Competing Intellectual Currents within Modern Turkish Conservatism: The Bergsonian Connection

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Bibliographische Infos

Cover der Ausgabe: DIYÂR Jahrgang 2 (2021), Heft 2
Vollzugriff

DIYÂR

Jahrgang 2 (2021), Heft 2

Autor:innen:
Verlag
Ergon, Baden-Baden
Copyrightjahr
2021
ISSN-Online
2942-3155
ISSN-Print
2625-9842

Kapitelinformationen

Vollzugriff

Jahrgang 2 (2021), Heft 2

Competing Intellectual Currents within Modern Turkish Conservatism: The Bergsonian Connection

Autor:innen:
ISSN-Print
2625-9842
ISSN-Online
2942-3155
Kapitelvorschau:

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Adamson, Walter L. 1992. ‘The Language of Opposition in Early Twentieth-Century Italy: Rhetorical Continuities between Prewar Florentine Avant-Gardism and Mussolini’s Fascism’. The Journal of Modern History. 64.1. 22-51. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  2. Ansell-Pearson, Keith. 2018. Bergson: Thinking Beyond the Human Condition. London: Bloomsbury Academic. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  3. Antliff, Mark. 1993. Inventing Bergson: Cultural Politics and the Parisian Avant-Garde. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  4. Aslan, İlker. 2020. ‘1930’lar Türkiye’sinin Kültürel Haraketlerine Genel Bir Bakış: Necip Fazıl Kısakürek ve Ağaç Dergisi Örneği’. İmgelem Dergisi. 4.6. 107-130. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  5. Azouvi, François. 2007. La gloire de Bergson: Essai sur le magistère philosophique. Paris: Gallimard. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  6. Baldwin, Thomas (ed.). 2003. The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  7. Baltacıoğlu, İsmail Hakkı. 1337/[1921]. ‘Kerbelaya Giden Derviş’. Dergâh. I.1. 2-3. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  8. Bayraktar, Levent. 1998. ‘Bergsonculuğun Türkiye’ye Girişi ve İlk Temsilcileri’. Felsefe Dünyası. 28. 62-72. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  9. Bergson, Henri. 1920. Mind-Energy: Lectures and Essays. New York: Henry Holt. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  10. Bergson, Henri. 1935. The Two Sources of Morality and Religion. London: Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  11. Bergson, Henri. 1944. Creative Evolution. New York: Random House. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  12. Bergson, Henri. 1946. The Creative Mind. New York: Philosophical Library. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  13. Bergson, Henri. 1947. Yaratıcı Tekamül. İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  14. Bergson, Henri. 1959. Écrits et Paroles. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  15. Berkes, Niyazi. 1954. ‘Ziya Gökalp: His Contribution to Turkish Nationalism’. The Middle East Journal. 8.4. 375-390. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  16. Çınar, Metin. 2003. ‘Dergâh Dergisi’. Bora, Tanıl and Gültekingil, Murat (eds.). Modern Türkiye’de Siyasi Düşünce: Muhafazakârlık’. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. 85-91. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  17. Duran, Burhanettin. 2015. ‘Necip Fazıl Kısakürek’te Tek Parti ve Kemalizm Eleştrisi’. Öz, Asım, Kara, İsmail and Ertuğrul, Aykut (eds.). Necip Fazıl Kitabı. İstanbul: Zeytinburnu Belediyesi Kültür Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  18. Fardid, Ahmad. 1316 [1938]. ‘Hanry Bergson va Falsafe-ye Bergsoni: I’. Majalle-ye Mehr (I). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  19. Fardid, Ahmad. 1316 [1938]. ‘Hanry Bergson va Falsafe-ye Bergsoni: II’. Majalle-ye Mehr (II). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  20. Fujita, Hisashi. 2012. ‘Anarchy and Analogy: The Violence of Language in Bergson and Sorel’. In Lefebvre, Alexandre and White, Melanie (eds.). Bergson, Politics, and Religion. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 126-143. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  21. Gallagher, Idella J. 1970. Morality in Evolution: The Moral Philosophy of Henri Bergson. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  22. Guida, Michelangelo. 2014. ‘Nurettin Topçu and Necip Fazıl Kısakürek: Stories of ‘Conversion’ and Activism in Republican Turkey’. Journal for Islamic Studies. 34.1. 98-117. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  23. Güzel, Murat. 2003. ‘Necip Fazıl Kısakürek’. Bora, Tanıl and Gültekingil, Murat (eds.). Modern Türkiye’de Siyasi Düşünce: Muhafazakârlık’. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. 334-345. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  24. Hanioğlu, M. Şükrü. 1995. The Young Turks in Opposition. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  25. Hanioğlu, M. Şükrü. 2008. A Brief History of the Late Ottoman Empire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  26. Heyd, Uriel. 1950. Foundations of Turkish Nationalism: The Life and Teachings of Ziya Gökalp. London: Luzac & Company and Harvill Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  27. Howard, Douglas A. 2017. A History of the Ottoman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  28. İrem, Nazım. 1999. ‘Muhafazakâr Modernlik, Diğer Batı ve Türkiye’de Bergsonculuk’. Toplum ve Bilim. 82. 141-179. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  29. İrem, Nazım. 2002. ‘Turkish Conservative Modernism: Birth of Nationalist Quest for Cultural Renewal’. International Journal of Middle East Studies. 34.1. 87-112. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  30. İrem, Nazım. 2004. ‘Undercurrents of European Modernity and the Foundations of Modern Turkish Conservatism: Bergsonism in Retrospect’. Middle Eastern Studies. 40.4. 79-112. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  31. İrem, Nazım. 2011. ‘Bergson and Politics: Ottoman-Turkish Encounters with Innovation’. The European Legacy. 16.7. 873-882. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  32. İrem, Nazım. 2014. ‘Cumhuriyetçi Muhafazakarlık, Seferber Edici Modernlik ve Diğer Batı Düşüncesi’. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi. 2.57. 41-60. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  33. Kadıoğlu, Ayşe. 1996. ‘The Paradox of Turkish Nationalism and the Construction of Official Identity’. Middle Eastern Studies. 32.2. 177-193. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  34. Kısakürek, Necip Fazıl. 1973. İdeolocya Örgüsü. İstanbul: Büyük Doğu Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  35. Kısakürek, Necip Fazıl. 1982. Batı Tefekkürü ve İslam Tasavvufu. İstanbul: Büyük Doğu Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  36. Kısakürek, Necip Fazıl. 1984. Batı Tefekkürü ve İslam Tasavvufu. İstanbul: Büyük Doğu Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  37. Kısakürek, Necip Fazıl. 1992. Sahte Kahramanlar. İstanbul: Büyük Doğu Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  38. Kısakürek, Necip Fazıl. 2002. İdeolocya Örgüsü. İstanbul: Büyük Doğu Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  39. Kısakürek, Necip Fazıl. 2010. O ve Ben. İstanbul: Büyük Doğu Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  40. Kıvılcımlı, Hikmet. 2008. Bergsonizm: Göçen Sermaye Dervişliği. İstanbul: Sosyal İnsan Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  41. Lefebvre, Alexandre and White, Melanie. 2020. ‘Bergson and Social Theory’. In Lefebvre, Alexandre and Schott, Nils F (eds.). Interpreting Bergson: Critical Essays. New York: Cambridge University Press. 139-154. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  42. Mardin, Şerif. 1992. Jön Türklerin Siyasi Fikirleri. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  43. Mardin, Şerif. 1999. Religion, Society and Modernity in Turkey. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  44. Mirsepassi, Ali. 2017. Transnationalism in Iranian Political Thought: The Life and Times of Ahmad Fardid. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  45. Miyasoğlu, Mustafa. 1999. Necip Fazıl Kısakürek. Ankara: Akçağ Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  46. Okay, Orhan. 1987. Necip Fazıl Kısakürek. Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  47. Özdenören, Rasim. 2004. ‘Necip Fazıl Kısakürek’. Bora, Tanıl and Gültekingil, Murat (eds.). Modern Türkiye’de Siyasi Düşünce: İslamcılık’. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. 136-156. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  48. Reardon, Bernard M.G. 1989. ‘Ernest Renan and the Religion of Science’. In Jasper, David and Wright, T.R. (eds.). The Critical Spirit and the Will to Believe: Essays in Nineteenth-Century Literature and Religion. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 191-205. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  49. Robinet, André (ed.). 1972. Mélanges. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  50. Safa, Peyami. 1953. ‘Türk Düşüncesi ve Batı Medeniyeti’. Türk Düşüncesi Dergisi. 1.1. 4-9. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  51. Safa, Peyami. 2019. Türk İnkılâbına Bakışlar. İstanbul: Ötüken Neşriyat. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  52. Sarmış, Dilek. 2009. ‘Cumhuriyet öncesi Fikir Hareketlerinde Bergsonculuğun yeri ve yayılması’. Toplumsal Tarih. 192. 66-74. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  53. Sarmış, Dilek. 2014. ‘L’essor du bergsonisme en Turquie: une lecture de la guerre d’indépendance à travers la revue Dergâh (1921-1923)’. Işiksel, Güneş et Szurek, Emmanuel (éds.). Turcs et Français. Une histoire culturelle, 1860-1960. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes. 115-132. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  54. Sarmış, Dilek. 2016. La pensée de Bergson dans la genèse de la Turquie moderne. Un prisme des transitions lexicales, institutionnelles et politiques de la fin de l’Empire ottoman à la Turquie républicaine. PhD Dissertation. EHESS, Paris. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  55. Sarmış, Dilek. 2019. ‘Psychologies ottomanes et turques. Un laboratoire pour les partages savants’. Revue d’histoire des sciences humaines et sociales. 34. 34-66. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  56. Sarmış, Dilek. 2020. ‘Variations bergsoniennes dans les écritures intellectuelles et littéraires turques’. François, Arnaud et Riquier, Camille (éds.). Annales bergsoniennes IX – Bergson et les écrivains. Paris: PUF. 155-175. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  57. Shaw, Stanford J. and Shaw, Ezel Kural. 2002. History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  58. Sinclair, Mark. 2016. ‘Bergson’s Philosophy of Will and the War of 1914-1918’. Journal of the History of Ideas.77.3. 467-487. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  59. Sinclair, Mark. 2020. Bergson. New York, London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  60. Sorel, Georges. 1908. Réflexions sur la violence. Paris: Marcel Rivière. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  61. Taglia, Stefano. 2017. Intellectuals and Reform in the Ottoman Empire: The Young Turks on the challenges of modernity. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  62. Tekin, Arslan and İzgöer, Ahmet Zeki (eds.) 2014. Dergâh Giriş-Çeviriyazı-Dizin I.Cilt. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  63. Ter Schure, Leon. 2019. Bergson and History: Transforming the Modern Regime of Historicity. Albany: State University of New York Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  64. Törenek, Mehmet. 2012. ‘Peyami Safa ve Türk Düşüncesi Dergisi’. Erdem Dergisi. 62. 237-249. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  65. Tunç, Mustafa Şekip. 1337/ [1921]. ‘Hakiki Hürriyet’. Dergâh. I.3. 39. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  66. Tunç, Mustafa Şekip. 1958. ‘Descartes Kongresine Hitab’. Bilgi Dergisi. XI. 132. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  67. Turnaoğlu, Banu. 2017. The Formation of Turkish Republicanism. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  68. Uçman, Abdullah. (n.d.). “Dergâh”. TDV Encyclopedia of Islam. URL. https://islamansiklopedisi.org.tr/dergah--dergi (accessed 04.03.2021). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  69. Ülken, Hilmi Ziya. 1992. Türkiye’de Çağdaş Düşünce Tarihi. İstanbul: Ülken Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  70. Yılmaz, Murat. 2003. ‘Türk Düşüncesi Dergisi’. Bora, Tanıl and Gültekingil, Murat (eds.). Modern Türkiye’de Siyasi Düşünce: Muhafazakârlık’. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. 216-219. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232
  71. Zürcher, Erik J. 2004. Turkey: A Modern History. London: I.B. Tauris Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/2625-9842-2021-2-232

Zitation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download Kapitel (PDF)

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Per E-Mail teilen

Medien