Education, political sophistication, cohesive policy signals and proximity voting: Do voters choose the party that reflects their interests?

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover des Buchs: Informationsflüsse, Wahlen und Demokratie
Open Access Vollzugriff

Informationsflüsse, Wahlen und Demokratie

Festschrift für Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck

Autor:innen:
Reihe
Studien zur Wahl- und Einstellungsforschung
Band
35
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2023
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0800-1
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-1555-3

Kapitelinformationen

Open Access Vollzugriff

Education, political sophistication, cohesive policy signals and proximity voting: Do voters choose the party that reflects their interests?

Autor:innen:
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0800-1
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-1555-3
Kapitelvorschau:

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. References Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  2. Abney, R., Adams, J.F., Clark, M., Easton, M., Ezrow, L., Kosmidis, S., Neundorf, A., 2013. When does valence matter? Heightened valence effects for governing parties during election campaigns. Party Politics 19 (1), 61–82. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  3. Adams, J.F., Merrill, S.III, Grofman, B., 2005. A unified theory of party competition: A cross-national analysis integrating spatial and behavioral factors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  4. Baumann, M., Gross, M., 2016. Where Is My Party? Introducing New Data Sets on Ideological Cohesion and Ambiguity of Party Positions in Media Coverage. MZES Working Paper 167. Mannheim: Mannheim Centre for European Social Research. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  5. Benoit, K., Laver, M., 2006. Party policy in modern democracies. London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  6. Box-Steffensmeier, J., Dillard, M., Kimball, D., Massengill, W., 2015. The long and short of it: the unpredictability of late deciding voters. Electoral Studies 39 (1), 181–194. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  7. Brader, T.A., Tucker, J.A., 2009. What’s Left behind When the Party’s Over: Survey Experiments on the Effects of Partisan Cues in Putin’s Russia. Politics & Policy 37 (4), 843–868. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  8. Brambor, T., Clark, W.R., Golder, M., 2006. Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis 14 (1), 63–82. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  9. Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller, W.E., Stokes, D.E., 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  10. Converse, P., 1964. The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. In: Apter, D. (Ed.), Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press, pp. 206–261. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  11. Costello, R., Thomassen, J., Rosema, M., 2012. European Parliament elections and political representation: Policy congruence between voters and parties. West European Politics 35 (6), 1226–1248. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  12. Cox, G.W., McCubbins, M.D., 1991. On the decline of party voting in Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 16 (4), 547–570. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  13. Dassonneville, R., Baudewyns, P., Debus, M., Schmitt-Beck, R., 2017. The time of the vote choice: Causes and consequences of late-deciding. In: Deschouwer, K. (Ed.), Mind the Gap: Political Participation and Representation in Belgium. Colchester: Rowman & Littlefield International/ECPR Press, pp. 201–227. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  14. Dassonneville, R., Lewis-Beck, M.S., 2013. Economic policy voting and incumbency: Unemployment in Western Europe. Political Science Research and Methods 1 (1), 53–66. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  15. Dassonneville, R., Lewis-Beck, M.S., 2014. Macroeconomics, economic crisis and electoral outcomes: A national European pool. Acta Politica 49 (4), 372–394. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  16. Debus, M., Müller, J., 2014. Expected utility or learned familiarity? The formation of voters’ coalition preferences. Electoral Studies 34 (1), 54–67. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  17. Debus, M., Somer-Topcu, Z., Tavits, M., 2016. Comparative Campaign Dynamics Dataset. Mannheim Centre for European Social Research, University of Mannheim. http://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de/d7/en/datasets/comparative-campaign-dynamics-dataset. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  18. Downs, A., 1957. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  19. Eberl, J.M., Plescia, C., 2018. Coalitions in the news: How saliency and tone in news coverage influence voters' preferences and expectations about coalitions. Electoral Studies 55 (1), 30–39. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  20. Elff, M., Roßteutscher, S., 2011. Stability or decline? Class, religion and the vote in Germany. German Politics 20 (1), 107–127. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  21. Evans, G., 1999. Class voting: From premature obituary to reasoned appraisal. In: Evans, G. (Ed.), The end of class politics? Class voting in comparative context. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–20. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  22. Fernandez-Vazquez, P., Somer-Topcu, Z., 2019. The informational role of party leader changes on voter perceptions of party positions. British Journal of Political Science 49 (3), 977–996. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  23. Fortunato, D., 2021. The cycle of coalition: How parties and voters interact under coalition governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  24. Gomez, B.T., Wilson, J.M., 2001. Political sophistication and economic voting in the American electorate: A theory of heterogeneous attribution. American Journal of Political Science 45 (4), 899–914. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  25. Grofman, B., 2004. Downs and two-party convergence. Annual Review of Political Science 7 (1), 25–46. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  26. Joesten, D.A., Stone, W.J., 2014. Reassessing proximity voting: Expertise, party, and choice in congressional elections. Journal of Politics 76 (3), 740–753. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  27. Johann, D., Kleinen-von Königslöw, K., Kritzinger, S., Thomas, K., 2018. Intra-campaign changes in voting preferences: the impact of media and party communication. Political Communication 35 (2), 261–286. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  28. Lachat, R., 2008. The impact of party polarization on ideological voting. Electoral Studies 27 (4), 687–698. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  29. Lefkofridi, Z., Giger, N., Gallego, A., 2014. Electoral participation in pursuit of policy representation: ideological congruence and voter turnout. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 24 (3), 291–311. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  30. Lewis-Beck, M.S., 1986. Comparative Economic Voting: Britain, France, Germany, Italy. American Journal of Political Science 30 (2), 315–346. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  31. Lewis-Beck, M.S., Jacoby, W.G., Norpoth, H., Weisberg, H.F., 2008. The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  32. Lewis-Beck, M.S., Stegmaier, M., 2000. Economic determinants of electoral outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science 3 (1), 183–219. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  33. Lipset, S.M., Rokkan, S., 1967. Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments: an introduction. In: Lipset, S.M., Rokkan, S. (Eds.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: The Free Press, pp. 1–64. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  34. Lupia, A., McCubbins, M.D., 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  35. Lupia, A., McCubbins, M.D., Popkin, S.L., 2000. Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  36. Macdonald, S.E., Rabinowitz, G., Listhaug, O., 1995. Political sophistication and models of issue voting. British Journal of Political Science 25 (4), 453–483. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  37. MacKuen, M.B., Erikson, R.S., Stimson, J.A., 1992. Peasants or bankers? The American electorate and the US economy. American Political Science Review 86 (3), 597–611. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  38. Mauerer, I., Thurner, P., Debus, M., 2015. Under Which Conditions Do Parties Attract Voters’ Reactions to Issues? Party-Varying Issue Voting in German Elections 1987–2009. West European Politics 38 (6), 1251–1273. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  39. Merolla, J.L., Stephenson, L.B., Zechmeister, E.J., 2008. Can Canadians Take a Hint? The (In)Effectiveness of Party Labels as Information Shortcuts in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science 41 (3), 673–696. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  40. Mitchell, M.N., 2012. Interpreting and visualizing regression models using Stata. College Station: Stata Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  41. Müller, W. C., (2000). “Political parties in parliamentary democracies: Making delegation and accountability work”. European Journal of Political Research 37 (3), 309-33. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  42. Morgenstern, S., 2004. Patterns of Legislative Politics: Roll Call Voting in Latin America and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  43. Nadeau, R., Lewis-Beck, M.S., Foucault, M., 2019. Wealth and voter turnout: investigating twenty-eight democracies. Polity 51 (2), 261–287. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  44. Nadeau, R., Pétry, F., Bélanger, É., 2010. Issue-based strategies in election campaigns: The case of health care in the 2000 Canadian federal election. Political Communication 27 (4), 367–388. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  45. Nyhuis, D., Plescia, C., 2018. The nonideological component of coalition preferences. Party Politics 24 (6), 686–697. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  46. Popkin, S., 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  47. Powell Jr, G. Bingham. 2004. The quality of democracy: The chain of responsiveness. Journal of Democracy 15 (4), 91–105. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  48. Rabinowitz, G., Macdonald, S.E., 1989. A Directional Theory of Issue Voting. American Political Science Review 83 (1), 93–121. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  49. Rahn, W.M., 1993. The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates. American Journal of Political Science 37 (2), 472–496. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  50. Rattinger, H., Roßteutscher, S., Schmitt-Beck, R., Weßels, B., et al., 2011. Zwischen Langeweile und Extremen: Die Bundestagswahl 2009. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  51. Schmitt-Beck, R., Partheymüller, J., 2012. Why voters decide late: A simultaneous test of old and new hypotheses at the 2005 and 2009 German federal elections. German Politics 21 (3), 299–316. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  52. Schmitt-Beck, R., Rattinger, H., Roßteutscher, S., Weßels, B., Wolf, C., et al., 2014. Zwischen Fragmentierung und Konzentration: Die Bundestagswahl 2013. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  53. Schmitt-Beck, R., Weick, S., Christoph, B., 2006. Shaky attachments: Individual‐level stability and change of partisanship among West German voters, 1984–2001. European Journal of Political Research 45 (4), 581–608. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  54. Singh, S.P., 2010. Contextual influences on the decision calculus: A cross-national examination of proximity voting. Electoral Studies 29 (3), 425–434. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  55. Singh, S.P., Roy, J., 2014. Political knowledge, the decision calculus, and proximity voting. Electoral Studies 34 (1), 89–99. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  56. Slothuus, R., 2009. The Political Logic of Party Cues in Opinion Formation. Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  57. Somer‐Topcu, Z. 2015. Everything to everyone: The electoral consequences of the broad‐appeal strategy in Europe. American Journal of Political Science 59 (4), 841–854. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  58. Stinchcombe, A.L., 1975. Social structure and politics. In: Greenstein, F.I., Polsby, N.W. (Eds.), Macropolitical theory. Reading: Addison-Wesley, pp. 557–622. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  59. Stokes, D., 1963. Spatial Models and Party Competition. American Political Science Review 57 (2), 368–377. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  60. Suzuki, M., 1991. The rationality of economic voting and the macroeconomic regime. American Journal of Political Science 35 (3), 624–642. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  61. Thomassen, J., 2016. An ever closer and more democratic Union? Electoral Studies 44 (1), 544–551. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  62. Zaller, J., 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  63. Online Appendix Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269
  64. https://www.nomos-shop.de/shopfiles/anhang_978-3-7560-0800-1_mat_online_anhang.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-269

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF) Download kompl. Werk (PDF)

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien