushik, K., Verbalyte, M., Sojka, A., Sorci, G., Trenz, H.-J., & Eigmüller, M. (2022). Same Same but Different? Gender Politics and (Trans-)National Value Contestation in Europe on Twitter. Politics and Governance, 10(1), 146–160. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i1.4751 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  84. Wallaschek, S., Verbalyte, M., & Eigmüller, M. (2024). Cleavage theory meets gender equality: Examining party positions in Germany. European Politics and Society, 25(5), 809–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2024.2304591 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  85. Weeks, A. C., Caravantes, P., Espírito-Santo, A., Lombardo, E., Stratigaki, M., & Gul, S. (2025). When is gender on party agendas? Manifestos and (De-)democratisation in Greece, Portugal, and Spain. South European Society and Politics, 30(4), 561–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2024.2412746 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  86. Weiss, P., Koban, K., & Matthes, J. (2025). A narrow gateway from misogyny to the far right: Empirical evidence for social media exposure effects. Information, Communication & Society, 28(13), 2377–2395. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2445637 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  87. Welzel, C., Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2002). Gender Equality and Democracy. Comparative Sociology, 1(3–4), 321–345. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913302100418628 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159
  88. Yarchi, M., Baden, C., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2021). Political Polarization on the Digital Sphere: A Cross-platform, Over-time Analysis of Interactional, Positional, and Affective Polarization on Social Media. Political Communication, 38(1–2), 98–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1785067 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2026-1-159

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF) Download kompl. Werk (PDF)

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien