Gendered flight constellations and family-reunion intentions of female refugees from Ukraine: Evidence from a representative survey in Germany

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover der Ausgabe: Culture, Practice & Europeanization Jahrgang 8 (2023), Heft 2
Open Access Vollzugriff

Culture, Practice & Europeanization

Jahrgang 8 (2023), Heft 2

Autor:innen:
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2023
ISSN-Online
2566-7742
ISSN-Print
2566-7742

Kapitelinformationen

Open Access Vollzugriff

Jahrgang 8 (2023), Heft 2

Gendered flight constellations and family-reunion intentions of female refugees from Ukraine: Evidence from a representative survey in Germany

Autor:innen:
ISSN-Print
2566-7742
ISSN-Online
2566-7742
Kapitelvorschau:

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Abdelaaty, L. E. (2021). Discrimination and delegation: Explaining state responses to refugees. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  2. Ahmed, S. (2007). A Phenomenology of Whiteness. Feminist Theory, 8(2), 149–168. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  3. Ahmed, S., Castañeda, C., Fortier, A-M. & Scheller, M. (2003). Introduction: Up-rootings/Regroundings: Questions of Home and Migration. In S. Ahmed, C. Castañeda, A-M. Fortier & M. Sheller (Eds.), Uprootings/Regroundings. Questions of Home and Migration (1–19), Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  4. Baldassar, L. (2015). Guilty feelings and the guilt trip: Emotions and motivation in migration and transnational caregiving. Emotion, Space and Society 16, 81–89. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  5. Bernt, M., Hamann, U., El-Kayed, N. & Keskinkilic, L. (2022). Internal Migration Industries: Shap-ing the Housing Options for Refugees at the Local Level. Urban Studies 59(11), 2217–2233. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  6. Boccagni, P. & Baldassar, L. (2015). Emotions on the move: Mapping the emergent field of emo-tion and migration. Emotion, Space and Society 16 (August), 73–80. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  7. Costello, C. & Foster, M. (2022). (Some) refugees welcome: When is differentiating between ref-ugees unlawful discrimination? International Journal of Discrimination and the Law 22(3), 244–280. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  8. Crawley, H. & Skleparis, D. (2018). Refugees, migrants, neither, both: categorical fetishism and the politics of bounding in Europe’s ‘migration crisis’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44(1), 48–64. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  9. Divercities (2014). European Policy Brief No 2: Governing Diversity. Retrieved from: https://zenodo.org/records/437925 (last accessed: 2023, October 30). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  10. Drewski, D. & Gerhards, J. (2020). The Liberal Border Script and Its Contestations: An Attempt of Definition and Systematization. SCRIPTS Working Paper No. 4. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  11. El-Kayed, N. & Hamann, U. (2018). Refugees’ Access to Housing and Residency in German Cities: Internal Border Regimes and Their Local Variations. Social Inclusion 6(1), 135–146. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  12. El-Mafaalani, A., Jording, J. & Massumi, M. (2020). Bildung und Flucht. In U. Bauer, U.H. Bittling-mayer & A. Scherr (Eds.), Handbuch Bildungs- und Erziehungssoziologie (1–19). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  13. Emmerich, M., Hormel, U. & Jording, J. (2016). Des-/Integration durch Bildung? Flucht und Mig-ration als Bezugsprobleme kommunalen Bildungsmanagements. Neue Praxis Sonderheft 13, 115–125. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  14. European Council/Council of the European Union (n.d.): Infographic – Refugees from Ukraine in the EU. Retrieved from: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/infographics/ukraine-refugees-eu/ (last accessed: 2023, October 30). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  15. Eurostat (2023a). Asylum and first time asylum applicants – annual aggregated data (round-ed). Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tps00191/default/table?lang=en (last ac-cessed: 2023, July 13). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  16. Eurostat (2023b). Beneficiaries of temporary protection at the end of the month by citizenship, age and sex – monthly data. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/MIGR_ASYTPSM__custom_5996564/bookmark/table?lang=en&bookmarkId=c1c734bb-fa84-49d0-a163-7b5d911990d6 (last accessed: 2023, July 8). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  17. FitzGerald, D. S. (2019). Refuge beyond Reach: How Rich Democracies Repel Asylum Seekers. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  18. Grittmann, E., Hess, S., Koopmann, U. & Schwenken, H. (2023). Gender, Flucht, Aufnahmepoliti-ken: Die vergeschlechtlichte In- und Exklusion geflüchteter Frauen*. In N. Akdemir, J. Elle, E. Gri-ttmann, S. Hess, U. Koppmann, D. Müller, H. Schwenken, H. Pınar Şenoğuz & J. Ullmann (Eds.), Gender, Flucht, Aufnahmepolitiken: Die vergeschlechtlichte In- und Exklusion geflüchteter Frau-en (1–32). Wiesbaden: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  19. Grzymala-Kazlowska, A. (2018). From connecting to social anchoring: adaptation and ‘settle-ment’ of Polish migrants in the UK. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(2), 252–269. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  20. Hess, S. & Elle, J. (2023). ‚Sind wir hier sicher?‘ Dynamiken und Fallstricke in den Genderdiskursen der Unterbringungspolitik. In N. Akdemir, J. Elle, E. Grittmann, S. Hess, U. Koppmann, D. Müller, H. Schwenken, H. Pınar Şenoğuz & J. Ullmann (Eds.), Gender, Flucht, Aufnahmepolitiken: Die vergeschlechtlichte In- und Exklusion geflüchteter Frauen (77–113). Wiesbaden: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  21. Hamlin, R. (2021). Crossing: How We Label and React to People on the Move. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  22. Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85(3), 551–575. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  23. Hutter, S. & Kriesi, H. (2022). Politicising immigration in times of crisis. Journal fo Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(2), 341–365. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  24. Kreichauf, R. (2018). From forced migration to forced arrival: the campization of refugee accom-modation in European cities. Comparative Migration Studies, 6(1), 7. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  25. Lutz, H. & Amelina, A. (2021). Gender in Migration Studies: From Feminist Legacies to Intersec-tional, Post- and Decolonial Prospects. Zeitschrift Für Migrationsforschung, 1(1), 55–73. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  26. Mau, S. (2023). Sorting Machines: The Reinvention of the Border in the 21st Century. Cam-bridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  27. Mayblin, L. & Turner, J. (2020). Migration Studies and Colonialism. Cambridge, UK: Medford, MA: Polity. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  28. Niemann, A. & Zaun, N. (2018). EU Refugee Policies and Politics in Times of Crisis: Theo-retical and Empirical Perspectives. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(1), 3–33. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  29. Scharrer, T., Glorius, B., Kleist, J.O. & Berlinghoff, M. (2023). Flucht- und Flüchtlingsforschung: Handbuch für Wissenschaft und Studium. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  30. Schimmelfennig, F. (2018) Liberal Intergovernmentalism and the Crises of the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(7), 1578–94. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  31. Shachar, A. (2020). The Shifting Border: Legal Cartographies of Migration and Mobility. Ayelet Shachar in Dialogue. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  32. Slaby, J. & von Scheve, C. (2019). Introduction: Affective Societies – key concepts. In J. Slaby & C. von Scheve (Eds.), Affective Societies. Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  33. Torpey, J. (1998). Coming and Going: On the State Monopolization of the Legitimate “Means of Movement”. Sociological Theory, 16(3), 239–259. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  34. UNHCR (2023). Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2022. Retrieved from: https://www.unhcr.org/global-trends-report-2022 (last accessed: 2023, September 28). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  35. Vermot, C. (2015). Guilt: A gendered bond within the transnational family. Emotion, Space and Society, 16 (August), 138–146. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  36. Vey, J. & Gunsch, S. (2021). Unterbringung von Flüchtenden in Deutschland: Inklusion, Exklusi-on, Partizipation? Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-153
  37. Ansa (2023, September 26). Meloni scrive a Scholz: ‘Stupita dagli aiuti alle ONG’. Retrieved from: https://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/politica/2023/09/25/migranti-meloni-a-scholz-stupita-dai-fondi-non-coordinati-alle-ong._520117df-c228-4fde-b30f-667ccafbe90f.html (last accessed: 2023, October 16). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  38. Alagna, F. & Cusumano, E. (2023). Varieties of criminalization. Italy’s evolving approach to policing sea rescue NGOs. Contemporary Italian Politics, 1–10. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  39. Aragno, G. & Trasi, C. (2021). Search and Rescue Gone Adrift: A Magnet for Migration or a Lifesaver? PhD thesis. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  40. Bauböck, R. (1997). Notwendige Öffnung und legitime Schließung liberaler Demokratien. European Journal of Sociology, 38, 71–103. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  41. Catena Mancuso, M. & Signorelli, V. (2022). Heroes or criminals? The legitimacy of humanitarian organizations rescuing lives in the Central Mediterranean Sea after 2017. Journal of Italian Cinema and Media Studies, 10(1), 37–58. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  42. Carrera, S. & Cortinovis, R. (2019). Search and rescue, disembarkation and relocation arrangements in the Mediterranean. Sailing Away from Responsibility? (CEPS Paper in Liberty and Security in Europe). Retrieved from: http://aei.pitt.edu/100390/1/LSE2019-10_ReSoma_Sailing-Away-from-Responsibility.pdf (last accessed: 2023, July 24). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  43. Ceccorulli, M. (2019). Beyond a statecentric right to protect human rights. Operation Mediterranea by land and sea (The EU-blog). Retrieved from: https://sciencenorway.no/blog-eu-blog/beyond-a-state-centric-right-to-protect-human-rights-operation-mediterranea-by-land-and-sea/1584159 (last accessed: 2023, June 21). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  44. Cervi, L., Tejedor, S. & Dornelles, M. A. (2020). When Populists Govern the Country: Strategies of Legitimization of Anti-Immigration Policies in Salvini’s Italy. Sustainability, 12, 1–12. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  45. Chianese, M. (2023). The Role of Flag States of NGO Vessels under Italy’s New Migration Policy. The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law, 3(1), 185–199. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  46. Cusumano, E. (2017). Straightjacketing Migrant Rescuers? The Code of Conduct on Maritime NGOs. Mediterranean Politics, 24(1), 106–114. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  47. Cusumano, E. & Gombeer, K. (2020). In deep waters: The legal, humanitarian and political implications of closing Italian ports to migrant rescuers. Mediterranean Politics, 25(2), 245253. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  48. Cusumano, E. & Villa, M. (2021). From “Angels” to “Vice Smugglers”. The Criminalization of Sea Rescue NGOs in Italy. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 27(1), 23–40. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  49. Cusumano, E. & Bell, F. (2021). Guilt by association? The criminalisation of sea rescue NGOs in Italian media. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(19), 4285–4307. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  50. Cuttitta, P. (2017). Repoliticization Through Search and Rescue? Humanitarian NGOs and Migration Management in the Central Mediterranean. Geopolitics, 23(3), 632–660. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  51. Cuttitta, P. & Last, T. (2020). Border Deaths. Causes, Dynamics and Consequences of Migration-related Mortality. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  52. Der Spiegel (20231, June 14). Auswärtiges Amt blockiert Millionenhilfe für zivile Seenotretter. Retrieved from: https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/annalena-baerbock-in-der-kritik-auswaertiges-amt-blockiert-millionenhilfe-fuer-zivile-seenotretter-a-a4797f76-524c-4a7c-bcb1-d59dfaa9939a (last accessed: 2023, June 28). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  53. Der Spiegel (20232, October 10). Scholz distanziert sich von öffentlicher Finanzierung der Seenotrettung. Retrieved from: https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/scholz-distanziert-sich-von-oeffentlicher-finanzierung-von-seenotrettung-a-f28b10b8-f46f-477a-972f-66415ffbb746?sara_ref=re-xx-cp-sh (last accessed: 2023, October 16). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  54. de Wilde, P., Koopmans, R., Merkel, W., Strijbis, O. & Zürn, M. (2019). The Struggle over Borders. Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  55. Düvell, F., Triandafyllidou, A. & Vollmer, B. (2008). Ethical issues in irregular migration research. Project Clandestino. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/migrant-integration/sites/default/files/2009-07/docl_9062_895712459.pdf (last accessed: 2023, October 21). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  56. Ehrmann, J. (2021). Schwarzes Mittelmeer, weißes Europa. Kolonialität, Rassismus und die Grenzen der Demokratie. Zeitschrift für Praktische Philosophie, 8(1), 419–466. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  57. Expert-Council-on-NGO-Law. (2023). Opinion on the Compatibility with European Standards of Italian Decree Law No. 1 of 2 January 2023 on the Management of Migratory Flows. Retrieved from: https://rm.coe.int/expert-council-conf-exp-2023-opinion-italy-30-jan-2023-en/1680a9fe26 (last accessed: 2023, July 19). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  58. Farahat, A. & Markard, N. (2020). Places of Safety in the Mediterranean. The EU’s Policy of Outsourcing Responsibility. Brussels: Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  59. Federal-Foreign-Office. (2023). Talking about European solutions: civil society perspectives on sea rescues in the Mediterranean. Retrieved from: https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/en/aussenpolitik/themen/krisenpraevention/seenotrettung-sar-kontaktgruppe/2599076 (last accessed: 2023, July 19). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  60. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (2023, June 17). Ärzte ohne Grenzen boykottiert Gelder aus Brüssel. Retrieved from: https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/fluechtlingskrise/aerzte-ohne-grenzen-nimmt-kein-geld-mehr-von-eu-und-mitgliedstaaten-14293982.html (last accessed: 2023, July 19). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  61. Funke, B. (2018). Shaping the Discourse: How Search and Rescue NGOs Got Under Fire in the Debate on Migration. Sicherheit und Frieden (S+F) / Security and Peace, 36(3), 159–164. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  62. Gebhardt, M. (2020). To Make Live and Let Die. On Sovereignty and Vulnerability in the EU Migration Regime. Redescriptions. Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory, 23(2), 120–137. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  63. Hamann, U. & Karakayali, S. (2016). Practicing Willkommenskultur. Migration and Solidarity in Germany. Intersections, 2(4), 69–86. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  64. Il Giornale (2023, 10.01.). "Navi private non sono lo Stato". Piantedosi tira dritto sul decreto migranti. Retrieved from: https://www.ilgiornale.it/news/interni/navi-private-non-si-possono-sostituire-stato-piantedosi-tira-2103709.html (last accessed: 2023, July 19). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  65. Irrera, D. (2016). Migrants, the EU and NGOs. The ‘Practice’ of Non-Governmental SAR Operations. Romanian Journal of European Affairs, 16(3), 20–35. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  66. Reuters (2023, 17.01.). Italy's migrant rescue ship decree should be scrapped, Catholic bishop says. Retrieved from: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/italys-migrant-rescue-ship-decree-should-be-scrapped-catholic-bishop-2023-01-17/ (last accessed: 2023, July 19). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  67. Laube, L. & Eisleb, J. (2021). Ausgebremst trotz wachsender zivilgesellschaftlicher Unterstützung. Die zivile Seenotrettung im ersten Jahr der Coronapandemie (FluchtforschungsBlog). Retrieved from: https://fluchtforschung.net/blogbeitraege/ausgebremst-trotz-wachsender-zivilgesellschaftlicher-unterstutzung/ (last accessed: 2023, July 11). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  68. Laube, L. & Ullrich, M. (forthcoming). Über die Rettung Flüchtender hin zu politischer Inklusion? Handlungsfelder von SAR-NGOs im zentralen Mittelmeer. In R. Pates & D. Oğuzhan (Eds.), Identität und Repräsentation. Analysen über den Zustand der Demokratie. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  69. Mann, I. (2020). The Right to Perform Rescue at Sea. Jurisprudence and Drowning. German Law Journal, 21(3), 598–619. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  70. Mann, I. & Mourão Permoser, J. (2022). Floating sanctuaries. The ethics of search and rescue at sea. Migration Studies, 10(3), 442–463. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  71. MSF (2023, 07.03.). Appeal lodged against illegitimate detention of MSF rescue ship (Press release). Retrieved from: https://www.msf.org/appeal-lodged-against-detention-msf-rescue-ship (last accessed: 2023, June 19). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  72. Pahlke, J. & Demir, H. (2023). Appellbrief Deutscher Bundestagsabgeordneter an das Parlament der Italienischen Republik. Retrieved from: https://carolinwagner.bayern/news/appellbrief-deutscher-bundestagsabgeordneter-an-das-parlament-der-italienischen-republik/ (last accessed: 2023, July 21). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  73. Paulitsch, A. (2023 forthcoming). Zivile Seenotrettung im zentralen Mittelmeer. Politischer Druck auf Search and Rescue-NGOs und seine Folgen. In K. Bräuer (Ed.), Maritime Konflikte und Verheißungsformen in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  74. Rodriguez Sanchez, A., Wucherpfennig, J., Rischke, R., & Iacus, S. M. (2023). Search-and-rescue in the Central Mediterranean Route does not induce migration: Predictive modeling to answer causal queries in migration research. Sci Rep, 13(1), 11014. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  75. Schwenken, H. & Schwiertz, H. (2021). Transversale und inklusive Solidaritäten im Kontext politischer Mobilisierungen für sichere Fluchtwege und gegen Abschiebungen. In Nach der »Willkommenskultur«. Geflüchtete zwischen umkämpfter Teilhabe und zivilgesellschaftlicher Solidarität (165–192). Bielefeld: transcript Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  76. SOS-Humanity (2023, January 5). Joint statement by search and rescue organisations: More deaths in the Mediterranean Sea due to Italian government’s new decree (Press release). Retrieved from: https://sos-humanity.org/en/press/joint-statement-by-search-and-rescue-organisations/ (last accessed: 2023, July 19). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  77. SPD, Bündnis 90/Die Grüne & FDP (2021). Mehr Fortschritt wagen. Bündnis für Freiheit, Gerechtigkeit und Nachhaltigkeit (Coalition agreement). Retrieved from: https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/service/gesetzesvorhaben/koalitionsvertrag-2021-1990800 (last accessed: 2023, October 21). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  78. Stierl, M. (2018). A Fleet of Mediterranean Border Humanitarians. Antipode, 50(3), 704–724. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  79. Sutter, O. (2017). “Welcome!”. The emotional politics of voluntary work with refugees. Journal of European Ethnology and Cultural Analysis, 2(1), 5–25. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  80. Tazzioli, M. & Stierl, M. (2021). “We Closed the Ports to Protect Refugees.” Hygienic Borders and Deterrence Humanitarianism during Covid-19. International Political Sociology, 15(4), 539–558. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-166
  81. Al Khlefawi, R., Al Shallal, N. & Khan, A. (2021). “Wir sind nicht bereit, unseren Platz hier zu verlie-ren. Weil es unser Zuhause ist, es ist unser Leben. ” Interview mit Mitbegründer:innen der Moni-toring Group (geführt von Judith Vey und Salome Gunsch). In J. Vey & S. Gunsch (Eds.). Unter-bringung von Flüchtenden in Deutschland. Inklusion, Exklusion, Partizipation? (229–244). Ba-den-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  82. Balibar, É. (2015). Borderland Europe and the challenge of migration. openDemocracy. Retrieved from: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/can-europe-make-it/borderland-europe-and-challenge-of-migration/ (last ac-cessed: 2023, July 17). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  83. Balibar, É. (2002). Politics and the Other Scene. London/New York: Verso. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  84. BAMF (2023): Sichere Herkunftsstaaten. Retrieved from: https://www.bamf.de/DE/Themen/AsylFluechtlingsschutz/Sonderverfahren/SichereHerkunftsstaaten/sichereherkunftsstaaten-node.html (last accessed: 2023, November 8). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  85. Blank, M. (2021). Unterbringung im Grenzregime – Grenzen im Unterbringungsregime: Kommu-nale Anschlussunterbringung in Frankfurt am Main. In J. Vey & S. Gunsch (Eds.), Unterbringung von Flüchtenden in Deutschland. Inklusion, Exklusion, Partizipation? (21–50). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  86. Bayerischer Füchtlingsrat (2020a): Sachleistungsprinzip. Retrieved from: https://www.fluechtlingsrat-bayern.de/hintergrund/sachleistungsprinzip-2/ (last accessed: 2023, November 8). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  87. Bayerischer Flüchtlingsrat (2020b): Standorte der bayerischen ANKER-Zentren. Retrieved from: https://www.fluechtlingsrat-bayern.de/hintergrund/standorte-der-bayerischen-anker-zentren/ (last accessed: 2023, November 8). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  88. Brand, U. & Wissen, M. (2017): Imperiale Lebensweise. Zur Ausbeutung von Mensch und Natur im globalen Kapitalismus, München: oekom verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  89. Cassidy, K., Yuval-Davis, N. & Wemyss, G. (2018). Debordering and everyday (re)bordering in and of Dover: Post-borderland borderscapes. Political Geography, 66, 171–179. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  90. Deutsches Institut für Menschenrechte (2017). Entwicklung der Menschenrechtssituation in Deutschland Juli 2016 – Juni 2017. Bericht an den Deutschen Bundestag gemäß § 2 Absatz 5 DIMRG, Berlin. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  91. Devlin, J. (2021). ANKER : KASERNE : FABRIK. Zur Architektur sozialer Kontrolle. In J. Devlin, T. Evers, & S. Goebel (Eds.), Praktiken der (Im-)Mobilisierung. Lager, Sammelunterkünfte und An-kerzentren im Kontext von Asylregimen (137–152). Bielefeld: transcript. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  92. Devlin, J., Evers, T. & Goebel, S. (Eds.) (2021). Praktiken der (Im-)Mobilisierung. Lager, Sammel-unterkünfte und Ankerzentren im Kontext von Asylregimen. Bielefeld: transcript. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  93. Flüchtlingsrat Thüringen (2021). Welche sozialen Leistungen erhalten Flüchtlinge? Retrieved from: https://www.fluechtlingsrat-thr.de/themen/basiswissen/welche-sozialen-leistungen-erhalten-fluechtlinge (last acces-sed: 2021, September 10). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  94. Gelardi, L. (2021). Transitzentrum oder: Über die (Un-)Durchlässigkeit von (Lager-)Grenzen. In J. Devlin, T. Evers & S. Goebel (Eds.) Praktiken der (Im-)Mobilisierung. Lager, Sammelunterkünfte und Ankerzentren im Kontext von Asylregimen (97–116). Bielefeld: transcript. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  95. Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Brunswick/London: Aldine. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  96. Hanewinkel, V. (2015). Deutschland: Verwaltungs- und Infrastrukturkrise. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. Retrieved from: Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  97. http://www.bpb.de/gesellschaft/migration/kurzdossiers/217376/verwaltungs-und- infrastrukturkrise (last accessed: 2023, September 20). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  98. Heimeshoff, L., Hess, S., Kron, S., Schwenken, S. & Trzeciak, M. (Eds.) (2014): Grenzregime II. Migration – Kontrolle – Wissen. Transnationale Perspektiven. Berlin/Hamburg: Assoziation A. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  99. Hess, S. & Kasparek, B. (Eds.) (2010): Grenzregime. Diskurse, Praktiken, Institutionen in Europa. Berlin: Assoziation A. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  100. Hess, S. & Kasparek, B. (2017). Under Control? Or Border (as) Conflict: Reflections on the Euro-pean Border Regime. Social Inclusion, 5(3), 58–68. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  101. Hess, S., Kasparek, B., Kron, S., Rodatz, M., Schwertl, M. & Sontowski, S. (Eds.) (2017): Grenzre-gime III. Der lange Sommer der Migration. Berlin/Hamburg: Assoziation A. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  102. Huke, N. (2023). „Sie haben uns komplett vergessen.“ Sorglosigkeit und Füreinander-Sorge-Tragen in Flüchtlingsunterkünften während der Corona-Pandemie. Femina Politica, 32(1), 54–69. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  103. Informationsverbund Asyl & Migration (2022): Pflichten von Schutzsuchenden während des Asylverfahrens. Retrieved from: https://www.asyl.net/themen/asylrecht/asylverfahren/pflichten-von-asylsuchenden (last accessed: 2023, September 19). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  104. IPCC (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  105. Kleist, O., Dermitzaki, D., Oghalai, B. & Zajak, S. (2022). Gewaltschutz in Geflüchtetenunter-künften. Theorie, Empirie und Praxis. Bielefeld: transcript. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  106. Lessenich, S. (2023). Doubling Down on Double Standards: The Politics of Solidarity in the Exter-nalization Society. Journal of Political Sociology, 1(1), 15–32. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  107. Lessenich, S. (2020). Doppelmoral hält besser: Die Politik mit der Solidarität in der Externalisie-rungsgesellschaft. Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 30(1), 113–130. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  108. Lessenich, S. (2018): Externalisierung als soziale Praxis – Wachstum als Lebensform. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, 19(3), 423–428. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  109. Lessenich, S. (2017): Neben uns die Sintflut: Die Externalisierungsgesellschaft und ihr Preis, München: Hanser Berlin. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  110. Mau, S. (2021): Sortiermaschinen. Die Neuerfindung der Grenze im 21. Jahrhundert. München: C.H.Beck. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  111. Newman, D. (2006): Borders and Bordering: Towards an Interdisciplinary Dialogue. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(2), 171–186. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  112. Parker, N. & Vaughan-Williams, N. (2012): Critical Border Studies: Broadening and Deepening the ‘Lines in the Sand’ Agenda. Geopolitics, 17(4), 727–733. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  113. Pieper, T. (2013). Die Gegenwart der Lager. Zur Mikrophysik der Herrschaft in der deutschen Flüchtlingspolitik, Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  114. Pieper, T. (2008). Die Gegenwart der Lager in der deutschen Flüchtlingspolitik. Flüchtlingsräte. Zeitschrift der Flüchtlingsräte in Deutschland, 4, 6–8. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  115. PRO ASYL (2017). Das Asylbewerberleistungsgesetz (AsylbLG). Retrieved from: https://www.proasyl.de/hintergrund/das-asylbewerberleistungsgesetz-asylblg/ (last accessed: 2021, May 15). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  116. Rumford, C. (2012). Towards a Multiperspectival Study of Borders. Geopolitics, 17(4), 887–902. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  117. Schwenken, H. & Ruß-Sattar, S. (2014). New border and citizenship politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  118. Sperling, S. & Muy, S. (2021). Lager – Prognosen – Labels: Zur Rolle der "Bleibeperspektive" im bayerischen Unterbringungssystem. In J. Devlin, T. Evers & S. Goebel (Eds.), Praktiken der (Im-)Mobilisierung. Lager, Sammelunterkünfte und Ankerzentren im Kontext von Asylregimen (261–280). Bielefeld: transcript. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  119. Strübing, J. (2004). Grounded Theory : Zur sozialtheoretischen und epistemologischen Fundie-rung des Verfahrens der empirisch begründeten Theoriebildung. Wiesbaden: VS. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  120. Täubig, V. (2009). Totale Institution Asyl: Empirische Befunde zu alltäglichen Lebensführungen in der organisierten Desintegration. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  121. terre des hommes (2020). Kein Ort für Kinder. Zur Lebenssituation von minderjährigen Geflüch-teten in Aufnahmeeinrichtungen. Osnabrück. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  122. Thomas, S., Sauer, M. & Zalewski, I. (2018). Unbegleitete minderjährige Geflüchtete. Ihre Le-benssituationen und Perspektiven in Deutschland. Bielefeld: transcript. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  123. UNHCR (2023). Global Trends. Forced Displacement in 2022. Retrieved from: https://www.uno-fluechtlingshilfe.de/fileadmin/user_upload/global-trends-report-2022.pdf (last accessed: 2023, July 19). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  124. UNICEF & Deutsches Institut für Menschenrechte (2020). Gewaltschutz in Unterkünften für ge-flüchtete Menschen. Eine kinderrechtliche Analyse basierend auf einer Befragung der 16 Bun-desländer. Retrieved from: https://www.unicef.de/informieren/materialien/studie-gewaltschutz-in-fluechtlingsunterkuenften/231948 (last accessed: 2021, September 20). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  125. Van Houtum, H. & Van Naerssen, T. (2002). Bordering, Ordering and Othering Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 93(2), 125–136. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  126. Vey, J. (2019). Unterbringung von Flüchtenden im autoritären Festungskapitalismus. Dynamiken, Eigenlogiken, Widersprüche. In C. Book, N. Huke, S. Klauke & O. Tietje (Eds.). Alltägliche Grenz-ziehungen. Das Konzept der imperialen Lebensweise, Externalisierung und exklusive Solidarität (168–185), Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  127. Vey, J. (2018): Leben im Tempohome. Qualitative Studie zur Unterbringungssituation von Flüch-tenden in temporären Gemeinschaftsunterkünften in Berlin, Berlin: Discussion Paper. Retrieved from: https://www.static.tu.berlin/fileadmin/www/10002449/PDF_s/discussion_paper_Nr._40_18.pdf (last accessed: 2021, October 20). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  128. Vey, J. & Gunsch, S. (Eds.) (2021). Unterbringung von Flüchtenden in Deutschland. Inklusion, Exklusion, Partizipation? Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  129. Vey, J. & Sauer, M. (2016). Ehrenamtliche Flüchtlingsarbeit in Brandenburg. Aktionsbündnis Brandenburg. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  130. Von Unger, H. (2014). Partizipative Forschung: Einführung in die Forschungspraxis. Wiesbaden: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  131. Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-systems analysis: an introduction. Durham/London: Duke Universi-ty Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  132. Yuval-Davis, N., Wemyss, G. & Cassidy, K. (2019). Bordering. Cambridge/Medford: Polity. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  133. Zenker, H.J. & S. Kirchner (2020). Geflüchtete Menschen in Deutschland: Ankerzentren machen krank, Deutsches Ärzteblatt 117(3), 70–71. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-183
  134. Aas, K. F. (2011). ‘Crimmigrant’ bodies and bona fide travelers: Surveillance, citizenship and governance. Theoretical Criminology, 15(3), 331–46. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  135. Al Ajlan, A. (2022). The asylum procedure in Germany: Desperation and uncertainty as risk factors for violence among young adult asylum seekers in collective accommodations. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(7–8), NP4108–NP4132. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  136. Amit, I. & Lindberg, A. (2020). Performing states of crisis: Exploring migration detention in Israel and Denmark. Patterns of Prejudice, 54(3), 238–257. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  137. Baier, A. & Siegert, M. (2018). Die Wohnsituation Geflüchteter (BAMF-Kurzanalyse, Ausgabe 02, 2018). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  138. Barker, V. & Scharff Smith, P. (2021). This is Denmark: Prison islands and the detention of immigrants. The British Journal of Criminology, 61(6), 1540–1556. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  139. Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (BMFSFJ) & UNICEF (2021). Mindeststandards zum Schutz von geflüchteten Menschen in Flüchtlingsunterkünften. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  140. Böhme, C. & Schmitt, C. (2022). Konflikte und Konfliktpotentiale in Geflüchtetenunterkünften. In J. O. Kleist, D. Dermitzaki, B. Oghalai & S. Zajak (Eds.), Gewaltschutz in Geflüchtetenunterkünften (85–126). Bielefeld: transcript. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  141. Böhme, C. & Schmitz, A. (2022a). Gewaltprävention in Geflüchtetenunterkünften durch die Einführung eines kultursensiblen Beschwerdemanagements. In J. O. Kleist, D. Dermitzaki, B. Oghalai & S. Zajak (Eds.), Gewaltschutz in Geflüchtetenunterkünften (231–259). Bielefeld: transcript. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  142. Böhme, C. & Schmitz, A. (2022b). Refugee’s agency and coping strategies in refugee camps during the coronavirus pandemic: Ethnographic perspectives. Comparative Migration Studies, 10(34), 1–20. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  143. Bosworth, M. (2016). The impact of immigration detention on mental health: A literature review. Criminal Justice, Borders and Citizenship Research Paper No. 2732892. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2732892 (last accessed: 2023, May 16). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  144. Bosworth, M. (2019). Affect and authority in immigration detention. Punishment & Society, 21(5), 542–559. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  145. Christ, S., Meininghaus, E., & Röing, T. (2017a). “All day waiting“: Konflikte in Unterkünften für Geflüchtete in NRW (BICC Working Paper, 3). Retrieved from: https://nbn-resolving.org/ urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-61651–8 (last accessed: 2023, May 16). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  146. Emirbayer, M. & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  147. Filges, T., Montgomery, E. & Kastrup, M. (2016). ‘The impact of detention on the health Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  148. of asylum seekers: A systematic review’. Research on Social Work Practice, 28(4), 399–414. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  149. Foucault, M. (2009). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–1979. Palgrave. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  150. Gusfield, J. R. (2003). A journey with symbolic interaction. Symbolic Interaction, 26(1), 119–139. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  151. Hartmann, M. (2017). Contested boundaries: Refugee centers as spaces of the political. Zeitschrift für Flüchtlingsforschung, 1(2), 218–243. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  152. Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart. Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  153. Jakobsen, C. O. (2022). ‘Little prisons’: Revisiting trajectories and carcerality in a Danish asylum camp. Incarceration, 3(1), 1–18. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  154. Järvinen, M. (2005). Interview i en interaktionistisk begrebsramme. In M. Järvinen og N. Mik-Meyer (Eds.), Kvalitative metoder i et interaktionistisk perspektiv (27–48). København: Hans Reitzels Forlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  155. Judge, N., & Loughnan, C. (2022). Witnessing violence: Stories from a migration support worker. Incarceration – An international journal of imprisonment, detention and coercive confinement, 3(2), 1–18. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  156. Katz, I. (2022). Camps by design: Architectural spectacles of migrant hostipitality. Incarceration – An international journal of imprisonment, detention and coercive confinement, 3(1), 1–19. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  157. Kohl K. S. (2022). The stalemate: Motivational interviewing at a carceral junction. Incarceration – An international journal of imprisonment, detention and coercive confinement, 3(1), 1–18. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  158. Kreichauf, R. (2018). From forced migration to forced arrival: The campization of refugee accommodation in European cities. Comparative Migration Studies 6(7), 1–22. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  159. Lamont, M. & Aksartova, S. (2002). Ordinary cosmopolitanisms: Strategies for bridging racial boundaries among working-class men. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(4), 1–25. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  160. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  161. Lindberg, A. (2022). Feeling difference: Race, migration, and the affective infrastructure of a Danish detention camp. Incarceration – An international journal of imprisonment, detention and coercive confinement, 3(1), 1–18. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  162. Lindow M, Kjellin L, Engström I, & Pelto-Piri V. (2022). Strategies for the prevention of violence in institutional care: A qualitative interview study with ward managers. Front Psychiatry, 13(853260), 1–12. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  163. Lorenz MH, Ensle A, Taggert J, Uricher J, Heidenreich T, Laging M. (2023). Professionals' Perspectives on Substance Use among Refugees in Shared Accommodations: A Qualitative Study. Health & Social Work. 21; 48(3), 188–197. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  164. Luhmann, N. (2003). Macht. Stuttgart: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  165. Maxwell, J. (2002). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. In A. M. Huberman & M. B. Miles (Eds.), The qualitative researcher’s companion (37–64). London: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  166. Münch, S. (2021). Creating uncertainty in the governance of arrival and return: Target-group constructions in Bavarian AnkER Facilities. Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(4), 3590–3607. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  167. Nilsson, M. & Badran, D. (2021). Conflicts and relative deprivation in Ein El Hilweh: Palestinian refugees in the shadow of the Syrian civil war. Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(1), 453–473. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  168. Packer, M. (2011). The qualitative research interview. In M. Packer, The Science of Qualitative Research (43–56). New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  169. Popitz, H. (1992). Phänomene der Macht. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  170. Raithelhuber, E. (2012). Ein relationales Verständnis von Agency. Sozialtheoretische Überlegungen und Konsequenzen für empirische Analysen. In S. Bethmann, C. Helferich, H. Hofmann & D. Niermann (Eds.), Agency. Qualitative Rekonstruktionen und gesellschaftstheoretische Bezüge von Handlungsmächtigkeit (122–153). Weinheim: Beltz Juventa. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  171. Rebughini, P. (2021). Agency in intersectionality. Towards a method for studying the situatedness of action. Socio, 15, 189–205. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  172. Ryen, A. (2002). Etikk og forskning: Finnes det en mal? In A. Ryen. Det kvalitative Intervjuet: Fra videnskapsteori til feltarbeid (206–229). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  173. Scherr, A. (2022). Theorien und Konzepte von Gewalt im Kontext von Geflüchtetenunterkünften. In J. O. Kleist, D. Dermitzaki, B. Oghalai & S. Zajak (Eds.), Gewaltschutz in Geflüchtetenunterkünften (21–54). Bielefeld: transcript. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  174. Schmitt, C. (2020). Vermessen, Klassifizieren, Zuweisen. Das AnKER-Zentrum als machtvolle Organisation der Asylverwaltung. Soziale Passagen 12(1), 135–154. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  175. Schwartz-Shea, P. (2006). Judging quality. In D. Yanow & P. Schwartz-Shea. Interpretation and method. Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn (89–113). Armonk (NY), London: M. E. Sharpe. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  176. Scott, P. (2018). “It's like fighting for survival”: How rejected black African asylum seekers experience living conditions in an eastern German state. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 16(4), 372–390. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  177. Statistisches Bundesamt (2023). Schutzsuchende nach Schutzstatus und Berichtsjahren. Retrieved from: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bevoelkerung/Migration-Integration/Tabellen/schutzsuchende-zeitreihe-schutzstatus.html (last accessed: 2023, September 5). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  178. Turner, S. (2015). What is a refugee camp? Explorations of the limits and effects of the camp. Journal of Refugee Studies, 29(2), 139–148. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  179. Turner, S. & Whyte, Z. (2022). Introduction: Refugee camps as carceral junctions. Incarceration – An international journal of imprisonment, detention and coercive confinement, 3(1). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  180. Trammel, R., Cook, A. R., Marquez, M. V. D., Hinkle, P., Protze, L. M. & Rodriguez, N. (2018). From procedural justice to procedural injustice: Understanding prison staff and inmate conflict. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 57(4), 537–555. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  181. Träbert, A. & Dörr, P. (2020). „Sofern besonderer Bedarf identifiziert wurde“ – Eine Analyse der Gewaltschutzkonzepte der Bundesländer im Hinblick auf den besonderen Schutzbedarf von LSBTI*-Geflüchteten. Freiburger Zeitschrift für GeschlechterStudien, 26(1), 35–54. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  182. van Eggermont Arwidson, C., Holmgren, J., Gottberg, K., Tinghög, P. & Eriksson, H. (2022). Living a frozen life: A qualitative study on asylum seekers’ experiences and care practices at accommodation centers in Sweden. Conflict and Health 16(47), 1–14. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  183. Wendel, K. (2014). Unterbringung von Flüchtlingen in Deutschland. Regelungen und Praxis der Bundesländer im Vergleich (Förderverein PRO ASYL e. V.). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  184. Whyte, Z., Campbell, R. & Overgaard, H. (2020). Paradoxical infrastructures of asylum: Notes on the rise and fall of tent camps in Denmark. Migration Studies, 8(2), 143–160. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  185. Wimark, T. (2020). Housing policy with violent outcomes – The domestication of queer asylum seekers in a heteronormative society. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(3), 703–722. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-204
  186. Adam, F., Föbker, S., Imani, D., Pfaffenbach, C., Weiss, G. & Wiegandt, C. (2019). ‘Lost in Transition’? Integration of Refugees Into the Local Housing Market in Germany. Journal of Urban Affairs, 1–20. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-226
  187. Alba, R. & Foner, N. (2015). Strangers No More: Immigration and the Challenges of Integration in North America and Western Europe. Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-226
  188. Arar, R. & FitzGerald, S.D. (2022). The refugee system: A sociological approach. John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-226
  189. Apitzsch, U, Inowlocki, L. & Kontos, M. (2008). The method of biographical policy evaluation, in Apitzsch, Ursula and Kontos, Maria (eds.), Self-Employment Activities of Women and Minorities. Their Success or Failure in Relation to Social Citizenship Policies, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, 12–18. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-226
  190. Bernardot, M. (2019). Étrangers, immigrés:(re) penser l’intégration. Presses de l’École des hautes études en santé publique Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-226
  191. Bourke, B. (2014). Positionality: Reflecting on the research process. The Qualitative Report, 19(33), 1–9. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-226
  192. Dwyer, S. C. & Buckle, J. L. (2009). The space between: On being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 54–63. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-226
  193. Danielak, S. (2019). Einwanderungsland? Germany’s Asylum Dilemma in Policy and Design. Journal of International Migration and Integration 20(1), 1–13. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-226
  194. Gowayed, H. (2022). Refuge: How the State Shapes Human Potential. Princeton University Press Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-226
  195. Etzel, M. (2022). New Models of the “Good Refugee” – Bureaucratic Expectations of Syrian Refugees in Germany. Ethnic and Racial Studies 45(2), 1115–34. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-226
  196. FrC, Gestionnaire (2023). Hébergement des demandeurs d’asile: une couverture des besoins toujours limitée. Forum réfugiés. Retrieved from: https://www.forumrefugies.org/s-informer/publications/articles-d-actualites/en-france/1215-hebergement-des-demandeurs-d-asile-une-couverture-des-besoins-toujours-limitee. (last accessed: 2023, October 1). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-226
  197. Geertz, C. (1973). Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, New York: Basic Books, 3–30. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-226
  198. Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowball sampling. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 148–170. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-226
  199. Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual review of anthropology 24(1), 95–117. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-226
  200. Pedersen, M. (2013). Going on a Class Journey: The Inclusion and Exclusion of Iraqi Refugees in Denmark. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 38(7), 1101–17. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-226
  201. Portes, A. & Zhou, M. (1993). The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 530(1), 74–96. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-226
  202. Renner, N. (2018). Die Wohnsitzauflage Als Mittel Deutscher Integrationspolitik? Das Beispiel Sachsen.Policy Paper. Dresden: Mercator Forums Migration und Demokratie (MIDEM). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-226
  203. Safi, M. (2006). Le processus d’intégration des immigrés en France: inégalités et segmentation. Revue francaise de sociologie 47(1), 3–48. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-226
  204. Simmons, E.S. & Smith, N.R. (2019). The case for comparative ethnography. Comparative Politics 51(3), 341–59. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-226
  205. Schnapper, D. (2007). Qu’est-ce que l’intégration? Gallimard. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-226
  206. Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-Diversity and Its Implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies 30(6): 1024–54. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-226
  207. Xenia, F. & Kluge, J. (2016). Die Wohnsitzauflage als kostspielige Integrationsbremse für Flüchtlinge. IFO Dresden berichtet 23(6), 30–34. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-226
  208. Ager, A. & Alison, S. (2008). Understanding integration: A conceptual framework. Journal of Refugee Studies, 21(2), 166–191. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  209. Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  210. Aquino, M. B., Chanamuto, N. J. C. & Christou, A. (2022). Introduction: Emotions and mobilities: Gendered, temporal and spatial representations. Emotions: History, Culture, Society, 6(2), 201–214. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  211. Assmuth, L., Aure, M., Hakkarainen, M. & Siim, P. M. (2023). Introduction: Translocal familyhood and lifelines across borders. In L. Assmuth, M. Aure, M. Hakkarainen, and P. M. Siim (Eds.), Mi-gration and Families in East and North Europe: Translocal Lifelines (1–22). Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  212. Baldassar, L. (2015). Guilty feelings and the guilt trip: Emotions and motivation in migration and transnational caregiving. Emotion, Space and Society, 16, 81–89. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  213. BAMF (2022). Fragen und Antworten zur Einreise aus der Ukraine und zum Aufenthalt in Deutschland (Stand: 01.12.2022). Retrieved from: https://www.bamf.de/SharedDocs/Anlagen/DE/AsylFluechtlingsschutz/faq-ukraine.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=6 (last accessed: 2023, October 4). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  214. Bauder, H. (2008). Media discourse and the new German immigration law. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34(1), 95–112. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  215. Boccagni, P. & Baldassar, L. (2015). Emotions on the move: Mapping the emergent field of emo-tion and migration. Emotion, Space and Society, 16, 73–80. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  216. Boland, C. (2020). Hybrid identity and practices to negotiate belonging: Madrid’s Muslim youth of migrant origin. Comparative Migration Studies, 8(1), 1–17. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  217. Brücker, H., Kosyakova, Y., Schwanhäuser, S., Silva, A., Zinn, S., Grabka, M., Niehues, W., Tanis, K., Siegert, M., Maddox, A., Rother, N., Spieß, K., Décieux, J., Schmitz, S., Milewski, N., Bujard, M., Ette, A. & Sauer, L. (2022). Geflüchtete aus der Ukraine in Deutschland: Flucht, Ankunft und Le-ben. Wiesbaden: Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung (BiB). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  218. Burkitt, I. (2012). Emotional reflexivity: Feeling, emotion and imagination in reflexive dialogues. Sociology, 46(3), 458–472. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  219. Calman, L., Brunton, L. & Molassiotis, A. (2013). Developing longitudinal qualitative designs: Les-sons learned and recommendations for health services research. BMC Medical Research Meth-odology, 13(1), 1–10. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  220. Carling, J., Erdal, M. B. & Ezzati, R. (2014). Beyond the insider–outsider divide in migration re-search. Migration Studies, 2(1), 36–54. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  221. Cheung, S. & Phillimore, J. (2014). Refugees, social capital, and labour market integration in the UK. Sociology, 48(3), 518–536. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  222. Council of the European Union (2001). Council Directive 2001/55/EC. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32001L0055 (last accessed: 2023, October 4). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  223. De Coninck, D. (2023). The refugee paradox during wartime in europe: How Ukrainian and Af-ghan refugees are (not) alike. International Migration Review, 57(2), 578–586. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  224. Eastmond, M. (2011). Egalitarian ambitions, constructions of difference: The paradoxes of refu-gee integration in Sweden. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(2), 277–295. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  225. Grossoehme, D. & Lipstein, E. (2016). Analyzing longitudinal qualitative data: The application of trajectory and recurrent cross-sectional approaches. BMC Research Notes, 9(136). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  226. Grzymala-Kazlowska, A. (2016). Social anchoring: Immigrant identity, security and integration reconnected? Sociology, 50(6), 1123–1139. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  227. Grzymala-Kazlowska, A. (2018). From connecting to social anchoring: Adaptation and ‘settle-ment’ of Polish migrants in the UK. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(2), 252–269. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  228. Grzymala-Kazlowska, A. & Phillimore, J. (2018). Introduction: Rethinking integration. New per-spectives on adaptation and settlement in the era of super-diversity. Journal of Ethnic and Mi-gration Studies, 44(2), 179–196. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  229. Grzymala-Kazlowska, A. & Ryan, L. 2022. Bringing anchoring and embedding together: Theorising migrants’ lives over-time. Comparative Migration Studies, 10(46). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  230. Holmes, M. (2010). The Emotionalization of reflexivity. Sociology, 44(1), 139–154. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  231. Holmes, M. (2015). Researching emotional reflexivity. Emotion Review, 7(1), 61–66. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  232. Holmes, M. & Castañeda, H. (2016). Representing the ‘European Refugee Crisis’ in Germany and beyond: Deservingness and difference, life and death. American Ethnologist, 43(1), 12–24. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  233. Kane, A. (2001). Finding emotion in social movement processes. In: J. Goodwin, J. Jasper, F. Pol-letta (Eds.), Passionate Politics. Emotions and Social Movements (251–266). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  234. Mai, N. & King, R. (2009). Love, sexuality and migration: Mapping the Issue(s). Mobilities, 4(3), 295–307. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  235. Phillimore, J. (2021). Refugee-integration-opportunity structures: Shifting the focus from refu-gees to context. Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(2), 1946–1966. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  236. Povrzanović Frykman, M. & Mozetič, K. (2020). The Importance of friends: Social life challenges for foreign physicians in Southern Sweden. Community, Work & Family, 23(4), 385–400. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  237. Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles: SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  238. von Scheve, C. & Slaby, J. (2019). Emotion, emotion concept. In C. von Scheve & J. Slaby (Eds.), Affective Societies: Key Concepts (42–51). Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  239. Spencer, S. & Charsley, K. (2021). Reframing ‘Integration’: Acknowledging and addressing five core critiques. Comparative Migration Studies, 9(18). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  240. Svašek, M. (2010). On the move: Emotions and human mobility. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(6), 865–880. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  241. UNHCR (2023). Operational data portal: Ukrainian refugee situation. Retrieved from: https://data.unhcr.org/en/situations/ukraine (last accessed: 2023, October 10). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-238
  242. AAPOR (2023). Standard definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys, 10th Edition. The American Association for Public Opinion Research. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  243. Aksoy, C. G., & Poutvaara, P. (2021). Refugees’ and irregular migrants’ self-selection into Europe. Journal of Development Economics, 152, 102681. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  244. Aybek, C., & Milewski, N. (2019). Introduction to the special issue on “Family migration processes in a comparative perspective". Journal of Family Research, 31(3), 247–263. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  245. Babka von Gostomski, C., & Pupeter, M. (2008). Zufallsbefragung von Ausländern auf Basis des Ausländerzentralregisters: Erfahrungen bei der Repräsentativbefragung" Ausgewählte Migran-tengruppen in Deutschland 2006/2007"(RAM). Methoden, Daten, Analysen (Mda), 2(2), 149–177. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  246. Baizán, P., Beauchemin, C., & González-Ferrer, A. (2014). An origin and destination perspective on family reunification: the case of senegalese couples. European Journal of Population, 30(1), 65–87. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  247. Beiser, M., & Hou, F. (2017). Predictors of positive mental health among refugees: results from Canada’s General Social Survey. Transcultural Psychiatry, 54(5–6), 675–695. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  248. Best, H., & Wolf, C. (2014). Logistic regression. In H. Best (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of regression analysis and causal inference (153–172). Los Angeles: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  249. Birgier, D. P., Lundh, C., Haberfeld, Y., & Elldér, E. (2018). Self-selection and host country context in the economic assimilation of political refugees in the United States, Sweden, and Israel. Inter-national Migration Review, 52(2), 524–558. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  250. BMI – Bundesministerium des Innern und für Heimat. (2023). Aktuelle Zahlen aus dem Auslän-derzentralregister. Berlin: Bundesministerium des Innern und für Heimat. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  251. Bonjour, S., & Kraler, A. (2016). Family migration and migrant integration. In A. Triandafyllidou (Ed.), Routledge handbook of immigration and refugee studies (153–159). London, New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  252. Brinks, J. (2023). The Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED). Retrieved from: https://acleddata.com/ (last accessed: 2023, November 6). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  253. Brücker, H. (2022). War in the Ukraine: consequences for the governance of refugee migration and integration. CESifo Forum, 23(4), 41–48. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  254. Brücker, H., Rother, N., & Schupp, J. (2018). IAB-BAMF-SOEP-Befragung von Geflüchteten 2016: Studiendesign, Feldergebnisse sowie Analysen zu schulischer wie beruflicher Qualifikation, Sprachkenntnissen sowie kognitiven Potenzialen (No. 30; Forschungsbericht). BAMF/ IAB/ SOEP. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  255. Brücker, H., Ette, A., Grabka, M. M., Kosyakova, Y., Niehues, W., Rother, N., Spieß, C. K., Zinn, S., Bujard, M., Silva, A. R. C., Décieux, J. P., Maddox, A., Milewski, N., Sauer, L., Schmitz, S., Schwan-häuser, S., Siegert, M., Steinhauer, H., & Tanis, K. (2023). Ukrainian refugees in Germany: evi-dence from a large representative survey. Comparative Population Studies, 48. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  256. Buber-Ennser, I., Kohlenberger, J., Rengs, B., Zalak, Z. A., Goujon, A., Striessnig, E., Potančoková, M., Gisser, R., Testa, M. R., & Lutz, W. (2016). Human capital, values, and attitudes of persons seeking refuge in Austria in 2015. PLOS ONE, 11(9), e0163481. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  257. Bujard, M., Diehl, C., Kreyenfeld, M., Leyendecker, B., & Spieß, C. K. (2020). Geflüchtete, Familien und ihre Kinder. Warum der Blick auf die Familien und die Kindertagesbetreuung entscheidend ist. Sozialer Fortschritt, 69(8–9), 561–577. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  258. Cornesse, C., Felderer, B., Fikel, M., Krieger, U., & Blom, A. G. (2022). Recruiting a probability-based online panel via postal mail: experimental evidence. Social Science Computer Review, 40(5), 1259–1284. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  259. Dillman, D. A. (2017). The promise and challenge of pushing respondents to the web in mixed-mode surveys. Survey Methodology, 4(1), 3–30. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  260. Duszczyk, M, & Kaczmarczyk, P. (2022). War and migration: the recent influx from Ukraine into Poland and possible scenarios for the future (Research Newsletter 4(39); CMR Spotlight). Centre of Migration Research. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  261. Duszczyk, M., Górny, A., Kaczmarczyk, P., & Kubisiak, A. (2023). War refugees from Ukraine in Poland – one year after the Russian aggression. Socioeconomic consequences and challenges. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 15(1), 181–199. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  262. Ette, A., Décieux, J. P., Erlinghagen, M., Guedes Auditor, J., Sander, N., Schneider, N. F., & Witte, N. (2021). Surveying across borders: the experiences of the German emigration and remigration panel study. In M. Erlinghagen, A. Ette, N. F. Schneider, & N. Witte (Eds.), The global lives of Ger-man migrants (21–39). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  263. Fouarge, D, Özer, MN, & Seegers, P. (2019). Personality traits, migration intentions, and cultural distance. Papers in Regional Science 98, 2425–2454. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  264. Gambaro, L., Kreyenfeld, M., Schacht, D., & Spieß, C. K. (2018). Refugees in Germany with chil-dren still living abroad have lowest life satisfaction. DIW Weekly Report, 8(42), 415–425. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  265. Genoni, A., Décieux, J. P., Ette, A., & Witte, N. (2021). Setting up probability-based online panels of migrants with a push-to-web approach: lessons learned from the German Emigration and Re-migration Panel Study (GERPS). In M. Erlinghagen, A. Ette, N. F. Schneider, & N. Witte (Eds.), The global lives of German Migrants (289–307). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  266. Goodson, L. J., & Phillimore, J. (2008). Social capital and integration: the importance of social relationships and social space to refugee women. The International Journal of Diversity in Organ-izations, Communities, and Nations: Annual Review, 7(6), 181–194. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  267. Guichard, L. (2020). Self-selection of asylum seekers: evidence from Germany. Demography, 57(3), 1089–1116. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  268. Gummer, T., Schmiedeberg, C., Bujard, M., Christmann, P., Hank, K., Kunz, T., Lück, D., & Neyer, F. J. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 on fieldwork efforts and planning in pairfam and FReDA-GGS. Survey Research Methods, 14(2), 223–227. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  269. Jacobsen, J., Krieger, M., & Legewie, N. (2020). Labour market participation of refugees in Ger-many: legal context and individual-level factors. In Refugees in Canada and Germany: from re-search to policies and practice (Vol. 25, 189–201). Köln: GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwis-senschaften. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  270. Kosyakova, Y., Kristen, C., & Spörlein, C. (2022). The dynamics of recent refugees’ language ac-quisition: how do their pathways compare to those of other new immigrants? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(5), 989–1012. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  271. Kraus, E. K., Sauer, L., & Wenzel, L. (2019). Together or apart? Spousal migration and reunifica-tion practices of recent refugees to Germany. Journal of Family Research, 31(3), 303–332. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  272. Kroh, M., Kühne, S., Jacobsen, J., Siegert, M., & Siegers, R. (2017). Sampling, nonresponse, and integrated weighting of the 2016 IAB-BAMF-SOEP survey of refugees (M3/M4) – revised ver-sion. DIW/ SOEP. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  273. Löbel, L.-M., & Jacobsen, J. (2021). Waiting for kin: a longitudinal study of family reunification and refugee mental health in Germany. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(13), 2916–2937. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  274. Lynn, P. (2020). Evaluating push-to-web methodology for mixed-mode surveys using address-based samples. Survey Research Methods, 14(1), 19–30. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  275. Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1993). Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal. Population and Development Review, 19(3), 431–466. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  276. Melander, E., & Öberg, M. (2007). The threat of violence and forced migration: geographical scope trumps intensity of fighting. Civil Wars, 9(2), 156–173. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  277. Morris, S., Lenard, P. T., & Haugen, S. (2021). Refugee sponsorship and family reunification. Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(1), 130–148. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  278. Porter, M., & Haslam, N. (2005). Predisplacement and postdisplacement factors associated with mental health of refugees and internally displaced persons: a meta-analysis. JAMA, 294(5), 602–612. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  279. Rousseau, C., Rufagari, M.-C., Bagilishya, D., & Measham, T. (2004). Remaking family life: strate-gies for re-establishing continuity among Congolese refugees during the family reunification pro-cess. Social Science & Medicine, 59(5), 1095–1108. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  280. Ruhe, C., & Kuhnt, J. (2023). Who wants to leave? Global survey evidence on how individual em-igration aspirations differ between peaceful and conflict-affected contexts. International Migra-tion Review, 0(0). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  281. Sauer, L., Ette, A., Steinhauer, H. W., Siegert, M., & Tanis, K. (2023). Spatial Patterns of Recent Ukrainian Refugees in Germany: Administrative Dispersal and Existing Ethnic Networks. Compar-ative Population Studies, 48. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  282. Schneider, N. F., Bujard, M., Wolf, C., Gummer, T., Hank, K., & Neyer, F. J. (2021). Family Research and Demographic Analysis (FReDA): evolution, framework, objectives, and design of “The Ger-man Family-Demographic Panel Study.” Comparative Population Studies, 46, 149–186. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  283. Schon, J. (2019). Motivation and opportunity for conflict-induced migration: an analysis of Syri-an migration timing. Journal of Peace Research, 56(1), 12–27. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  284. Spörlein, C., & Kristen, C. (2019). Why we should care about regional origins: educational selec-tivity among refugees and labor migrants in Western Europe. Frontiers in Sociology, 4, 39. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  285. Spörlein, C., Kristen, C., Schmidt, R., & Welker, J. (2020). Selectivity profiles of recently arrived refugees and labour migrants in Germany. Soziale Welt, 71(1–2), 54–89. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  286. Steinhauer, H. W., Décieux, J. P., Siegert, M., Ette, A., & Zinn, S. (2023). Probability sampling for a study of Ukrainian refugees in Germany (IAB-BiB/FReDA-BAMF-SOEP study). Conference of the European Survey Research Association, Milano. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  287. Tienda, M. (2017). Multiplying diversity: family unification and the regional origins of late-age US immigrants. International Migration Review, 51(3), 727–756. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  288. Torregroza, S., Leschny, K., Ruland, M., Gilberg, R., & von der Burg, K. (2023). Technical report IAB-BIB-BAMF-SOEP Ukrainian refugees in Germany (wave 1). infas. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  289. Tyldum, G., & Kjeøy, I. (2022). Assessing future migration among Ukrainian refugees in Poland and Norway (Fafo Policy Brief, p. November) [Policy Brief]. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  290. Van Dalen, H. P., & Henkens, K. (2013). Explaining emigration intentions and behaviour in the Netherlands, 2005–10. Population Studies, 67(2), 225–241. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  291. Wilmsen, B. (2013). Family separation and the impacts on refugee settlement in Australia. Aus-tralian Journal of Social Issues, 48(2), 241–262. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250
  292. Zlotnik, H. (1995). Migration and the family: the female perspective. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 4(2–3), 253–271. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2023-2-250

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF)

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien