The Digital Revolution in the Social Sciences: Five Theses about Big Data and Other Recent Methodological Innovations from an Analytical Sociologist

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos


Cover des Buchs: Soziologie des Digitalen - Digitale Soziologie?
Open Access Vollzugriff

Soziologie des Digitalen - Digitale Soziologie?

Soziale Welt - Sonderband 23


Autor:innen:
Reihe
Sonderheft Soziale Welt
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2020
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-5323-9
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-9500-8

Kapitelinformationen


Open Access Vollzugriff

The Digital Revolution in the Social Sciences: Five Theses about Big Data and Other Recent Methodological Innovations from an Analytical Sociologist


Autor:innen:
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-5323-9
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-9500-8


Kapitelvorschau:

In recent years, both scholars and policy-makers place big hopes in the emerging fields of data science and computational social science to solve not only academic puzzles, but also to cure many “real-world” problems in a wide range of areas such as health, crime, and poverty. In this paper, we re-evaluate these claims, highlight current problems of these nascent fields, and show what sociology has to contribute to and can gain from the digital revolution in the social sciences. We thereby focus on analytical sociology - a field at the intersection of classical sociology and modern computational social science, which places a strong emphasis on mechanism-based explanations and rigorous empirical analyses. In a nutshell, we argue that sociology has to bring a lot to the table with important contributions concerning not only substantive research questions, but also theoretical insights and methodological skills. Both sides - not only sociology, but also data science - could thus substantially profit from a closer exchange, while some problems still remain that hinder an even more fruitful collaboration.

Literaturverzeichnis


  1. Anderson, Chris (2008): The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. Wired; 23.8.2008, Link: http:// www. wired. com/ 2008 / 06 / pb-theory/ (retrieved: 9.2.2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  2. Borgman, Christine L. (2014): Big Data, Little Data and Beyond. Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  3. Boyd, Danah/Crawford, Kate (2012): Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication and Society 15(5): 662-79. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  4. Burrows, Roger/Savage, Mike (2014): After the crisis? Big Data and the methodological challenges of empirical sociology. Big Data & Society 1(1): 1-6. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  5. Callegaro, Mario (2016): Keynote "Importance of surveys in the era of big data", Kickoff Meeting International Program in Survey and Data Science, University of Mannheim, 20.2.2016. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  6. Centola, Damon (2018): How Behavior Spreads. The Science of Complex Contagions. Princeton. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  7. Connelly, Roxanne/Playford, Christopher J./Gayle, Vernon/Dibben, Chris (2016): The role of administrative data in the big data revolution in social science research. Social Science Research 59: 1-12. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  8. Couldry, Nick/Turow, Joseph (2014): Advertising, big data and the clearance of the public realm: marketers’ new approaches to the content subsidy. International Journal of Communication 8: 1710-1726. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  9. Deaton, Angus (2010): Instruments, randomization, and learning about development. Journal of Economic Literature 48(2): 424-55. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  10. Diekmann, Andreas/Jann, Ben/Przepiorka, Wojtek/Wehrli, Stefan (2014): Reputation formation and the evolution of cooperation in anonymous online markets. American Sociological Review 79(1): 65-85. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  11. Eagle, Nathan/Greene, Kate (2014): Reality Mining: Using Big Data to Engineer a Better World. Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  12. Gelman, Andrew/Carlin, John B./Stern, Hal S./Dunson, David B./Vehtari, Aki/Rubin, Donald Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  13. A. (2013): Bayesian Data Analysis (3rd edition). London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  14. Giles, Jim (2012): Making the links: From e-mails to social networks, the digital traces left life in the modern world are transforming social science. Nature 488: 448-50. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  15. Gill, Jeff (2014): Bayesian Methods: A Social and Behavioral Sciences Approach (3rd edition). London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  16. Gitelman, Lisa (2013): Raw Data is an Oxymoron. Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  17. Golder, Scott/Macy, Michael (2014): Digital footprints: Opportunities and challenges for online social research. Annual Review of Sociology. 40:6.1-6.24 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  18. González-Bailón (2013): Social science in the era of big data. Policy & Internet 5(2): 147-160. González-Bailón (2017): Decoding the Social World: Data Science and the Unintended Conse- Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  19. quences of Communication. Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  20. González-Bailón, Sandra/Wang, Ning/Rivero, Alejandro/Borge-Holthoefer, Javier/Moreno, Yamir (2014): Assessing the bias in samples of large online networks. Social Networks 38:16-27. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  21. Grimmer, Justin (2015): We are all social scientists now: How big data, machine learning, and causal inference work together. Political Science & Politics 48(1): 80-83. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  22. Guimera, Roger/Uzzi, Brian/Spiro, Jarrett/Amaral, Luis A.Nunes (2005): Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science 308(5722): 697-702. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  23. Haase, Knut/Al Abideen, Habib Zain/Al-Bosta, Salim/Kasper, Mathias/Koch, Matthes/Müller, Sven/Helbing, Dirk (2016): Improving pilgrim safety during the Hajj: An analytical and operational research approach. Interfaces 46(1): 74-90. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  24. Harron, Katie/Goldstein, Harvey/Dibben, Chris (eds.) (2016): Methodological Developments in Data Linkage. Chichester. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  25. Hedström, Peter/Bearman, Peter (eds.) (2009): The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  26. Helbing, Dirk/Frey, Bruno S./Gigerenzer, Gerd/Hafen, Ernst/Hagner, Michael/Hofstetter, Yvonne/van den Hoven, Jeroen/Zicari, Roberto V./Zwitter, Andrej (2016): Digitale Demokratie statt Datendiktatur. Spektrum der Wissenschaft 2016.1: 50-58. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  27. Jackman, Simon (2009): Bayesian Analysis for the Social Sciences. New York. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  28. Keuschnigg, Marc/Lovsjö, Niclas/Hedström, Peter (2018): Analytical sociology and computational social science. Journal of Computational Social Science 1(1):3-14. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  29. King, Gary/Keohane, Robert O./Verba, Sidney (1994): Designing Social Inquiry. Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  30. Kreuter, Frauke (ed.) (2013): Improving Surveys with Paradata: Analytic Uses of Process Information. Hoboken, NJ. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  31. Lazer, David/Kennedy, Ryan/King, Gary/Vespignani, Alessandro (2014): The parable of Google Flu: Traps in big data analysis. Science 343(6176): 1203-1205. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  32. Legewie, Joscha/Schaeffer, Merlin (2016): Contested boundaries: Explaining where and when ethno-racial diversity provokes neighborhood conflict. American Journal of Sociology 122(1): 125-161. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  33. Lewis, Kevin/Kaufman, Jason/Gonzalez, Marco/Wimmer, Andreas/Christakis, Nicholas (2008): Tastes, ties, and time: A new social network dataset using facebook.com. Social Networks 30(4): 330-342. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  34. Lewis, Kevin/Gonzalez, Marco/Kaufman, Jason (2012): Social selection and peer influence in an online social network. PNAS 109: 68-72. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  35. Light, Richard J./Singer, Judith D./Willett, John B. (1990): By Design. Planning Research on Higher Education. Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  36. Manski, Charles F. (1993): Identification of endogenous social effects: the reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies 60(3): 531-42 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  37. Martin, Travis/Hofman, Jake M./Sharma, Amit/Anderson, Ashton/Watts, Duncan J. (2016): Exploring limits to prediction in complex social systems: Predicting cascade size on Twitter. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  38. Mayer-Schonberger, Viktor/Cukier, Kenneth (2013): Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work and Think. London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  39. Morgan, Stephen L./Christopher Winship (2015), Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research (2nd edition). Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  40. Moussaid Mehdi/Helbing, Dirk/Guy, Theraulaz (2011): How simple rules determine pedestrian behavior and crowd disasters. PNAS 108: 6884-6888. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  41. Murdoch, Travis B./Detsky, Allan S. (2013): The inevitable application of big data to health care. Journal of the American Medical Association 309(13): 1351-1352. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  42. Nagel, Ernst (1963): Assumptions in economic theory. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 53(2): 211-19. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  43. O’Brien, Daniel/Sampson, Robert J./Winship, Christopher (2015): Ecometrics in the Age of Big Data: Measuring and Assessing ‘Broken Windows’ Using Large-scale Administrative Records. Sociological Methodology 45: 101-147. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  44. Rosenbaum, Paul R. (2010): Design of Observational Studies. München. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  45. Rubin, Donald B./Little, Roderick J.A. (2002): Statistical Analysis with Missing Data (2nd edition). New York. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  46. Ruths, Derek/Pfeffer, Jürgen (2014): Social media for large studies of behavior. Science 346(6213): 1063-1064. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  47. Salganik, Matthew J. (2017): Bit by Bit: Social Research in the Digital Age. Princeton. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  48. Salganik, Matthew J./Dodds, Peter Sheridan/Watts, Duncan J. (2006): Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 311(5762): 854-856. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  49. Savage, Mike/Burrows, Roger (2007): The coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology 41(5): 885-899. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  50. Schich, Maximilian/Song, Chaoming/Ahn, Yong-Yeol/Mirsky, Alexander/Martino, Mauro/ Barabási, Albert-László/Helbing, Dirk (2014): A network framework of cultural history. Science 345(6196): 558-562. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  51. Shaw, Jonathan (2014): Why “big data”. Harvard Business Magazine March/April: 30-35 and 74-75. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  52. Silver, Nate (2012): The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail - But Some Don’t. London. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  53. Van de Rijt, Arnout/Kang, Soong Moon/Restivo, Michael/Patil, Akshay (2014): Field experiments of success-breeds-success dynamics. PNAS 111: 6934-6939. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60
  54. Watts, Duncan J. (2014): Common sense and sociological explanations. American Journal of Sociology 120(2): 313-351. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845295008-60

Zitation


Download RIS Download BibTex