Party Contacts in Comparative Perspective
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Bibliographische Infos

Open Access Vollzugriff
Informationsflüsse, Wahlen und Demokratie
Festschrift für Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck
- Autor:innen:
- | | |
- Reihe
- Studien zur Wahl- und Einstellungsforschung
- Band
- 35
- Verlag
- Nomos, Baden-Baden
- Copyrightjahr
- 2023
- ISBN-Print
- 978-3-7560-0800-1
- ISBN-Online
- 978-3-7489-1555-3
Kapitelinformationen
Open Access Vollzugriff
Party Contacts in Comparative Perspective
- Autor:innen:
- ISBN-Print
- 978-3-7560-0800-1
- ISBN-Online
- 978-3-7489-1555-3
- Kapitelvorschau:
Literaturverzeichnis
Es wurden keine Treffer gefunden. Versuchen Sie einen anderen Begriff.
- References Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Aldrich, John H., Rachel K. Gibson, Marta Cantijoch, and Tobias Konitzer. 2012. “Getting Out the Vote in the Social Media Era: Are Digital Tools Changing the Extent, Nature, and Impact of Party Contacting in Elections?” Party Politics 22: 165-178. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Anderson, Christopher J., and Pablo Beramendi. 2012. “Left Parties, Poor Voters, and Electoral Participation in Advanced Industrial Societies.” Comparative Political Studies 45: 714-746. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Barnes, Samuel H. 1977. Representation in Italy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Beck, Paul A. 2022. “The Ground Game in 2020: Party Contacts as Reported by Voters,” in John C. Green. David B. Cohen, and Kenneth M. Miller (eds.), State of the Parties 2022. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp.179-195. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Beck, Paul A. 1975. “Environment and Party: The Impact of Political and Demographic County Characteristics on Party Behavior.” American Political Science Review, 68: 1229‑1244. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Beck, Paul A., Richard Gunther, and Erik Nisbet. 2018. “What Happened to the Ground Game in 2016?” in John C. Green, Daniel J. Coffey, and David B. Cohen (eds.), The State of The Parties: The Changing Role of Contemporary American Parties. Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 263-277. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Bhatti, Yosef, Jens Olav Dahlgaard, Jonas Hedegaard Hansen, and Kasper M. Hanson. 2016. “Is Door-to-Door Canvassing Effective in Europe? Evidence from a Meta-study across Six European Countries.” British Journal of Political Science 49: 279-290. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, and Jan Teorell, 2022. Dataset v10. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Cutright, Phillips. 1963. “Measuring the Impact of Local Party Activity on the General Election Vote.” Public Opinion Quarterly 27: 372-386. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Cutright, Phillips, and Peter Rossi. 1958. “Grass Roots Politicians and the Vote.” American Sociology Review 23: 171-179. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Green, Donald P., and Alan S. Gerber. 2015. Get Out the Vote: How to Increase Voter Turnout. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Green, Donald P., and Alan S. Gerber. 2016. “Voter Mobilization, Experimentation, and Translational Social Science.” Perspectives on Politics 14: 738-749. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Hill, Kim Quaile, and Jan E. Leighley. 1996. “Political Parties and Class Mobilization in Contemporary United States Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 4: 787-804. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Hooghe, Marc, Sara Vissers, Dietlind Stolle, and Valérie-Anne Maheo. 2010. “The Potential of Internet Mobilization: An Experimental Study on the Effects of Internet and Face-to-Face Mobilization Efforts.” Political Communication 27: 404-431. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Huckfeldt, Robert, and John Sprague. 1992. “Political Parties and Electoral Mobilization: Political Structure, Social Structure, and the Party Canvass.” American Political Science Review 86: 70-86. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Johnston, Ron, David Cutts, Charles Pattie, and Justin Fisher. 2012. “We’ve Got Them on the List: Contacting, Canvassing and Voting in a British General Election Campaign.” Electoral Studies 31: 317-329. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Karp, Jeffrey. 2012. “Electoral Systems, Party Mobilisation and Political Engagement.” Australian Journal of Political Science 47: 71-89. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Karp, Jeffrey, and Susan A. Banducci. 2007. “Party Mobilization and Political Participation in New and Old Democracies.” Party Politics 13: 217-234. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Karp, Jeffrey, Susan A. Banducci, and Shaun Bowler. 2007. “Getting Out the Vote: Party Mobilization in Comparative Perspective.” British Journal of Political Science 38: 91-112. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Klingelhöfer, Tristan, and Daniel Schlozman. 2018. “Between Mass Party Legacy and Catch-All Efficiency: Party Contacting in Old and New Democracies”. Paper delivered at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Krönke, Matthias, Sarah J. Lockwood, and Robert Mattes. 2022. “Who is Canvassing Whom? Party Electoral Strategies in Africa.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Montreal, Canada. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Magalhães, Pedro C., John H. Aldrich, and Rachel K. Gibson. 2020. “New Forms of Mobilization, New People Mobilized? Evidence from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems.” Party Politics 26: 605-618. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- McClurg, Scott. 2004. “Indirect Mobilization: The Social Consequences of Party Contacts in an Election Campaign.” American Politics Research 32: 406-443. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Mujami, Saiful, R. William Liddle, and Kuskridho Ambardi. 2018. Voting Behavior in Indonesia Since Democratization. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Nuñes, Lucas. 2021. “The Effects of Local Campaigning in Great Britain.” Electoral Studies 73: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102384. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Panagopoulos, Costas. 2016. “All About That Base: Changing Campaign Strategies in U.S. Presidential Elections.” Party Politics 22: 179-190. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Riccardo, Ladini. 2021. “The Differentiated Effects of Direct Mobilization on Turnout: Evidence from the 2013 Austrian Parliamentary Elections.” German Politics 30: 267-296. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Rohrschneider, Robert. 2002. “Mobilizing versus Changing: How Do Parties Target Voters in Election Campaigns.” Electoral Studies 21: 367-382. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Rosenstone, Steven J., and John Mark Hansen. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Sudulich, Laura, and Siim Trumm. 2019. “A Comparative Study of the Effects of Electoral Institutions on Campaigns.” British Journal of Political Science 49-381-399. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
- Vaccari, Cristian. 2017. “Online Mobilization in Comparative Perspective: Digital Appeals and Political Engagement in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom.” Political Communication 34: 69-88. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289