Defining Knowledge in the Age of Society 5.0

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover der Ausgabe: Swiss Journal of Business Jahrgang 80 (2026), Heft 1
Open Access Vollzugriff

Swiss Journal of Business

Jahrgang 80 (2026), Heft 1

Autor:innen:
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2026
ISSN-Online
2944-3741
ISSN-Print
2944-3741

Kapitelinformationen

Open Access Vollzugriff

Jahrgang 80 (2026), Heft 1

Defining Knowledge in the Age of Society 5.0

Autor:innen:
ISSN-Print
2944-3741
ISSN-Online
2944-3741
Kapitelvorschau:

Ziel dieses Perspektivbeitrags ist es, das Konzept des verantwortungsvollen Wissensmanagements und dessen Nutzen für die Implementierung ethisch akzeptierter KI-Lösungen in Organisationen vorzustellen. Letzteres wird anhand anschaulicher Beispiele verdeutlicht. Der Artikel schließt mit einer Reihe von Forschungsfragen, die als Ausblick und Inspiration für weitere Überlegungen zum verantwortungsvollen Wissensmanagement und ethisch vertretbaren KI-Lösungen in Unternehmen dienen sollen.

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2944-3741-2026-1-83
  2. Caddy, I. (2000). Intellectual capital: recognizing both assets and liabilities. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(2), 129-146. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2944-3741-2026-1-83
  3. Carayannis, E. G., & Morawska-Jancelewicz, J. (2022). The Futures of Europe: Society 5.0 and Industry 5.0 as Driving Forces of Future Universities. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(4), 3445-3471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00854-2 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2944-3741-2026-1-83
  4. Dalkir, K. (2025). Handbook of inclusive knowledge management. CRC Press, Abingdon, Oxon. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2944-3741-2026-1-83
  5. Davenport, T. H. (1994). Saving IT's Soul: Human Centered Information Management. Harvard Business Review, March-April, 72(2), 119-131. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2944-3741-2026-1-83
  6. Davenport, T., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Ubiquity 2000, August, Article 6 (August 1 - August 31, 2000). https://doi.org/10.1145/347634.348775 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2944-3741-2026-1-83
  7. de Holan, P. M., & Phillips, N. (2004). Organizational forgetting as strategy. Strategic Organization, 2(4), 423-433. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127004047620 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2944-3741-2026-1-83
  8. Du Plessis, M. (2007). The role of knowledge management in innovation. Journal of knowledge management, 11(4), 20-29. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2944-3741-2026-1-83
  9. Durst, S. (2024). A plea for responsible and inclusive knowledge management at the world level. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems; 54(1), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-09-2021-0204 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2944-3741-2026-1-83
  10. Durst, S., & Foli, S. (2024). Responsible and inclusive knowledge management made concrete. In Handbook of Inclusive Knowledge Management: Ensuring Inclusivity, Diversity, and Equity in Knowledge Processing Activities (pp. 1-12). CRC Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2944-3741-2026-1-83
  11. Durst, S., & Khadir, Y. (2025). Towards Responsible Knowledge Management. In S. Durst and Y. Khadir (eds) Knowledge Management at the Crossroads. Navigating Risks and Benefits (pp. 79-88). Springer, Cham. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2944-3741-2026-1-83
  12. Durst, S., & Zieba, M. (2018). Mapping knowledge risks: towards a better understanding of knowledge management. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 17(1), 1-13, https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2018.1538603 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2944-3741-2026-1-83
  13. Dyllick, T., & Muff, K. (2016). Clarifying the Meaning of Sustainable Business: Introducing a Typology From Business-as-Usual to True Business Sustainability. Organization & Environment, 29(2), 156-174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575176 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2944-3741-2026-1-83
  14. Ferreira, J., Mueller, J., & Papa, A. (2020). Strategic knowledge management: theory, practice and future challenges. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24 (2), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2018-0461 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2944-3741-2026-1-83
  15. McGill, M. E., & Slocum, J. W. (1993). Unlearning the organization. Organizational Dynamics, 22(2), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(93)90054-5 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2944-3741-2026-1-83
  16. Merhi, M. I. (2023). An evaluation of the critical success factors impacting artificial intelligence implementation. International Journal of Information Management, 69, 102545. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2944-3741-2026-1-83
  17. Mökander, J., Sheth, M., Gersbro-Sundler, M., Blomgren, P., & Floridi, L. (2022). Challenges and best practices in corporate AI governance: Lessons from the biopharmaceutical industry. Frontiers in Computer Science, 4, 1068361. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2022.1068361 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2944-3741-2026-1-83
  18. Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2944-3741-2026-1-83
  19. Schneider, J., Abraham, R., Meske, C., & Vom Brocke, J. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Governance For Businesses. Information Systems Management, 40(3), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2022.2085825 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2944-3741-2026-1-83
  20. Williams, C., & Durst, S. (2019). Exploring the transition phase in offshore outsourcing: Decision making amidst knowledge at risk. Journal of Business Research, 103, 460-471. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2944-3741-2026-1-83
  21. Zack, M.H. (2002). Developing a knowledge strategy. California Management Review, 41(3), 125-223. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2944-3741-2026-1-83

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF) Download kompl. Werk (PDF)

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien