Party Contacts in Comparative Perspective

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos


Cover des Buchs: Informationsflüsse, Wahlen und Demokratie
Open Access Vollzugriff

Informationsflüsse, Wahlen und Demokratie

Festschrift für Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck


Autor:innen:
Reihe
Studien zur Wahl- und Einstellungsforschung
Band
35
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2023
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0800-1
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-1555-3

Kapitelinformationen


Open Access Vollzugriff

Party Contacts in Comparative Perspective


Autor:innen:
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0800-1
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-1555-3


Kapitelvorschau:

Literaturverzeichnis


  1. References Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  2. Aldrich, John H., Rachel K. Gibson, Marta Cantijoch, and Tobias Konitzer. 2012. “Getting Out the Vote in the Social Media Era: Are Digital Tools Changing the Extent, Nature, and Impact of Party Contacting in Elections?” Party Politics 22: 165-178. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  3. Anderson, Christopher J., and Pablo Beramendi. 2012. “Left Parties, Poor Voters, and Electoral Participation in Advanced Industrial Societies.” Comparative Political Studies 45: 714-746. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  4. Barnes, Samuel H. 1977. Representation in Italy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  5. Beck, Paul A. 2022. “The Ground Game in 2020: Party Contacts as Reported by Voters,” in John C. Green. David B. Cohen, and Kenneth M. Miller (eds.), State of the Parties 2022. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp.179-195. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  6. Beck, Paul A. 1975. “Environment and Party: The Impact of Political and Demo­graphic County Characteris­tics on Party Behav­ior.” American Political Science Review, 68: 1229‑1244. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  7. Beck, Paul A., Richard Gunther, and Erik Nisbet. 2018. “What Happened to the Ground Game in 2016?” in John C. Green, Daniel J. Coffey, and David B. Cohen (eds.), The State of The Parties: The Changing Role of Contemporary American Parties. Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 263-277. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  8. Bhatti, Yosef, Jens Olav Dahlgaard, Jonas Hedegaard Hansen, and Kasper M. Hanson. 2016. “Is Door-to-Door Canvassing Effective in Europe? Evidence from a Meta-study across Six European Countries.” British Journal of Political Science 49: 279-290. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  9. Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, and Jan Teorell, 2022. Dataset v10. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  10. Cutright, Phillips. 1963. “Measuring the Impact of Local Party Activity on the General Election Vote.” Public Opinion Quarterly 27: 372-386. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  11. Cutright, Phillips, and Peter Rossi. 1958. “Grass Roots Politicians and the Vote.” American Sociology Review 23: 171-179. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  12. Green, Donald P., and Alan S. Gerber. 2015. Get Out the Vote: How to Increase Voter Turnout. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  13. Green, Donald P., and Alan S. Gerber. 2016. “Voter Mobilization, Experimentation, and Translational Social Science.” Perspectives on Politics 14: 738-749. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  14. Hill, Kim Quaile, and Jan E. Leighley. 1996. “Political Parties and Class Mobilization in Contemporary United States Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 4: 787-804. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  15. Hooghe, Marc, Sara Vissers, Dietlind Stolle, and Valérie-Anne Maheo. 2010. “The Potential of Internet Mobilization: An Experimental Study on the Effects of Internet and Face-to-Face Mobilization Efforts.” Political Communication 27: 404-431. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  16. Huckfeldt, Robert, and John Sprague. 1992. “Political Parties and Electoral Mobilization: Political Structure, Social Structure, and the Party Canvass.” American Political Science Review 86: 70-86. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  17. Johnston, Ron, David Cutts, Charles Pattie, and Justin Fisher. 2012. “We’ve Got Them on the List: Contacting, Canvassing and Voting in a British General Election Campaign.” Electoral Studies 31: 317-329. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  18. Karp, Jeffrey. 2012. “Electoral Systems, Party Mobilisation and Political Engagement.” Australian Journal of Political Science 47: 71-89. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  19. Karp, Jeffrey, and Susan A. Banducci. 2007. “Party Mobilization and Political Participation in New and Old Democracies.” Party Politics 13: 217-234. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  20. Karp, Jeffrey, Susan A. Banducci, and Shaun Bowler. 2007. “Getting Out the Vote: Party Mobilization in Comparative Perspective.” British Journal of Political Science 38: 91-112. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  21. Klingelhöfer, Tristan, and Daniel Schlozman. 2018. “Between Mass Party Legacy and Catch-All Efficiency: Party Contacting in Old and New Democracies”. Paper delivered at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  22. Krönke, Matthias, Sarah J. Lockwood, and Robert Mattes. 2022. “Who is Canvassing Whom? Party Electoral Strategies in Africa.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Montreal, Canada. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  23. Magalhães, Pedro C., John H. Aldrich, and Rachel K. Gibson. 2020. “New Forms of Mobilization, New People Mobilized? Evidence from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems.” Party Politics 26: 605-618. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  24. McClurg, Scott. 2004. “Indirect Mobilization: The Social Consequences of Party Contacts in an Election Campaign.” American Politics Research 32: 406-443. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  25. Mujami, Saiful, R. William Liddle, and Kuskridho Ambardi. 2018. Voting Behavior in Indonesia Since Democratization. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  26. Nuñes, Lucas. 2021. “The Effects of Local Campaigning in Great Britain.” Electoral Studies 73: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102384. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  27. Panagopoulos, Costas. 2016. “All About That Base: Changing Campaign Strategies in U.S. Presidential Elections.” Party Politics 22: 179-190. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  28. Riccardo, Ladini. 2021. “The Differentiated Effects of Direct Mobilization on Turnout: Evidence from the 2013 Austrian Parliamentary Elections.” German Politics 30: 267-296. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  29. Rohrschneider, Robert. 2002. “Mobilizing versus Changing: How Do Parties Target Voters in Election Campaigns.” Electoral Studies 21: 367-382. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  30. Rosenstone, Steven J., and John Mark Hansen. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  31. Sudulich, Laura, and Siim Trumm. 2019. “A Comparative Study of the Effects of Electoral Institutions on Campaigns.” British Journal of Political Science 49-381-399. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289
  32. Vaccari, Cristian. 2017. “Online Mobilization in Comparative Perspective: Digital Appeals and Political Engagement in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom.” Political Communication 34: 69-88. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-289

Zitation


Download RIS Download BibTex