Dynamic norms for dynamic times? An experiment on the effects of dynamic and static norms messages on COVID-19 vaccination intention

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover der Ausgabe: SCM Studies in Communication and Media Jahrgang 11 (2022), Heft 3
Open Access Vollzugriff

SCM Studies in Communication and Media

Jahrgang 11 (2022), Heft 3

Autor:innen:
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2022
ISSN-Online
2192-4007
ISSN-Print
2192-4007

Kapitelinformationen

Open Access Vollzugriff

Jahrgang 11 (2022), Heft 3

Dynamic norms for dynamic times? An experiment on the effects of dynamic and static norms messages on COVID-19 vaccination intention

Autor:innen:
ISSN-Print
2192-4007
ISSN-Online
2192-4007
Kapitelvorschau:

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Albæk, E. (2011). The interaction between experts and journalists in news journalism. Journalism, 12(3), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884910392851 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  2. Albæk, E., Christiansen, P. M., & Togeby, L. (2003). Experts in the mass media: Researchers as sources in Danish daily newspapers, 1961–2001. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(4), 937–948. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900308000412 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  3. Albrecht, S. (2010). Reflexionsspiele: Deliberative Demokratie und die Wirklichkeit politischer Diskurse im Internet [Reflective Games: Deliberative democracy and the reality of political discourses on the internet] (1. Aufl.). Sozialtheorie. transcript. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kxp/detail.action?docID=6695179 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  4. Anter, L. (2021). Mein Text, meine Meinung, meine Wissenschaftlerin? Eine qualitative Untersuchung zur Nutzung von Wissenschaftler*innen als opportune Zeugen [My Text, my opinion, my scientist? A qualitative study on the use of scientists as opportune witnesses]. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 69(3), 397–415. https://doi. org/10.5771/1615-634X-2021-3-397 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  5. Beck, U. (1986). Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. [Risk society: On the way to another modernity]. Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  6. Blöbaum, B. (2017). Wissenschaftsjournalismus [Science journalism]. In H. Bonfadelli, B. Fähnrich, C. Lüthje, J. Milde, M. Rhomberg, & M. S. Schäfer (Hrsg.), Forschungsfeld Wissenschaftskommunikation [Research area science communication] (S. 221–238). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12898-2_12 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  7. Blöbaum, B., Görke, A., & Wied, K. (2004). Quellen der Wissenschaftsberichterstattung: Inhaltsanalyse und Befragung [Sources of science reporting: Content analysis and survey]. Universität Münster. https://www.uni-bamberg.de/fileadmin/uni/fakultaeten/split_ lehrstuehle/kommunikationswissenschaften_1/Dateien/Downloads/Veroeff/Kristina_ Wied/Studie_Quellen_des_Wijo_2004.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  8. Bucher, H.-J. (2017). Massenmedien als Handlungsfeld I: Printmedien [Mass media as field of action I: Printed media]. In K. S. Roth, M. Wengeler, & A. Ziem (Hrsg.), Handbuch Sprache in Politik und Gesellschaft (S. 298-333). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/ 9783110296310-014 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  9. Catalan-Matamoros, D. & Elías, C. (2020). Vaccine hesitancy in the age of coronavirus and fake news: Analysis of journalistic sources in the Spanish quality press. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218136 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  10. Donsbach, W. (1987). Journalismusforschung in der Bundesrepublik: Offene Fragen trotz Forschungsboom [Journalism research in the Federal Republic: Open questions despite research boom]. In J. Wilke (Hrsg.), Zwischenbilanz der Journalistenausbildung (S. 105–142). Ölschläger. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  11. Easton, D. (1990). The analysis of political structure. Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  12. Eilders, C. (2011). Zivilgesellschaftliche Beteiligung im Medienbereich [Civil society participation in the media]. In H. J. Kleinsteuber (Hrsg.), Media Governance in Europa: Regulierung - Partizipation - Mitbestimmung (S. 159–181). VS Verl. für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  13. Eisenegger, M., Oehmer, F., Udris, L., & Vogler, D. (2020). Die Qualität der Medienberichterstattung zur Corona-Pandemie (Qualität der Medien 1/2020) [The quality of media coverage of the Corona pandemic]. Universität Zürich. https://www.foeg.uzh.ch/ dam/jcr:b87084ac-5b5b-4f76-aba7-2e6fe2703e81/200731_Studie%20Leitmedien%20 Corona.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  14. Engelmann, I. (2016). Gatekeeping. Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845263533 Esser, F. (1998). Die Kräfte hinter den Schlagzeilen: Englischer und deutscher Journalismus Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  15. im Vergleich [The forces behind the headlines: English and German journalism compared]. Alber. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  16. Evensen, D. T., & Clarke, C. E. (2012). Efficacy information in media coverage of infectious disease risks. Science Communication, 34(3), 392–418. https://doi. org/10.1177/1075547011421020 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  17. Ferree, M. M., Gamson, W. A., Gerhards, J., & Rucht, D. (2002). Four models of the public sphere in modern democracies. Theory and Society, 31(3), 289–324. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  18. Gerhards, J. (2002). Das Öffentlichkeitsdefizit der EU im Horizont normativer Öffentlichkeitstheorien [The public deficit of the EU in the horizon of normative public theories]. In H. Kaelble, M. Kirsch, & A. Schmidt-Gernig (Hrsg.), Transnationale Öffentlichkeiten und Identitäten im 20. Jahrhundert (S. 135–158). Campus. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  19. Gerhards, J., Neidhardt, F., & Rucht, D. (1998). Zwischen Palaver und Diskurs: Strukturen öffentlicher Meinungsbildung am Beispiel der deutschen Diskussion zur Abtreibung [Between palaver and discourse: Structures of public opinion formation using the example of the German discussion on abortion]. Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  20. Habermas, J. (1969). Technik und Wissenschaft als „Ideologie“ [Technology and science as “ideology“]. Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  21. Habermas, J. (1990). Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft [The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society]. Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  22. Habermas, J. (1992). Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats [Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy] (2. Aufl.). Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  23. Hagen, L. M. (1993). Opportune witnesses: An analysis of balance in the selection of sources and arguments in the leading German newspapers’ coverage of the census issue. European Journal of Communication, 8(3), 317–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323193008003004 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  24. Haring, S. (2010). Herrschaft der Experten oder Herrschaft des Sachzwangs? Technokratie als politikwissenschaftliches »ProblemEnsemble« [Rule of the experts or rule of constraint? Technocracy as a political science “problem ensemble”]. Zeitschrift Für Politik, 57(3), 243–264. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  25. Hayman, D. (2020). IPBES Workshop on Biodiversity and Pandemics: Workshop Report. https://ipbes.net/sites/default/files/2020-10/20201028%20IPBES%20Pandemics%20 Workshop%20Report%20Plain%20Text%20Final_0.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  26. Hermida, A. (2011). Fluid spaces, fluid journalism: The role of the “active recipient” in participatory journalism. In J. B. Singer, D. Domingo, A. Heinonen, A. Hermida, S. Paulussen, T. Quandt, Z. Reich, & M. Vujnovic (Hrsg.), Participatory journalism: Guarding open gates at online newspapers (S. 177–191). Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  27. Huber, B. (2014). Öffentliche Experten: Über die Medienpräsenz von Fachleuten [Public experts: About the media presence of experts]. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  28. Kepplinger, H. M., Brosius, H.-B., & Staab, J. F. (1991). Instrumental actualization: A theory of mediated conflicts. European Journal of Communication, 6(3), 263–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323191006003002 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  29. Kevenhörster, P. (2021). Politikberatung [Political consulting]. In U. Andersen, J. Bogumil, S. Marschall, & W. Woyke (Hrsg.), Handwörterbuch des politischen Systems der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (S. 720–727). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-658-23666-3_108 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  30. Kohring, M. (2016). Journalismus als Leistungssystem der Öffentlichkeit [Journalism as a performance system of the public]. In M. Löffelholz & L. Rothenberger (Hrsg.), Handbuch Journalismustheorien (S. 165–176). Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  31. Kolb, S. (2005). Mediale Thematisierung in Zyklen: Theoretischer Entwurf und empirische Anwendung [Medial thematization in cycles: Theoretical outline and empirical application]. Herbert von Halem. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  32. Kropp, S. (2020). Corona-Krise: Wie wichtig ist Expertenwissen in der Politik? [Corona crisis: How important is expert knowledge in politics?]. https://www.bpb.de/politik/ innenpolitik/coronavirus/310712/expertenwissen Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  33. Lehmkuhl, M (2021). Covid-19 und der Journalismus: Problemzonen im Verhältnis zwischen Wissenschaft und Öffentlichkeit [COVID-19 and journalism: Problem areas in the relationship between science and the public]. In Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung (Hrsg.), Corona: Pandemie und Krise (S. 266-276). Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  34. Lehmkuhl, M., & Leidecker-Sandmann, M. (2019). „Visible scientists revisited“: Zum Zusammenhang von wissenschaftlicher Reputation und der Präsenz wissenschaftlicher Experten in der Medienberichterstattung über Infektionskrankheiten [“Visible scientists revisited”: On the relationship between scientific reputation and the public presence of scientific experts in mass media coverage of infectious diseases]. Publizistik, 64, 479–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-019-00530-1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  35. Leidecker-Sandmann, M., Attar, P., Schütz, A., & Lehmkuhl, M. (2022). Selected by expertise? Scientific experts in German news coverage of COVID-19 compared to other pandemics. Public Understanding of Science, 31(7), 847–866. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 09636625221095740 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  36. Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Holford, D. L., Finn, A., Leask, J., Thomson, A., Lombardi, D., Al-Rawi, A. K., Amazeen, M. A., Anderson, E. C., Armaos, K. D., Betsch, C., Bruns, H. H. B., Ecker, U. K. H., Sah, S., Sinatra, G. M., Tapper, K., & Vraga, E. K. (2021). The COVID-19 Vaccine Communication Handbook: A practical guide for improving vaccine communication and fighting misinformation. https://sks.to/c19vax Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  37. Maelzer, D. (2014). Politik gut beraten? Lernprozesse in deutschen Gesundheitsreformen [Politics well advised? Learning processes in German health care reforms]. Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  38. Maier, M., Stengel, K., & Marschall, J. (2010). Nachrichtenwerttheorie [News value theory] Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845260365 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  39. Matthes, J. (2014). Framing. Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845260259 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  40. Maurer, M., Reinemann, C., & Kruschinski, S. (2021). Einseitig, unkritisch, regierungsnah? Eine empirische Studie zur Qualität der journalistischen Berichterstattung über die Corona-Pandemie [One-sided, uncritical, pro-government? An empirical study on the quality of journalistic coverage of the corona pandemic]. https://rudolf-augstein- stiftung.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Studie-einseitig-unkritisch-regierungsnah- reinemann-rudolf-augstein-stiftung.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  41. Neidhardt, F. (1994). Öffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen [Public, public opinion, social movements]. In F. Neidhardt (Hrsg.), Öffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen: Sonderheft 34 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie (S. 7–41). Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  42. Nelkin, D. (1987). Risk and the press. Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 1(2), 3–9. https://doi. org/10.1177/108602668700100202 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  43. Nölleke, D. (2013). Experten im Journalismus: Systemtheoretischer Entwurf und em- pirische Bestandsaufnahme [Experts in Journalism: System-theoretical outline and em- pirical survey]. Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845245317 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  44. Peters, B., Schultz, T., & Wimmel, A. (2004). Publizistische Beiträge zu einer diskursiven Öffentlichkeit: Eine themenübergeifende Inaltsanalyse deutscher Zeitungen und Zeitschriften [Journalistic contributions to a discursive public sphere: A cross-thematic analysis of German newspapers and magazines]. (InIIS-Arbeitspapiere Nr. 30). Universität Bremen. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/67356/ssoar-2004-peters_et_al-Publizistische_Beitrage_zu_einer_diskursiven.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y&lnkname=ssoar-2004-peters_et_al-Publizistische_Beitrage_zu_einer_diskursiven.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  45. Peters, H. P. (1994). Wissenschaftliche Experten in der öffentlichen Kommunikation über Technik, Umwelt und Risiken [Scientific experts in public communication about technology, environment and risks]. In F. Neidhardt (Hrsg.), Öffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen: Sonderheft 34 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie (S. 162–190). Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  46. Peters, H. P., Brossard, D., Cheveigné, S. de, Dunwoody, S., Kallfass, M., Miller, S., & Tsuchida, S. (2008). Science communication: Interactions with the mass media. Science, 321(5886), 204–205. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1157780 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  47. Post, S. (2015). Scientific objectivity in journalism? How journalists and academics define objectivity, assess its attainability, and rate its desirability. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 16(6), 730–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884914541067 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  48. Quandt, T., Boberg, S., Schatto-Eckrodt, T., & Frischlich, L. (2020). Pandemic news: Facebook pages of mainstream news media and the coronavirus crisis – a computational content analysis. http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.13290v2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  49. Radkau, J. (2011). Die Ära der Ökologie: Eine Weltgeschichte [The era of ecology: A world history]. C.H.Beck. https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406619021 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  50. Reese, S. D. (2001). Understanding the global journalist: A hierarchy-of-influences approach. Journalism Studies, 2, 173-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700118394 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  51. Schäfer, M. S. (2007). Wissenschaft in den Medien: Die Medialisierung naturwissenschaftlicher Themen [Science in the media: The medialization of scientific topics]. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  52. Schelsky, H. (1961). Der Mensch in der wissenschaftlichen Zivilisation [Man in scientific civilization]. Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  53. Scheufele, B., & Engelmann, I. (2013). Die publizistische Vermittlung von Wertehorizonten der Parteien: Normatives Modell und empirische Befunde zum Value-Framing und News Bias der Qualitäts- und Boulevardpresse bei vier Bundestagswahlen [The journalistic communication of parties’ value horizons: Normative model and empirical findings on value framing and news bias of the quality and tabloid press in four German parliament elections]. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 61(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2013-4-532 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  54. Soley, L. C. (1994). Pundits in print: “Experts” and their use in newspaper stories. Newspaper Research Journal, 15(2), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/07395329940150020 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  55. Stark, B., Magin, M., Jandura, O., & Maurer, M. (2012). Zur Einführung: Methodische Probleme komparativer Kommunikationsforschung und mögliche Lösungsansätze [Introduction: Methodological problems of comparative communication research and possible solutions]. In B. Stark, M. Magin, O. Jandura, & M. Maurer (Hrsg.), Methodische Herausforderungen komparativer Forschungsansätze (S. 9–17). Herbert von Halem. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  56. Tejedor, S., Cervi, L., Tusa, F., Portales, M., & Zabotina, M. (2020). Information on the COVID-19 pandemic in daily newspapers’ front pages: Case study of Spain and Italy. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(17). https://doi. org/10.3390/ijerph17176330 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  57. Volpers, A.-M., & Summ, A. (2015). Der Wandel des einst verspäteten Ressorts – Konstanten und Veränderungen der Wissenschaftsberichterstattung in deutschen Printmedien [The transformation of the once belated department: Constants and changes in science reporting in German print media]. In M. S. Schäfer (Hrsg.), Wissenschaftskommunikation im Wandel (pp. 233–257). Herbert von Halem. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  58. Walli, T. (2021, 12. März). Politik und Wissenschaft: Eine schwierige Beziehung [Politics and science: A difficult relationship]. Der Standard. https://www.derstandard.de/sto- ry/2000124970898/politik-und-wissenschaft-eine-schwierige-beziehung Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  59. Washer, P. (2010). Emerging infectious diseases and society. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230277182 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  60. Weber, M. (1922). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre [Collected essays on the theory of science]. Mohr. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  61. Weingart, P. (2006). ‚Demokratisierung‘ der wissenschaftlichen Politikberatung: Eine Antwort auf die Legitimationsdilemmata von Wissenschaft und Politik? [‘Democratization’ of scientific policy advice: A response to the legitimacy dilemmas of science and politics?]. In Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften (Hrsg.), Politikberatung in Deutschland (S. 73–84). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  62. Weingart, P. (2019). Wissensgesellschaft und wissenschaftliche Politikberatung [Knowledge society and science policy advice]. In S. Falk, M. Glaab, A. Römmele, H. Schober, & M. Thunert (Hrsg.), Handbuch Politikberatung (S. 1–12). Springer VS. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-658-07461-6_2-1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  63. Weisband, M. (2021, 9. Juni). Problem „False Balance“. Journalisten sollen einordnen [False balance problem: Journalists should classify]. Deutschlandfunk. https://www. deutschlandfunk.de/problem-false-balance-journalisten-sollen-einordnen-100.html Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  64. Weischenberg, S. (1992). Journalistik: Theorie und Praxis aktueller Medienkommunikation. Band 1: Mediensysteme, Medienethik, Medieninstitutionen [Journalism: Theory and practice of contemporary media communication. Volume 1: Media systems, media ethics, media institutions]. Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  65. Welker, M. (2016). Journalismus als Inklusions- und Partizipationsleistung [Journalism as an inclusive and participatory service]. In M. Löffelholz & L. Rothenberger (Hrsg.), Handbuch Journalismustheorien (S. 385–402). Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  66. Wissenschaft im Dialog (WiD). (Hrsg.). (2020). Wissenschaftsbarometer Corona Spezial [Science barometer corona special]. https://www.wissenschaft-im-dialog.de/projekte/ wissenschaftsbarometer/wissenschaftsbarometer-corona-spezial/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  67. Wissenschaft im Dialog (WiD), Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung (DZHW), & Nationales Institut für Wissenschaftskommunikation (NaWiK). (Hrsg.). (2021). Wissenschaftskommunikation in Deutschland. Ergebnisse einer Befragung unter Wissenschaftler:innen [Science communication in Germany: Results of a survey among scientists]. https://www.nawik.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/2021_WisskommBefragung_Ergebnisbroschuere_WiD_DZHW_NaWik.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-337
  68. Barr, M., & Copeland-Stewart, A. (2021). Playing video games during the COVID-19 pandemic and effects on players’ well-being. Games and Culture, 17(1), 122–139. https:// doi.org/10.1177/15554120211017036 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  69. Bausinger, H. (1983). Alltag, Technik, Medien [Everyday life, technology, media]. In H. Pross & C.-D. Rath (Hrsg.), Rituale der Medienkommunikation: Gänge durch den Medienalltag (S. 24–36). Guttandin & Hoppe. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  70. Beck, U. (1986). Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne [Risk society: Towards a different modernity]. Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  71. Berg, M. (2017). Kommunikative Mobilität. Die mediale Vernetzung beruflich mobiler Menschen [Communicative mobility: The media connectedness of professionally mobile people]. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15941-2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  72. Birkel, M., Kerkau, F., Reichert, M., & Scholl, E. (2021). Deutscher Pay-VoD-Markt profitiert von Corona-Krise: Markt und Nutzung kostenpflichtiger Streamingdienste [German paid VoD market benefits from Corona crisis: market and usage of paid streaming services]. Media Perspektiven, (2), 98–108. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  73. Bruns, A. (2009). Produtzung: Von medialer zu politischer Partizipation [Produsage: From media to political participation]. In C. Bieber, M. Eifert, T. Groß, & J. Lamla (Hrsg.), Interaktiva: Bd. 7. Soziale Netze in der digitalen Welt: Das Internet zwischen egalitärer Teilhabe und ökonomischer Macht (S. 65–85). Campus. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  74. Bundesagentur für Arbeit. (2022). Beschäftigte nach Berufen (KldB 2010) (Zeitreihe Quartalszahlen). Deutschland. Stichtag 30. Juni 2021 [Employees by occupation (KldB 2010) (time series, quarterly figures). Germany. Reporting date June 30, 2021]. https:// statistik.arbeitsagentur.de/Statistikdaten/Detail/Aktuell/iiia6/beschaeftigung-soz- be-kldb2010-zeitreihe/kldb2010-zeitreihe-d-0-xlsx.xlsx Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  75. Certeau, M. de. (1988). Kunst des Handelns [The practice of everyday life]. Merve-Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  76. Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The Mediated Construction of Reality. Polity. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  77. Düvel, C. (2016). Transkulturelle Vernetzungen: Zur Nutzung digitaler Medien durch junge russische Migranten in Deutschland [Transcultural networking: On the use of digital media by young russian migrants in Germany]. Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93357-3 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  78. Haddad, D., Hartmann, L., & Zubayr, C. (2021). Tendenzen im Zuschauerverhalten: Nutzungsgewohnheiten und Reichweiten im Jahr 2020 [Trends in audience behavior: Usage patterns and coverage in the year 2020]. Media Perspektiven, (3), 138–151. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  79. Hardley, J., & Richardson, I. (2021). Digital placemaking and networked corporeality: Embodied mobile media practices in domestic space during Covid-19. Convergence, 27(3), 625–636. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856520979963 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  80. Hasebrink, U., & Popp, J. (2006). Media repertoires as a result of selective media use. A conceptual approach to the analysis of patterns of exposure. Communications, 31(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMMUN.2006.023 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  81. Hepp, A. (2010). Mediatisierung und Kulturwandel: Kulturelle Kontextfelder und die Prägkräfte der Medien [Mediatization and cultural change: Cultural contexts and the molding forces of the media]. In M. Hartmann & A. Hepp (Hrsg.), Die Mediatisierung der Alltagswelt (S. 65–84). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-531-92014-6_5 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  82. Hepp, A. (2012). Mediatization and the ‘molding force’ of the media. Communications, 37(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2012-0001 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  83. Hepp, A. (2020). Deep mediatization. Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  84. Hepp, A., Hjarvard, S., & Lundby, K. (2015). Mediatization: Theorizing the interplay between media, culture and society. Media, Culture & Society, 37(2), 314–324. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0163443715573835 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  85. Hepp, A., & Krotz, F. (2012). Mediatisierte Welten: Forschungsfelder und Beschreibungsansätze – Zur Einleitung [Mediatized worlds: Research fields and approaches – An introduction]. In F. Krotz & A. Hepp (Hrsg.), Mediatisierte Welten: Forschungsfelder und Beschreibungsansätze (S. 7–23). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94332-9_1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  86. Hepp, A., & Röser, J. (2014). Beharrung in Mediatisierungsprozessen: Das mediatisierte Zuhause und die mediatisierte Vergemeinschaftung [Persistence in mediatization processes: The mediatized home and the mediatized communitization]. In F. Krotz, C. Despotović, & M.-M. Kruse (Hrsg.), Die Mediatisierung sozialer Welten: Synergien empirischer Forschung (S. 165–187). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04077-2_8 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  87. Höflich, J. R. (2016). Der Mensch und seine Medien: Mediatisierte interpersonale Kommunikation. Eine Einführung [Man and his media: Mediatized interpersonal communication: An introduction]. Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18683-2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  88. ifo Institut – Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München e.V. (2021, 23. April). Handel mit Bekleidung und Haushaltsgeräten wandert ins Internet ab [Trade in clothing and household appliances moves to the Internet] [Pressemitteilung]. https://www.ifo.de/pressemitteilung/2021-04-23/handel-mit-bekleidung-und- haushaltsgeraeten-wandert-ins-internet-ab Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  89. Kaltenbrunner, A., Fronaschütz, D. A., & Luef, S. (2021). Sehr konfliktär: Nachrichtennutzung junger RezipientInnen zu Covid-19 [Highly conflictual: Young recipients’ news use on Covid-19.]. MedienJournal, 45(2), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.24989/ medienjournal.v45i2.1987 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  90. Krotz, F. (2007). Mediatisierung: Fallstudien zum Wandel von Kommunikation [Mediatization: Case Studies on the transformation of communication]. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90414-6 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  91. Krotz, F. (2012). Von der Entdeckung der Zentralperspektive zur Augmented Reality: Wie Mediatisierung funktioniert [From the discovery of central perspective to augmented reality: How mediatization works]. In F. Krotz & A. Hepp (Hrsg.), Mediatisierte Welten: Forschungsfelder und Beschreibungsansätze (S. 27–55). Springer VS. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-531-94332-9_2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  92. Krotz, F. (2014). Mediatization as a mover in modernity: Social and cultural change in the context of media change. In K. Lundby (Hrsg.), Handbooks of communication science: Bd. 21. Mediatization of Communication (S. 131–162). De Gruyter Mouton. https:// doi.org/10.1515/9783110272215.131 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  93. Krotz, F. (2017a). Mediatisierung: Ein Forschungskonzept [Mediatization: A concept for research]. In F. Krotz, C. Despotović, & M.-M. Kruse (Hrsg.), Mediatisierung als Metaprozess: Transformationen, Formen der Entwicklung und die Generierung von Neuem (S. 13–32). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16084-5_2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  94. Krotz, F. (2017b). Pfade der Mediatisierung: Bedingungsgeflechte für die Transformationen von Medien, Alltag, Kultur und Gesellschaft [Paths of mediatization: Relational networks for the transformations of media, everyday life, culture and society]. In F. Krotz, Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  95. C. Despotović, & M.-M. Kruse (Hrsg.), Mediatisierung als Metaprozess: Transformationen, Formen der Entwicklung und die Generierung von Neuem (S. 347–364). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16084-5_16 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  96. Krotz, F. (2018). Mediatisierung [Mediatization]. In D. Hoffmann & R. Winter (Hrsg.), Mediensoziologie: Handbuch für Wissenschaft und Studium (S. 86–99). Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  97. Krotz, F., & Thomas, T. (2007). Domestizierung, Alltag, Mediatisierung: Ein Ansatz zu einer theoriegerichteten Verständigung [Domestication, everyday life, mediatization: An approach to a theory-based understanding]. In J. Röser (Hrsg.), MedienAlltag: Domestizierungsprozesse alter und neuer Medien (S. 31–42). VS Verl. für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28282-0_3 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  98. Lachance, E. L. (2021). COVID-19 and its impact on volunteering: Moving towards virtual volunteering. Leisure Sciences, 43(1-2), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2020.1773990 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  99. Linke, C. (2010). Medien im Alltag von Paaren: Eine Studie zur Mediatisierung der Kommunikation in Paarbeziehungen [Media in couples everyday life: A study on the mediatization of communication in romantic relationships]. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92332-1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  100. Lundby, K. (Hrsg.). (2014). Handbooks of communication science: Bd. 21. Mediatization of communication. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110272215 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  101. Meyen, M. (2014). Medialisierung des deutschen Spitzenfußballs. Eine Fallstudie zur Anpassung von sozialen Funktionssystemen an die Handlungslogik der Massenmedien [Mediatization of German premier soccer: A case study on the adaptation of social systems to the logic of the mass media]. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 62(3), 377–394. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2014-3-377 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  102. Möll, G., & Hitzler, R. (2017). Zwischen spekulativen Strategien und strategischen Spekulationen. Zur reflexiven Mediatisierung riskanter Geldverausgabung [Between speculative strategies and strategic speculations: On the reflexive mediatization of risky monetary spending]. In F. Krotz, C. Despotović, & M.-M. Kruse (Hrsg.), Mediatisierung als Metaprozess: Transformationen, Formen der Entwicklung und die Generierung von Neuem (S. 211–232). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16084-5_10 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  103. Müller, K. F. (2018). „Ein schön schrecklicher Fortschritt“. Die Mediatisierung des Häuslichen und die Entgrenzung von Berufsarbeit [“A beautifully terrible progress”: The mediatization of the domestic sphere and the blurring of limits of occupational work]. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 66(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.5771/ 1615-634X-2018-2-217 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  104. Müller, K. F. (2020). Beyond classic mass media and stand-alone technologies: Using media online in the domestic sphere. European Journal of Communication, 36(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120966837 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  105. Müller, K. F., & Röser, J. (2017). Wie Paare Second Screen beim Fernsehen nutzen: Eine ethnografische Studie zur Mediatisierung des Zuhauses [How couples use second screens while watching TV: Findings of an ethnographic study]. In U. Göttlich, L. Heinz, & M. R. Herbers (Hrsg.), Ko-Orientierung in der Medienrezeption: Praktiken der Second-Screen-Nutzung (S. 137–155). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14929-1_8 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  106. Müller, P. (2016). Die Wahrnehmung des Medienwandels. Eine Exploration ihrer Dimensionen, Entstehungsbedingungen und Folgen [The perception of media change: An exploration of its dimensions, conditions of emergence and consequences]. Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12812-8 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  107. Nguyen, D. (2021). Mediatisation and datafication in the global COVID-19 pandemic: On the urgency of data literacy. Media International Australia, 178(1), 210–214. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1329878X20947563 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  108. Niemand, S. (2020). Alltagsumbrüche und Medienhandeln. Eine qualitative Panelstudie zum Wandel der Mediennutzung in Übergangsphasen [Everyday life transitions and media practice: A qualitative panel study on changes in media use in transitional phases]. Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30738-7 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  109. Peil, C. (2021). Polymedia in der Krise. (Außer-)Alltägliches Medienhandeln während des ersten Lockdowns in Österreich [Polymedia in crisis: (Non-)everyday media practice during the first lockdown in Austria]. MedienJournal, 45(2), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.24989/medienjournal.v45i2.1989 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  110. Peil, C., Müller, K. F., Drüeke, R., Niemand, S., & Roth, R. (2020). Technik – Medien – Geschlecht revisited. Gender im Kontext von Datafizierung, Algorithmen und digitalen Medientechnologien – eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme [Technology – Media – Gender revisited: Gender in the context of datafication, algorithms and digital media technologies – a critical overview]. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 68(3), 211–238. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2020-3-211 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  111. Peter, C., & Brosius, H.-B. (2020). Umgang mit der Corona-Krise: Mediennutzung, 1–11 [Dealing with the corona crisis: Media use, 1–11]. https://www.ls1.ifkw.uni-muenchen.de/forschung/forschungsbereiche/corona/teil-1-mediennutzung.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  112. Pfadenhauer, M., & Grenz, T. (2017). De-Mediatisierung: Diskontinuitäten, Non-Linearitäten und Ambivalenzen im Mediatisierungsprozess [De-Mediatization: Discontinuities, non-linearities and ambivalences in the mediatization process]. Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14666-5 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  113. Poell, T., Nieborg, D., & van Dijck, J. (2019). Platformisation. Internet Policy Review, 8(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1425 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  114. Roitsch, C. (2020). Kommunikative Grenzziehung: Herausforderungen und Praktiken junger Menschen in einer vielgestaltigen Medienumgebung [Setting communicative boundaries: Challenges and practices of young people in a multifaceted media environment]. Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28430-5 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  115. Roll, J. (2017). Kommunikation im öffentlichen Raum: Aufmerksamkeit und Mediennutzung [Communication in public space: Attention and media use]. Springer VS. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16521-5 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  116. Röser, J., & Müller, K. F. (2017). Der Domestizierungsansatz [The domestication approach]. In L. Mikos & C. Wegener (Hrsg.), Qualitative Medienforschung: Ein Handbuch (2. Aufl., S. 156–163). UVK Verlagsgesellschaft mbH. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  117. Röser, J., Müller, K. F., Niemand, S., & Roth, U. (2017). Häusliches Medienhandeln zwischen Dynamik und Beharrung: Die Domestizierung des Internets und die Mediatisierung des Zuhauses 2008–2016 [The domestication of the internet between dynamics and persistence: Domestic media practices 2008–2016]. In F. Krotz, C. Despotović, & M.-M. Kruse (Hrsg.), Mediatisierung als Metaprozess: Transformationen, Formen der Entwicklung und die Generierung von Neuem (S. 139–162). Springer VS. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16084-5_7 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  118. Röser, J., Müller, K. F., Niemand, S., & Roth, U. (2019). Das mediatisierte Zuhause im Wandel: Eine qualitative Panelstudie zur Verhäuslichung des Internets [The mediatized home in transition: A qualitative panel study on the domestication of the internet]. Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26073-6 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  119. Roth-Ebner, C. (2015). Der effiziente Mensch. Zur Dynamik von Raum und Zeit in mediatisierten Arbeitswelten [The efficient human: On the dynamics of space and time in mediatized working environments]. Bielefeld: transcript. https://doi.org/10.14361/transcript.9783839429143.163 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  120. Siani, A., & Marley, S. A. (2021). Impact of the recreational use of virtual reality on physical and mental wellbeing during the Covid-19 lockdown. Health and technology, 11(2), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-021-00528-8 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  121. Stürz, R. A., Stumpf, C., Mendel, U., & Harhoff, D. (2020). Digitalisierung durch Corona? [Digitalization because of Corona?]. bidt – Bayerisches Forschungsinstitut für Digitale Transformationen. https://doi.org/10.35067/XYPQ-KN62 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  122. Steinmaurer, T. (2016). Permanent vernetzt. Zur Theorie und Geschichte der Mediatisierung [Permanently connected: Theory and history of mediatization]. Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04511-1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  123. Vogl, G., & Carstensen, T. (2021). Mobiles Arbeiten vor und seit Corona. Arbeitssoziologische Perspektiven [Mobile work before and since corona: Work sociological perspectives]. WSI-Mitteilungen, 74(3), 192–198. https://doi.org/10.5771/0342-300X-2021-3-192 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  124. Watson, A., Lupton, D., & Michael, M. (2021). Enacting intimacy and sociality at a distance in the COVID-19 crisis: The sociomaterialities of home-based communication technologies. Media International Australia, 178(1), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1329878X20961568 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  125. Wolling, J., Kuhlmann, C., Schumann, C., Berger, P., & Arlt, D. (2021). Corona 2020 – Zerreißprobe für die Gesellschaft? Persönliches Erleben und mediale Vermittlung einer multiplen Krise [Corona 2020 – A tear test for society? Personal experience and mediation of a multiple crisis]. Kommunikationswissenschaft interdisziplinär: Band 8. Universitätsverlag Ilmenau. https://www.db-thueringen.de/receive/dbt_mods_00048770 https://doi.org/10.22032/dbt.48770 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  126. Ziemann, A. (2012). Soziologie der Medien [Sociology of the media] (2. Aufl.). transcript. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-394
  127. Arnold, E., & Boggs, K. U. (2020). Interpersonal relationships: Professional communication skills for nurses (8th ed.). Elsevier Inc. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  128. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  129. Brennan, R. L., & Prediger, D. J. (1981). Coefficient Kappa: Some Uses, Misuses, and Alternatives. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41(3), 687–699. https://doi. org/10.1177/001316448104100307 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  130. Bruin, W. B. de, & Bostrom, A. (2013). Assessing what to address in science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(Supplement 3), 14062–14068. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212729110 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  131. Chan-Olmsted, S., & Wang, R. (2020). Understanding podcast users: Consumption motives and behaviors. New Media & Society, 24(3), 684–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1461444820963776 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  132. Cole, T., & Leets, L. (1999). Attachment styles and intimate television viewing: Insecurely forming relationships in a parasocial way. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16(4), 495–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407599164005 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  133. Derrick, J. L., Gabriel, S., & Hugenberg, K. (2009). Social surrogacy: How favored television programs provide the experience of belonging. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(2), 352–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.003 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  134. Dibble, J. L., Hartmann, T., & Rosaen, S. F. (2016). Parasocial Interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research, 42(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12063 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  135. Domenichini, B. (2018). Podcastnutzung in Deutschland [Podcast use in Germany]. Media Perspektiven, 46-49. ARD Media. https://www.ard-media.de/fileadmin/user_upload/ media-perspektiven/pdf/2018/0218_Domenichini.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  136. Dowling, D. O., & Miller, K. J. (2019). Immersive audio storytelling: Podcasting and serial documentary in the digital publishing industry. Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 26(1), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/19376529.2018.1509218 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  137. Eden, A. L., Johnson, B. K., Reinecke, L., & Grady, S. M. (2020). Media for coping during COVID-19 social distancing: Stress, anxiety, and psychological well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577639 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  138. Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. (2004). Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annual review of psychology, 55, 745–774. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141456 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  139. Goldsmith, D. J., & MacGeorge, E. L. (2000). The impact of politeness and relationship on perceived quality of advice about a problem. Human Communication Research, 26(2), 234–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00757.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  140. Greenwood, D. N., & Long, C. R. (2009). Psychological predictors of media involvement: Solitude experiences and the need to belong. Communication Research, 36(5), 637–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209338906 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  141. Halfmann, A., & Reinecke, L. (2021). Binge-Watching as case of escapist entertainment use. In P. Vorderer & K. Christoph (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Entertainment Theory. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190072216.013.11 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  142. Hilmes, M., & Lindgren, M. (2016). Podcast review and criticism: A forum. Radio Journal: International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media, 14, 83–89. https://doi.org/ 10.1386/rjao.14.1.83_7 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  143. Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  144. Jarzyna, C. (2020). Parasocial interaction, the COVID-19 quarantine, and digital media (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3668053). Social Science Research Network. https://papers. ssrn.com/abstract=3668053 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  145. Katz, E., & Foulkes, D. (1962). On the use of the mass media as “escape”: Clarification of a concept. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26(3), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1086/267111 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  146. Kenya, K., Kogel, D., & Terschüren, H. (2020, March 27). Christian Drosten – Wie ein Virologe zum erfolgreichen Podcaster wurde [Christian Drosten – How a virologist became a successful podcaster]. Deutschlandfunk Kultur. https://www.deutschland-funkkultur.de/christian-drosten-wie-ein-virologe-zum-erfolgreichen.4038.de.html?dram:article_id=473441 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  147. Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2013). The effects of tv and film exposure on knowledge about and attitudes toward mental disorders. Journal of Community Psychology, 41(8), 931– 943. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21581 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  148. Klotz, A. M. (2011). Social media and weather warnings: Exploring the new parasocial relationships in weather forecasting. http://cardinalscholar.bsu.edu/handle/123456789/194749 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  149. Krauss, L. M. (2015). Scientists as celebrities: Bad for science or good for society? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 71(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096340214563676 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  150. Lau, M. (2020, March 18). Virologen: Ist das unser neuer Kanzler? [Virologists: Is this our new chancellor?]. Die Zeit. https://www.zeit.de/2020/13/coronavirus-wissenschaft-aus- wirkung-auf-politik-virologen-christian-drosten-alexander-kekule Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  151. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  152. Liebers, N., & Schramm, H. (2019). Parasocial interactions and relationships with media characters–An inventory of 60 years of research. Communication Research Trends, 38(2), 4–31. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  153. Lindgren, M. (2016). Personal narrative journalism and podcasting. Radio Journal: International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media, 14, 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1386/ rjao.14.1.23_1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  154. Maddux, J. E., & Rogers, R. W. (1980). Effects of source expertness, physical attractiveness, and supporting arguments on persuasion: A case of brains over beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(2), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.39.2.235 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  155. Maier, M., Rothmund, T., Retzbach, A., Otto, L., & Besley, J. C. (2014). Informal learning through science media usage. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 86–103. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00461520.2014.916215 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  156. Martinez-Conde, S., Macknik, S. L., & Powell, D. (2016). The plight of the celebrity scientist. Scientific American, 315(4), 64–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1016-64 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  157. Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  158. MacDougall, R. C. (2012). Digination: Identity, organization, and public life in the age of small digital devices and big digital domains. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press; Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  159. Mercer-Mapstone, L., & Kuchel, L. (2017). Core skills for effective science communication: A teaching resource for undergraduate science education. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(2), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2015.111 3573 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  160. NDR. (2020). Das Coronavirus-Update von NDR Info [The coronavirus-update from NDR info]. NDR. https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/info/podcast4684.html Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  161. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., & Nielsen, R. (2019). Reuters Institute digital news report 2019. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://ora.ox. ac.uk/objects/uuid:18c8f2eb-f616-481a-9dff-2a479b2801d0 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  162. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andı, S., Robertson, C. T., & Kleis Nielsen, R. (2021). Reuters Institute digital news report 2021. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2021-06/Digital_News_Report_2021_FINAL.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  163. Newman, N., & Gallo, N. (2020). Daily news podcasts: Building new habits in the shadow of coronavirus. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  164. O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1609406919899220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  165. Pavelko, R. L., & Myrick, J. G. (2020). Muderinos and media effects: How the my favorite murder podcast and its social media community may promote well-being in audiences with mental illness. Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 27(1), 151–169. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/19376529.2019.1638925 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  166. Perks, L. G., & Turner, J. S. (2019). Podcasts and productivity: A qualitative uses and gratifications study. Mass Communication and Society, 22(1), 96–116. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/15205436.2018.1490434 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  167. Phua, J. (2016). The effects of similarity, parasocial identification, and source credibility in obesity public service announcements on diet and exercise self-efficacy. Journal of Health Psychology, 21(5), 699–708. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  168. Rubin, A. M., & Step, M. M. (2000). Impact of motivation, attraction, and parasocial interaction on talk Radio listening. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(4), 635–654. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4404_7 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  169. Sanderson, J., & Emmons, B. (2014). Extending and withholding forgiveness to Josh Hamilton: Exploring forgiveness within parasocial interaction. Communication & Sport, 2(1), 24–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479513482306 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  170. Sanderson, J., & Truax, C. (2014). I hate you man!’: Exploring maladaptive parasocial interaction expressions to college athletes via Twitter. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 2014, 333–351. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  171. Schlütz, D., & Hedder, I. (2021). Aural parasocial relations: Host–listener relationships in podcasts. Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19376529.2 020.1870467 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  172. Sherman-Morris, K. (2005). Tornadoes, television and trust—A closer look at the influence of the local weathercaster during severe weather. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards, 6(4), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazards.2006.10.002 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  173. Sood, G. (2020). tuber: Access YouTube from R. R package version 0.9.9. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  174. Steenbuck, T. (2020, April 9). Podcasts: Medien-Gewinner der Coronakrise [Podcasts: Corona crisis media winners]. NDR. https://www.ndr.de/fernsehen/sendungen/zapp/ index.html Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  175. Stevis-Gridneff, M. (2020, April 5). The rising heroes of the coronavirus era? Nations’ top scientists. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/05/world/europe/scientists-coronavirus-heroes.html Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  176. Tukachinsky, R., & Stever, G. (2019). Theorizing development of parasocial engagement. Communication Theory, 29(3), 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty032 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  177. Turner, J. R. (1993). Interpersonal and psychological predictors of parasocial interaction with different television performers. Communication Quarterly, 41(4), 443–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379309369904 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  178. Utz, S., Gaiser, F., & Wolfers, L. N. (2022). Guidance in the chaos: Effects of science communication by virologists during the COVID-19 crisis in Germany and the role of parasocial phenomena: Public Understanding of Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 09636625221093194 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  179. Utz, S., Otto, F., & Pawlowski, T. (2021). “Germany crashes out of world cup”: A mixedmethod study on the effects of crisis communication on facebook. Journal of Sport Management, 35(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1123/JSM.2019-0430 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  180. Über 15 Mio. Abrufe: Der gewaltige Erfolg des “Coronavirus Update” mit Professor Christian Drosten [Over 15 million hits: The tremendous success of the “coronavirus update” with professor Christian Drosten]. (2020, March 26). MEEDIA. https://meedia. de/2020/03/26/ueber-15-mio-abrufe-der-gewaltige-erfolg-des-coronavirus-update-mit- professor-christian-drosten/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  181. VERBI Software. (2019). MAXQDA 2020 [computer software]. Berlin, Germany: VERBI Software. Available at maxqda.com Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  182. Westlund, O., & Ghersetti, M. (2015). Modelling news media use: Positing and applying the GC/MC model to the analysis of media use in everyday life and crisis situations. Journalism Studies, 16(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2013.868139 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  183. Wichert, F. (2020, April 27). Der Held, der keiner sein wollte [The hero who didn’t want to be one]. T-Online. https://www.t-online.de/-/87771476 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  184. Wolfers, L. N., & Schneider, F. M. (2020). Using media for coping: A scoping review. Communication Research, 0093650220939778. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220939778 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  185. Wormer, H. (2020). German media and coronavirus: Exceptional communication—or just a catalyst for existing tendencies? Media and Communication, 8(2), 467–470. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.3242 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  186. Wrather, K. (2016). Making ‘maximum fun’ for fans: Examining podcast listener participation online. Radio Journal: International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media, 14(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1386/rjao.14.1.43_1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  187. Yuan, S., Ma, W., & Besley, J. C. (2019). Should scientists talk about GMOs nicely? Exploring the effects of communication styles, source expertise, and preexisting attitude. Science Communication, 41(3), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547019837623 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  188. Zhao, X. (2009). Media use and global warming perceptions: A snapshot of the reinforcing spirals. Communication Research, 36(5), 698–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209338911 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  189. Zuraikat, L. (2020). The parasocial nature of the podcast. In J. Hendricks (Ed.), Radio’s second country: Past, present, and future perspectives (pp. 39-52). Rutgers University Press. https://doi.org/10.36019/9780813598505-005 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-427
  190. Argote Tironi, P., Barham, E., Zuckerman Daly, S., Gerez, J. E., Marshall, J., & Pocasangre, O. (2021). Messages that increase COVID-19 vaccine acceptance: Evidence from online experiments in six Latin American countries. PloS One, 16(10), e0259059. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259059 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  191. Aschwanden, C. (2021). Five reasons why COVID herd immunity is probably impossible. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  192. Nature, 591(7851), 520–522. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-00728-2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  193. Bish, A., Yardley, L., Nicoll, A., & Michie, S. (2011). Factors associated with uptake of vaccination against pandemic influenza: A systematic review. Vaccine, 29(38), 6472–6484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.06.107 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  194. Bresge, A. (2021, April 5). Vaccine selfies are the new social media trend, but also a reminder of unequal access. The Canadian Press. https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/coronavirus/vaccine-selfies-are-the-new-social-media-trend-but-also-a-reminder-of-unequal- access-1.5374668 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  195. Chou, W.-Y. S., Burgdorf, C. E., Gaysynsky, A., & Hunter, C. M. (2020). COVID-19 vaccination communication: Applying behavioral and social science to address vaccine hesitancy and foster vaccine confidence. US National Institutes of Health. https://obssr. od.nih.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/COVIDReport_Final.pdf?emci=712687ce- 1e60-eb11-a607-00155d43c992&emdi=e4597073-8d64-eb11-9889-00155d43c992 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  196. &ceid=4112502 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  197. Christensen, P. N., Rothgerber, H., Wood, W., & Matz, D. C. (2004). Social norms and identity relevance: A motivational approach to normative behavior. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(10), 1295–1309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264480 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  198. Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.58.6.1015 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  199. Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 151–192). McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  200. COVID-19 Snapshot Monitoring. (2021). Impfbereitschaft [Vaccination willingness]. https://projekte.uni-erfurt.de/cosmo2020/web/explorer/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  201. Covid-Norms. (2021). Monitoring and analyzing preventive behavior. https://covid-norms.ch/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  202. Diekmann, A. (2020). Emergence of and compliance with new social norms: The example of the Corona crisis. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 49(4), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2020-0021 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  203. East, K., McNeill, A., Thrasher, J. F., & Hitchman, S. C. (2021). Social norms as a predictor of smoking uptake among youth: A systematic review, meta-analysis and metaregression of prospective cohort studies. Addiction, 116(11), 2953–2967. https://doi. org/10.1111/add.15427 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  204. Epton, T., Lawes-Wickwar, S., Ghio, D., Shorter, G. W., Whittaker, E., Arden, M. A., Armitage, C., Byrne-Davis, L., Chadwick, P., Drury, J., Hart, J., Lewis, L., McBride, E., O’Connor, D., Swanson, V., Kamal, A., & Chater, A. (2011). Optimising vaccination uptake for Covid-19. https://www.bps.org.uk/coronavirus-resources/professional/optimising-vaccine-uptake Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  205. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  206. Federal Office of Public Health. (2021, May 17). “Ein Herz für uns alle”: BAG lanciert neue Informationskampagne zur Covid-19-Impfung [“A heart for us all”: FOPH launches new information campaign on Covid-19 vaccination; Press release]. Bern. https://www.bag.admin.ch/bag/de/home/das-bag/aktuell/medienmitteilungen.msg-id-83547.html Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  207. Geber, S., & Friemel, T. N. (2022). Tracing-technology adoption during the Covid-19 pandemic: The multifaceted role of social norms. International Journal of Communication, 16, 247–266. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/18089 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  208. Geber, S., & Hefner, D. (2019). Social norms as communicative phenomena: A communication perspective on the theory of normative social behavior. Studies in Communication and Media, 8(1), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2019-1-6 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  209. Geber, S., Ho, S. S., & Ou, M. (2022, May 26–30). Communicative and normative influences on the intention to get vaccinated against COVID-19: A cross-cultural study in Singapore and Switzerland. 72nd Annual Conference of the International Communication Association (ICA), Paris, France. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  210. Geber, S., & Sedlander, E. (2022). Communication as the crucial link: Toward a multilevel approach to normative social influence. Studies in Communication Sciences. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2022.02.005 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  211. Green, S. B., & Yang, Y. (2009). Reliability of summed item scores using structural equation modeling: An alternative to coefficient alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9099-3 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  212. Hitchman, S. C., Tribelhorn, L., Geber, S., & Friemel, T. N. (2021). Reasons for not getting vaccinated against COVID-19 in German-speaking Switzerland: An online survey among vaccine hesitant 16-60 year olds. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hnzke Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  213. Hubbard, T. L. (2015). The varieties of momentum-like experience. Psychological Bulletin, 141(6), 1081–1119. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000016 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  214. Kelley, K. (2020). MBESS (Version 4.8.0) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/ web/packages/MBESS Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  215. Lee, S. J., & Liu, J. (2021). Leveraging dynamic norm messages to promote counter-normative health behaviors: The moderating role of current and future injunctive norms, attitude and self-efficacy. Health Communication, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/104102 36.2021.1991638 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  216. Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Holford, D. L., Finn, A., Leask, J., Thomson, A., Lombardi, D., Al-Rawi, A. K., Amazeen, M. A., Anderson, E. C., Armaos, K. D., Betsch, C., Bruns, H. H. B., Ecker, U. K. H., Gavaruzzi, T., Hahn, U., Herzog, S., Juanchich, M., . . . Vraga, E. K. (2021). The COVID-19 vaccine communication handbook. A practical guide for improving vaccine communication and fighting misinformation. SciBeh. http://repository.essex.ac.uk/29625/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  217. Loomba, S., Figueiredo, A. de, Piatek, S. J., Graaf, K. de, & Larson, H. J. (2021). Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(3), 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562- 021-01056-1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  218. Loschelder, D. D., Siepelmeyer, H., Fischer, D., & Rubel, J. A. (2019). Dynamic norms drive sustainable consumption: Norm-based nudging helps café customers to avoid disposable to-go-cups. Journal of Economic Psychology, 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. joep.2019.02.002 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  219. Lüthy, B. (2021, January 3). 50 Prozent der Schweizer sind bereit, sich impfen zu lassen [50 percent of the Swiss are willing to be vaccinated]. 20min. https://www.20min.ch/ story/50-prozent-der-schweizer-sind-bereit-sich-impfen-zu-lassen-584758043422 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  220. Maglio, S. J., & Polman, E. (2016). Revising probability estimates: Why increasing likelihood means increasing impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000058 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  221. Manning, M. (2009). The effects of subjective norms on behaviour in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(Pt 4), 649–705. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X393136 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  222. McNeish, D. (2018). Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 412–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000144 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  223. Moehring, A., Collis, A., Garimella, K., Rahimian, M. A., Aral, S., & Eckles, D. (2021). Surfacing norms to increase vaccine acceptance. SSRN Electronic Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3782082 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  224. Mortensen, C. R., Neel, R., Cialdini, R. B., Jaeger, C. M., Jacobson, R. P., & Ringel, M. M. (2019). Trending norms: A lever for encouraging behaviors performed by the minority. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(2), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617734615 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  225. Palm, R., Bolsen, T., & Kingsland, J. T. (2021). The effect of frames on COVID-19 vaccine resistance. Frontiers in Political Science, 3, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.661257 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  226. Patrick, M. E., Neighbors, C., & Lee, C. M. (2012). A hierarchy of 21st birthday drinking norms. Journal of College Student Development, 53(4), 581–585. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2012.0060 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  227. Ratcliff, C. L., Jensen, J. D., Scherr, C. L., Krakow, M., & Crossley, K. (2019). Loss/gain framing, dose, and reactance: A message experiment. Risk Analysis, 39(12), 2640– 2652. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13379 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  228. Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. E. (2009). Coefficients Alpha, Beta, Omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  229. Rhodes, N., Shulman, H. C., & McClaran, N. (2020). Changing norms: A meta-analytic integration of research on social norms appeals. Human Communication Research, 46(2-3), 161–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqz023 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  230. Rimal, R. N., Lapinski, M. K., Turner, M. M., & Smith, K. C. (2011). The attribute-centered approach for understanding health behaviors: Initial ideas and future research directions. Studies in Communication Sciences, 11(1), 15–34. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  231. Rimal, R. N., & Storey, J. D. (2020). Construction of meaning during a pandemic: The forgotten role of social norms. Health Communication, 35(14), 1732–1734. https:// doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1838091 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  232. Ritchie, H., Mathieu, E., Rodés-Guirao, L., Appel, C., Giattino, C., Ortiz-Ospina, E., Hasell, J., Macdonald, B., Beltekian, D., & Roser, M. (2020). Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19): OurWorldInData.org. https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  233. Schmid, P., Rauber, D., Betsch, C., Lidolt, G., & Denker, M.-L. (2017). Barriers of influenza vaccination intention and behavior: A systematic review of influenza vaccine hesitancy, 2005 – 2016. PLOS ONE, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170550 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  234. Schneider, P. (2021, January 15). Impfbereitschaft in der Schweiz nimmt markant zu [Vaccination willingness in Switzerland increases markedly]. Srf.Ch. https://www.srf.ch/ news/schweiz/6-corona-umfrage-der-srg-impfbereitschaft-in-der-schweiz-nimmt-markant-zu Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  235. Shulman, H. C., Rhodes, N., Davidson, E., Ralston, R., Borghetti, L., & Morr, L. (2017). The state of the field of social norms research. International Journal of Communication, 11, 1192–1213. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  236. Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  237. Sinclair, S., & Agerström, J. (2021). Do social norms influence young people’s willingness to take the COVID-19 vaccine? Health Communication, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1937832 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  238. Sparkman, G., Howe, L., & WALTON, G. (2021). How social norms are often a barrier to addressing climate change but can be part of the solution. Behavioural Public Policy, 5(4), 528–555. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2020.42 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  239. Sparkman, G., & Walton, G. M. (2017). Dynamic norms promote sustainable behavior, even if it is counternormative. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1663–1674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617719950 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  240. Sparkman, G., & Walton, G. M. (2019). Witnessing change: Dynamic norms help resolve diverse barriers to personal change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 82, 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.01.007 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  241. Swissmedic. (2020, December 19). Swissmedic erteilt Zulassung für den ersten Covid-19-Impfstoff in der Schweiz [Swissmedic authorizes first Covid 19 vaccine in Switzerland]. [Press release]. Bern. https://www.swissmedic.ch/swissmedic/de/home/news/coronavirus-covid-19/covid-19-impfstoff_erstzulassung.html Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  242. Zuzak, T. J., Zuzak-Siegrist, I., Rist, L., Staubli, G., & Simões-Wüst, A. P. (2008). Attitudes towards vaccination: Users of complementary and alternative medicine versus non-users. Swiss Medical Weekly, 138(47-48), 713–718. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-13603 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-453
  243. Adegbola, O., & Gearhart, S. (2019). Examining the relationship between media use and political engagement: A comparative study among the United States, Kenya, and Nigeria. International Journal of Communication, 13, 1231–1251. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  244. Ardèvol-Abreu, A., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2017). Effects of editorial media bias perception and media trust on the use of traditional, citizen, and social media news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(3), 703–724. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016654684 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  245. Arlt, D., Schumann, C., & Wolling, J. (2020). Upset with the refugee policy: Exploring the relations between policy malaise, media use, trust in news media, and issue fatigue. Communications, 45(s1), 624–647. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2019-0110 Armando, A. (2019). Public political communication: Ideologies, partisanship and media Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  246. freedom in Indonesia. In A. Grüne, K. Hafez, S. Priyadharma, & S. Schmidt (Eds.), Media and transformation in Germany and Indonesia: Asymmetrical comparisons and perspectives, (pp. 49–71), Frank & Timme. D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (pp. 63-91). Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  247. Badan Nasional Penanganan Bencana. (2020). Sebanyak 2.925 bencana alam terjadi pada 2020 di tanah air, bencana hidrometeorologi mendominasi [2.925 cases of natural disaster reported in 2020 in Indonesia, dominated by hydrometeorology disaster]. National Agency on Disaster Management. https://bnpb.go.id/berita/sebanyak-2-925-ben- cana-alam-terjadi-pada-2020-di-tanah-air-bencana-hidrometeorologi-mendominasi Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  248. Ball-Rokeach, S. J., & DeFleur, M. L. (1976). A dependency model of mass-media effects. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  249. Communication Research, 3(1), 3–21. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  250. Beyer, A., & Figenschou, T. U. (2018). Media hypes and public opinion: Human interest frames and hype fatigue. In P. Vasterman (Ed.), From media hype to Twitter storm: News explosions and their impact on issues, crises and public opinion (pp. 249–266). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt21215m0.16 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  251. Boukes, M., & Vliegenthart, R. (2017). News consumption and its unpleasant side effect. Journal of Media Psychology, 29(3), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/ a000224 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  252. Brosius, H.-B., & Kepplinger, H. M. (1995). Killer and victim issues: Issue competition in the agenda-setting process of German television. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 7(3), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/7.3.211 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  253. Bruin, K. de, Haan, Y. de, Vliegenthart, R., Kruikemeier, S. & Boukes, M. (2021). News avoidance during the Covid-19 crisis: Understanding information overload. Digital Journalism, 9(9), 1286–1302. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1957967 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  254. Ceron, A., & Memoli, V. (2015). Trust in government and media slant. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 20(3), 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161215572634 Chakravartty, P., Kuo, R., Grubbs, V., & McIlwain, C. (2018). #CommunicationSoWhite. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  255. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy003 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  256. Chao Su, C., Jund Liu, & Baohua Zhou (2020). Two levels of digitalization and internet use across Europe, China, and the U.S. International Journal of Communication, 14, 5838–5859. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  257. CIA – Central Intelligence Agency (2020). The world fact book. https://www.cia.gov/the- world-factbook/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  258. Claussen, D. S. (2020). Beware of international comparative research. Newspaper Research Journal, 41(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739532919898774 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  259. Dahlgren, P. (1995). Television and the public sphere: Citizenship, democracy and the media. SAGE Publications Ltd. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  260. De Vreese, C. H., & Boomgaarden, H. (2006). News, political knowledge and participation: The differential effects of news media exposure on political knowledge and participation. Acta Politica, 41(4), 317–341. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500164 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  261. Demeter, M. (2019). The winner takes it all: International inequality in communication and media studies today. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018792270 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  262. DetikHot (2020). Reisa Broto Asmoro: Model luar negeri, host Dr Oz hingga jubir COVID-19 [Reisa Broto Asmoro: International model, host Dr Oz until spokesperson COVID-19]. https://hot.detik.com/celeb/d-5047078/reisa-broto-asmoro-model-luar-negeri-host-dr-oz-hingga-jubir-covid-19/2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  263. Din, N. U. (2020). Media landscape in Pakistan. https://medialandscapes.org/country/pakistan Downs, A. (1972). Up and down with ecology: The issue-attention cycle. Public Interest, 28, 38–50. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  264. Dunwoody, S. & Griffin, R. J. (2015). Risk information seeking and processing model. In H. Cho, T. Reimer, & K. McComas (Eds.), The Sage handbook of risk communication, 102-116. SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  265. Edelman (2021). 2021 Edelman Trust Barometer. https://www.edelman.com/trust/2021-trust-barometer Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  266. Edgerly, S. (2020, October 15). Both sides of news avoidance. The Hill. https://thehill.com/opinion/education/520056-both-sides-of-news-avoidance Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  267. Ejaz, W., Bräuer, M., & Wolling, J. (2017). Subjective evaluation of media content as a moderator of media effects on European identity: Mere exposure and the hostile media phenomenon. Media and Communication, 5(2), 41. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v5i2.885 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  268. Emmer, M., & Kunst, M. (2018). Digital citizenship revisited: The impact of ICTs on citizens’ political communication beyond the Western state. International Journal of Communication, 12, 2191-2211. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  269. Finance Division Government of Pakistan (2019). Pakistan Economic Survey 2018-19. https://www.finance.gov.pk/survey/chapters_19/Economic_Survey_2018_19.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  270. Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2020). News avoidance in the UK remains high as lockdown restrictions are eased. Reuters Institute, University of Oxford. UK Covid-19 News and Information Project: Factsheet 8. https://reutersinstitute.poli- tics.ox.ac.uk/news-avoidance-uk-remains-high-lockdown-restrictions-are-eased Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  271. Freedom House (2020). Freedom in the world. https://freedomhouse.org/countries/free- dom-world/scores Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  272. Gallotti, R., Valle, F., Castaldo, N., Sacco, P., & Domenico, M. de (2020). Assessing the risks of ‘infodemics’ in response to COVID-19 epidemics. Nature human behaviour, 4(12), 1285–1293. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00994-6 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  273. Geers, S. (2020). News consumption across media platforms and content. Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(S1), 332–354. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa010 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  274. Geiß, S. (2011). Patterns of relationships between issues: An analysis of German prestige newspapers. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 23(3), 265–286. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edq050 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  275. Geiß, S. (2015). Die Aufmerksamkeitsspanne der Öffentlichkeit. [The attention span of the public] Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  276. Golman, R., Hagmann, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2017). Information avoidance. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(1), 96–135. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20151245 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  277. Gurr, G., & Metag, J. (2021). Examining avoidance of ongoing political issues in the news: A longitudinal study of the impact of audience issue fatigue. International Journal of Communication, 15, 1789–1809. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  278. Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Communication, Society and Politics. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  279. Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (Eds.). (2012). Comparing media systems beyond the Western world. Communication, Society and Politics. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  280. Hanitzsch, T., van Dalen, A., & Steindl, N. (2018). Caught in the nexus: A comparative and longitudinal analysis of public trust in the press. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217740695 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  281. Hasebrink, U., Jensen, K. B., van den Bulck, H., Hölig, S., & Maeseele, P. (2015). Changing patterns of media use across cultures: A challenge for longitudinal research. International Journal of Communication, 9(1), 435–457. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  282. Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center. (2021). COVID-19 Map. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  283. Jones, J. P. (2005). Entertaining politics: New political television and civic culture. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  284. Kang, D. S., & Mastin, T. (2008). How cultural difference affects international tourism public relations websites: A comparative analysis using Hofstede’s cultural dimensions. Public Relations Review, 34(1), 54–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.11.002 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  285. Kassambara, A. (2018). Machine learning essentials: Practical guide in r. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  286. Khalid, A., Nawaz, M. B., & Nazeer, J. (2021). The effect of news TV channels coverage during pandemic Covid-19 on youth in Pakistan. Global Mass Communication Review, VI(I), 302–320. https://doi.org/10.31703/gmcr.2021(vi-i).23 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  287. Khokhar, R. (2022, October 9). Pakistan Covid-19 update: Current trends and future projections. Stimson. https://www.stimson.org/2020/pakistan-covid-19-update-current- trends-and-future-projections/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  288. Kim, H. K., Ahn, J., Atkinson, L., & Kahlor, L. A. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 misinformation on information seeking, avoidance, and processing: A multicountry comparative study. Science Communication, 42(5), 586–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020959670 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  289. Kinnick, K. N., Krugman, D. M., & Cameron, G. T. (1996). Compassion fatigue: Communication and burnout toward social problems. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 73(7), 687–707. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909607300314 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  290. Kirchgässner, G. (2008). Homo oeconomicus: Das ökonomische Modell individuellen Verhaltens und seine Anwendung in den Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften [Homo oeconomicus: The economic modell of individual behavior and its application in economics and social sciences]. Mohr Siebeck. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  291. Kohring, M., & Matthes, J. (2007). Trust in news media. Communication Research, 34(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0093650206298071 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  292. Kuhlmann, C., Schumann, C., & Wolling, J. (2014). “Ich will davon nichts mehr sehen und hören!” Exploration des Phänomens Themenverdrossenheit [I do not want to hear or see anything about this anymore!” Exploration of the phenomenon issue fatigue.] Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 62(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615- 634x-2014-1-5 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  293. Kühne, R., & Schemer, C. (2015). The emotional effects of news frames on information processing and opinion formation. Communication Research, 42(3), 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213514599 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  294. Ladd, J. M. (2010). Why Americans hate the media and how it matters. Princeton Univ. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  295. Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  296. Link, E. (2021). Information avoidance during health crises: Predictors of avoiding information about the COVID-19 pandemic among German news consumers. Information processing & management, 58(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102714 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  297. Liu, X., & Lu, J. (2020). Comparatives media studies in the digital age: Does the internet erode trust in media? A comparative study of 46 countries. International Journal of Communication, 14, 5822–5837. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  298. Livingstone, S. (2016). On the challenges of cross-national comparative media research. European Journal of Communication, 18(4), 477–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/026732 3103184003 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  299. Luhmann, N. (2000). The reality of the mass media. Cultural memory in the present. Stanford Univ. Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  300. McCombs, M. (2005). A Look at Agenda-setting: past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 6(4), 543–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500250438 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  301. Metag, J., & Arlt, D. (2016). Das Konstrukt Themenverdrossenheit und seine Messung. Theoretische Konzeptualisierung und Skalenentwicklung. [Issue fatigue and its meas-urement: Theoretical conceptualization and scale development]. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 64(4), 542–563. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2016-4-542 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  302. Mukaromah, V. F. (2020). Mengenal Dokter Reisa, Anggota Tim Komunikasi Gugus Tugas Percepatan Penanganan Covid-19 [Getting to know medical doctor Reisa, member of communication team of Covid-19 taskforce]. https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2020/06/09/141500665/mengenal-dokter-reisa-anggota-tim-komunikasi-gugus-tugas-percepatan?page=2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  303. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Robertson, C., Eddy, K., & Nielsen, R. (2022). Reuters Institute digital news report 2022. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.poli- tics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2022-06/Digital_News-Report_2022.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  304. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andi, S., Robertson, C.T. Nielsen, R.K. (2021). Reuters institute digital news report 2021. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2021-06/Digital_News_Report_2021_FINAL.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  305. Ng, E., White, K. C., & Saha, A. (2020). #CommunicationSoWhite: Race and power in the academy and beyond. Communication, Culture and Critique, 13(2), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcaa011 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  306. Noprian, E. (2020, December 27). Data positivity rate Covid-19 sampai 27 Desember 2020 [Data positivity rate Covid-19 until 27 December 2022]. Berita Satu. https://www.beritasatu.com/berita-grafik/713881/data-positivity-rate-covid19-sampai-27-desember-2020 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  307. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (2019). Compendium on gender statistics of Pakistan 2019. https://www.pbs.gov.pk/sites/default/files/social_statistics/publications/Compendium_of_Gender_Statistics_2019.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  308. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (2021). Population and housing census – 2017 report. https://www.pbs.gov.pk/sites/default/files/population/census_reports/ncr_pakistan.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  309. Pathak-Shelat, M., Kotilainen, S., & Hirsjärvi, I. (2015). A polycentric approach to comparative research: Reflections on an international youth media participation study. Journal of Children and Media, 9(3), 386–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.201 5.1053645 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  310. Rieger, D., Reinecke, L., Frischlich, L., & Bente, G. (2014). Media entertainment and well-being-linking hedonic and eudaimonic entertainment experience to media-induced recovery and vitality. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 456–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12097 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  311. RKI (2021). Aktuelle Daten und Informationen zu Infektionskrankheiten und public health [Current data and information on infectious diseases and public health]. https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Infekt/EpidBull/Archiv/2021/Ausgaben/06_21.pdf? blob=publicationFile Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  312. Robinson, M. J. (1976). Public affairs television and the growth of political malaise: The case of “The selling of the pentagon”. American Political Science Review, 70(2), 409– Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  313. 432. https://doi.org/10.2307/1959647 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  314. Rochyadi-Reetz, M., & Löffelholz, M. (2019). A pressing tale of two countries: Comparing the media system of Indonesia and Germany. In A. Grüne, K. Hafez, S. Priyadharma, & S. Schmidt (Eds). Media and transformation in Germany and Indonesia: Asymmetrical comparisons and perspectives (pp. 31-48). Frank et Timme. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  315. Rochyadi-Reetz, M., Maryani, E., & Agustina, A. (2020). Public’s media use and gratification sought during Corona virus outbreak in Indonesia: A national survey. Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.25008/jkiski. v5i1.381 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  316. Schemer, C. (2014). Emotional effects in political communication. In C. Reinemann (Ed.), Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  317. Political Communication (pp. 569–589). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  318. Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and riming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  319. Schuck, A. R. T. (2017). Media malaise and political cynicism. In P. Rössler, C. A. Hoffner, & L. Zoonen (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects (pp. 1–19). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0066 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  320. Schumann, C. (2018). Is topic fatigue an international problem? Four theses. Global Media Journal (German Edition), 8(2) 1-12. https://doi.org/10.22032/dbt.37780 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  321. Shehata, A. (2016). News habits among adolescents: The influence of family communication on adolescents’ news media use—Evidence from a three-wave panel study. Mass Communication and Society, 19(6), 758–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2016.1199705 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  322. Siebenhaar, K., Köther, A., & Alpers, G. (2020). Dealing with the COVID-19 infodemic: Distress by information, information avoidance, and compliance with preventive measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.567905 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  323. Skovsgaard, M., & Andersen, K. (2020). Conceptualizing news avoidance: Towards a shared understanding of different causes and potential solutions. Journalism Studies, 21(4), 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1686410 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  324. Smelser, N. J. (1976). Comparative methods in the social sciences. Prentice-Hall methods of social science series. Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  325. So, J., & Alam, N. (2019). Predictors and effects of anti-obesity message fatigue: A thought-listing analysis. Health Communication, 34(7), 755–763. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1434736 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  326. Soroya, S. H., Farooq, A., Mahmood, K., Isoaho, J., & Zara, S. (2021). From information seeking to information avoidance: Understanding the health information behavior during a global health crisis. Information Processing & Management, 58(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102440 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  327. Toff, B., & Kalogeropoulos, A. (2020). All the news that’s fit to ignore. Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(S1), 366–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa016 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  328. Toff, B., & Palmer, R. A. (2019). Explaining the gender gap in news avoidance: “News-is-for-men” perceptions and the burdens of caretaking. Journalism Studies, 20(11), 1563–1579. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1528882 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  329. Tsfati, Y. (2003). Does audience skepticism of the media matter in agenda setting? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4702_1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  330. UNDP (2020,). Human development reports. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-devel- opment-index-hdi Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  331. van den Bulck, J. (2006). Television news avoidance: Exploratory results from a one-year follow-up study. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem5002_4 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  332. Vasterman, P. (Ed.). (2018). From media hype to Twitter storm: News explosions and their impact on issues, crises and public opinion. Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt21215m0 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  333. Vermeer, S., Kruikemeier, S., Trilling, D., & Vreese, C. de (2022). Using panel data to study political interest, news media trust, and news media use in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journalism Studies, 23(5-6), 740–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616 70X.2021.2017790 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  334. Vina Fadhrotul Mukaromah (2020, June 9). Mengenal Dokter Reisa, Anggota Tim Komunikasi Gugus Tugas Percepatan Penanganan Covid-19. Kopmas.Com, https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2020/06/09/141500665/mengenal-dokter-reisa-anggota-tim-komunikasi-gugus-tugas-percepatan?page=2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  335. Vowe, G., & Wolling, J. (2001). Die Organisationsfunktion der Netzkommunikation. Wie lassen sich Unterschiede in der Nutzung von Online-Angeboten erklären? [The organizing function of internet-communication. How can differences in the use of online-services be explained?]. In U. Maier-Rabler & M. Latzer (Eds.), Kommunikationskulturen zwischen Kontinuität und Wandel: Universelle Netzwerke für die Zivilgesellschaft (pp. 269–285). UVK. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  336. We Are Social (2020). Digital 2020: Global digital overview. https://wearesocial.com/digital-2020 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  337. Wolipop (2020). Gaya dr Reisa yang bikin adem saat jumpa pers Corona, ini ciri khasnya [Here are some calming style pf Reisa (dr. med) during press release on Corona]. https://wolipop.detik.com/celeb-style/d-5104002/foto-gaya-dr-reisa-yang-bikin-adem-saat-jumpa-pers-corona-ini-ciri-khasnya?_ga=2.250396806.1682711801.1649242954-1760642998.1621429181 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  338. Wolling, J. (1999). Politikverdrossenheit durch Massenmedien? Der Einfluß der Medien auf die Einstellungen der Bürger zur Politik [Political alienation through mass media? The influence of the mass media on citizen’s attitudes towards politics]. Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  339. Wolling, J., Kuhlmann, C., Schumann, C., Berger, P., & Arlt, D. (2021). Corona 2020 – Zerreißprobe für die Gesellschaft? Persönliches Erleben und mediale Vermittlung einer multiplen Krise [Corona 2020 – crucial test for societies? Personal experience and medial mediation of a multiple crisis]. Universitätsverlag Ilmenau. https://doi.org/10.22032/dbt.48770 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  340. Wonneberger, A., Schoenbach, K., & van Meurs, L. (2013). Dimensionality of TV-news exposure: Mapping news viewing behavior with people-meter data. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(1), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/eds004 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  341. World Health Organization (2020). Advice for the public. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  342. Yamamoto, M., Kushin, M. J., & Dalisay, F. (2017). Social media and political disengagement among young adults: A moderated mediation model of cynicism, efficacy, and social media use on apathy. Mass Communication & Society, 20(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2016.1224352 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477
  343. Ytre-Arne, B., & Moe, H. (2021). Doomscrolling, monitoring and avoiding: News use in COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Journalism Studies, 22(13), 1739–1755. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1952475 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2022-3-477

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF)

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien